International Business Crime & Fraud

International Business Crime & Fraud: Navigating Legal Risk in a Global Economy

In a hyperconnected world, the scale and complexity of business crime and fraud have evolved dramatically. What once constituted isolated acts of embezzlement or corruption has evolved into an intricate global web of corporate misconduct, encompassing cybercrime, money laundering, asset misappropriation, insider trading, bribery, sanctions evasion and corporate malfeasance. These activities are increasingly crossing borders, involving multiple jurisdictions and triggering overlapping legal regimes.

As such, international business crime and fraud law has emerged as one of the most critical and high-stakes areas of cross-border legal practice. The consequences for individuals and corporations are profound, including fines, imprisonment, debarment, asset seizures, reputational ruin and shareholder litigation.

This foreword introduces the International Business Crime & Fraud Practice Area Guide by framing the global enforcement landscape and highlighting emerging threats. The aim is to equip legal professionals, executives, compliance officers and stakeholders with a foundational understanding of the forces shaping the fight against financial crime in the global arena.

The Era of Global Enforcement of Business Crime Law

The prosecution of business crime is no longer confined to national borders. Law enforcement agencies now work together across jurisdictions to investigate and prosecute complex financial crimes. 

From the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO), to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), INTERPOL and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a growing network of authorities collaborates to trace funds, extradite suspects and share intelligence.

Key features of this global business crime & fraud enforcement era include:

• Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Countries are increasingly asserting legal authority over conduct occurring abroad, primarily where financial systems, victims or conspirators are located within their domestic territory.
• Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) & Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs): These agreements enable corporations to settle charges while cooperating with authorities and avoid a criminal conviction.
• Whistleblower Protection Mechanisms: Enhanced protections and financial incentives have led to more internal disclosures and cross-border investigations.
• Multinational Regulatory Settlements: Increasingly, significant enforcement actions involve coordinated resolutions across multiple countries, often with joint fines and restitution arrangements.

Corporations must recognise that legal exposure in one jurisdiction can cascade into global scrutiny, requiring coordinated legal and crisis management strategies.

What is the Role of International Bodies in Combatting Business Fraud?

International organisations play a crucial role in the global fight against business crime and fraud by promoting cooperation, setting global standards and facilitating information sharing among nations.

Bodies such as the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the FATF & Interpol help harmonise anti-fraud regulations and encourage governments to adopt consistent legal frameworks. They also provide technical assistance, training and resources to strengthen enforcement capabilities, especially in developing countries.

Additionally, international institutions help track cross-border financial crimes, coordinate investigations and support the recovery of stolen assets. By offering platforms for dialogue and collaboration, they bridge jurisdictional gaps and reduce safe havens for fraudsters.

Their efforts not only enhance legal accountability, but also protect global markets from the economic instability that international business crime and fraud can cause. In essence, these international bodies act as a unified front against fraud in an increasingly interconnected business environment.

What Laws Govern Transnational Corporate Fraud & Bribery?

A mix of national laws and international agreements regulates transnational corporate fraud and bribery. Key legal frameworks include the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act, both of which have broad extraterritorial reach.

Internationally, conventions like the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) establish global standards for anti-fraud and anti-bribery enforcement.

These laws mandate transparency, corporate accountability and criminal penalties for offenders, enabling cross-border cooperation in investigations and prosecutions. Together, they form a robust legal shield against international corporate misconduct.

What Are the Main Types of International Business Crime?

Several key risk domains dominate the current international business crime landscape:

1. Anti-Corruption & Bribery

The global crackdown on corporate fraud is intensifying. The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), UK Bribery Act, Brazil’s Clean Company Act and France’s Sapin II law are all part of the international anti-corruption laws aimed at enforcing robust anti-bribery provisions. Common corruption and bribery risks at the global scale include, but are not limited to:

• Facilitation payments in emerging global markets;
• Third-party agent misconduct;
• Public procurement fraud; and
• Inadequate corporate oversight of subsidiaries and joint ventures.

Multinationals are now expected to implement robust anti-corruption compliance programmes, conduct third-party due diligence and report internal violations promptly.

Compliance Best Practices for Cross-Border Bribery

Effectively combatting cross-border bribery requires a proactive and structured compliance approach, especially for multinational corporations operating in diverse legal and cultural environments. 

To minimise legal risks and uphold ethical standards, businesses must implement robust preventive measures, regularly monitor operations and promote a strong culture of integrity throughout the organisation.

Below are key best practices for ensuring compliance with anti-bribery laws:

• Establish clear anti-bribery policies tailored to international operations;
• Conduct regular risk assessments focusing on high-risk regions and sectors;
• Implement due diligence procedures for third-party partners and intermediaries;
• Train employees and agents on anti-corruption laws and internal policies;
• Monitor and audit transactions to detect suspicious activity;
• Encourage whistleblowing through confidential reporting channels; and
• Maintain detailed records to demonstrate compliance efforts.

2. Money Laundering & Terrorist Financing

Financial institutions, real estate developers, law firms and even art dealers face obligations under anti-money laundering (AML) regimes. These include know-your-customer (KYC) processes, suspicious activity reporting (SAR) and transparency on beneficial ownership.

Failure to detect or report illicit flows can result in regulatory penalties, licence suspension and criminal liability. However, digital currencies, shell companies and offshore havens continue to complicate detection and enforcement.

Global Money Laundering Techniques

Money laundering is a global concern involving the concealment of illegally obtained funds through complex financial transactions to make them appear legitimate. Criminal networks frequently exploit loopholes in financial systems across multiple jurisdictions, rendering detection and enforcement challenging. 

The process typically involves three stages: placement, layering and integration. Each has distinct methods tailored to avoid scrutiny. Below are some of the most commonly used global money-laundering techniques:

• Smurfing (Structuring): Splitting large sums into smaller deposits to avoid reporting thresholds.
• Trade-Based Laundering: Manipulating invoices, over- or under-valuing goods to move money across borders.
• Shell Companies: Using fake or inactive businesses to disguise the origin of funds.
• Real Estate Investments: Purchasing property to integrate illicit money into the legitimate economy.
• Cryptocurrency Transactions: Leveraging digital assets for anonymous or untraceable fund transfers.
• Casino Laundering: Converting illicit cash into chips, gambling minimally and cashing out as “clean” money.
• Offshore Accounts: Hiding funds in jurisdictions with strict bank secrecy laws.

3. Sanctions Violations

Economic sanctions, imposed by such bodies as the UN, the EU, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and national governments, target individuals, companies, and countries involved in terrorism, human rights violations or geopolitical tensions.

Violating sanctions, even inadvertently, can expose companies to severe penalties and consequences. The use of complex ownership structures, transhipment tactics and emerging markets makes sanctions compliance a legal and operational priority.

4. Tax Fraud & Evasion

As global tax transparency grows through initiatives like FATCA, CRS and country-by-country reporting, tax evasion is increasingly treated as a corporate criminal offence. Common risks include:

• Undisclosed offshore accounts;
• False invoicing and transfer pricing abuse;
• Corporate residence manipulation; and
• Use of opaque trusts and nominee arrangements.

Tax authorities now share data globally and collaborate on investigations, transforming tax fraud from a local issue into a transnational threat.

5. Cybercrime & Data Breaches

Ransomware attacks, business email compromise (BEC) and financial data/identity theft are among the fastest-growing categories of cyber-enabled scams and crimes. These cybercrimes may be perpetrated by criminal syndicates or state-linked actors, often targeting financial institutions, retailers and healthcare data repositories.

Regulatory obligations now extend to data breach reporting, cybersecurity audits and board-level governance of cyber risks. Failing to prepare for or respond to data breaches may result in liability under GDPR, CCPA and other data privacy laws.

How Does Cybercrime Impact International Trade?

Cybercrime poses a significant threat to international trade by disrupting global supply chains, compromising sensitive business data and undermining trust between trading partners.

Attacks such as data breaches, ransomware, business email compromise and financial fraud can cause significant economic losses and damage a company’s reputation. Additionally, cyber threats can lead to stricter regulatory requirements and delays in cross-border transactions.

As digital trade continues to grow, the risks associated with cybercrime escalate, making cybersecurity a critical component of safe and efficient international commerce.

Corporate Liability & Individual Accountability

In many jurisdictions, corporations can face criminal liability for the actions of their agents, executives or employees, particularly when internal controls are inadequate. Increasingly, regulators also focus on individual accountability, prosecuting directors, compliance officers and auditors who fail in their oversight duties.

This dual focus compels companies to implement:

• Clear compliance frameworks;
• Investigative procedures;
• Professional ethics training; and
• Escalation protocols.

Failure to act on red flags or internal reports can trigger allegations of wilful blindness or systemic failure.

Internal Investigations & Whistleblower Response

When allegations of crime and fraud arise, companies are expected to launch prompt and independent internal investigations. This involves managing legal privilege, conducting employee interviews, performing forensic reviews and making decisions regarding voluntary disclosure to regulators.

Lawyers engaged in international crime and fraud litigation must be prepared to:

• Manage cross-border data and employment law issues;
• Protect confidentiality and avoid retaliation;
• Preserve documents and chain of custody; and
• Coordinate public relations and regulatory communication.

Increasingly, whistleblower programmes are the first point of detection. Legal frameworks, such as the EU Whistleblower Directive, impose obligations to protect informants and prevent retaliation.

Cross-Border Evidence & Procedural Hurdles

International business crime and fraud investigations often involve gathering evidence across borders, including bank records, communications and offshore transactions. However, accessing this information presents legal barriers, among them being:

• Data privacy and transfer restrictions;
• Bank secrecy laws;
• Mutual legal assistance treaties (MLATs) that delay or limit access; and
• Use of letters rogatory or evidence requests under treaties like The Hague Convention.

International business crime and fraud counsel must be adept at navigating these procedural hurdles while preserving due process and protecting client rights.

Conclusion: A Time of Heightened Scrutiny

The world of international business crime and fraud is marked by increased regulation, deeper interagency cooperation and heightened expectations of corporate conduct. Legal, reputational and operational risks are no longer confined by geography.

This guide brings together expert contributors from around the world to help businesses and lawyers proactively identify risks, design preventative systems and respond effectively when crises emerge. In a world where law enforcement operates without borders, legal vigilance and ethical clarity have never been more essential.

If you want to read more on the latest legal news, follow us at @Global Law Expert News.