Our Expert in Cyprus
No results available
Updated for 2026 CRS/DAC & AML guidance.
Tax residency due diligence cyprus sits at the centre of every compliant onboarding file an adviser opens in 2026. This checklist is written for relationship managers, tax specialists and MLROs who onboard international or non‑resident clients and must satisfy four overlapping regimes at once: the Cyprus residency tests (183‑day and 60‑day), CRS/DAC reporting, AML/KYC obligations, and GDPR record‑keeping. With supervisory focus on onboarding evidence sharpening ahead of year‑end reporting cycles, advisers need a single, procedural workflow rather than scattered checks. The guidance below sets out who the process applies to, the steps, the documents, the deadlines and the costs, so that each file is defensible from day one.
This process applies to any international or non‑resident client, individuals or entities tax resident outside Cyprus, or claiming Cyprus residence under the 60‑day test, and to cross‑border structures that trigger CRS/DAC reporting. International information exchange obligations flow from Directive 2011/16/EU (DAC) and the OECD Common Reporting Standard, so residence and TIN data must be captured and validated at intake.
| Test | Key criteria | Practical proof examples |
|---|---|---|
| 183‑day test | Individual physically present in Cyprus more than 183 days in the tax year | Travel records, passport stamps, accommodation leases |
| 60‑day test | Not tax resident elsewhere and not present in another state more than 183 days; at least 60 days in Cyprus; carries on business, is employed or holds an office in Cyprus; and maintains a permanent home (owned or rented) | Employment contract or directorship, residential lease, title deed |
Note that the residency tests above apply to individuals. A company is generally tax resident in Cyprus if it is managed and controlled in Cyprus; under legislation effective from the 2023 tax year, a company incorporated in Cyprus is also treated as Cyprus tax resident unless it is tax resident elsewhere.
Follow these seven steps in order. Each produces a documented output that forms part of the client file.
| Step | Responsible (Who) | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Client intake & ID capture | Relationship manager / adviser | 1–2 business days |
| 2. Tax‑residency self‑certification & evidence | Adviser / tax specialist | 1–5 business days |
| 3. AML screening & risk rating | Compliance officer / MLRO | 0.5–2 business days |
| 4. Beneficial ownership verification | Corporate team / compliance | 1–5 business days |
| 5. CRS/DAC data collection & validation | Tax team / adviser | 1–3 business days |
| 6. GDPR consent & record creation | Data protection officer / adviser | Immediate (during onboarding) |
| 7. Final approval & system upload | Authorising officer / manager | 0.5–1 business day |
Collect certified or electronically verified copies and record the date each item was obtained. The table below is the minimum defensible set for an international client file.
| Document | Purpose / minimum acceptable evidence |
|---|---|
| Valid passport / national ID | Proof of identity, certified copy or e‑ID verification |
| Proof of address (utility bill / bank statement, recent) | Evidence of residence for KYC |
| Tax residency self‑certification (CRS form) + TIN | CRS/DAC reporting & tax residency verification |
| Evidence of days in Cyprus (travel records / tenancy / employment contract) | Support for 183‑day or 60‑day test |
| Proof of source of wealth/funds (bank statements, sale contracts) | AML risk assessment |
| Corporate documents (certificate of incorporation, shareholder register) | Beneficial ownership checks |
| BO declaration or registry extract | Verify ultimate beneficial owners |
| Trust deed / trustee declaration (if applicable) | Identify settlors and beneficiaries |
| GDPR consent / processing notice | Lawful basis for data handling and cross‑border transfers |
| Sanctions / PEP screening report | AML evidence and risk rating |
Adviser and compliance costs vary significantly by provider and complexity. The ranges below are indicative only; complex structures, trusts and high‑risk clients attract higher review time. Government and registry fees are set by the relevant authority and should be confirmed at the time of filing.
| Item | Indicative cost (EUR) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ID verification (digital) | Provider‑dependent | Per client |
| AML/PEP/sanctions screening subscription | Provider‑dependent | Team subscription amortised per client |
| Legal / tax residency review (hourly) | By engagement | Complex cases higher |
| CRS reporting / tax filing | By engagement | Per client / per report |
| Beneficial ownership registry extract / filing | As set by the Registrar | Government fees vary |
For 2026, advisers should expect continued supervisory focus on the quality of onboarding evidence, ongoing CRS/DAC technical handling of TINs and residence, and periodically refreshed national AML guidance. Reviewers increasingly scrutinise whether residency conclusions are supported by documents rather than client self‑certification alone. Align files with current MOKAS, Tax Department and OECD/EU guidance. Advisers should also note the EU’s phased establishment of the Anti‑Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) and monitor any resulting changes to national supervision.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Rafaella Dionysiou at Dionysiou Legal, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 3 minutes ago
posted 21 minutes ago
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 46 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 58 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message