Last updated: 24 May 2026
If your company has been served with a creditor’s statutory demand for payment of debt, you have exactly 21 days to act. Understanding how to reply to a statutory demand is critical: the clock starts the moment the document reaches your registered office or an Australian-resident director, and missing the deadline creates a legal presumption that your company is insolvent. Under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), you have three options, pay the debt in full, negotiate a resolution with the creditor, or file an application to set aside the demand under s 459G.
This guide walks company directors, CFOs and in-house counsel through every step of that 21‑day window, from preserving evidence on Day 0 to filing a set‑aside application before the deadline expires. Whether your company genuinely disputes the debt, holds an offsetting claim, or has identified defects in the demand itself, the practical checklists, affidavit guidance and timeline below will help you protect your business from a winding‑up application.
A statutory demand is a formal written notice served by a creditor on a company requiring payment of an outstanding debt. It is not a court order, but it triggers serious legal consequences if ignored. The demand is the first procedural step a creditor must take before applying to wind up a company on the grounds of insolvency under the Corporations Act.
Section 459E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) sets out the requirements for a valid statutory demand. The demand must be in writing, specify the debt (or debts) and the total amount owing, and require the company to comply within 21 days of service. If the creditor does not already hold a court judgment for the debt, the demand must be accompanied by a verifying affidavit. Section 459G then provides the company’s pathway to challenge the demand by applying to the court to have it set aside, provided the application is filed and served within the same 21‑day compliance period.
The statutory demand form prescribed under the Corporations Regulations is Form 509H. A creditor can only issue a valid demand where the debt (or aggregate of debts) totals at least $4,000, a threshold that was increased on 1 July 2021. The form must correctly identify the debtor company, state the precise amount owed, and include the prescribed wording requiring compliance within 21 days. Any material departure from these requirements may itself be grounds for setting aside the demand.
Time is the most valuable resource you have after receiving a statutory demand. The following checklist breaks the 21‑day compliance period into manageable action blocks. Treat it as an emergency triage protocol.
| Step | Deadline from Service | Action / Form / Legal Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Note service & preserve evidence | Day 0 (immediate) | Record time/date, who served; preserve originals/photos; Corporations Act s 459E |
| Contact creditor / negotiate | Within 0–7 days | Offer payment plan; get written confirmation of any agreement |
| Gather evidence & draft affidavit | Days 3–14 | Collate documents; prepare affidavit supporting set‑aside grounds |
| File set‑aside (s 459G) application | By Day 21 (strict) | File in appropriate court (Supreme Court or Federal Court), include affidavit & originating process |
| Payment / compliance | By Day 21 | Pay debt in full (if appropriate) to avoid winding‑up presumption |
The instant the demand arrives, record the exact date and time of service. Photograph or scan every page of the demand and accompanying affidavit. Confirm whether the document was delivered to the company’s registered office address (as recorded with ASIC) or personally to an Australian‑resident director. Check the company name, ACN and debt amount against your own records. Any discrepancy could be significant later. Do not contact the creditor before you have preserved this evidence and taken preliminary legal advice.
If the debt is admitted and the company can pay, the simplest response is to pay in full within the 21‑day window and obtain written confirmation of receipt. If cash flow is tight, contact the creditor promptly to negotiate a payment plan. Keep all communications in writing. A sample opening email might read:
“We acknowledge receipt of your statutory demand dated [date]. We are reviewing the amount claimed and wish to discuss a resolution. Without prejudice to our rights, we propose [payment in instalments / partial payment of $X by Y date]. Please confirm whether this is acceptable so that we may formalise the arrangement.”
Any agreement reached should be documented in a signed settlement deed or exchange of correspondence. Industry observers note that creditors frequently agree to withdraw a statutory demand where a realistic payment plan is offered promptly, because the alternative, contested court proceedings, carries its own costs and delays.
If the debt is genuinely disputed, or you have identified defects in the demand, these middle days are critical for building your case. Collate every document relevant to the alleged debt: contracts, purchase orders, invoices, credit notes, delivery dockets, bank statements, email correspondence and any reconciliation records. Organise them chronologically and flag the specific items that demonstrate why the claimed amount is wrong, why the debt is not yet due, or why a genuine dispute exists. Begin drafting the supporting affidavit, the court will rely heavily on this document, and it must be precise and supported by exhibits.
If negotiation fails and you intend to contest, your s 459G application must be both filed with the court and served on the creditor within the 21‑day period. There is no power to extend this deadline. Engage your solicitor to finalise the originating process, supporting affidavit and evidence bundle. Confirm whether to file in the relevant State or Territory Supreme Court or in the Federal Court of Australia, and check local registry hours and filing requirements. Courts have consistently refused to excuse even a single day of delay.
Setting aside a statutory demand under s 459G of the Corporations Act is the primary defence available to a company that disputes the underlying debt. There are three recognised categories of grounds.
Under s 459H(1)(a), the court may set aside a statutory demand if satisfied there is a genuine dispute about the existence or amount of the debt. The threshold is not high, the company does not need to prove its case on the balance of probabilities at this stage, but neither will a bare assertion suffice. The court applies what is often described as a “plausible contention requiring investigation” test. The company must point to specific evidence: a contract term that supports a different interpretation of the amount owing, correspondence showing the debt was disputed before the demand was issued, credit notes or reconciliations that contradict the creditor’s figure, or delivery records showing goods were defective or short-shipped.
The practical effect of this standard is that courts will look through the affidavit evidence to determine whether the dispute is real and not merely fabricated for the purpose of defeating the demand. Annexing the relevant documents to your affidavit, not just describing them, is essential. A genuine dispute about even a portion of the claimed amount can be enough to set aside the entire demand if the residual amount falls below the $4,000 statutory minimum or if the demand cannot be severed.
Sample affidavit language that courts find persuasive typically follows this pattern: “The creditor claims $52,000 for goods delivered under Invoice No. 1234. I dispute this amount. Annexed hereto and marked ‘A’ is a credit note dated [date] for $18,000 issued by the creditor acknowledging defective items. The true amount owing, if any, is no more than $34,000, and this figure is itself disputed because…”
Section 459H(1)(b) provides a separate ground: the company has an offsetting claim against the creditor. An offsetting claim is a genuine counterclaim, set-off or cross‑demand that the company could bring against the creditor in its own right. The claim must be quantifiable and have reasonable prospects of success. For example, if the creditor supplied faulty equipment causing production losses, and you have evidence of those losses (repair invoices, expert reports, lost‑revenue calculations), this can reduce the effective amount of the statutory demand below the statutory minimum, or eliminate it entirely, triggering a set‑aside. The court will assess whether the offsetting claim is genuine using a similar threshold to the genuine dispute test.
Even where the underlying debt is not contested, a statutory demand may be set aside under s 459J if there is a defect in the demand that would cause “substantial injustice” if the demand were not set aside, or if there is “some other reason” to do so. Common defects include:
If you have identified viable grounds, the next step is preparing and filing the application. Precision matters: courts routinely dismiss applications that are poorly drafted, filed late, or unsupported by adequate evidence.
Applications to set aside a statutory demand can be filed in either the Federal Court of Australia or the Supreme Court of the relevant State or Territory. The Federal Court’s Corporations Information Sheet 1 outlines the procedural requirements in detail. Your application must include an originating process (or interlocutory application, depending on local rules), the supporting affidavit, and copies of the statutory demand and accompanying documents. Both the application and the affidavit must be filed and served on the creditor within the 21‑day period. Filing alone is not sufficient, service must also be completed within the deadline.
The supporting affidavit is the centrepiece of your application. It should follow a clear, logical structure:
Common affidavit mistakes that lose set‑aside applications:
Ensure your evidence bundle includes the following documents (where applicable):
Understanding the creditor’s playbook helps you respond strategically. Experienced creditors issue statutory demands rapidly, sometimes within days of a debt falling overdue, to start the 21‑day clock running before the debtor can organise a defence. The demand is often accompanied by a carefully drafted affidavit designed to present the debt as straightforward and undisputed.
However, creditors frequently make procedural errors that hand the debtor a viable set‑aside argument. The most common mistakes include serving the demand at a former registered office rather than the current one recorded with ASIC, misstating the debtor company’s name or ACN, claiming an amount that includes disputed or contingent components, and failing to annex a verifying affidavit when no court judgment has been obtained. In some cases, the creditor’s own affidavit contains admissions or inconsistencies that undermine the claim that the debt is undisputed.
Where a creditor has made a material error, the likely practical effect is that the debtor can apply to set aside the demand on the basis of the defect alone, without needing to establish a genuine dispute about the debt itself. Industry observers expect that the increasing use of template-driven demand preparation, particularly by non-specialist debt recovery firms, will continue to produce a steady stream of defective demands.
While the Corporations Act is a Commonwealth statute and applies uniformly across Australia, the court in which you file a s 459G application may have its own practice notes and registry procedures.
In all States, the 21‑day deadline under the Corporations Act is absolute and is not affected by local court listing delays. If the registry is closed or experiencing delays near the deadline, take immediate steps to file electronically where available.
Failing to respond to a statutory demand within 21 days is one of the most consequential mistakes a company director can make. Once the compliance period expires without payment, negotiation or a filed set‑aside application, the company is presumed to be insolvent under s 459C(2) of the Corporations Act. The creditor can then file a winding‑up application with the court.
If a winding‑up order is made, a liquidator is appointed to take control of the company’s assets. Directors lose their management powers. The liquidator will investigate the company’s affairs, pursue voidable transactions and potential insolvent trading claims, and distribute any remaining assets to creditors. Banks will typically freeze accounts, customers and suppliers will be notified, and the company’s contracts may be terminated. Directors who allowed the company to trade while insolvent face potential personal liability, including civil penalties and compensation orders.
“Dear [Creditor],
We refer to the statutory demand dated [date] served on [Company Name] (ACN [number]). Without prejudice to any rights, we propose the following payment arrangement to resolve the claimed debt of $[amount]: [e.g., $X upon execution of a payment deed, followed by monthly instalments of $Y over Z months]. We request withdrawal of the statutory demand upon execution of the deed. Please confirm your position by [date, well within 21 days].”
“Dear [Creditor],
We refer to the statutory demand dated [date]. [Company Name] disputes the debt claimed and intends to apply to [the Supreme Court of (State) / the Federal Court of Australia] to set aside the demand under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). An originating process and supporting affidavit will be served on you shortly. All rights are reserved.”
Knowing how to reply to a statutory demand is essential for every Australian company director. The 21‑day deadline is strict and non‑extendable. Whether your path is to pay, negotiate or apply to set aside under s 459G, action must begin on the day the demand is served. Engage an insolvency specialist immediately, the consequences of inaction are severe, and the window for building a defensible position is narrow. For assistance locating an experienced insolvency lawyer, consult the Global Law Experts Australia lawyer directory or browse the full international lawyer listings.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Paul Hutchinson at Modus Law, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 23 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message