Our Expert in South Africa
No results available
VAT registration in South Africa entered a new era on 1 April 2026, when the compulsory threshold rose to R2.3 million and the voluntary threshold increased to R120,000, the first upward adjustment in years. These changes, announced in the 2026/2027 Budget, coincide with a landmark Western Cape High Court judgment that struck down section 7(4) of the Value-Added Tax Act, creating immediate uncertainty around retrospective assessments and refund claims. For tax directors, CFOs and advisers, the convergence of new thresholds and active litigation demands a thorough compliance review, and this guide provides the legal analysis, worked examples and practical roadmap needed to navigate both developments with confidence.
From 1 April 2026, any person making taxable supplies exceeding R2.3 million in any consecutive twelve-month period must register for VAT with SARS. Persons whose taxable supplies exceed R120,000 but remain below R2.3 million may apply for voluntary registration. The Western Cape High Court’s invalidation of section 7(4) may affect existing assessments and create refund opportunities that require urgent legal review.
Before reading further, use this five-point checklist to determine your immediate exposure:
The 2026/2027 National Budget, tabled by National Treasury, increased both the compulsory and voluntary VAT registration thresholds with effect from 1 April 2026. SARS subsequently published an updated FAQ confirming the new figures and their application to ongoing twelve-month rolling periods.
The compulsory registration threshold moved from R1 million to R2.3 million, and the voluntary registration threshold moved from R50,000 to R120,000. These are the first adjustments to these thresholds since they were originally set, and they reflect both inflation and a deliberate policy choice to reduce the administrative burden on smaller enterprises that previously fell within the VAT net.
SARS confirmed in its FAQ that the thresholds apply to taxable supplies made in any consecutive twelve-month period ending on or after 1 April 2026. This means that a business must monitor its rolling turnover from that date forward using the new figures, while periods ending before 1 April 2026 remain subject to the previous thresholds.
| Date | Event | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| February 2026 | 2026/2027 National Budget tabled | Announced threshold increases for compulsory (R2.3m) and voluntary (R120,000) registration |
| 1 April 2026 | New thresholds effective | All rolling twelve-month periods ending on or after this date use the new figures |
| April 2026 | SARS FAQ published / updated | Confirmed application of thresholds to rolling periods; clarified transitional treatment |
| 2026 (ongoing) | Western Cape High Court judgment on s7(4) | Created parallel compliance uncertainty, see dedicated section below |
What this means this financial year: businesses that were compulsorily registered under the old R1 million threshold but whose taxable supplies now fall below R2.3 million should assess whether deregistration is appropriate. Conversely, businesses previously below R50,000 that now exceed R120,000 have a new voluntary registration option available.
Compulsory registration is triggered when the total value of taxable supplies made by any person exceeds R2.3 million in any consecutive twelve-month period. This is not an annual test aligned to the financial year, it is a rolling calculation that SARS may apply to any twelve consecutive months.
The term “person” in the VAT Act is broad. It includes companies, close corporations, trusts, sole proprietors, partnerships, municipalities and any other legal or natural person carrying on an enterprise. The test applies to taxable supplies only, exempt supplies (such as certain financial services, residential rental accommodation and educational services listed in section 12 of the VAT Act) are excluded from the calculation.
Example A, seasonal retailer: A clothing retailer generates R150,000 per month for ten months but spikes to R400,000 in November and R450,000 in December. Total for the twelve months ending December: R2,350,000. Because this exceeds R2.3 million, compulsory registration is triggered despite several low-turnover months.
Example B, new business: A tech consultancy incorporated in June 2026 projects annual revenue of R2.5 million based on signed contracts. Even though no twelve months of actual trading have yet elapsed, the VAT Act requires registration where there are reasonable grounds for believing that taxable supplies will exceed the threshold in the coming twelve months. The consultancy must register before commencing trade or within 21 business days of exceeding the threshold.
Example C, mixed supplies: A financial advisory firm earns R3 million annually, but R2 million of that comprises exempt financial services under section 12. Only R1 million qualifies as taxable supplies, placing the firm below the R2.3 million compulsory threshold.
| Entity Type | Registration Test | Reporting Obligations / Typical Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Company (PTY/LTD) | Taxable supplies > R2.3m in any consecutive 12 months → compulsory; voluntary if > R120k but < R2.3m | Monthly or bi-monthly returns depending on turnover category; watch group attribution and VAT on intercompany management fees |
| Trust / Sole proprietor | Same turnover tests apply individually; care with distinguishing personal and business supplies | Record-keeping commonly weaker, audit risk higher; ensure dedicated business bank account and compliant commercial invoicing |
| VAT-exempt suppliers (financial services, residential rentals) | Only taxable supplies count, exempt supplies excluded from the turnover calculation | May remain under threshold due to exempt supplies, but invoice treatment and apportioned input recovery are complex |
The VAT Act contains anti-avoidance provisions that prevent businesses from fragmenting activities across related entities to remain below the vat registration threshold. Where two or more connected persons (as defined in the Income Tax Act, read with section 1 of the VAT Act) carry on substantially similar enterprises, SARS may aggregate their supplies for the purpose of applying the R2.3 million test.
Common pitfalls include holding-company and operating-company structures where management fees flow between entities, franchise arrangements where the franchisor and franchisee are connected persons, and agency relationships where a principal’s supplies are attributed to the agent. In each case, businesses should map all intercompany flows and confirm, with professional advice, whether aggregation applies before concluding they fall below the compulsory threshold.
A person carrying on an enterprise whose taxable supplies exceed R120,000 in any consecutive twelve-month period, but remain below R2.3 million, may apply for voluntary registration. This is not automatic: the applicant must satisfy SARS that it genuinely carries on an enterprise and that the supplies are taxable.
The decision to register voluntarily requires balancing several factors:
Start-up example: A web-development firm launched in May 2026 expects R180,000 in taxable supplies in its first year. It has already incurred R60,000 (excluding VAT) in equipment purchases. By registering voluntarily, it recovers R9,000 in input VAT on those purchases (at 15%). However, it must now add VAT to client invoices and submit bi-monthly returns. If most of its clients are VAT-registered businesses that can claim input VAT themselves, the price increase is neutral, making voluntary registration advantageous.
Section 7(4) of the VAT Act historically empowered SARS to raise additional assessments where it determined that a vendor had failed to account correctly for output tax or had overclaimed input tax. The provision operated as a backstop, allowing SARS to adjust a vendor’s VAT liability without following the full objection-and-appeal process under the Tax Administration Act. In 2026, the Western Cape High Court declared section 7(4) constitutionally invalid, fundamentally altering the enforcement landscape for SARS VAT compliance.
The case arose when a taxpayer challenged a SARS additional assessment raised under section 7(4). The taxpayer argued that the provision circumvented fair administrative-action protections guaranteed by the Constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), because it permitted SARS to alter a self-assessed VAT return without the procedural safeguards available under sections 92 to 104 of the Tax Administration Act.
The Western Cape High Court agreed. It held that section 7(4) was inconsistent with the right to fair administrative action and declared it invalid. The practical effect of the order was to remove SARS’ ability to raise additional assessments under this specific provision. Industry observers expect that any assessments already issued under section 7(4) that have not become final may now be susceptible to challenge.
Businesses and their advisers should take the following steps in response to the judgment:
Early indications suggest that SARS is likely to appeal the judgment, either to the Supreme Court of Appeal or, if constitutional validity is at issue, to the Constitutional Court. Until a higher court confirms or reverses the ruling, the practical landscape remains uncertain. The likely practical effect will be a period of twelve to twenty-four months during which assessments under section 7(4) occupy a legal grey zone. During this window, businesses should document their positions carefully and seek specialist VAT counsel before taking any action that relies on the judgment being upheld.
Once a business determines that it must, or wishes to, register for VAT, the process is administered through SARS eFiling or at a SARS branch office. SARS has enhanced its registration process in recent years, introducing stricter verification requirements and longer processing times. A well-prepared application minimises delays and reduces the risk of SARS queries.
| Document / Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Completed VAT101 form | Available on SARS eFiling; must be completed in full with accurate banking details |
| Proof of enterprise | Contracts, invoices, purchase orders, or a business plan demonstrating that an enterprise is being carried on |
| Turnover evidence | Management accounts, bank statements, or financial projections showing supplies exceed the relevant threshold |
| Identity and address verification | Certified copy of ID for sole proprietors / directors; proof of business and residential address |
| Company registration documents | CIPC registration certificate, memorandum of incorporation, or trust deed |
| Banking confirmation | Bank-stamped confirmation letter or recent bank statement in the entity’s name |
| Lease agreement or proof of premises | Required if SARS requests a physical verification visit |
VAT registration timeline: once the application is submitted via eFiling, SARS typically acknowledges receipt within two to five business days. Verification queries, particularly for first-time registrants, may extend the process to three to six weeks. During peak periods, delays of eight weeks have been reported by practitioners. Businesses should plan accordingly and not wait until the 21-business-day deadline to begin preparing documentation.
SARS retains the administrative power to register a person for VAT without their application if it determines that the person should have been registered. This automatic registration can be backdated to the date on which the obligation first arose, creating retrospective output tax liabilities, penalties and interest.
To manage this risk, businesses should maintain contemporaneous records of monthly taxable supplies, file returns promptly once registered, and respond to any SARS correspondence within the stated deadlines. If a SARS audit results in a proposed backdated registration, the business should immediately engage specialist tax counsel. In many cases, a voluntary disclosure, submitted before the audit is formally concluded, can reduce penalties from a maximum of 200% of the understated tax to as low as 0% for a qualifying voluntary disclosure.
Late registration for VAT triggers several financial consequences under the Tax Administration Act. An administrative non-compliance penalty may be imposed for each month of non-compliance. In addition, SARS charges interest on any output tax that should have been declared during the period of non-registration, this interest accrues from the date the tax was originally due.
Understatement penalties range from 10% (for a “substantial understatement”) to 200% (for intentional tax evasion). The s7(4) judgment may change the penalty landscape for assessments previously raised under that provision, as the legal basis for those assessments is now in question. However, penalties raised under the Tax Administration Act’s general provisions remain unaffected.
Mitigation strategies include early engagement with SARS through the voluntary disclosure programme, negotiating payment arrangements for any backdated liabilities, and ensuring that all future returns are filed accurately and on time. Businesses that proactively correct historical non-compliance before a SARS audit commences benefit from significantly reduced penalty exposure.
Certain sectors present unique challenges when applying the vat registration threshold test. Financial services providers must distinguish between exempt supplies (interest on loans, life insurance premiums) and taxable supplies (advisory fees, short-term insurance) to determine whether the R2.3 million threshold is met. Mining and resource companies frequently face complex place-of-supply rules when exporting minerals, which affect whether supplies are zero-rated or standard-rated. Tourism operators dealing with foreign tourists may qualify for zero-rating under section 11 but must maintain documentary proof to support those claims.
Digital-services providers face an additional layer of complexity. Since the introduction of the electronic-services regulations, non-resident suppliers of digital services to South African consumers must register for and charge VAT, regardless of whether they have a physical presence in the country. These businesses must assess their South African-sourced revenue against the compulsory threshold and comply with SARS’ electronic-services registration requirements.
In each of these sectors, a bespoke legal review is strongly recommended before drawing conclusions about registration obligations.
Use this ten-point checklist as a structured action plan over the next 30, 60 and 90 days:
The 2026 changes to VAT registration in South Africa represent the most significant shift in registration obligations in over a decade. The new compulsory threshold of R2. 3 million and voluntary threshold of R120,000 demand an immediate recalculation of every business’s rolling taxable-supply figures. Layered on top of these threshold changes, the Western Cape High Court’s invalidation of section 7(4) introduces a parallel stream of risk and opportunity that no tax director or adviser can afford to ignore. Businesses should act now, calculate their rolling turnover, review outstanding assessments, prepare compliant documentation, and engage specialist VAT counsel where the s7(4) ruling or complex group structures are in play.
For tailored advice on VAT registration South Africa obligations, consult a qualified VAT specialist through the Global Law Experts lawyer directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Tom Combrink at WTS Global, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 11 seconds ago
posted 49 seconds ago
posted 25 minutes ago
posted 27 minutes ago
posted 51 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message