Global Law Experts
Discover independent Contract lawyers recognized by Global Law Experts. Explore expertise and connect with legal experts in Contract law.
posted 4 months ago
Contracts are the foundation of virtually every business relationship. Whether you’re drafting, reviewing, negotiating, or enforcing agreements, having experienced legal guidance helps ensure clarity, manage risk, and protect your interests at every stage.
Global Law Experts connects you with seasoned contract lawyers who provide tailored, strategic counsel for companies and individuals alike. Our vetted specialists assist with contract creation, risk assessment, dispute resolution, and enforcement—helping you build strong, enforceable agreements that support your business goals.
Every GLE member is independently vetted by practice area and jurisdiction.
Yes, because what looks “simple” to a layperson often contains hidden traps that can bankrupt a business. A lawyer reviews the contract not just for what is there, but for what is missing, such as a clear termination clause or a limit on your liability. Investing in a review is essentially an insurance policy against future litigation; industry data suggests that correcting a contract dispute in court costs roughly 10 times more than paying a lawyer to draft it correctly in the first place.
For a contract to be valid, it must contain three non-negotiable elements: Offer (a clear proposal), Acceptance (agreement to that proposal), and Consideration (something of value exchanged, like money or services). If you just promise to give someone a car for free, that is a gift, not a contract, because there is no “consideration” returning to you. Additionally, both parties must have the “legal capacity” to sign (meaning they aren’t minors or intoxicated) and the contract’s purpose cannot be illegal (you can’t legally contract to rob a bank).
Generally yes, a handshake deal is legally binding, but it is a nightmare to enforce because it becomes a “he-said, she-said” battle of evidence. However, under the “Statute of Frauds” in the US (and similar laws in the UK), certain specific types of contracts must be in writing to be valid, such as real estate sales, contracts that take longer than a year to complete, or the sale of goods over $500. Without a written record for these specific deals, the court will likely dismiss your case immediately regardless of what was said.
The difference is whether the contract ever legally existed. A “Void” contract is dead on arrival—it is invalid from the start, usually because it involves illegal activity (like a drug deal), and no court will ever enforce it. A “Voidable” contract is valid but “wounded”—one party has the option to cancel it if they want to, usually because they were misled, acted under duress, or were a minor (under 18) when they signed.
Yes, lawyers are experts at finding “exit ramps” in seemingly ironclad agreements. They look for specific legal triggers to break the deal, such as a “Material Breach” (the other side failed to do something major), “Frustration of Purpose” (an unexpected event made the deal impossible), or “Unconscionability” (the terms are so unfairly one-sided that a judge would refuse to enforce them). If no legal loophole exists, they can negotiate a “mutual rescission,” where you pay a smaller settlement fee to walk away rather than being stuck in the long-term obligation.
An integration clause (often called an “Entire Agreement” clause) acts as a legal wall that blocks out any previous conversations or promises. It states that the written document is the final and complete version of the deal, meaning that anything the salesperson promised you over the phone or in an email before signing does not count if it isn’t written in the contract. This clause is the number one reason people lose lawsuits over verbal promises, as the court is forced to ignore everything that isn’t inside the four corners of the signed page.
You should use a lawyer because generic internet templates are often too broad to be enforceable. If your NDA defines “Confidential Information” as “everything the company knows,” a judge will likely throw the entire document out for being “unreasonable” and a restraint of trade. A lawyer tailors the NDA to be specific (e.g., protecting only “proprietary code” and “customer lists”) and sets a reasonable time limit (like 3 to 5 years), which makes the protection actually stick if you ever have to sue a former employee for leaking secrets.
Yes, because what looks "simple" to a layperson often contains hidden traps that can bankrupt a business. A lawyer reviews the contract not just for what is there, but for what is missing, such as a clear termination clause or a limit on your liability. Investing in a review is essentially an insurance policy against future litigation; industry data suggests that correcting a contract dispute in court costs roughly 10 times more than paying a lawyer to draft it correctly in the first place.
For a contract to be valid, it must contain three non-negotiable elements: Offer (a clear proposal), Acceptance (agreement to that proposal), and Consideration (something of value exchanged, like money or services). If you just promise to give someone a car for free, that is a gift, not a contract, because there is no "consideration" returning to you. Additionally, both parties must have the "legal capacity" to sign (meaning they aren't minors or intoxicated) and the contract's purpose cannot be illegal (you can't legally contract to rob a bank).
Generally yes, a handshake deal is legally binding, but it is a nightmare to enforce because it becomes a "he-said, she-said" battle of evidence. However, under the "Statute of Frauds" in the US (and similar laws in the UK), certain specific types of contracts must be in writing to be valid, such as real estate sales, contracts that take longer than a year to complete, or the sale of goods over $500. Without a written record for these specific deals, the court will likely dismiss your case immediately regardless of what was said.
The difference is whether the contract ever legally existed. A "Void" contract is dead on arrival—it is invalid from the start, usually because it involves illegal activity (like a drug deal), and no court will ever enforce it. A "Voidable" contract is valid but "wounded"—one party has the option to cancel it if they want to, usually because they were misled, acted under duress, or were a minor (under 18) when they signed.
Yes, lawyers are experts at finding "exit ramps" in seemingly ironclad agreements. They look for specific legal triggers to break the deal, such as a "Material Breach" (the other side failed to do something major), "Frustration of Purpose" (an unexpected event made the deal impossible), or "Unconscionability" (the terms are so unfairly one-sided that a judge would refuse to enforce them). If no legal loophole exists, they can negotiate a "mutual rescission," where you pay a smaller settlement fee to walk away rather than being stuck in the long-term obligation.
An integration clause (often called an "Entire Agreement" clause) acts as a legal wall that blocks out any previous conversations or promises. It states that the written document is the final and complete version of the deal, meaning that anything the salesperson promised you over the phone or in an email before signing does not count if it isn't written in the contract. This clause is the number one reason people lose lawsuits over verbal promises, as the court is forced to ignore everything that isn't inside the four corners of the signed page.
You should use a lawyer because generic internet templates are often too broad to be enforceable. If your NDA defines "Confidential Information" as "everything the company knows," a judge will likely throw the entire document out for being "unreasonable" and a restraint of trade. A lawyer tailors the NDA to be specific (e.g., protecting only "proprietary code" and "customer lists") and sets a reasonable time limit (like 3 to 5 years), which makes the protection actually stick if you ever have to sue a former employee for leaking secrets.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message
