Global Law Experts Logo

Find a Global Law Expert

Specialism
Country
Practice Area
awardsr

Awards

Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.

The Lifting of the Corporate Veil in Mexico: Recent Criteria of the SCJN

posted 3 weeks ago

Introduction

The corporate veil in Mexico is a fundamental pillar of commercial law, guaranteeing the patrimonial autonomy of companies. However, its application is not absolute, and it has exceptional mechanisms to prevent fraud. This analysis addresses its legal regime updated with the latest criteria of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) corresponding to 2024–2025.

Conceptual Framework and Legal Basis

The principle of separation of assets between partners and the commercial company operates as a constitutional guarantee derived from the right of association (Article 9 of the Constitution). This figure:

  • Limits liability to the capital contributed.
  • Confers independent legal personality.
  • It protects personal assets from company obligations.

Its legal basis is found in articles 1796 (principle of good faith) and 1910 (prohibition of illegal acts) of the Federal Civil Code, although its application in case law has generated doctrinal debates.

Criteria for Exceptional Lifting

The First Chamber of the SCJN has established strict requirements through recent case law (2024-2025):

Objective Elements:

  • Proven insolvency of the company.
  • Causal relationship between the breach and the corporate structure.
  • Existence of enforceable debt through documentary evidence.

Subjective Elements:

  • Fraudulent intent in the constitution or operation of the company.
  • Contractual simulation or acts contrary to good faith.
  • Use of the company as a front to avoid obligations.

Procedural Limits and New Guidelines

Recent jurisprudential innovations highlight three key aspects:

  1. Inadmissibility in precautionary measures: It cannot be decreed in the precautionary stage because it affects third party rights without a hearing.
  2. Need for an autonomous trial: It requires an ordinary commercial process with guarantees of defense.
  3. Restrictive interpretation: Subsidiary application only in the event of serious and irreparable harm.

The SCJN emphasizes that the lifting does not constitute a sanction, but a corrective mechanism in the event of distortions in the corporate system. Its application must respect:

  • The principle of proportionality.
  • The presumption of corporate legality.
  • A reinforced burden of proof for the applicant.

Impact on Corporate Practice

The latest judicial criteria have specific effects on various actors:

Advantages

  • For partners: Investment security
  • For creditors: Anti-avoidance tool
  • For judges: Delimitation of competencies

Risks

  • For partners: Joint and several liability in fraud cases
  • For creditors: Complex burden of proof
  • For judges: Need for technical specialization

This jurisprudential balance seeks to combat practices such as:

  • Simulation of commercial operations.
  • Corporate tax avoidance strategies.
  • Opaque corporate structures.

Prospects for Evolution

Current challenges include:

  • Harmonization with international treaties against money laundering.
  • Express regulation in commercial codes.
  • Development of objective indicators of corporate fraud.

The jurisprudential trend points towards a model that combines:

  • Respect for corporate autonomy.
  • Agile supervision mechanisms.
  • Personal liability for fraudulent actions.

This legal framework reflects the maturity of the Mexican legal system in balancing investor protection and the fight against illegal practices, positioning itself as a benchmark in comparative corporate law.

Conclusion

The lifting of the corporate veil in Mexico has evolved in accordance with recent judicial criteria that seek a balance between investor protection and the prevention of corporate abuse. The SCJN has delimited its application under a restrictive scheme, favoring due process and a reinforced burden of proof.

In a global context where transparency and corporate regulation are increasingly strict, these precedents consolidate Mexico as a modern legal system, aligned with international standards on corporate responsibility and the fight against fraud.

 

Stay ahead with the newest legal updates at GLE News

Author

Find the right Legal Expert for your business

The premier guide to leading legal professionals throughout the world

Specialism
Country
Practice Area
LAWYERS RECOGNIZED
0
EVALUATIONS OF LAWYERS BY THEIR PEERS
0 m+
PRACTICE AREAS
0
COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD
0

Join

who are already getting the benefits
0
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox. Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Newsletter Sign Up

About Us

Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.

Social Posts

[wp_social_ninja id="50714" platform="instagram"]

See More:

Contact Us

Stay Informed

Join Mailing List

GLE