Our Expert in Kenya
No results available
When a lender moves to enforce a charge over land, shares or other assets, understanding the remedies of a chargor in Kenya can mean the difference between losing property at a fire-sale price and preserving it through lawful challenge. The Supreme Court of Kenya’s decision of 14 November 2025, which affirmed the enforceability of continuing-security clauses, has intensified enforcement disputes and placed fresh urgency on borrowers to act quickly and strategically. This guide sets out the statutory framework, the practical steps a chargor can take (from emergency injunctions to statutory redemption), and the procedural pathway to set aside an irregular auction.
It is designed for borrowers, corporate counsels, insolvency practitioners and litigation lawyers who need actionable, step-by-step direction grounded in Kenyan statute and case law.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. Readers facing enforcement proceedings should seek case-specific guidance from a qualified advocate in Kenya.
The remedies of a chargor in Kenya are scattered across several statutes, each governing different categories of charged assets and different enforcement mechanisms. A chargor’s ability to obtain relief depends on correctly identifying which legislation applies, what registration obligations the chargee must satisfy, and what procedural protections the law affords before a sale can be completed. The table below maps the principal statutes to their scope and relevance for borrowers facing enforcement.
| Statute | Scope / Asset Class | Key Relevance for Chargors |
|---|---|---|
| Land Act, 2012 | Charges over freehold and leasehold land | Sections 90–96 govern the chargee’s power of sale, statutory notice requirements, and the chargor’s right of redemption. Non-compliance with notice provisions is a primary ground for setting aside a sale. |
| Companies Act, 2015 | Company charges and debentures | Section 878 requires registration of charges created by a company. Failure to register renders the charge void against a liquidator and creditors, a powerful defence for chargors in corporate contexts. |
| Insolvency Act (Cap 53) | Receivership and administration of insolvent companies | Section 690 governs the appointment and powers of a receiver. Chargors can challenge a receiver’s appointment if procedural requirements are not met. |
| Movable Property Security Rights Act (MPSR Act), 2017 | Security over movable assets (equipment, inventory, receivables) | Establishes an electronic registration regime. Imperfect registration may undermine enforcement, offering the chargor a defence. |
| Civil Procedure Act & Rules | Court procedure, all asset classes | Provides the procedural basis for injunctions, stay orders and applications to set aside sales. |
The interplay between these statutes is critical. A charge over company-owned land, for example, engages both the Land Act (for the power-of-sale procedure) and the Companies Act (for registration obligations under section 878 of the Companies Act). Practitioners advising chargors must audit compliance across all applicable regimes before formulating a challenge.
The most time-sensitive remedy available to a chargor is the interlocutory injunction. When a lender has issued a statutory notice and an auction date is imminent, obtaining a court order to restrain the sale is often the only way to preserve the status quo while the underlying dispute is resolved.
Kenyan courts apply the principles established in Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd (1973), which require the applicant to demonstrate:
Where a sale is imminent (within days), the chargor can apply ex parte, without notice to the chargee, for a temporary restraining order. The applicant has a duty of full and frank disclosure: the court must be informed of all material facts, including those unfavourable to the applicant. Failure to disclose can result in the order being discharged with costs. The typical procedural timeline is:
In parallel with a court application, a chargor (or any person claiming an interest in the land) can lodge a caution at the Land Registry under the Land Registration Act, 2012. A registered caution prevents the Registrar from registering any dealing, including a transfer following an auction, until the caution is removed or the cautioner is served with notice. This is a low-cost, fast-acting protective measure that complements a court injunction.
Documents to prepare for urgent relief:
The right to redeem is arguably the most fundamental of the remedies of a chargor in Kenya. Redemption allows the borrower to reclaim the charged property by discharging the outstanding debt in full, including principal, interest, and costs, before the sale is completed. Under Section 92 of the Land Act, 2012, a chargor retains the right to redeem at any point before the chargee has executed the transfer to a purchaser.
The redemption window closes only when the sale is completed, that is, when the transfer instrument is executed and registered at the Land Registry. An auction alone does not extinguish the chargor’s equity of redemption. Industry observers expect that the Supreme Court’s 2025 affirmation of continuing-security clauses will lead chargees to move more swiftly to complete transfers, compressing the practical window for redemption.
Before tendering a redemption payment, the chargor should demand a full accounting from the chargee. The calculation should include:
The chargor should tender payment formally, in writing, specifying the amount and requesting a discharge of the charge within a stated period. If the chargee refuses to accept a valid tender or to provide a proper accounting, this can constitute evidence of bad faith and support a subsequent application to set aside any sale that proceeds.
Where a sale has already taken place, the chargor’s principal remedy is to apply to court to have the sale set aside. Kenyan courts have consistently held that the chargee’s power of sale is not absolute, it must be exercised in strict compliance with statutory requirements and in good faith.
The chargor should act immediately upon learning of a defective sale. Delay can be fatal, courts may refuse relief where the chargor has acquiesced or where an innocent third-party purchaser has registered the transfer. The practical timeline is:
| Step | Action | Indicative Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obtain official search at the Land Registry to confirm status of title | Day 1 |
| 2 | Lodge a caution at the Land Registry to prevent registration of transfer | Day 1–2 |
| 3 | File a suit and application for injunction to restrain completion of sale | Day 1–3 |
| 4 | Serve the chargee, auctioneer and purchaser with the court process | Day 3–7 |
| 5 | Attend inter partes hearing; present evidence of irregularity | Day 14–30 |
| 6 | Seek final orders: rescission of sale, damages, discharge of charge (as appropriate) | 3–12 months (full trial) |
Strong applications are built on contemporaneous documentary evidence. The chargor should preserve and present:
To understand the remedies available, a chargor must also understand the chargee’s enforcement arsenal. The typical powers conferred on a chargee include the statutory power of sale, the power of attorney to transfer, and the right to appoint a receiver. Each power has specific procedural prerequisites, and failure to follow them opens the door to challenge.
The Supreme Court’s 14 November 2025 decision affirmed that continuing-security clauses, which provide that a charge secures not just the original loan but all present and future indebtedness, are enforceable in Kenya. The likely practical effect is that chargees will rely on these clauses to resist redemption attempts where additional facilities remain outstanding, even if the original loan has been repaid. Chargors must therefore audit the full scope of the charge instrument and verify whether any “all monies” clause extends the secured obligation beyond the debt they believe to be outstanding.
A debenture secured by a fixed or floating charge over company assets is typically enforced by appointing a receiver (under section 690 of the Insolvency Act, Cap 53) or by exercising the power of sale. The chargee must follow the notice requirements specified in the debenture instrument and must act in good faith with a view to obtaining the best price. If the chargee appoints a receiver without proper grounds, for instance, where the debt is genuinely disputed, the chargor can apply for the appointment to be set aside.
| Remedy / Procedure | Statutory Basis | Typical Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Injunction (interlocutory) | Civil Procedure Act & Rules; Land Act, 2012 | Ex parte within 1–3 days; return date 7–21 days |
| Statutory sale by chargee | Land Act, 2012 (Sections 90–96); Companies Act (company charges) | Sale notice 3 months (land); challenge window immediately upon sale or within months (case law varies) |
| Redemption by chargor | Land Act, 2012 (Section 92); contract and common law | Before completion of transfer; payment and accounting within days |
| Setting aside an irregular sale | Land Act, 2012; Civil Procedure Act | File immediately; full trial 3–12 months |
| Appointment of receiver | Insolvency Act, Section 690; debenture instrument | Receiver appointed upon trigger event; challenge must be filed promptly |
Chargors often face confusion about the difference between a receiver and an administrator, particularly where a company debtor is involved. The distinction has significant practical implications for the scope of the chargor’s remedies and the assets that may be affected.
| Feature | Receiver | Administrator |
|---|---|---|
| How appointed | By the chargee (out of court) pursuant to a debenture or by the court under the Insolvency Act | By court order, by the company, or by a qualifying floating charge holder under the Insolvency Act |
| Primary purpose | Realise charged assets and repay the appointing chargee | Rescue the company as a going concern, or achieve a better result for creditors as a whole than liquidation |
| Scope of powers | Limited to the charged assets specified in the debenture | Wide, extends to all company assets; moratorium on enforcement actions |
| Effect on chargor’s rights | Chargor can challenge appointment if procedural requirements are not met; can still seek redemption if sale not completed | Administration moratorium may prevent the chargor from pursuing individual remedies; must work within the administration framework |
| When to seek injunction | Immediately upon appointment if grounds exist (disputed debt, defective notice, conflict of interest) | Within 14 days of appointment; legal advice essential on whether moratorium can be lifted |
Early indications suggest that where a chargor faces a receivership (rather than administration), the window for injunctive relief is narrower because the receiver typically moves quickly to realise assets. Negotiation should be pursued in parallel with court action, not as a substitute for it.
Proper registration of a charge is the chargee’s obligation, but it directly affects the chargor’s remedies. An unregistered charge is a potent defence. The steps for debenture registration are:
The MPSR Act brought movable-asset security in Kenya into a modern framework with an electronic notice-filing system. From a chargor’s perspective, the Act’s significance lies in enforcement discipline: a secured creditor who has not perfected their security interest by registration may lose priority to other creditors, and, critically, may be unable to enforce the security against the chargor at all. Chargors should always conduct an MPSR registry search as a first step in any defence strategy.
Where a chargee holds security over company shares, enforcement typically involves transferring the shares to the chargee or a third-party purchaser. The chargor’s defences include challenging the valuation of the shares, contesting whether proper notice was given, and invoking any pre-emption rights in the company’s articles of association. Taking security in Kenya over shares requires careful compliance with both the charge instrument and company-law formalities, and any lapse can be exploited by the chargor.
The remedies of a chargor in Kenya are powerful but time-sensitive. Delay is the single greatest risk. Borrowers facing enforcement should take the following immediate steps:
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Collins Otieno at Madhani Advocates LLP, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message