Our Expert in Indonesia
No results available
Any merger, consolidation or acquisition that meets Indonesia’s statutory thresholds must be notified to the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU), and understanding exactly how to file merger notification in Indonesia is the single most important compliance step a deal team can take after closing. The regulatory framework tightened significantly with the issuance of KPPU Regulation No. 3 of 2023 (PerKPPU No. 3/2023), which overhauled assessment criteria and filing procedures, while Government Regulation No. 20 of 2023 (PP No. 20/2023) restructured the fee regime under the non-tax state revenue (PNBP) system.
This guide provides a complete, practitioner-focused walkthrough, from threshold screening through portal submission, fee calculation and penalty mitigation, so that M&A counsel, in-house legal teams and transaction advisors can achieve full compliance in 2026. For broader context on Indonesia’s competition landscape, see our Indonesia M&A guide.
TL;DR, four things every deal team must know:
Before diving into the detail, use this ten-point checklist to map your compliance timeline from signing to post-filing. Each item links to the relevant section below.
Not every M&A transaction triggers the obligation to file merger notification in Indonesia. The merger notification requirements Indonesia imposes are threshold-based: they apply to mergers (penggabungan), consolidations (peleburan) and acquisitions (pengambilalihan) of shares that result in a change of control, provided the resulting entity (or the combined parties) breaches certain asset or turnover levels. The statutory basis sits in Article 29 of Law No. 5 of 1999 (the Competition Act), implemented through PP No. 57/2010 and refined by PerKPPU No. 3/2023.
The test involves two cumulative questions. First, does the transaction constitute a merger, consolidation or share acquisition resulting in a change of control? Second, do the combined parties exceed the asset and turnover thresholds Indonesia sets for mandatory notification? If the answer to both is yes, the surviving or acquiring entity must notify KPPU within the prescribed deadline.
The following table summarises the thresholds as established under the merger-control framework. Banking-sector entities are subject to separate, higher asset thresholds given the scale of financial-institution balance sheets.
| Threshold Type | Threshold Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Combined assets (general) | IDR 2.5 trillion | Calculated across all merging entities and their affiliates; excludes banking-sector entities counted under the banking threshold. |
| Combined assets (banking sector) | IDR 20 trillion | Applies where at least one party is a bank; reflects the larger balance-sheet scale of financial institutions. |
| Combined turnover (all sectors) | IDR 5 trillion | Domestic sales revenue; calculated on the most recent audited financial year. Exceeding either the asset or the turnover threshold triggers the obligation. |
Because the test is disjunctive, exceeding either the asset threshold or the turnover threshold is sufficient, deal teams should model both metrics at the earliest stage of transaction planning. Affiliate-level data must be consolidated, which can be particularly complex in multi-layered holding structures common in Southeast Asian conglomerates.
Indonesia operates a post-merger (ex-post) notification regime, not a pre-merger clearance system. This means parties are free to close and implement a transaction without waiting for KPPU approval, but they must notify KPPU within 30 working days from the legally effective date of the transaction. The post-merger notification deadline Indonesia imposes is strict, and missing it exposes the notifying party to administrative penalties.
Defining the “effective date” is critical, and often contested. The table below outlines common trigger scenarios.
| Event | Trigger Date | KPPU Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Share acquisition closes | Date the share-transfer deed is executed and registered | 30-working-day clock starts on the registration date. |
| Merger / consolidation becomes effective | Date the Ministry of Law and Human Rights approves the amended articles of association | 30-working-day clock starts on the ministerial approval date. |
| Conditional closing with regulatory approval | Date the last regulatory condition is satisfied (e.g., OJK approval for banking) | The clock starts on the date the transaction becomes unconditionally effective. |
| Staged / deferred consideration | Date on which control effectively passes (typically the first tranche closing) | Notify based on the earliest date of effective change of control. |
Industry observers expect KPPU to apply an increasingly purposive interpretation of “effective date”, focusing on the date control genuinely shifts, regardless of administrative formalities. Deal teams should therefore err on the side of an earlier trigger date to preserve filing headroom.
The KPPU online notification portal is the exclusive channel for submitting a merger notification. Hardcopy or email submissions are no longer accepted for standard notifications. The portal URL is notifikasi.kppu.go.id. Below is a step-by-step walkthrough based on KPPU’s official filing guidance.
The KPPU online notification portal accepts submissions during business days only, between 09:00 and 14:00 Western Indonesia Time (WIB). For international counsel, WIB is UTC+7, meaning portal closing at 14:00 WIB equates to 07:00 UTC, 02:00 Eastern US, and 15:00 Singapore/Hong Kong. Submissions attempted outside these hours will not be processed until the next business day, which can jeopardise a tight deadline. Plan uploads for mid-morning WIB to allow time for any technical issues.
| Document | Who Provides It | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Company identity documents (deed of establishment, latest amendments, company registration certificate) | All merging parties | Must be notarised copies; foreign entities provide apostilled / legalised equivalents. |
| Transaction documents (SPA, merger agreement, shareholders’ resolution) | Notifying party | Executed copies in PDF; redaction of pricing terms is generally not accepted. |
| Audited financial statements (most recent two fiscal years) | All merging parties | Must include balance sheet and income statement showing asset and turnover figures used to calculate thresholds. |
| Power of attorney (surat kuasa) | Notifying party | Required if a legal representative or external counsel files on behalf of the entity; must be specifically drafted for KPPU notification. |
| Market-share analysis / relevant-market description | Notifying party | Include market definition, competitive landscape and estimated post-merger market share. KPPU may request further detail during assessment. |
| Sector-specific approvals (OJK for banking, Kominfo for telecom, etc.) | Regulated-sector parties | Only required where the transaction involves a regulated industry; submit copies of approvals already obtained. |
Filing fees for merger notifications are classified as non-tax state revenue (Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak, or PNBP) and are governed by PP No. 20/2023. This regulation replaced the earlier fee framework and introduced a structured tariff schedule for KPPU services, including merger-notification assessment fees. Understanding the merger filing fee Indonesia applies is essential for transaction budgeting.
The fee structure under PP No. 20/2023 distinguishes between several types of KPPU-related PNBP. The most relevant to deal teams are the notification registration fee and the assessment fee. The notifying party, typically the surviving entity in a merger, or the acquirer in a share acquisition, is responsible for payment. Payment is made through the state revenue system (SIMPONI or equivalent channel) and must be completed before the portal will finalise the notification submission.
| Fee Type | Basis | Indicative Amount / Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Notification registration fee | Flat fee per notification | A fixed administrative charge payable upon filing each notification. |
| Assessment fee (simple assessment) | Per notification; tariff schedule in PP No. 20/2023 | Applies where KPPU determines a simple (Phase I) assessment is sufficient. |
| Assessment fee (detailed assessment) | Per notification; tariff schedule in PP No. 20/2023 | Applies if KPPU escalates to a detailed (Phase II) assessment; higher tariff than simple assessment. |
Consider a consolidation involving three Indonesian manufacturing companies, all of which will merge into a single surviving entity. Because this constitutes a single transaction resulting in one consolidated entity, only one notification is required, not three. The surviving entity is the notifying party and bears the filing fee. The total fee payable consists of the flat notification registration fee plus the applicable assessment fee (simple or detailed, depending on KPPU’s classification of the case). Practitioners should consult the specific tariff amounts in the schedule annexed to PP No. 20/2023, as these are denominated in IDR and periodically reviewed.
Early indications suggest that KPPU’s fee regime is designed to remain accessible relative to the scale of transactions that trigger the thresholds, but in multi-step deal structures, the question of whether a single notification or multiple notifications are required should be resolved in advance to avoid over-payment.
A common question for cross-border deal teams is whether a foreign-to-foreign merger notification Indonesia requires applies when neither party is incorporated in Indonesia. The answer is yes, provided the transaction meets the statutory thresholds when measured by the parties’ Indonesian assets, sales or activities. If the merging foreign entities have subsidiaries, branches or significant revenue in Indonesia, and their combined Indonesian-attributed assets or turnover exceed the thresholds, notification is mandatory.
Sector-specific variations add further complexity. The table below summarises key differences.
| Sector / Entity Type | Threshold Difference | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Banking | Asset threshold of IDR 20 trillion (vs. IDR 2.5 trillion general) | OJK approval is typically a precondition; coordinate both KPPU and OJK timelines. |
| Telecommunications | General thresholds apply; however, Kominfo licensing approvals may be required | Spectrum and licence-transfer rules may affect the effective date used for notification. |
| Digital platforms | General thresholds apply; KPPU increasingly scrutinises data-market effects | Platform businesses registered under PSE rules should assess whether user data or advertising revenue in Indonesia contributes to threshold calculations. |
| Manufacturing / general commerce | Standard thresholds (IDR 2.5 trillion assets or IDR 5 trillion turnover) | No sector-specific exemptions; straightforward application of the general rules. |
For transactions involving entities in AI-regulated sectors, counsel should also consider whether emerging regulatory frameworks create additional notification or approval requirements that interact with the KPPU timeline.
Once a notification is submitted through the KPPU online notification portal, the review proceeds in defined stages. Understanding these stages helps deal teams plan integration timelines and manage board reporting.
It is important to note that because Indonesia operates a post-merger system, KPPU’s assessment opinion does not formally “approve” or “block” a transaction that has already closed. However, an adverse opinion can trigger enforcement proceedings, including orders to unwind the transaction. The likely practical effect for most transactions is that a timely, well-prepared notification receives clearance at the simple-assessment stage within a matter of weeks.
Failing to notify KPPU or missing the 30-working-day deadline exposes the notifying party to administrative sanctions under the Competition Act and its implementing regulations. The penalty framework operates as follows.
| Violation | Penalty Type | Practical Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Late notification (filed after the 30-day deadline) | Administrative fines; amount determined by KPPU based on the severity and duration of the delay | File voluntarily as soon as the oversight is discovered; engage KPPU proactively to demonstrate good faith. |
| Failure to notify (no filing made) | Administrative fines and potential investigation; KPPU may also issue orders regarding the transaction structure | Conduct an internal merger-control audit; self-report to KPPU with full documentation. |
| Incomplete or misleading notification | Notification may be rejected; administrative penalties may apply; KPPU may require re-submission | Invest in thorough document preparation; use the document checklist above to verify completeness before submission. |
KPPU penalties for late filing have become a genuine enforcement priority. Industry observers expect increasing scrutiny of foreign-to-foreign transactions where the parties assumed no Indonesian nexus existed. The safest course is to conduct a threshold analysis for every cross-border deal involving Indonesian subsidiaries or revenue streams.
Deal counsel should integrate the following ten-point protocol into their signing and closing mechanics to ensure how to file merger notification in Indonesia is addressed seamlessly within the transaction workflow.
Filing a merger notification with KPPU is a non-discretionary compliance step for any transaction that crosses Indonesia’s asset or turnover thresholds. The 2023 regulatory reforms, PerKPPU No. 3/2023 for procedures and PP No. 20/2023 for fees, tightened the framework, and the likely trajectory is toward even stricter enforcement and potential movement toward a pre-merger clearance model in future years. Deal teams that build KPPU notification into their transaction playbook from the earliest stages of due diligence will avoid the risks of late filing, administrative fines and, in the worst case, KPPU-mandated unwinding.
For practitioners seeking step-by-step support on how to file merger notification in Indonesia, securing experienced Indonesian corporate counsel early in the deal process is the most effective risk-mitigation strategy. Find an Indonesian corporate lawyer through our directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Bagus Nur Buwono at Bagus Enrico & Partners, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 5 minutes ago
posted 7 minutes ago
posted 11 minutes ago
posted 12 minutes ago
posted 20 minutes ago
posted 25 minutes ago
posted 31 minutes ago
posted 32 minutes ago
posted 56 minutes ago
posted 56 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message