Our Expert in India
No results available
Last updated: 24 July 2026
Any company planning a cross‑border merger involving an Indian entity must understand how to get RBI approval for a cross‑border merger in India before the scheme can be sanctioned by a tribunal or implemented under the fast‑track route. The Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018 (“CBM Regulations”), issued under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), govern the foreign‑exchange aspects of every such transaction, while Rule 25A of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 (“CAA Rules”) prescribes the corporate‑law framework, including the requirement for prior RBI approval.
In June 2026, the RBI amended the CBM Regulations to broaden the categories of cross‑border merger schemes that qualify for deemed approval, particularly those processed under the fast‑track route prescribed by Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013, significantly changing the sequencing calculus for general counsel, private equity sponsors and foreign acquirers. This guide sets out the eligibility criteria, step‑by‑step procedure, required documents, realistic timelines, indicative costs and common pitfalls for the cross‑border merger process in India as it stands in mid‑2026.
A cross‑border merger under Indian law is a scheme of merger, amalgamation or arrangement between an Indian company and a foreign company. The statutory gateway is Section 234 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 25A of the CAA Rules and the CBM Regulations. These provisions apply to every merger or amalgamation in which at least one party is a company incorporated outside India, regardless of whether the Indian entity is listed, unlisted, private or public.
Under the CBM Regulations, any transaction undertaken in accordance with those regulations is deemed to have the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India as required under Rule 25A. This means the RBI does not issue a separate approval letter for every transaction; instead, compliance with the regulations themselves satisfies the statutory approval condition. However, where a transaction falls outside the scope of the CBM Regulations, for instance, because the foreign jurisdiction is not permitted or a sectoral FDI cap is breached, express RBI approval must be sought.
The cross‑border merger process in India covers three principal structures:
Multiple regulators may be involved depending on the deal structure:
Before approaching the RBI, or relying on the deemed‑approval route, applicants must confirm that the proposed transaction satisfies the requirements for a cross‑border merger in India.
The following numbered steps represent the core procedure for securing RBI sign‑off, whether through deemed approval under the CBM Regulations or by express application, and implementing the scheme under the Companies Act.
The board of directors of each merging entity considers and approves the proposed scheme. Key actions at this stage include:
The correct sequencing of regulatory filings is critical. As a general Rule 25A procedure, prior RBI approval, or confirmed compliance for deemed approval, must precede the NCLT or Regional Director filing. Where a listed Indian entity is involved, SEBI observation must also be obtained before the NCLT application is submitted. If the CCI notification thresholds are triggered, applicants should file with the CCI in parallel to avoid holding up the timeline.
The 2026 CBM Regulation amendments introduce an important procedural shift: for inbound schemes processed under the fast‑track route (Section 233), compliance with the CBM Regulations is now sufficient for deemed RBI approval, eliminating the need to await a separate RBI clearance letter in those cases. Counsel should confirm at this stage whether the fast‑track cross‑border merger 2026 pathway applies or whether express RBI approval is required.
Where deemed approval applies, there is no separate RBI application to file, compliance is demonstrated as part of the NCLT or RD filing, supported by a Rule 25A compliance certificate.
Where express RBI approval is required (for example, because the transaction falls outside the scope of the CBM Regulations), the applicant prepares and files the following with the RBI through the authorised dealer bank or the RBI’s designated portal:
The RBI’s FEMA department undertakes an administrative intake check and then a substantive technical review. Industry observers expect the administrative intake to take 7–14 days, after which the technical team may raise clarificatory queries on valuation methodology, ownership disclosures or FEMA compliance. Applicants should respond to RBI queries promptly; extended delays in responding can result in the application being returned or deemed withdrawn.
On completion of the review, the RBI either grants approval, requests modifications to the scheme, or declines the application with reasons. The timeline for RBI approval varies, routine inbound transactions may be completed in 2–8 weeks, while complex outbound or multi‑jurisdictional schemes can take up to 12 weeks or longer.
Once RBI approval is obtained (or deemed compliance is confirmed for fast‑track schemes), the applicant files the scheme with the NCLT under Sections 230–232 of the Companies Act or with the Regional Director under Section 233. The NCLT will hold hearings, invite objections and ultimately sanction the scheme by order. The NCLT’s own timeline typically runs 6–16 weeks from admission to final order, depending on the bench’s listing and whether objections are received.
Post‑sanction, the applicant must file the NCLT order with the Registrar of Companies and comply with any post‑merger FEMA reporting and compliance obligations within prescribed deadlines.
| Step | Who does it | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre‑transaction planning (board & shareholder approvals; valuations) | Applicant counsel / corporate secretary / registered valuer | 2–6 weeks |
| 2. Prepare and file RBI / FEMA application (including Rule 25A compliance evidence) | Applicant (with external counsel) | 1–3 weeks to assemble; e‑file on completion |
| 3. RBI initial intake and administrative check | RBI (FEMA Division) | 7–14 days |
| 4. RBI technical review and queries | RBI (FEMA Dept), applicant response required | 2–8 weeks (query‑dependent) |
| 5. RBI decision (approval / deemed approval / clarifying direction) | RBI | 2–12 weeks overall; fast‑track routes shorten this materially |
| 6. File scheme with NCLT / RD and implement post‑sanction steps | Applicant counsel / NCLT / RD / RoC | 6–16 weeks (hearing and order dependent) |
The following table sets out the documents needed for a cross‑border merger application under the CBM Regulations and Rule 25A. Where a document originates outside India, it will typically require apostillisation or consular legalisation and, for non‑English documents, a certified translation.
| Document | Notes |
|---|---|
| Draft Scheme of Arrangement / Merger | Prepared by applicant counsel; stamped and signed; must comply with Companies Act Sections 230–232 or 233 and Rule 25A disclosure requirements. |
| Board and shareholder resolutions | Certified copies from the company secretary; must show quorum and type of resolution (ordinary / special as required). |
| Valuation report(s) | Independent registered valuer for the Indian entity (name and IBBI registration number); recognised professional for the foreign entity; include methodology and supporting financials. |
| Rule 25A compliance certificate | Directors’ or counsel’s certificate confirming compliance with Rule 25A, annexure showing jurisdictional eligibility (outbound mergers). |
| RBI / FEMA application form(s) | As prescribed by the applicable RBI FEMA notification; attach all supporting annexures; e‑file via the RBI portal or submit through the authorised dealer bank. |
| Audited financial statements (last 3 years) | Includes auditor’s report and directors’ report; foreign‑company financials may require Indian translation and attestation. |
| KYC documents and ownership structure | Ultimate beneficial ownership charts, shareholder register, proof of address and incorporation certificates; apostilled / legalised as required. |
| SEBI filings / listing particulars (if listed) | Draft scheme filed with SEBI and stock exchanges; SEBI observation letter; investor notices. |
| FDI / sectoral approval certificates | Government approval (if government‑route sector) or evidence that the automatic route applies; include self‑declaration of FDI compliance. |
| Tax clearances / transfer‑pricing opinions | As required for cross‑border tax treatment; include no‑objection certificates where applicable. |
| CCI clearance or exemption confirmation | Required if merger‑control thresholds under the Competition Act, 2002, are triggered; include a copy of the CCI order or self‑certification of exemption. |
Realistic time expectations are essential for cross‑border merger planning. The overall timeline for RBI approval and scheme implementation depends on the route chosen (NCLT vs. fast‑track / RD), the complexity of the deal, whether a listed entity is involved and the responsiveness of the applicant to RBI queries.
Routine inbound, non‑listed merger (NCLT route): From initial planning to NCLT sanction order, expect a total elapsed time of approximately 4–8 months. The RBI segment (Steps 2–5) typically accounts for 4–12 weeks of that total. The NCLT filing and hearing process adds a further 6–16 weeks.
Inbound fast‑track merger under Section 233 (post‑2026 amendments): Because RBI approval is deemed (no separate application), the regulatory timeline compresses. From planning to Regional Director approval, the likely practical effect will be a total elapsed time of approximately 3–5 months.
Outbound merger: These transactions are often more complex because the foreign jurisdiction’s regulatory requirements must be satisfied in parallel. Total elapsed time: 6–12 months is not uncommon.
Listed‑entity overlay: Add 4–8 weeks for SEBI observation processes and stock‑exchange filings. SEBI’s timelines run concurrently with, but may precede, the NCLT filing.
Key deadlines and sequencing cautions:
The cost profile for a cross‑border merger in India spans several categories. The following table provides indicative ranges; all figures should be verified with counsel before budgeting.
| Item | Amount / Notes |
|---|---|
| RBI / FEMA application fee | The RBI does not typically levy a separate statutory application fee for FEMA permissions under the CBM Regulations, verify per the applicable notification. |
| Registered valuer fee | INR 1,00,000 – INR 10,00,000+ depending on deal size and complexity (market estimate). |
| NCLT filing and publication costs | Varies by state and complexity, typically INR 50,000 – INR 5,00,000+ (estimate; includes gazette and newspaper publication charges). |
| Professional fees (legal / tax / regulatory) | Varies significantly by firm and deal complexity, usually the largest cost item; structured as retainer plus implementation / success fee. |
| Stamp duty / transfer taxes | State‑dependent for transfers of immovable property and shares; verify with a tax adviser, as rates vary across Indian states. |
Stamp duty can be a material cost, particularly where immovable property or high‑value share transfers are involved. Early tax structuring advice, including transfer‑pricing analysis and capital‑gains treatment, is essential to avoid surprises.
The most significant development in the cross‑border merger process in India in 2026 is the RBI’s amendment to the CBM Regulations, effective 5 June 2026. This amendment, read with MCA’s earlier expansion of Rule 25A to permit inbound mergers through the fast‑track route under Section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013, reshapes the approval landscape.
Under the original CBM Regulations, deemed RBI approval extended only to cross‑border merger schemes sanctioned by the NCLT under Sections 230–232 of the Companies Act. The 2026 amendment broadens this: schemes approved by any authority competent under the Companies Act and the rules thereunder, including the Regional Director under the fast‑track route (Section 233), now qualify for deemed RBI approval, provided the scheme otherwise complies with all conditions of the CBM Regulations.
Early indications suggest this change will be particularly significant for reverse / flip mergers, where a foreign parent merges into its Indian wholly‑owned subsidiary through the fast‑track route.
Deemed approval applies only when the transaction fully complies with the CBM Regulations. Express RBI approval remains necessary where:
The likely practical effect of the 2026 amendments is a material reduction in the overall timeline for qualifying inbound mergers. By removing the separate RBI approval step, the elapsed time from planning to implementation can compress by 4–12 weeks. Applicants should document their compliance with the CBM Regulations meticulously, as the compliance certificate submitted with the NCLT or RD filing effectively replaces the prior approval mechanism. Any deficiency discovered post‑sanction could expose the parties to FEMA enforcement risk.
Understanding how to get RBI approval for a cross‑border merger in India requires a clear grasp of the interplay between FEMA, the Companies Act, Rule 25A and the regulatory roles of the RBI, NCLT, SEBI and CCI. The 2026 amendments to the CBM Regulations, extending deemed RBI approval to fast‑track schemes under Section 233, represent a meaningful simplification for qualifying inbound mergers, but they do not eliminate the need for rigorous compliance analysis. Every cross‑border merger transaction should begin with a detailed eligibility assessment, a regulatory sequencing plan and the early engagement of a registered valuer and experienced counsel.
The documents checklist, timeline table and step‑by‑step procedure set out in this guide provide the operational framework for navigating the process efficiently. For further guidance, consult the latest RBI banking and regulatory updates or use the Global Law Experts lawyer directory to connect with a cross‑border M&A specialist in India.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Shinoj Koshy at SK & Partners, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 10 minutes ago
posted 35 minutes ago
posted 59 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message