Our Expert in Switzerland
No results available
Understanding paid sick leave requirements in Switzerland is one of the most common compliance challenges for employers operating in the Confederation. Under Article 324a of the Swiss Code of Obligations (CO), employers must continue paying wages during an employee’s illness for a limited period that increases with length of service, commonly 30, 90 or 180 days depending on tenure. Most employers manage this financial exposure through Krankentaggeldversicherung (KTG), a daily sickness allowance insurance that typically covers 80 % of insured salary for up to 720 or 730 days within a 900-day window. With payroll parameters and AVS contribution rates updated for 2026, HR teams across Switzerland are reviewing handbooks, medical-certificate policies and KTG administration processes.
This guide sets out the legal baseline, walks through medical-certificate timing and privacy rules, explains salary continuation and KTG mechanics, and provides an operational HR checklist with sample contract clauses, everything an employer needs to stay compliant.
Article 324a of the Swiss Code of Obligations is the cornerstone of every employer sick leave policy in Switzerland. It establishes that where an employee is prevented from working through no fault of their own, including by illness, the employer must continue to pay the employee’s wage “for a limited period” once the employment relationship has lasted, or was entered into for, more than three months.
The statutory text does not fix a precise number of paid sick-leave days. Instead, it directs courts and practitioners to consider the duration of the employment relationship and the particular circumstances of the case. In practice, Swiss courts and cantons have developed recognised scales (known as Berner, Basler and Zürcher scales) that translate this general obligation into concrete day-counts. Employers are free to derogate from these scales only if they offer an arrangement that is at least equivalent, typically by taking out KTG insurance.
Key points for HR teams:
Many industries in Switzerland are governed by CBAs (Gesamtarbeitsverträge) that set their own, often more generous, salary continuation rules. Construction, hospitality and healthcare CBAs, for example, frequently mandate KTG coverage and specify minimum benefit levels. Employers must check whether a generally binding CBA (allgemeinverbindlich erklärter GAV) applies to their sector before relying solely on the CO baseline. Where a CBA or an employment contract includes a KTG scheme that meets the equivalence test, it replaces, rather than supplements, the CO Art. 324a obligation.
A sick leave certificate in Switzerland serves as evidence that the employee is medically incapacitated. While CO Art. 324a does not itself prescribe when a certificate must be submitted, established employer practice and case law have created widely followed norms.
A valid sick-leave certificate should state the degree of incapacity (full or partial, expressed as a percentage), the expected duration, and any work restrictions. Crucially, it must not disclose the diagnosis or the nature of the illness. The Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) restricts how employers process health data. Employers may only collect the minimum information necessary to administer salary continuation and insurance claims. Sharing diagnostic details with managers who do not need them for operational planning creates a data-protection risk under the revised FADP.
Where an employer has reasonable grounds to doubt the validity of a medical certificate, it may instruct an independent medical examiner, a Vertrauensarzt, to conduct a control examination. Key rules governing this process:
Medical certificate policy checklist for employer handbooks:
Under CO Art. 324a, the employer must continue paying the employee’s full wage during sickness for a limited period. In practice, the financial burden of long absences makes standalone compliance expensive. This is why the vast majority of Swiss employers take out KTG insurance, a daily sickness allowance policy that replaces or supplements the statutory obligation.
KTG (Krankentaggeldversicherung) is not legally mandatory at federal level, unlike accident insurance (UVG), but it is required by many CBAs and is almost universally adopted. A standard KTG policy operates as follows:
For a KTG arrangement to satisfy the equivalence test under CO Art. 324a, and thus replace the statutory obligation, it must be at least as favourable to the employee overall. Swiss case law generally accepts an arrangement offering 80 % of salary for 720 days as equivalent, even though the statutory baseline requires 100 % for a shorter period.
KTG covers non-occupational illness. Occupational accidents and diseases fall under the mandatory UVG accident insurance, which provides 80 % of insured earnings from day three. Where an employee’s incapacity may give rise to invalidity-insurance (IV) benefits, the KTG insurer typically coordinates with the IV office. Employers managing cross-border workers should also review social-security coordination rules under the bilateral agreements, further detail is available in the guide to Switzerland cross-border worker rules (2026).
CO Art. 324a does not fix a universal number of paid sick-leave days. Instead, three cantonal scales have emerged as the dominant reference points across Switzerland. The table below reflects the most commonly applied scale, widely cited by the Swiss federal portal ch.ch and used by employers in many cantons.
| Length of employment | Typical paid sick-leave entitlement (days per service year) | Source / notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1st year of service | 21–30 days | Varies by cantonal scale (Berner, Basler, Zürcher); ch.ch cites common practice of approximately 3 weeks in the first year. Pro-rate for part-time employees by contractual work days. |
| 2nd–5th year of service | 60–90 days | Scales diverge here: the Berner scale is typically more generous in middle tenure years. Check applicable CBA. Pro-rate by work pattern. |
| 6th year onward | 90–180 days | Longer-serving employees benefit from extended entitlements. Many CBAs and company policies set 180 days. Pro-rate as applicable. |
Calculating pro-rata entitlement for part-time employees: a part-time employee working three days per week is entitled to the same proportional number of working days as a full-time employee. For example, if the applicable scale grants 90 working days in the third year of service, a 60 %-FTE employee would receive 54 paid sick days (90 × 0.6).
Where the employer has taken out a KTG policy that meets the equivalence test, these scales are replaced by the KTG benefit structure (typically 80 % of salary for up to 720 or 730 days). The contractual documentation should make clear which regime applies and how the KTG waiting period dovetails with the employer’s direct payment obligation.
Mental health sick leave in Switzerland, including burnout, depression and anxiety-related absences, follows the same legal baseline as physical illness under CO Art. 324a. The employee needs a medical certificate confirming incapacity, and the employer owes salary continuation on the same terms. In practice, however, mental-health cases present additional challenges:
Under CO Art. 329h, employees are entitled to paid leave of up to three days per event to care for a sick or injured child, provided a medical certificate is presented. For serious health impairments, the entitlement may extend to up to 14 weeks of care leave under CO Art. 329i, funded through the income-compensation scheme (EO). Employers should document child sick leave separately from the employee’s own sickness entitlement, as the two draw on different legal bases.
Where a medical certificate attests to partial incapacity, for example, an employee certified as 50 % incapacitated, the employer pays wages for the hours worked and the KTG insurer covers the proportion attributable to incapacity. Payroll teams must split salary and benefit components accurately and ensure AHV contributions are calculated on both streams.
Sickness during the notice period in Switzerland triggers important protective rules. Under CO Art. 336c, a dismissal issued during a period of total or partial incapacity due to illness is void if it falls within a statutory protection period (30 days in the first year, 90 days from the second to the fifth year, and 180 days from the sixth year onward). If the employee falls ill after notice has been given, the notice period is suspended for the duration of the protected period and resumes once the protection expires. For detailed guidance on managing termination and notice in Switzerland, see the linked guide.
Translating legal obligations into an effective employer sick leave policy in Switzerland requires documented processes, clear contract language and trained managers. The following checklist and sample clauses are designed for immediate use.
“In the event of absence due to illness, the Employer shall continue to pay the Employee’s salary in accordance with Art. 324a CO. The Employer has taken out a daily sickness allowance insurance policy (KTG) which provides benefits equal to 80 % of the insured salary for a maximum of 720 days within a 900-day reference period. This KTG arrangement replaces the statutory salary-continuation obligation under Art. 324a CO, as it constitutes an at least equivalent solution within the meaning of Art. 324a para. 4 CO. Insurance premiums are shared equally between the Employer and the Employee.”
“The Employee must provide a medical certificate (Arbeitsunfähigkeitszeugnis) from a licensed physician from the fourth calendar day of any absence due to illness. The certificate must state the degree of incapacity and its expected duration. The Employer reserves the right to request a certificate from the first day of absence and to arrange an independent medical examination (Vertrauensarzt) at the Employer’s cost.”
Employers operating across cantons or managing expat employees on B permits should ensure that sick-leave policies align with both federal law and any applicable cantonal or CBA-specific requirements. For employers dealing with international documentation, the rules on whether an apostille is required for Switzerland may be relevant where foreign medical certificates are submitted.
When an employer has legitimate concerns about the authenticity of an absence, a structured and legally compliant response is essential to avoid unfair-dismissal claims and data-protection breaches.
Swiss employers face a layered set of obligations, from the general duty under CO Art. 324a, through cantonal scales, to the operational detail of KTG insurance administration and medical-certificate handling. Getting these requirements right protects the business from litigation risk, ensures employees receive the benefits they are entitled to, and keeps payroll compliant. The practical next steps are clear: review and update your internal sick-leave policy, verify that your KTG coverage meets the equivalence test, embed sample contract clauses referencing CO Art. 324a, train managers on notification and privacy rules, and ensure payroll processes align with current AHV contribution requirements. Where multi-cantonal operations or cross-border employment adds complexity, specialist legal review is strongly recommended.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Audrey Pion at Locca Pion & Ryser, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 27 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message