Author
No results available
For families and business owners with assets in Italy, a carefully designed trust can support succession planning, continuity of ownership and the responsible management of wealth across generations. This guide explains how foreign-law trusts are recognised in Italy, when a trust may be preferable to other structures, and how to coordinate the trust deed, trustee appointment, corporate documentation and ongoing tax compliance. It is intended for international families, owners of Italian businesses and their advisers seeking a practical starting point rather than a substitute for case-specific legal and tax advice.
The relevant legal framework includes the 1985 Hague Trusts Convention, Italian civil and tax law, the EU Succession Regulation and applicable anti-money-laundering rules. The sources at the end identify specific primary legislation and administrative guidance for further verification. The adviser must also consider the law governing the particular trust and the jurisdictions where assets and family members are located.
Succession planning for an Italian business often involves three linked objectives: keeping a shareholding or a group of assets under coherent management, providing for family beneficiaries over time, and anticipating the relevant legal and tax consequences. A properly constituted trust establishes a separate fund of assets administered by the trustee under the governing law and trust deed. Asset segregation is legally meaningful, but it does not provide absolute immunity from creditors, succession claims or tax scrutiny.
Italy does not have its own domestic common-law trust statute, but it recognises and gives effect to trusts through international instruments, and it operates a parallel civil-law tradition of fiduciary arrangements. Understanding how these two tracks interact is the foundation of sound structuring. The sections that follow explain the legal basis, the models available, the drafting detail that matters, and the operational steps to implement a robust arrangement.
In a trust, a settlor places assets under the control of a trustee, who administers them for beneficiaries or a permitted purpose in accordance with the applicable law and the trust deed. Under Article 2 of the Hague Convention, the assets form a fund separate from the trustee’s personal estate. A trust should not be confused with an ordinary fiduciary mandate or nominee arrangement, even where those alternatives serve related planning objectives.
Italy recognises qualifying trusts under the 1985 Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition, ratified by Law No. 364 of 1989. Under Article 6, the settlor may choose a law providing for the relevant type of trust; under Article 11, a trust created in accordance with the applicable law is recognised, subject to the Convention’s limits and safeguards. This makes it possible to establish a foreign-law trust with Italian assets, including company shares. Recognition does not displace mandatory rules concerning property transfers, creditors, succession or taxation (notably Articles 12, 15 and 19 of the Convention).
Italian law also provides distinct asset-destination mechanisms, including the vincolo di destinazione under Article 2645-ter of the Civil Code. Such mechanisms have different legal conditions and effects and must not be presented as domestic equivalents of a common-law trust. The HCCH status table identifies the contracting states.
Italian law also recognises fiduciary mandates and nominee shareholding structures. A società fiduciaria operates within its own regulatory framework, notably Law No. 1966 of 1939; the legal character of any transfer, the principal’s rights and the fiduciary’s obligations require separate analysis. Such arrangements should not be equated with a trust’s segregated fund and trustee duties. The choice among a trust, a fiduciary mandate and other succession-planning tools depends on the assets, beneficiaries, governance objectives and applicable tax rules.
Typical objectives include placing family-company shares under coordinated management, providing for minors or vulnerable beneficiaries, organising succession in stages and establishing governance for assets held in multiple countries. Creditor protection may be a legitimate consequence of segregation, but transactions prejudicing creditors, sham arrangements or trusts that leave effective control with the settlor may be challenged or disregarded in relevant circumstances.
A trust should be selected only after comparing its benefits with simpler alternatives and accounting for establishment costs, trustee fees, reporting obligations and loss of direct control by the settlor.
Against these benefits, weigh the costs of administration, reporting and reduced flexibility. Where succession issues arise, first identify the law applicable to the succession: Italian forced-heirship provisions may apply, but in cross-border cases that conclusion cannot be assumed solely because assets are situated in Italy. Regulation (EU) No. 650/2012 generally uses the deceased’s habitual residence, subject to its exceptions and an eligible choice of national law.
The trustee is central to the arrangement. Selection should balance competence, independence, continuity, accountability and cost. The appropriate choice depends on the governing trust law and the nature of the assets.
A professional corporate trustee may provide continuity, specialist administration and professional indemnity cover; whether it is licensed or supervised depends on the jurisdiction and services concerned, and must be verified rather than assumed. An independent individual trustee may be appropriate where the mandate is manageable and continuity arrangements are robust. A family-member trustee may understand the family’s needs but can face significant conflict-of-interest and succession risks. A società fiduciaria or nominee shareholder is an alternative structure, not a fourth category of trustee, and should be assessed separately.
Governance design matters as much as trustee selection. A sole trustee offers simpler administration but concentrates responsibility; co-trustees may add oversight while increasing coordination costs. A protector (guardiano) may be given defined consent, veto, appointment or removal powers under the deed and governing law. These powers must provide meaningful oversight without depriving the trustee of the independent responsibilities required by the trust structure.
The trust deed turns the succession strategy into enforceable rights and obligations. It should address trustee powers, restrictions, beneficiary entitlements and discretion, conflicts, accounting and succession in office. An ordinary mandate and a trust deed are not interchangeable instruments.
Core content of a well-drafted trust deed includes:
Where a trustee is to hold Italian company shares, the deed must be coordinated with the company’s articles of association, applicable share-transfer restrictions and any shareholders’ agreement. The trustee must be able to exercise voting and other shareholder rights within the limits of company law and the deed. Whether consents, waivers or corporate amendments are required is a question to be resolved before the transfer.
Standardise reporting from the outset. A typical cycle includes annual accounts of the trust fund, a narrative report on material decisions, a distributions ledger, and a compliance confirmation covering beneficial-ownership and tax filings. Many arrangements adopt annual reporting to beneficiaries and protectors, with interim reporting on material events such as large transactions or trustee changes. Consistent templates reduce disputes and support the audit rights discussed below.
The deed should clearly identify the governing trust law and appropriate mechanisms for resolving disputes. In a cross-border matter, advisers should distinguish the law governing the trust from the laws governing the succession, transfer of specific assets and mandatory creditor or third-party protections. The relevant limitations are reflected in Articles 12, 15 and 19 of the Hague Convention and, for succession matters within its scope, Regulation (EU) No. 650/2012.
Where a trust holds shares in an Italian S.r.l. or S.p.A., the trustee’s position as shareholder must be reconciled with Italian company law, the articles of association and any shareholders’ agreements. A trust deed cannot override company-law requirements merely by providing different instructions to the trustee.
Pre-emption rights, approval clauses and other restrictions may apply when shares are transferred to a trustee. Review the articles and any shareholders’ agreement before transferring the shares; obtain the necessary consents or waivers, and amend the articles only where appropriate. Changes to the articles of an S.p.A. are generally resolved by the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting; for an S.r.l., Article 2480 of the Civil Code provides for a shareholders’ resolution recorded by a notary. Required amendments are filed with the Registro delle Imprese. A change in the trust’s beneficiaries does not automatically have the same legal effect as a transfer of registered shares, but it may still matter for contractual restrictions or beneficial-ownership checks.
Where a shareholders’ agreement addresses board appointments, deadlock, distributions or transfers, review its consistency with the deed. The deed must identify how the trustee exercises shareholder discretion and any legitimate protector consent rights without becoming a mere nominee. Corporate title, control and the identification of ultimate beneficial owners are related but distinct questions.
Italian trust taxation requires two separate analyses: income taxation during the trust’s life and inheritance/gift and transfer taxation in connection with asset transfers. For income tax, the residence and effective classification of the trust are material. A transparent trust (trust trasparente) is one whose identified income beneficiaries hold an enforceable right to the income within the meaning of Article 73 of the TUIR; merely naming someone as a potential discretionary beneficiary does not necessarily make the trust transparent. An opaque trust (trust opaco) is generally taxed on income at trust level, subject to the applicable rules for foreign trusts and distributions. The Agenzia delle Entrate Circular No. 34/E of 20 October 2022 remains relevant to this classification, but later statutory changes must also be applied.
Where the settlor, trustee, assets or beneficiaries are in different jurisdictions, examine the residence and location of each party and asset, foreign trust classification, relevant treaties (where applicable), and reporting regimes such as CRS and FATCA. Under Article 2(2-bis) of Legislative Decree No. 346 of 1990, the Italian inheritance/gift tax territorial scope of trust distributions takes account of the settlor’s residence at the time of asset segregation; a non-resident settlor generally brings Italian-situs assets within scope. Treaty protection should not be presumed, because not every treaty applies to trusts or to every relevant tax.
Trustee duties arise primarily under the governing trust law and the trust deed, while mandatory Italian rules may also apply to particular assets and activities. Proper administration includes acting within powers, managing conflicts of interest, keeping accounts and satisfying the applicable disclosure and due-diligence obligations. Recognition of the trust and the extent of the trustee’s duties should not be inferred from broad references to court decisions without identifying the relevant authority.
Build proportionate oversight into the structure from the outset: accounts, recorded decisions, information rights under the governing law and deed, and appropriate independent review. Italian customer-due-diligence obligations depend on the status of the parties and the services supplied; they should not be described as applying identically to every private trustee. The current Italian framework is complemented by EU reforms, including Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, generally applicable from July 2027.
Define clear escalation routes for breaches, conflicts or underperformance, and set out the grounds and mechanics for removing and replacing a trustee. Indemnities and professional indemnity insurance manage residual liability, but they should never substitute for competent administration and robust internal controls.
An effective trust should remain administrable if a trustee resigns, dies, becomes incapacitated or is removed. The deed and governing law should provide for the appointment of a successor and the orderly transfer of records and control over the fund.
Staged handovers, where the next generation gradually assumes roles as protector, co-trustee or advisor, help build competence and trust before full responsibility passes.
The comparison below is indicative. A fiduciary mandate is included as an alternative to a trust, not as another kind of trust or trustee. Regulatory status and costs vary considerably with jurisdiction, structure and asset complexity.
| Model | Typical use-case | Control retained by settlor | Regulatory complexity | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional trust company | Complex portfolios and cross-border families | Institutional continuity; trustee must exercise independent duties | Oversight, insurance and continuity plan | Fees and scope vary |
| Independent individual trustee | Estates suited to personal professional administration | Independence, insurance and successor arrangements must be checked | Competence, insurance and named successor | Key-person risk |
| Family-member trustee | Family structures with manageable conflicts | Family familiarity versus impartiality and continuity risks | Conflict-of-interest safeguards and removal rules | Limited independence |
| Fiduciary mandate or nominee shareholder (alternative) | Administration or holding of specified assets or shares | Different relationship from a trust; no equivalent trust segregation should be assumed | Mandate scope, reporting and asset ownership | Not equivalent to a trust |
A holding company and a trust serve different purposes. A holding company may centralise corporate ownership and management; a trust may establish long-term fiduciary administration for beneficiaries under a separate fund. The two may be combined, but this requires coordinated company, succession and tax advice and is not automatically preferable to a simpler arrangement.
The following sequence turns strategy into an implemented structure. Treat it as a project plan and confirm each legal and tax point against the official sources listed below.
Consider a hypothetical example. A founder owns a controlling stake in an Italian S.p.A. and holds investment property abroad. Three children are involved in the business to differing degrees; one is a minor. The founder wants to keep the company intact, protect the minor’s interests, and avoid a forced sale to meet future liabilities.
The advisory process begins by mapping the assets, relevant jurisdictions and the family objectives. The advisers then assess whether a foreign-law trust is suitable for the Italian S.p.A. shares and the overseas property, including whether the other country will recognise the proposed structure. An independent corporate trustee is considered, with a protector holding narrowly defined oversight powers. The S.p.A.’s articles contain a pre-emption clause: before transferring the shares, the advisers must determine whether a consent, waiver or amendment is required. Any amendment is adopted and registered through the appropriate corporate procedure. The deed provides for an investment policy, a mechanism for distributions and regular reporting.
Before implementation, the advisers determine the law governing the founder’s succession under the applicable private-international-law rules, including Regulation (EU) No. 650/2012 where relevant, and assess any protected heirship rights. They separately analyse trust residence, taxation at settlement and distribution (including the option under Article 4-bis), asset-transfer formalities and beneficial-ownership identification. The aim is structured continuity, not a guarantee that all succession or creditor challenges can be excluded.
An Italian-connected trust is best understood as a long-term governance arrangement requiring integrated legal, tax and administrative planning. The Hague Convention provides the framework for recognising qualifying foreign-law trusts; domestic fiduciary mandates are different legal instruments. Sound results depend on independent trustee administration, an appropriate deed, proper transfers and corporate coordination, up-to-date tax analysis and reliable succession in office. A trust can be valuable for family and business continuity, but only where its advantages justify the costs and its limitations are understood.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Filippo Lanteri at Studio Scarabosio Lanteri SRL STP, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 7 minutes ago
posted 19 minutes ago
posted 28 minutes ago
posted 50 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message