Our Expert in Malaysia
No results available
Whether you are acquiring a Malaysian business, expanding a franchise network across Southeast Asia, or planning a corporate rebrand, trademark due diligence in Malaysia is the single most overlooked step that can derail an otherwise sound transaction. The MyIPO Guidelines of Trademark 2019 VA1‑2026, published in February 2026, have tightened the rules around agent registration, renewal obligations, and filing compliance, creating fresh procedural risks for buyers and franchisors who fail to verify their target’s trademark portfolio before signing. This guide delivers a consolidated, transaction‑ready checklist covering every stage of the process, from initial MyIPO searches through to assignment recording, portfolio rationalisation, and rebranding rollout.
It is designed for corporate counsel, M&A teams, franchise developers, and Malaysian SMEs who need an actionable framework rather than a theoretical overview.
Before engaging in detailed document review, use the following 10‑point checklist as a rapid diagnostic for any Malaysian trademark portfolio. Each item corresponds to a detailed section below.
Industry observers expect the VA1‑2026 agent compliance requirements, in particular, to cause delays for transactions where agent records are outdated or agents have not renewed their registration. Addressing each of these ten items early in the deal process substantially reduces the risk of post‑closing disputes, MyIPO filing rejections, and enforcement gaps.
The first step in any trademark audit checklist is to compare the registered proprietor details held by MyIPO against the target company’s records at the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM). The Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 815) requires that the registered owner recorded on the Register of Trademarks accurately reflects the legal entity holding rights to the mark. Mismatches frequently arise where companies have changed names, restructured, or undergone mergers without updating MyIPO records.
A trademark registration alone does not guarantee commercial value. Equally, a brand with strong market goodwill may have no registration at all. During pre‑transaction screening, reconcile actual market use against the classes of goods and services covered by each registration.
Trademark clearance in Malaysia starts with searching the MyIPO database for identical or similar marks. The Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia offers both online preliminary searches and formal search requests. For transaction‑grade due diligence, relying solely on the free online search is insufficient, a formal search provides more comprehensive coverage and a documented record.
| Search type | Scope | Best used for |
|---|---|---|
| Online preliminary search (MyIPO e‑Search) | Identical and near‑identical word marks across all classes | Initial screening before engaging counsel; quick availability check |
| Formal search request (filed with MyIPO) | Comprehensive, covers word and device marks, phonetic equivalents, across specified classes | Transaction‑grade clearance for M&A, franchising, or rebranding; documented evidence for due diligence report |
The Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 815) governs what can be registered as a trademark in Malaysia and what constitutes infringement. Under the Act, registrable marks include signs, words, names, logos, letters, numerals, figurative elements, colours, shapes, sounds, scents, holograms, positioning, sequences of motion, and any combination of these, provided the mark is distinctive and capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from another.
Infringement under the Act occurs when a person uses, in the course of trade, a sign that is identical or similar to a registered trademark in relation to goods or services that are identical or similar to those for which the mark is registered, where such use is likely to cause confusion. Remedies available to the registered proprietor include injunctions, damages or an account of profits, and orders for delivery up of infringing goods.
When a trademark application is filed with MyIPO, it undergoes substantive examination, an assessment of whether the mark meets the statutory requirements for registration. Examiners evaluate absolute grounds (distinctiveness, non‑descriptiveness, non‑deceptiveness) and relative grounds (conflict with earlier marks). The MyIPO Manual of Trade Marks Law and Practice provides detailed guidance on examination practice and procedure.
The VA1‑2026 guidelines have reinforced that trademark agents must be properly registered and must maintain their registration through timely renewal. The likely practical effect is that applications or filings submitted by agents whose registration has lapsed may face procedural objections, creating delays that can affect transaction timelines. During due diligence, it is therefore essential to verify the current registration status of the agent on record.
The MyIPO Guidelines of Trademark 2019 VA1‑2026 set out the requirements for trademark agent registration, examination, and renewal. Under the Trademarks Act 2019, only registered trademark agents or advocates and solicitors may act on behalf of applicants and proprietors before the Registrar. The updated 2026 guidelines place additional emphasis on agent compliance: partnerships and bodies corporate may be registered as agents, but all registered agents must renew their registration within the prescribed window. Failure to maintain current agent registration can result in the inability to file documents or respond to office actions on behalf of clients, a critical risk during any transaction.
Use this checklist to verify the trademark agent currently on record for each mark in the target portfolio:
When a transaction involves the transfer of trademark ownership, whether through an asset purchase, share deal with IP carve‑out, or franchise restructuring, the trademark assignment checklist must cover both the legal documentation and MyIPO recording requirements. The Trademarks Act 2019 provides for assignment of registered trademarks, with or without the goodwill of the business concerned.
| Transaction type | Key formal document(s) required | MyIPO filing / registration action |
|---|---|---|
| Assignment (transfer of ownership) | Deed of assignment (signed), board resolution, consideration evidence | File assignment at MyIPO to record new owner on the Register |
| Change of agent (same owner) | Appointment/termination letter, power of attorney | File agent change notice with MyIPO; ensure new agent is registered under VA1‑2026 rules |
| Licence (owner retains title) | Licence agreement, evidence of territorial/field of use restrictions | No transfer of ownership, record licence if required; include in due diligence report |
When reviewing SPAs or franchise agreements, watch for clauses that may create trademark issues in M&A transactions:
The scope of trademark clearance Malaysia should be calibrated to the type of transaction. Each category carries distinct risks:
Malaysia recognises common law rights in unregistered marks through the tort of passing off. However, the owner of an unregistered trademark must prove ownership and goodwill through evidence before pursuing enforcement action. During trademark due diligence in Malaysia, unregistered marks require special attention:
A thorough trademark audit checklist must include a search of enforcement and dispute records. The following sources should be consulted:
Assign a risk rating to each mark in the portfolio based on the following triggers:
| Risk level | Trigger examples | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| High | Active opposition or cancellation proceedings; pending litigation; similar mark owner with history of aggressive enforcement | Obtain legal opinion; consider indemnity or escrow provisions; may require deal restructuring |
| Medium | Concluded proceedings with adverse findings; coexistence agreements with restrictive conditions; marks in classes where third‑party crowding is significant | Review settlement terms; negotiate warranty coverage; monitor during transition period |
| Low | No disputes on record; marks registered in narrow classes with no conflicting filings; strong use evidence | Standard representations and warranties sufficient; proceed with routine recording |
Not every registration in a portfolio carries equal strategic value. Before or immediately after closing, conduct a portfolio rationalisation exercise to identify marks that should be assigned to the acquirer, retained by the seller, or abandoned entirely. Marks that cover goods or services no longer offered, marks in jurisdictions where the business has no presence, and defensive registrations that no longer serve a competitive purpose are prime candidates for pruning.
Use a simple cost‑versus‑value framework to guide rationalisation decisions:
| Factor | Keep / assign | Consider abandoning |
|---|---|---|
| Active commercial use | Mark is used on current products or services | No use in the past three or more years |
| Renewal costs | Costs are justified by revenue attributable to the brand | Renewal fees exceed any identifiable commercial return |
| Defensive value | Mark blocks a competitor from registering a confusingly similar name | Mark is in a class or jurisdiction with no competitive threat |
| Licensing potential | Mark is or could be licensed for royalty income | No realistic licensing opportunities |
If the transaction involves a rebrand, the following items must be addressed in sequence to ensure legal protection and market continuity:
A well‑structured trademark rebranding checklist follows this sequence:
To streamline the trademark due diligence Malaysia process, the following templates and tools are recommended:
These templates are available for download and can be customised to suit the specific requirements of your transaction. For bespoke templates tailored to complex multi‑jurisdictional portfolios, specialist legal counsel should be engaged.
Trademark due diligence in Malaysia is not a one‑size‑fits‑all exercise. The scope, depth, and urgency of the process depend on whether you are navigating an M&A deal, structuring a franchise expansion, or executing a corporate rebrand. The VA1‑2026 agent compliance changes add a new procedural dimension that demands early attention. Engaging a registered trademark agent with transaction experience, particularly one familiar with the updated MyIPO guidelines, can prevent costly delays and protect the value of the IP assets at the heart of your deal.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Parvathi Kandasamy at MESSRS K.SILADASS & PARTNERS, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 22 minutes ago
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 47 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message