Our Expert in Denmark
No results available
If you are asking how can I invest in Denmark as a foreign investor, private-equity fund or strategic acquirer, your first compliance question in 2026 is whether the transaction triggers screening under Denmark’s Investment Screening Act. The Danish regime operates a dual-track system: a mandatory, suspensory authorisation requirement for particularly sensitive sectors and a broader voluntary notification mechanism for any deal that may affect national security or public order. Since 16 July 2026, the revised EU FDI Screening Regulation has added a further layer of cross-border coordination, extending coverage to indirect foreign investment and requiring mandatory screening mechanisms in every Member State.
This guide provides a step-by-step compliance playbook, covering thresholds, sector lists, filing procedures, timelines and deal-structuring strategies, designed for investors and counsel navigating the screening of foreign investments in Denmark.
Before diving into the detail, this compliance checklist captures the critical decision points every foreign investor must address before closing a transaction in Denmark.
Industry observers expect the volume of filings to increase significantly in 2026–2027 as the EU Regulation’s expanded scope, particularly covering indirect investments through intermediary holding structures, drives more transactions into the mandatory review pipeline.
Denmark’s screening of foreign investments rests on two interconnected pillars. The domestic Investment Screening Act (known in Danish as Lov om screening af visse udenlandske direkte investeringer m.v. i Danmark) was enacted in 2021 and is administered by the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen). It establishes both the mandatory authorisation regime for particularly sensitive sectors and the voluntary notification mechanism for broader national-security concerns.
On the EU level, the original FDI Screening Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/452) created a cooperation framework between Member States and the European Commission but did not require countries to operate a screening mechanism. The revised EU FDI Screening Regulation, which entered into force on 16 July 2026, changes this fundamentally. It introduces mandatory screening mechanisms in all Member States, broadens coverage to include indirect foreign investment, and strengthens the Commission’s role in coordinating cross-border reviews. For Denmark, which already had a functioning domestic regime, the practical effect is an expansion of the types of transactions caught, particularly those routed through EU-based intermediary entities, and longer potential review windows to accommodate Commission and Member State consultations.
| Legislative milestone | Date | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Danish Investment Screening Act enacted | 2021 | Introduced mandatory authorisation (sensitive sectors) and voluntary notification |
| Original EU FDI Screening Regulation (2019/452) | 11 October 2020 (full application) | Created EU cooperation mechanism; screening optional for Member States |
| Revised EU FDI Screening Regulation enters into force | 16 July 2026 | Mandatory screening in all Member States; covers indirect investment; strengthened coordination |
Understanding what qualifies as a foreign direct investment under the Investment Screening Act is essential to determining whether a filing obligation arises. The Act applies to investments by foreign investors, defined broadly to include natural persons and entities domiciled or established outside the EU/EFTA, in Danish companies or businesses whose activities fall within or may affect national security or public order.
The Act captures not only straightforward share acquisitions but also indirect holdings, special financial agreements, and any arrangement conferring equivalent control over a Danish entity. Following the 2026 EU Regulation, indirect investments, where a non-EU investor acquires influence through one or more EU-based intermediary entities, are now expressly within scope. The key statutory thresholds for the mandatory authorisation regime in particularly sensitive sectors begin at 10% of shares or voting rights. For the broader voluntary notification regime, the triggering threshold is 25%.
| Transaction type | Threshold triggering review | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition of shares (existing company in sensitive sector) | ≥10% of shares or voting rights triggers mandatory authorisation; incremental increases through 20%, one-third, 50% and 100% also trigger new filings | Non-EU fund acquires 15% stake in a Danish defence contractor |
| Greenfield investment (new facility in sensitive sector) | Establishment of a new business in a particularly sensitive sector triggers mandatory authorisation regardless of shareholding structure | Foreign manufacturer builds a dual-use technology plant in Denmark |
| Acquisition of control by other means | Effective control via contracts, board composition or other arrangements triggers the same test as a share acquisition | Long-term management agreement granting operational control over a critical-infrastructure operator |
| Investment outside sensitive sectors (voluntary track) | ≥25% of shares or voting rights, with further triggers at 30% and 40% for incremental increases | Non-EU investor acquires 30% of a Danish technology company not in a listed sensitive sector |
The mandatory authorisation regime applies to foreign investment in Danish entities active within designated particularly sensitive sectors. According to the Danish Business Authority and the Investment Screening Act, these sectors are defined by reference to activities that, if influenced by foreign actors, could compromise Denmark’s national security.
| Sector | Activities that trigger review | Example investments |
|---|---|---|
| Defence | Development, production or sale of military equipment, weapons systems, or related components | Acquisition of a Danish ammunition manufacturer or military-grade electronics supplier |
| IT security and computer-network security | Products and services for protecting government or critical networks, including security certifications | Investment in a Danish company providing firewall or intrusion-detection systems to Danish authorities |
| Production of dual-use items | Goods, software and technology listed under EU dual-use export controls | Stake in a Danish company manufacturing advanced sensors with both civilian and military applications |
| Critical infrastructure | Energy supply, water supply, telecommunications, transport infrastructure and other essential services | Acquisition of shares in a Danish district-heating operator or submarine-cable company |
| Processing of classified information | Entities with access to Danish or NATO classified material or government security clearances | Investment in a Danish IT-services firm holding a facility security clearance from the Danish Defence Intelligence Service |
In practice, identifying whether a target operates in a sensitive sector is not always straightforward. Companies may have mixed activities, only a portion of which falls within a listed sector. Industry observers expect the Danish Business Authority to scrutinise indirect sector exposure, such as a target’s subcontracting relationships or supply-chain position within a critical infrastructure network. Investors should conduct early-stage due diligence on the target’s customer base, government contracts, and any security clearances held.
The distinction between mandatory authorisation and voluntary notification is the most critical compliance decision when assessing how to structure an investment in Denmark. Getting it wrong can result in a void transaction and enforcement action.
| Feature | Mandatory authorisation (sensitive sectors) | Voluntary notification (broader regime) |
|---|---|---|
| Sectors covered | Particularly sensitive sectors only (defence, IT security, dual-use, critical infrastructure, classified information) | Any sector where the investment may threaten national security or public order |
| Investor nationality | All foreign investors (non-EU/EFTA) | All foreign investors (non-EU/EFTA) |
| Shareholding threshold | ≥10% (with incremental triggers at 20%, one-third, 50%, 100%) | ≥25% (with incremental triggers at 30%, 40%) |
| Suspensory effect | Yes, transaction may not be completed before authorisation is granted | No mandatory standstill, but the Danish Business Authority may order an investigation |
| Greenfield investments | Covered, establishment of a new business in a sensitive sector requires authorisation | May be covered if activities could threaten national security or public order |
| Exemptions | Certain exemptions for intra-group restructurings and investments below de minimis monetary thresholds may apply; seek counsel advice | N/A, voluntary by nature |
For greenfield investments in Denmark, the mandatory regime applies even where there is no existing Danish entity to acquire. A foreign company establishing a new production facility or research centre in a particularly sensitive sector must obtain authorisation before commencing operations. The likely practical effect is that site selection, permitting and FDI screening must run in parallel during project planning.
This section provides a practical, numbered guide for investors and counsel on how to apply for FDI screening approval with the Danish Business Authority. The process applies to both mandatory authorisation applications and voluntary notifications, though the documentation requirements are more extensive for mandatory filings.
| Document / item | Purpose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Investor ownership chart (full chain to UBO) | Identifies foreign control and beneficial ownership | Include all intermediate holding entities |
| Target company description and sector classification | Determines whether mandatory or voluntary regime applies | Map activities to the five listed sensitive sectors |
| Transaction documents (SPA, investment agreement) | Shows nature and extent of control being acquired | Include side letters and shareholder agreements |
| Impact analysis and mitigation proposals | Demonstrates effect on national security | Address government contracts, security clearances, supply-chain dependencies |
| Corporate governance documents of investor | Assesses investor’s governance and state links | Disclose any state ownership, sovereign-wealth-fund backing or government board seats |
| Parallel filing timeline | Coordinates FDI screening with merger control or other regulatory approvals | Align long-stop dates with realistic review periods |
Understanding the statutory timeline for foreign direct investment reviews in 2026 is essential for setting realistic long-stop dates in transaction agreements. The Danish Business Authority operates within defined review periods, but these can be extended under several circumstances.
| Phase | Statutory period | Practical notes |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness check | Authority confirms receipt and completeness of application | Clock does not start until application is deemed complete; incomplete submissions are returned |
| Initial review (Phase 1) | 60 calendar days from complete application | Straightforward cases may be cleared within this window |
| In-depth review (Phase 2) | Up to 90 additional calendar days | Triggered if national-security concerns require further analysis; Authority must notify applicant |
| Information requests (stop-the-clock) | Review period suspended during requests | Investor should pre-empt requests by providing comprehensive initial submissions |
| EU coordination period | Additional time for Commission and Member State comments | The 2026 EU Regulation strengthens this mechanism; early indications suggest it may add several weeks |
For enforcement, the consequences of non-compliance are significant. The Danish Business Authority may declare a completed transaction void, order divestiture, or impose fines. Investors who fail to seek mandatory authorisation before closing a transaction in a particularly sensitive sector face both administrative penalties and potential criminal liability. The Authority also has the power to impose interim measures, including suspending voting rights attached to the acquired shares, during an investigation.
Experienced counsel treat FDI screening not as a post-signing afterthought but as a core element of deal architecture. The following structuring and drafting strategies can reduce regulatory risk and protect both buyer and seller interests when investing in Denmark.
| Structure / clause | Benefits | Risks / limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Suspensive condition (FDI approval as condition precedent) | Prevents closing before authorisation; protects buyer from enforcement action | Extends deal timeline; seller may demand break fee if approval is denied or delayed |
| Carve-out of sensitive activities | Removes the sensitive business from the transaction scope, potentially avoiding mandatory filing | May reduce deal value; complex to implement if sensitive activities are integrated |
| Holdco / intermediate-entity structuring | May clarify the investment chain for regulatory assessment | Post-2026 EU rules capture indirect investment; cannot be used to circumvent screening |
| Trustee or escrow arrangements | Allows economic transfer while regulatory review is pending | Must be structured carefully to avoid “gun-jumping” (premature exercise of control) |
| Mitigation commitments (remedies offered to Authority) | May secure conditional approval, e.g., ring-fencing classified data, maintaining local management, preserving security clearances | Ongoing compliance burden; Authority may monitor and enforce commitments post-closing |
| Long-stop date aligned to realistic review period | Gives both parties certainty on maximum deal duration | Must account for Phase 1 + Phase 2 + EU coordination + potential information requests |
Industry observers recommend building a minimum of five to six months into transaction timetables when mandatory FDI authorisation is anticipated, to accommodate the full statutory review cycle plus EU coordination. Where parallel merger-control filings are required, for example, under the Danish Competition Act or the EU Merger Regulation, the long-stop date should reflect the longer of the two review tracks.
A non-EU private-equity fund proposes to acquire 100% of a Danish company operating energy-transmission infrastructure. The target is active in a particularly sensitive sector (critical infrastructure). Mandatory authorisation is required before completion. The fund submits its application with a full ownership chain disclosure, including its limited partners, and proposes mitigation commitments preserving local board control and Danish regulatory compliance. The Authority clears the transaction in Phase 1 with conditions requiring ongoing reporting on ownership changes.
A sovereign-wealth fund seeks to acquire a 12% stake in a Danish company manufacturing components for military communications systems. The 10% threshold in the defence sector triggers mandatory authorisation. The Authority conducts an in-depth Phase 2 review given the investor’s state ownership. After the investor agrees to restrictions on board representation and access to classified technical data, conditional approval is granted.
A non-EU technology company plans to establish a new research facility in Denmark focused on advanced semiconductor design (a dual-use technology). Although no existing Danish entity is being acquired, the establishment of a new business in a particularly sensitive sector triggers mandatory authorisation. The company files proactively during the site-permitting phase, allowing FDI review and construction planning to run concurrently.
For any foreign investor evaluating how can I invest in Denmark in 2026, early engagement with the FDI screening regime is not optional, it is a deal-critical compliance step. The combination of Denmark’s Investment Screening Act and the expanded EU FDI Screening Regulation means more transactions will require review, timelines will be longer, and the consequences of non-compliance remain severe. Investors and their counsel should integrate FDI screening into transaction planning from the earliest stages, prepare comprehensive applications, and build realistic long-stop dates that accommodate full regulatory review. Securing timely FDI approval in Denmark starts with expert legal guidance tailored to the specific transaction.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Hans-Christian Ohrt at Andersen Partners, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message