Our Expert in Turkey
No results available
Turkey’s merger notification form underwent its most significant overhaul in over a decade when Communiqué No. 2026/2 took effect in February 2026, replacing several annexes of the original Communiqué No. 2010/4 and introducing a restructured Standard Notification Form. For foreign buyers, private equity sponsors, and in‑house M&A counsel preparing a Turkish merger control filing, the 2026 changes alter turnover thresholds, add dedicated technology‑undertaking declarations, and recalibrate the boundary between Standard and Full Form filings. This guide provides the practical, section‑by‑section walkthrough that transaction teams need, from threshold gatekeeping to annex preparation and post‑filing communications with the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA).
Every step is mapped to the current merger filing checklist for Turkey so that cross‑border deal teams can file with confidence and avoid unnecessary Phase II scrutiny.
Communiqué No. 2026/2, published in the Official Gazette (Resmî Gazete) in February 2026, amends the foundational Communiqué No. 2010/4 on mergers and acquisitions requiring TCA approval. The changes respond to OECD and ICN best‑practice recommendations and align Turkish merger control more closely with international norms, particularly for digital and technology transactions.
Who should read this: Any foreign acquirer, private equity fund, or multinational corporate buyer whose transaction touches Turkey, whether through Turkish revenues, a Turkish target entity, or platform users located in Turkey.
| Milestone | Date | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Communiqué No. 2026/2 published in Official Gazette | February 2026 | Formal promulgation; amends Communiqué No. 2010/4 |
| New Standard Notification Form effective | February 2026 (upon publication) | All new filings must use the updated form and annexes |
| Transitional application | Filings already under review at effective date | Transactions pending at the TCA continue under the previous form unless the TCA requests supplementary information under the new rules |
Industry observers expect the transitional period to generate a wave of supplementary information requests from the TCA, particularly for transactions involving technology undertakings that were filed under the old regime without the newly required digital‑market disclosures.
The first question for any cross‑border deal team is whether the transaction triggers a mandatory notification under Turkish merger control rules. Communiqué No. 2026/2 revised the turnover thresholds and clarified the treatment of foreign‑to‑foreign transactions and technology undertakings.
Under Law No. 4054 (the Turkish Competition Law), concentrations that meet or exceed the turnover thresholds specified in the Communiqué must be notified to the TCA before closing. The thresholds are denominated in Turkish Lira and are periodically updated. Following Communiqué No. 2026/2, the threshold structure retains a two‑limb test:
A parallel global turnover test applies where at least one party’s Turkish turnover exceeds a specified level. Transaction teams should convert all figures into Turkish Lira at the exchange rate applicable to the most recent audited financial year, a step that frequently causes errors for foreign buyers dealing in EUR or USD.
Foreign‑to‑foreign transactions, where neither the acquirer nor the target is incorporated in Turkey, remain notifiable if the turnover thresholds are met. The TCA has consistently held that revenue generated in Turkey (including through exports to Turkish customers, digital platform revenue attributable to Turkish users, or licensing fees from Turkish licensees) counts toward the threshold calculation. Failing to account for these indirect revenue streams is among the most common filing errors for foreign buyers.
Communiqué No. 2026/2 introduced express provisions for technology and digital undertakings. Where a party qualifies as a “technology undertaking” under the Communiqué’s definitions, broadly, an entity whose business model is substantially based on digital platforms, data‑driven services, or technology licensing, the notification obligation may be triggered even where traditional turnover thresholds are not met, provided specified market‑connection criteria are satisfied. This brings Turkey closer to the transaction‑value thresholds adopted by the EU and Germany.
| Entity / Transaction Type | Reporting Obligation under Communiqué No. 2026/2 | Typical Filing Triggers / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic acquirer + domestic target (Turkey revenues) | Notify if combined and individual turnover thresholds are met | Submit Standard or Full Form depending on horizontal/vertical overlaps |
| Foreign‑to‑foreign (no Turkish entity) | Notify if combined global turnover thresholds and Turkish market connections meet Communiqué definitions, technology undertakings may broaden scope | Prepare evidence of local effect; currency conversion issues are common |
| Technology / digital undertaking (platforms, marketplaces) | Additional declarations required under 2026 changes; may trigger filing even with lower turnover | Include MAU/DAU, active merchants, data flows, and contractual exclusivity evidence |
Communiqué No. 2026/2 sharpened the dividing line between the Standard Notification Form and the Full Notification Form. Choosing the wrong form can delay a transaction significantly: submitting a Standard Form when a Full Form is required will trigger a deficiency notice; submitting a Full Form unnecessarily will burden the team with extensive economic analyses that are not needed for a straightforward deal.
The Standard Form is appropriate where the concentration does not raise material competitive concerns at first glance. In practice, this typically covers transactions where:
The Full Form is required where horizontal overlaps, vertical links, or conglomerate effects exceed the Communiqué’s quantitative or qualitative screens. Transactions involving a technology undertaking that exceeds specified user or revenue metrics in Turkey will generally also require a Full Form filing, given the additional competitive‑assessment disclosures involved.
| Criterion | Standard Form | Full Form |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal overlaps in Turkey | Below Communiqué share thresholds | At or above Communiqué share thresholds |
| Vertical / conglomerate links | No significant links identified | Significant upstream/downstream or portfolio effects |
| Technology undertaking involved | No, or below user/revenue metrics | Yes, and above specified user/revenue metrics |
| Typical review outcome | Phase I clearance likely | Phase I or Phase II depending on complexity |
When in doubt, industry observers recommend filing the Standard Form with a cover letter flagging the borderline issues, rather than defaulting to the Full Form. The TCA can always request a Full Form if it considers the Standard Form insufficient, but an unsolicited Full Form filing may signal competitive concerns that do not actually exist.
This section walks through each major block of the Standard Notification Form as restructured by Communiqué No. 2026/2. For each part, the guidance identifies the required content, recommended supporting documents, and common red flags.
Part A requires a concise description of the transaction structure (share acquisition, asset acquisition, joint venture), the identity and corporate structure of each party (including ultimate parents), and the legal basis for the concentration. Recommended approach:
Part B asks the notifying parties to define the relevant product and geographic markets and to identify affected markets. This is where many filings attract TCA scrutiny. Practical guidance:
Part C requires detailed turnover data. For each party, provide audited turnover figures for Turkey and worldwide for the last completed financial year. Supporting annexes should include:
Red flag: the TCA will cross‑check turnover figures against publicly available data (annual reports, trade‑registry filings). Inconsistencies between the notification and public filings are the single fastest route to a deficiency notice.
Part D is the substantive core of the standard notification form. Here, the notifying parties provide their competitive assessment of horizontal overlaps, vertical links, and, where applicable, conglomerate effects. Include:
Sample wording for a no‑overlap filing: “The parties’ activities in Turkey do not overlap on any plausible product market. The Acquirer’s activities are limited to [X], while the Target operates exclusively in [Y]. Accordingly, no affected markets arise.”
If the parties anticipate competition concerns, Part E allows them to propose commitments at the notification stage. While early remedy proposals are uncommon in Standard Form filings, they can accelerate Phase I clearance where the TCA’s likely concern is obvious and a straightforward divestiture or behavioural remedy can address it. Any proposed commitment should be drafted in the format prescribed by the TCA’s published guidelines.
The 2026 amendments to Turkish merger control introduced dedicated disclosure requirements for technology and digital undertakings. This section explains how to declare a technology undertaking on the merger notification form and what evidence to attach.
Where a party qualifies as a technology undertaking, the Standard Notification Form requires disclosure of the following metrics (where applicable and available):
The TCA expects structured, verifiable data rather than narrative assertions. Best practice is to provide:
Disclosing user‑level metrics to a regulator may engage Turkey’s data‑protection rules (Law No. 6698, the KVKK). Ensure that all data shared with the TCA is aggregated and anonymised. Where the TCA requests granular data, work with Turkish data‑protection counsel to structure a legally compliant disclosure, including any necessary data‑processing notifications.
A well‑organised annex bundle is critical to avoiding deficiency notices. Below is a sample table of contents for an annex bundle accompanying a Standard Notification Form under the current merger filing checklist for Turkey.
| Annex Reference | Document Type | Who Provides It | Typical Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annex 1‑A / 1‑B | Group structure charts (Acquirer / Target) | Each party’s legal team | PDF (org chart) |
| Annex 2 | Transaction documents (SPA, SHA, or JV agreement) | Transaction counsel | PDF (executed copies) |
| Annex 3‑A to 3‑N | Audited financial statements (each entity) | Finance / audit team | |
| Annex 4 | Turnover calculation workpapers (including FX conversion) | Finance team | Excel + PDF summary |
| Annex 5 | Market share tables (three years, each affected market) | Business / economics team | Excel + PDF summary |
| Annex 6 | Customer and supplier lists (top five, per affected market) | Business team | PDF (anonymised if needed) |
| Annex 7 | Technology undertaking metrics (MAU, DAU, ARR, data flows) | Product / analytics team | PDF + Excel |
| Annex 8 | Power of attorney (notarised, apostilled for foreign parties) | Legal team | Original + certified copy |
| Annex 9 | Board resolutions authorising the filing | Corporate secretary | PDF (certified) |
File naming convention: Use [PartyName]_Annex[Number]_[Description]_[Date].pdf (e.g., AcquirerCo_Annex3A_AuditedFS_2025.pdf). Consistent labelling prevents the TCA from issuing deficiency notices for missing documents that are in fact present but poorly labelled.
Understanding how to notify the TCA and the procedural timeline that follows is essential for managing deal certainty.
The TCA accepts filings through its established submission channels. Parties should confirm the current submission modality (electronic via e‑Devlet or physical filing at the TCA’s Ankara offices) with Turkish counsel before the filing date, as procedural requirements may be updated. The notification itself does not carry a prescribed government filing fee under long‑standing TCA practice, although parties should confirm this remains the case at the time of filing.
Once a complete notification is received, the statutory Phase I review period is 30 calendar days under Law No. 4054. If the TCA determines that the concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with competition, it may open a Phase II investigation, which extends the review period significantly. During both phases, the parties are subject to a mandatory standstill obligation: the transaction may not close until the TCA grants clearance.
Experienced deal teams encounter the same set of avoidable errors repeatedly. The following pitfalls are the most common sources of delay and risk for foreign buyers filing a merger notification form in Turkey:
Completing the merger notification form in Turkey under the 2026 regime requires methodical preparation, accurate threshold calculations, and, for technology deals, a structured approach to user‑metric disclosures. The following quick checklist summarises the critical steps:
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Oğuzkan Güzel at Guzel Law Office, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 3 minutes ago
posted 3 minutes ago
posted 26 minutes ago
posted 28 minutes ago
posted 51 minutes ago
posted 55 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message