Our Expert in India
No results available
Probate is no longer mandatory in India. The Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 omitted Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, removing the statutory compulsion that previously required executors to obtain probate before they could establish a right to property under a will. For wills & estates lawyers in India, this single legislative change has triggered a cascade of operational questions, from how banks will release funds without a court order to the precise FEMA repatriation steps NRI heirs must follow to compliantly move inherited wealth offshore.
This guide delivers the practical, step-by-step compliance framework that executors, NRIs, private client solicitors, conveyancers and banking compliance teams need right now, covering the legal effect of the Section 213 repeal, when voluntary probate still makes sense, TDS on inherited property, and a complete executor checklist for 2026.
The Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 (Act No. 37 of 2025) received Presidential assent on 20 December 2025 and was published in the Gazette of India on 21 December 2025. The Press Information Bureau issued an official factsheet on 1 January 2026 summarising the Act’s scope.
Among several provisions of older statutes identified for repeal or amendment, the Act’s Schedule omitted Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the section that had, for nearly a century, barred any person from establishing a right as executor of a deceased person or obtaining property that the deceased had bequeathed unless a court of competent jurisdiction in India had first granted probate of the will or letters of administration with the will annexed.
The practical effect is clear: the statutory compulsion to obtain probate before acting on a will has been removed. Executors named in a will can now, in principle, approach banks, registrars and other custodians directly with the will and supporting documentation, without first going through the time-consuming and sometimes costly probate process. Industry observers expect this change to materially reduce estate administration timelines across India, particularly for straightforward, uncontested successions.
Prior to the omission, Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 stated that no right as executor or legatee could be established in any court unless a court of competent jurisdiction in India had granted probate of the will, or letters of administration with the will annexed, under which the right was claimed. This provision applied with particular force in the presidency towns (Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai) and extended, through judicial interpretation, to many banking and property registration contexts nationwide. It meant that even a clearly valid, uncontested will could not be acted upon, by a bank, a sub-registrar or a third-party buyer, without a court order.
| Event | Date | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Presidential assent to Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 | 20 December 2025 | Gazette of India, eGazette PDF |
| Gazette publication | 21 December 2025 | eGazette (268699.pdf) |
| PIB Factsheet published | 1 January 2026 | PIB Factsheet ID 150601 |
| Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ceases to have effect | From the date of commencement of the 2025 Act | Schedule to the Repealing and Amending Act, 2025 |
The Act includes a standard savings clause, meaning the repeal does not affect any proceedings already concluded under the old provision, nor does it invalidate probates already granted. Estates where probate was obtained before the commencement date remain fully valid. The change is prospective: it removes the requirement for future estates without disturbing past grants.
Although probate is now optional rather than compulsory, there are several situations where experienced practitioners will continue to recommend a voluntary probate application. The repeal of Section 213 removes a legal barrier; it does not remove practical risk. Executors should assess each estate against the following decision criteria before choosing their path.
| Option | When Advisable | Key Practical Obligations |
|---|---|---|
| Probate (voluntary) | Contested wills; foreign title transfer requirements; institutional custody requiring court order; high-risk bank rejection scenarios | File petition in High Court or Principal Civil Court of competent jurisdiction; obtain probate order; register with banks, custodians and sub-registrars; court fees and hearing timelines apply |
| Letters of Administration | Intestate succession (no will exists) or where the executor named in the will is unavailable, unwilling or deceased | Apply to competent civil court for letters of administration; prepare full inventory of assets, affidavits of heirship, and indemnity bonds as directed by the court |
| No formal court process (post-repeal) | Uncontested will; cooperative beneficiaries; low-risk third parties; banks and registrars willing to accept affidavits and indemnities | Assemble complete evidence pack: original will, death certificate, identity proof of executor and beneficiaries, notarised affidavits, indemnity bonds, NOCs from all beneficiaries; conduct risk-profile assessment for each custodian |
The Section 213 repeal has shifted the burden from courts to executors. Without a compulsory probate, the executor must now assemble a comprehensive documentation package that gives banks, insurers and registrars sufficient comfort to release assets. The following guidance covers the typical operational steps and includes a sample bank instruction approach.
Although requirements vary by institution, early indications suggest that most banks and custodians in India will accept a well-prepared evidence pack in lieu of probate. The standard document list that executors should prepare includes:
Executors approaching banks without a probate order should present a structured cover letter containing the following elements:
If the bank receives a conflicting claim from another party (for example, a family member asserting a later will or challenging the executor’s appointment), the likely practical effect will be that the bank freezes the account and directs the claimants to court. In such cases, voluntary probate becomes not just advisable but essential. Executors who anticipate any dispute should consider filing for probate proactively rather than facing delays once a bank has frozen funds.
For Non-Resident Indians inheriting assets in India, the Section 213 repeal simplifies one step, obtaining authority to act, but does not change the substantial FEMA and RBI compliance framework that governs the repatriation of inherited funds. NRI inheritance under FEMA remains tightly regulated, and errors in documentation or procedure can result in significant delays or even regulatory penalties.
Under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the RBI’s Master Directions, NRIs who inherit assets from a person resident in India may hold or transfer those assets in accordance with FEMA regulations. Immovable property (other than agricultural land, plantation property or farmhouse) can be held and subsequently sold. Sale proceeds and other inherited balances can be credited to the NRI’s Non-Resident Ordinary (NRO) account and then repatriated, subject to conditions.
The RBI permits remittance of up to USD 1 million per financial year from an NRO account, inclusive of sale proceeds of inherited assets, subject to the following requirements:
India does not impose an inheritance tax. The receipt of property under a will is not a taxable event for the beneficiary under the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the tax event arises when the inherited property is sold. Understanding how wills & estates lawyers in India advise on TDS on inherited property is critical, particularly for NRI heirs where the withholding regime is significantly more burdensome.
Cost Basis and Holding Period
Under the Income-tax Act, 1961,( now superseded by the Income Tax Act, 2025) the cost of acquisition for the heir is deemed to be the cost at which the deceased (previous owner) originally acquired the property. Crucially, the holding period also includes the period for which the deceased held the property. This means that if the deceased purchased the property fifteen years ago and the heir sells it one year after inheriting, the total holding period is sixteen years, qualifying the gain as long-term capital gain (LTCG).
For immovable property, LTCG is computed after applying the cost inflation index to the original acquisition cost (for properties acquired before a specified cut-off date, the fair market value as on that date may be used as the deemed cost). The applicable tax rate depends on the date of sale and the provisions of Section 112 of the Income-tax Act as amended.
TDS Obligations, Resident vs Non-Resident Seller
The withholding obligations differ sharply depending on the seller’s residential status:
| Item | Amount / Detail |
|---|---|
| Property sale consideration | ₹2,00,00,000 (₹2 crore) |
| Deceased’s original cost of acquisition (2005) | ₹30,00,000 |
| Indexed cost of acquisition (using CII) | ₹78,00,000 (illustrative) |
| Long-term capital gain | ₹1,22,00,000 |
| LTCG tax at 12.5% | ₹15,25,000 |
| TDS deducted by buyer under Section 195 at 12.5% of sale consideration | ₹25,00,000 |
| Excess TDS (refund claimable by NRI) | ₹9,75,000 |
As the worked example demonstrates, the buyer withholds TDS on the full sale price under Section 195, not on the capital gain alone. This routinely results in over-deduction, which the NRI heir must recover by filing an income-tax return in India claiming a refund.
NRI sellers can apply to the Assessing Officer for a lower or nil deduction certificate under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act (using Form 13). If granted, the buyer deducts TDS at the reduced rate certified by the tax authority, aligning the withholding more closely with the actual tax liability. This step is strongly recommended for all NRI heirs selling inherited property, as it preserves liquidity and avoids the delay of waiting for a refund assessment.
The following operational checklist covers the first six months of estate administration after the death of the testator. Executors should treat this as a sequenced action plan, adapting timelines to the complexity of the estate.
For NRIs and families with assets in multiple jurisdictions, the post-repeal environment creates both opportunity and risk. Dual wills, one governing Indian assets and another governing assets in the country of residence, remain a recommended planning tool, but they require careful drafting to avoid inadvertent conflicts.
Even after the Section 213 repeal, executors dealing with cross-border estates should note that many foreign jurisdictions (the UK, Australia, Canada) still require a formal grant of representation before releasing assets. The Indian repeal does not affect foreign probate requirements. Family offices managing multi-jurisdictional wealth should map each asset to the applicable succession regime and obtain jurisdiction-specific legal advice on whether a local grant, a resealing of an Indian order, or a standalone foreign application is required.
The omission of Section 213 represents the most significant change to Indian succession practice in decades. Probate is now optional, but sound estate administration demands the same discipline, documentation and compliance rigour as before, if not more. Executors must assemble robust evidence packs; banks must update their internal policies to accept well-documented wills without court orders; and NRI heirs must navigate FEMA repatriation rules, TDS withholding and cross-border will coordination with precision.
The practical message for all stakeholders engaging wills & estates lawyers in India is straightforward: the legal barrier has been lowered, but the operational complexity remains. Every estate should be assessed individually. Where risk is elevated, contested wills, high-value holdings, cross-border assets, voluntary probate remains the gold standard. Where the estate is straightforward and all parties are cooperative, the post-repeal framework offers a faster, more efficient path to distribution.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Anil Harish at D.M. Harish & Co. LLP, Advocates, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 46 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message