Understanding what should you do in a dawn raid is no longer optional for any company operating in Belgium. Since the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) published its Guidelines on the Conduct of Inspections on 20 June 2025, the duties placed on undertakings during unannounced inspections have been sharpened, particularly around active cooperation, IT‑search protocols and the handling of copied data. This article delivers a Belgium‑specific, 2026‑updated playbook covering your rights, your obligations, privilege safeguards, IT forensics steps and post‑raid remediation. Whether you are an in‑house counsel, compliance officer or IT lead, the minute‑by‑minute checklist below is designed to be activated the moment inspectors arrive at reception.
TL;DR, your three non‑negotiable first moves:
A dawn raid is an unannounced inspection in which a regulatory authority enters business premises, typically early in the morning, to search for and copy evidence of suspected infringements. In competition law, dawn raids target cartels, bid‑rigging, market allocation and other anticompetitive conduct. The element of surprise is deliberate: it prevents the destruction of evidence.
In Belgium, several authorities hold inspection powers. The Belgian Competition Authority is the primary enforcer for domestic competition infringements, but the European Commission may also conduct inspections on Belgian soil for EU‑level cartel investigations. Financial regulators, the FSMA and the National Bank of Belgium (NBB), hold separate statutory inspection and seizure powers over regulated entities. More recently, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) has exercised cross‑border investigative measures that can include on‑site searches in Belgium.
| Authority | Typical Powers | When They Act |
|---|---|---|
| Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) | Enter premises; inspect, copy and temporarily seize documents and electronic data; require active cooperation | Suspected breaches of Belgian and EU competition law |
| European Commission (EC) | Wide inspection powers under Regulation 1/2003; may request national assistance; accompanied by EC cartel teams | EU‑level cartel or abuse‑of‑dominance investigations |
| FSMA / NBB | Statutory inspection and seizure powers for regulated financial entities; broader access to client records and transaction data | Suspected breaches of financial regulation, market abuse, AML non‑compliance |
| EPPO | Cross‑border investigative orders; may coordinate with Belgian judicial authorities for on‑site searches | Fraud affecting EU financial interests |
The best response to a dawn raid starts months before inspectors arrive. Industry observers consistently note that companies with a tested, pre‑distributed dawn raid playbook respond faster and make fewer costly errors during live inspections.
Every company with operations in Belgium should maintain a written dawn raid policy that is distributed to reception staff, management, legal, IT and HR. The policy must include a contact cascade, a list of names and mobile numbers for external counsel, the General Counsel, the compliance officer, and the designated IT forensics lead. Reception staff, in particular, need a one‑page script telling them exactly what to say and whom to call. Regular tabletop drills, at least annually, turn a policy document into muscle memory. The International Competition Network publishes training resources that can be adapted for Belgian‑specific scenarios.
IT preparedness is frequently the weakest link. Before any raid, the IT team should have a documented imaging plan that covers: which servers and endpoints hold potentially relevant data, how forensic images will be produced, where the chain‑of‑custody log is stored, and who is authorised to interact with inspectors on technical matters. The BCA’s 20 June 2025 guidelines place specific expectations on electronic‑data cooperation, making advance preparation essential.
The first hour determines whether a company preserves its rights or inadvertently creates obstruction exposure. Below is a stepwise operational timeline aligned with the Belgian Competition Authority guidelines 2025.
Understanding the boundary between BCA inspection powers and company rights is critical. The 20 June 2025 guidelines codify several important expectations for both sides.
Companies have the right to contact external counsel as soon as inspectors arrive. However, the BCA is not obliged to wait for counsel to arrive before commencing the inspection. In practice, inspectors will typically proceed, but they must allow a company representative to accompany them. Early indications suggest that companies that have external counsel on speed‑dial and in close physical proximity gain the most practical benefit from this right.
The undertaking is entitled to have a representative present during the inspection at all times. This right is both a safeguard and a tool: the representative’s role is to observe, document and, where necessary, raise privilege claims or scope objections in real time.
Under the BCA guidelines, confidentiality obligations apply to both sides. The BCA commits to handling copied data in accordance with professional secrecy rules, and at the end of the inspection, the undertaking will receive a copy of all documents and data that have been copied by the inspectors. This reciprocity is a meaningful safeguard, it ensures the company knows exactly what the authority holds and can prepare its defence accordingly.
| Inspector Action | Legal Basis | Company Response Script |
|---|---|---|
| Requests access to offices, meeting rooms | BCA inspection decision; 20 Jun 2025 guidelines, active cooperation duty | “Please proceed. Our representative will accompany you.” |
| Begins copying electronic files | BCA power to copy documents and electronic data | “Our IT lead will shadow the process. We request a copy of everything you copy.” |
| Asks factual questions to employees | Duty to cooperate; answers must be accurate | “Please answer factual questions. Do not speculate. If unsure, say so.” |
| Selects a document marked “privileged” | Legal professional privilege (Belgian law) | “We assert privilege over this document. We request a sealed‑envelope procedure.” |
Legal privilege during dawn raids is one of the most contested and high‑stakes issues in Belgian enforcement practice. Understanding what should you do in a dawn raid when privileged material is at risk requires advance planning and real‑time vigilance.
Belgian law recognises legal professional privilege for communications between a company and its external counsel, provided those communications relate to the exercise of the right of defence. The scope for documents prepared by or exchanged with in‑house counsel is considerably narrower. Under EU case law (Akzo Nobel, C‑550/07 P), in‑house lawyers do not benefit from the same level of privilege protection as independent external lawyers. The practical effect is that internal legal memoranda, compliance assessments and emails from in‑house lawyers may be subject to inspection unless they are clearly prepared in the context of receiving or relaying external legal advice.
When inspectors encounter material that the company asserts is privileged, the recommended approach is to request a sealed‑envelope procedure: the document is placed in a sealed envelope, marked as “privilege claimed,” and set aside for later review, either by the competition authority under a protected procedure or, if contested, by the Belgian courts. The company’s privilege log should record the document reference, a brief non‑revealing description, the legal basis for the privilege claim, and the name of the counsel involved.
Sample privilege log entry:
| Document Ref. | Description (Non‑Revealing) | Privilege Basis | Counsel Involved | Date Flagged |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOC‑2026‑0041 | Email re: legal advice on distribution agreement | External counsel – right of defence | [Law firm name] | [Date of raid] |
| DOC‑2026‑0042 | Memorandum on antitrust compliance, prepared at counsel’s request | Preparatory document for external legal advice | [Law firm name] | [Date of raid] |
IT searches during dawn raids are where the most significant volumes of evidence are collected, and where the greatest operational risks arise for companies that lack a forensics playbook.
BCA inspectors may request either targeted access to specific folders and mailboxes, or broader forensic imaging of entire drives and servers. Under the BCA’s 20 June 2025 guidelines, inspectors are empowered to copy electronic data, and the undertaking is expected to facilitate this process. If the scope of imaging appears to exceed the written scope of the inspection decision, the company should raise this objection on the record, document it in the master log, and, critically, still allow the copying to proceed while preserving the right to challenge scope subsequently. The Norton Rose Fulbright dawn raid guide provides additional operational detail on forensic imaging best practices applicable across EU jurisdictions.
Every interaction between inspectors and electronic systems must be recorded in a chain‑of‑custody log. This log should capture: the device serial number or hostname, the inspector’s name, the time access began and ended, the search terms or parameters used, the files or folders copied, and the medium onto which copies were transferred (USB drive, external hard disk, cloud upload). This documentation is essential for any subsequent challenge to the admissibility or scope of seized evidence.
Obstruction of a BCA dawn raid is treated seriously. Belgian competition law provides for administrative fines for undertakings that fail to cooperate, provide incomplete or misleading information, or interfere with the inspection process. The Belgian criminal code, including the provisions revised under the new criminal code entering into force in 2026, may also apply in severe cases, such as destruction of evidence, physical obstruction or active concealment of documents. Industry observers expect that penalties in Belgian enforcement will continue to tighten as the BCA builds its track record under the 2025 guidelines.
If a dawn raid reveals evidence of cartel conduct, the question of leniency arises immediately. Under the BCA’s leniency programme, the first undertaking to disclose a cartel and cooperate fully may receive full immunity from fines; subsequent applicants may receive reductions. However, timing is critical, a leniency window may close quickly once a raid is underway. Companies that suspect cartel exposure should have pre‑identified leniency counsel who can be contacted within minutes of a raid commencing. Delaying this assessment, even by a day, can mean the difference between immunity and a multi‑million‑euro fine.
What should you do in a dawn raid does not end when inspectors leave. The first seven days after a raid are decisive for preserving rights and building a defence.
Evidence preservation is paramount throughout this period. Issue a litigation hold immediately, instruct all employees and IT systems to retain all data, including emails, messages, drafts and deleted items, pending further instruction from counsel. For further context on cross‑border evidence handling and evolving data privacy obligations, coordinate with privacy counsel before sharing any seized data outside Belgium.
| Authority | Key Legal Powers at Inspection | Practical Difference for the Company |
|---|---|---|
| Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) | Enter premises; inspect, copy and temporarily seize documents and electronic data; require active cooperation per 20 June 2025 guidelines | Expect active cooperation demands and confidentiality obligations. The undertaking receives copies of all copied materials at the end of the raid. |
| European Commission (EC) | Wide dawn raid powers under Regulation 1/2003; may issue requests to national authorities for cross‑border data seizure; often accompanied by Directorate‑General for Competition teams | Cross‑border data requests are likely. Coordinate with EU counsel. Document return timelines tend to be longer. |
| FSMA / National Bank of Belgium (NBB) | Statutory inspection and seizure powers for regulated entities; sometimes broader access to client records and transaction data than competition authorities | Financial institutions need specialised scripts. Additional confidentiality and client‑data rules apply. Privilege considerations differ from competition law context. |
Vignette 1, the prepared company. A Belgian manufacturing firm received a BCA dawn raid at 07:30 on a weekday morning. Because reception had been trained and had a one‑page script taped inside the front desk drawer, external counsel was called within two minutes. Shadow teams were assigned within ten minutes. The company’s IT forensics lead produced a parallel forensic image of every system accessed and maintained a detailed chain‑of‑custody log. After the raid, counsel identified that three documents flagged as relevant by inspectors were in fact covered by legal professional privilege. A formal privilege challenge was filed within 48 hours, and the documents were ultimately excluded from the investigation file.
Vignette 2, the unprepared company. A services company in Brussels had no dawn raid policy. When BCA inspectors arrived, the office manager panicked, attempted to call the CEO (who was travelling) and left inspectors waiting in the lobby for 20 minutes before granting access. By the time external counsel arrived, inspectors had already copied significant volumes of data without any company representative present. Several documents later claimed as privileged had already entered the investigation file without a contemporaneous objection, making a subsequent challenge materially more difficult. The likely practical effect was a weaker negotiating position and higher legal costs throughout the enforcement process.
Knowing what should you do in a dawn raid is an operational necessity for every company with a Belgian presence. The BCA’s 20 June 2025 guidelines have raised the bar for active cooperation, IT‑search facilitation and real‑time privilege management, and the consequences of getting it wrong range from administrative fines to criminal exposure. The most effective defence starts before the raid ever happens: a tested playbook, trained staff, a pre‑positioned forensics plan and external counsel on speed‑dial. For a deeper look at white‑collar crime investigations and the critical role of computer forensics, or to find a specialist white‑collar crime lawyer in Belgium, explore the Global Law Experts directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Dirk Libotte at Arcas Law, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message