Our Expert in Switzerland
No results available
On 1 October 2026, Switzerland’s new Transparency Register goes live, requiring more than 500,000 legal entities to identify and report their beneficial owners to a central, non-public federal register maintained by the Federal Office of Justice. Enacted through the Federal Act on the Transparency of Legal Entities and the Identification of Beneficial Owners of 26 September 2025, the Swiss transparency register represents the most significant expansion of corporate disclosure obligations in Swiss commercial law in decades. Any natural person who directly or indirectly holds at least 25% of the capital or voting rights, or who otherwise controls an in-scope entity, must be declared, with reports submitted electronically via the EasyGov.swiss platform.
The Swiss transparency register is a central, electronic register of beneficial owners established under the Federal Act on the Transparency of Legal Entities and the Identification of Beneficial Owners. Its primary purpose is to enhance transparency within the Swiss corporate landscape and strengthen the country’s defences against money laundering and terrorist financing. The register is administered by a newly created authority within the Federal Office of Justice, and all submissions are made through the federal government’s EasyGov.swiss online portal.
Unlike some international equivalents, the beneficial owners register in Switzerland is not public. Information held in the register is strictly confidential and cannot be accessed by the general public. This design reflects Switzerland’s longstanding emphasis on privacy while still fulfilling international AML standards.
Access to the register is limited to designated authorities and regulated entities with legitimate compliance needs. These include:
No public search facility exists. Companies, journalists and private individuals cannot query the register. This restricted-access model distinguishes the Swiss transparency register from the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directive framework, where some member states maintain partially public registers.
The transparency law in Switzerland casts a wide net. Swiss companies must report beneficial owners if they fall within the categories defined by the Act. The obligation extends to domestic legal entities registered in the Swiss commercial register and to certain foreign entities with a Swiss nexus, such as those operating Swiss branches or owning Swiss real estate.
| Entity Type | Must Report? | Initial Reporting Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Stock corporation (AG/SA), subject to regular audit | Yes | 1 January 2027 |
| Other companies subject to regular audit (e.g., large GmbH/Sàrl, cooperatives) | Yes | 1 February 2027 |
| Stock corporation (AG/SA), not subject to regular audit | Yes | 1 March 2027 |
| Other legal entities, including GmbH/Sàrl not subject to audit and foreign entities | Yes | 1 April 2027 |
| Listed companies (shares listed on a recognised exchange) | No, exempt | N/A |
| Associations (Verein) | No, generally exempt | N/A |
| Foundations (Stiftung) | No, generally exempt | N/A |
Listed companies whose equity securities are traded on a recognised stock exchange are exempt because their ownership structures are already subject to disclosure requirements under securities regulation. Associations and foundations are generally exempt as well, reflecting the distinct governance structures of these entities.
However, industry observers expect that certain edge cases will require careful analysis. Nominee shareholders, individuals or entities holding shares on behalf of an undisclosed third party, must disclose the identity of the underlying beneficial owner. Trusts and similar arrangements with a Swiss nexus may also trigger reporting obligations where the trust holds a controlling interest in a Swiss entity. Companies should assess whether any indirect holding structures create a reporting requirement, particularly where multi-layered corporate chains cross the 25% threshold.
Foreign entities with a Swiss branch registered in the commercial register, or foreign entities that own Swiss real estate, also fall within the scope of the Act and must report their beneficial owners to the Swiss transparency register.
Under the Federal Act, a beneficial owner is any natural person who directly or indirectly holds at least 25% of the capital or voting rights in a legal entity, or who otherwise exercises control over that entity. The 25% threshold for beneficial ownership applies to both capital shares and voting rights, and it encompasses indirect holdings where a natural person’s interest is held through one or more intermediary entities.
Control “by other means” captures situations where a person exercises dominant influence through contractual arrangements, management rights, or comparable mechanisms, even if their formal shareholding is below 25%. This broad definition ensures that the UBO register in Switzerland captures the true controllers of in-scope entities regardless of how their influence is structured.
| Scenario | Ownership Structure | Reportable as UBO? |
|---|---|---|
| Direct holding | Person A holds 30% of shares in Swiss AG directly | Yes, exceeds the 25% threshold |
| Indirect (chain) holding | Person B owns 80% of Holding Co, which owns 40% of Swiss GmbH. Indirect interest: 80% × 40% = 32% | Yes, indirect interest exceeds 25% |
| Nominee structure | Person C holds 50% of Swiss AG through a nominee shareholder | Yes, Person C is the true beneficial owner and must be declared; the nominee is not reportable as UBO |
| Control without 25% shareholding | Person D holds 15% of shares but controls board appointments through a shareholders’ agreement | Yes, control by other means triggers the reporting obligation despite a sub-25% formal holding |
Where no natural person meets the 25% threshold or otherwise controls the entity, the Act requires the entity to report the members of its senior management (typically the board of directors or managing directors) as the persons to be recorded. This fallback ensures that no entity can avoid transparency obligations simply because its ownership is widely dispersed.
The implementing ordinance, the Transparency Ordinance, published by the Federal Council on 12 June 2026, sets out a phased schedule of initial reporting deadlines. These deadlines depend on the type of legal entity and whether it is subject to a regular (ordinary) audit.
| Deadline | Entity Category |
|---|---|
| 1 October 2026 | Act enters into force; register opens for voluntary early submissions via EasyGov |
| 1 January 2027 | Stock corporations (AG/SA) subject to regular audit must file |
| 1 February 2027 | Other companies subject to regular audit (e.g., audited GmbH, cooperatives) must file |
| 1 March 2027 | Stock corporations (AG/SA) not subject to regular audit must file |
| 1 April 2027 | All other legal entities, including non-audited GmbH/Sàrl and foreign entities with Swiss nexus |
Any entity that makes a filing with the Swiss commercial register after 1 October 2026, for example, a new incorporation, a change of registered office, or an amendment to the articles of association, triggers a one-month accelerated reporting deadline to the Swiss transparency register. This means that newly incorporated companies cannot wait until the phased deadline applicable to their entity type; they must file UBO information within one month of their commercial register entry.
Industry observers expect this trigger mechanism to have significant practical implications. Companies planning corporate restructurings, mergers, or new subsidiary formations after 1 October 2026 should factor the one-month UBO filing window into their transaction timelines. Failure to submit within this accelerated window carries the same penalty exposure as missing the standard deadline.
After the initial filing, entities must keep their transparency register entries up to date. Any change in beneficial ownership must be reported within a defined period. This includes changes resulting from share transfers, capital increases, changes in control arrangements, and corporate reorganisations. Entities should establish internal processes to monitor and flag reportable changes promptly.
The data fields required for each beneficial owner are defined in the Act and the implementing ordinance. For every reportable UBO, the following information must be submitted to the register:
Supporting documentation must accompany the filing. Depending on the entity and the nature of ownership, this may include copies of identification documents, excerpts from the share register, shareholders’ agreements, or notarial declarations confirming the beneficial ownership chain. Entities should prepare these documents in advance to avoid delays during the filing process.
All reports to the Swiss transparency register must be submitted electronically through the EasyGov.swiss platform, the federal government’s centralised online portal for businesses. There is no paper-based alternative. The following step-by-step guide outlines the filing process for companies preparing to submit their UBO information for the first time.
A company may authorise a third party, such as a lawyer, notary, fiduciary or corporate service provider, to file on its behalf. In such cases, a written power of attorney should be prepared and retained. The EasyGov guidance indicates that companies should register on the platform ahead of their filing deadline to allow adequate preparation time.
The Act and its implementing ordinance require entities to verify the identity of their beneficial owners using reliable documents and, where appropriate, through notarial declarations. For straightforward ownership structures, a single shareholder holding registered shares, a copy of the share register and a passport copy may suffice. For more complex arrangements involving indirect holdings, nominee structures, or foreign chains of ownership, a notarial declaration confirming the beneficial ownership chain is strongly recommended.
Entities are expected to exercise due diligence in verifying UBO information. The responsibility for accuracy rests with the reporting entity itself, not with the register authority. Submitting incorrect or incomplete information, even inadvertently, can expose the entity and its directors to penalties under the Swiss transparency register framework.
The penalties for non-compliance with the Swiss transparency register are significant and include criminal liability. The Federal Act provides for sanctions against both the legal entity and the individuals responsible for meeting the reporting obligations.
The likely practical effect of these provisions is that companies will need to treat UBO identification and reporting with the same seriousness as their anti-money laundering compliance obligations. Industry observers expect enforcement to follow a risk-based approach in the early phases, with the Federal Office of Justice focusing on systematic non-compliance and wilful concealment rather than minor procedural oversights.
Use the following checklist to prepare for your filing to the Swiss transparency register. Companies that complete these steps well ahead of their applicable deadline will minimise the risk of non-compliance.
For companies with operations in Switzerland that require tailored guidance, particularly those with cross-border ownership structures or nominee arrangements, engaging a qualified advisor early in the process can prevent costly filing errors and ensure full compliance with the transparency law in Switzerland.
The Swiss transparency register marks a fundamental shift in corporate disclosure requirements for entities operating in Switzerland. With the register going live on 1 October 2026 and initial reporting deadlines beginning in January 2027, companies should be actively preparing their UBO identification, verification and filing processes now. Entities that act early, registering on EasyGov, mapping ownership structures and assembling verification documents, will be best positioned to meet their obligations and avoid the penalties that accompany non-compliance.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Martin Eisenring at EISENRING Attorneys & Notaries, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 7 minutes ago
posted 17 minutes ago
posted 21 minutes ago
posted 31 minutes ago
posted 57 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message