Our Expert in India
No results available
Last reviewed: 22 May 2026
If you manage even a single Indian patent, understanding what is Form 27 in India has moved from a back-office housekeeping task to a board-level compliance priority in 2026. The Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024, and further refinements under the Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2025, overhauled the Statement of Working regime, creating condensed filing windows with hard deadlines that apply to patentees, licensees and non-resident owners alike. For the current cycle, the filing window opened on 1 April 2026 and closes on 30 September 2026, with a Form 4 extension mechanism available in limited circumstances.
This guide delivers the exact legal framework, entity-specific obligations, step-by-step e-filing instructions, worked examples and a 90-day remediation plan that in-house IP teams and patent counsel can put into action immediately.
Form 27 is the official template through which patent holders and licensees disclose whether, and to what extent, a patented invention has been commercially worked in India during a given financial year. The requirement originates from Section 146(2) of the Patents Act, 1970, which empowers the Controller General of Patents to call for information regarding the working of patented inventions. Rule 131(1) of the Patent Rules, 2003 operationalises this power by mandating that every patentee and every licensee furnish a Statement of Working in Form 27 for each financial year.
The stated legislative purpose is twofold. First, it provides the IPO with transparent data on whether patents are being used productively within India, information that feeds directly into decisions on compulsory licensing under Sections 84 and 85 of the Patents Act, 1970. Second, it functions as a public-interest safeguard: if a patent is not worked in the territory for three consecutive years, any interested person may apply to the Controller for a compulsory licence. The Form 27 record is the primary evidentiary basis the Controller examines when assessing such applications.
Before 2024, the form was relatively simple, and compliance enforcement was inconsistent. The Patent Amendment Rules, 2024 substantially restructured the content, deadlines and granularity of Form 27, demanding patent-by-patent reporting with quantified manufacturing output, revenue, import and export data, and details of any licensing arrangements. These changes transformed Form 27 from a largely ministerial filing into a substantive commercial disclosure exercise.
Understanding who bears the filing obligation is the first step in any compliance audit. Under the amended Rule 131, the duty falls on two primary categories: the patentee (owner) and the licensee. Industry observers expect that the IPO will increasingly scrutinise non-resident patentees and multinational portfolio holders, who historically under-reported or missed filings entirely.
| Entity Type | Filing Obligation (2026 Window) | Practical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Patentee / Owner (Indian resident) | Required for every in-scope patent | Primary reporting responsibility; must include quantum and value of working, manufacturing output, sales figures, import/export volumes |
| Patentee / Owner (non-resident) | Required for every in-scope patent | Non-resident owners often delegate to Indian agents or local counsel; must still provide accurate financial data on India-specific working |
| Exclusive licensee | Required where the licensee holds rights to work the patent and reports in place of (or alongside) the owner | Clarify in the licence agreement whether the licensee or the patentee takes responsibility for Form 27; attach licence instrument if filing as licensee |
| Non-exclusive licensee | Generally not required to file unless contractually obligated or specifically called upon by the Controller | Where multiple non-exclusive licensees exist, the patentee remains the primary filer; licensees should coordinate data provision |
| Small entity / MSME / Start-up | Required, no exemption based on entity size | May report aggregated revenue figures where line-item disclosure would compromise commercially sensitive information; IPO guidance permits reasonable aggregation |
A multinational corporation with 200 Indian patents must file 200 individual Form 27 statements, one per patent, per financial year, unless multiple patents share identical working data and can be grouped under the IPO’s consolidated filing guidance. Start-ups holding even a single granted patent are not exempt: the obligation attaches to the grant itself, not to the size or turnover of the entity.
The Patent Amendment Rules, 2024 introduced a transitional framework that determines which patents fall into the 2026 filing window and how far back the reporting lookback extends. The Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2025 made further refinements to the transitional calendar, which the IPO clarified through published FAQs. The practical effect is a tiered system based on the date of patent grant.
| Patent Grant Date | Financial Years to Report | Form 27 Due Date |
|---|---|---|
| Granted on or before 31 March 2020 | FY 2023-24, FY 2024-25, FY 2025-26 | 30 September 2026 |
| Granted between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2023 | FY 2023-24, FY 2024-25, FY 2025-26 | 30 September 2026 |
| Granted between 1 April 2023 and 14 March 2024 | FY 2023-24 (from grant date), FY 2024-25, FY 2025-26 | 30 September 2026 |
| Granted on or after 15 March 2024 | Per the new annual cycle (six months from close of each FY) | 30 September following the close of the relevant FY |
The critical takeaway is that the 2026 window captures a three-year lookback for the majority of existing Indian patents. In-house IP teams should note that patents granted on or before 31 March 2023 are squarely within the 30 September 2026 deadline. The IPO FAQs, as reported by K&S Partners, confirmed that the prospective application date for the amended rules is 15 March 2024, meaning all patents in force before that date must comply with the transitional schedule rather than the new ongoing annual cycle.
A patent in India expires 20 years from the date of filing the complete specification. If a patent expired before 1 April 2023, it generally falls outside the reporting obligation for the 2026 window. However, if the patent was in force during any part of the financial years within the lookback period, a Form 27 covering that period of active protection is still due. IP managers should cross-reference expiry dates against the financial-year ranges above when scoping their audit.
For most patentees, the 2026 Form 27 filing window is the most consequential compliance date on the Indian patent calendar this year. The window operates as follows:
Where a patentee or licensee is unable to file within the standard window, Rule 138 of the Patent Rules, 2003 permits a request for extension of time by filing Form 4 together with the prescribed fee. The extension is available for a period of up to three months beyond the original deadline. In practice, this means that a Form 4 filed before 30 September 2026 can extend the Form 27 deadline to 31 December 2026. The IPO’s published FAQs, summarised by both Selvam & Selvam and K&S Partners, confirm that Form 4 extensions are discretionary and should be supported by reasonable justification.
| Milestone | Target Date | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Identify all in-scope Indian patents | By 30 April 2026 | IP portfolio manager |
| Issue data requests to business units / licensees | By 15 May 2026 | IP counsel + finance |
| Collect and verify working data (revenue, output, imports) | By 31 July 2026 | Business units / licensees |
| Draft Form 27 statements and internal review | By 31 August 2026 | External patent counsel |
| File Form 4 if extension needed | Before 30 September 2026 | External patent counsel |
| File all Form 27 statements | By 30 September 2026 (or 31 December 2026 if extended) | IP counsel |
Form 27 is filed electronically through the IPO’s e-filing portal. The process requires a registered account with valid patent e filing login credentials. Below is a step-by-step checklist for completing and submitting the form.
Before logging into the portal, assemble the following information for each patent and each in-scope financial year:
Competitors in the SERP rarely provide worked examples. Below are two hypothetical scenarios demonstrating how to complete key Form 27 fields. These are illustrative only and should be adapted to each patent’s actual data.
| Field | Sample Entry |
|---|---|
| Patent number | IN 345678 |
| Financial year | FY 2025-26 (1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026) |
| Whether worked in India | Yes, manufactured commercially in India |
| Quantum manufactured | 85,000 units |
| Value of manufacture (INR) | ₹42,50,00,000 (approximately ₹42.5 crore) |
| Quantum imported | 12,000 units (components imported for assembly) |
| Value of imports (INR) | ₹6,00,00,000 |
| Licences granted | One exclusive licence to ABC Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, royalty at 5% of net sales |
| Reasons for non-working (if any) | Not applicable |
| Field | Sample Entry |
|---|---|
| Patent number | IN 789012 |
| Financial year | FY 2024-25 (1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025) |
| Whether worked in India | No, not worked commercially in India during this period |
| Quantum manufactured | 0 |
| Value of manufacture (INR) | ₹0 |
| Quantum imported | 0 |
| Licences granted | None |
| Reasons for non-working | Product development cycle ongoing; commercial launch in India planned for Q3 FY 2026-27. Indian manufacturing partner identified; licence negotiations in advanced stage. |
The amended Form 27 requires quantified disclosures that many companies consider commercially sensitive. The IPO has indicated, through its FAQs as summarised by K&S Partners, that filers may report aggregated figures where patent-level revenue breakdowns are not maintained in the ordinary course of business. Industry observers expect that reasonable aggregation accompanied by a brief explanatory note will satisfy the Controller, provided the overall picture of commercial working (or non-working) is transparent.
Non-compliance with Form 27 carries a range of legal and commercial consequences. While the Patents Act, 1970 does not prescribe a standalone monetary fine solely for failure to file Form 27, the enforcement architecture creates meaningful risk through several interconnected mechanisms.
| Non-Compliance Scenario | Likely Impact | Mitigation Steps |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to file Form 27 by the deadline | Administrative notice from the IPO; the patent is flagged as non-compliant in IPO records | File immediately upon receiving notice; submit Form 4 for extension if within three months of original deadline |
| Persistent non-filing across multiple financial years | Strengthens the basis for compulsory licensing applications under Section 84 of the Patents Act, 1970, any interested person can argue the patent is “not worked in the territory of India” | Conduct retrospective filing for all outstanding years; document reasons for non-working and steps toward future working |
| Filing false or misleading information | Potential contravention proceedings under Section 122 of the Patents Act, 1970, carrying a fine that may extend to INR 10 lakh | Implement internal data verification protocols; obtain sign-off from finance and business units before filing |
| Non-resident patentee ignoring filing obligation | IPO may issue notice to Indian agent of record; reputational risk and weaker position if patent is challenged or licensing is sought | Appoint dedicated Indian counsel for Form 27 filings; build reporting obligations into licence agreements with Indian partners |
The practical commercial risk is often more significant than the administrative penalty itself. As highlighted by commentary from Mirandah Asia, a patent that lacks Form 27 filings for three or more years presents a ready-made argument for a compulsory licensing applicant. Given that Indian courts have historically treated the working requirement seriously, the Natco v. Bayer compulsory licence grant in 2012 being the landmark example, prudent patentees treat Form 27 compliance as a defensive measure protecting the exclusivity of their rights.
For organisations that have fallen behind on Form 27 filings, whether due to the pre-2024 lax enforcement environment, internal restructuring, or simple oversight, the following 90-day remediation plan provides a structured pathway back to compliance before the 30 September 2026 deadline.
Understanding what is Form 27 in India is no longer optional for any organisation holding Indian patent rights. The Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2024 and 2025 have tightened deadlines, expanded disclosure requirements, and linked non-compliance more directly to compulsory licensing exposure. With the 30 September 2026 deadline approaching, in-house IP teams should treat portfolio-wide Form 27 compliance as an urgent operational priority, conducting audits, collecting data, and filing well ahead of the cut-off to preserve the full exclusivity of their Indian patent rights.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Gaurav Chhibber at Chadha & Chadha, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 16 minutes ago
posted 41 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message