Our Expert in Lebanon
No results available
Licensing agreements are among the most closely scrutinised instruments in Lebanese commercial practice, and 2026 brings a specific set of registration, tax and enforcement considerations that licensors and licensees cannot afford to overlook. Against a backdrop of continued currency volatility, the way a licence is drafted, stamped and enforced carries real financial consequences. This guide sets out, step by step, how to prepare a valid licence under Lebanese law, how to protect payment and royalty streams, what documents and fees to expect, and how to choose between the Lebanese courts and arbitration if a dispute arises.
It is written for in-house counsel, general counsel, licensors, licensees and commercial managers who need practical, actionable direction rather than a marketing overview.
Purpose: A practical, step-by-step guide to drafting, registering, taxing and enforcing licensing agreements in Lebanon in 2026.
Who this is for: In-house counsel, licensors, licensees, commercial managers and general counsel assessing whether and how to conclude licence arrangements in Lebanon.
Last reviewed: 8 October 2026.
Five numbers to know before you sign
A licence is a contractual grant permitting one party (the licensee) to use rights owned by another (the licensor), typically intellectual property such as trademarks, patents, copyright, software, designs or know-how, without transferring ownership. Under Lebanese law, licensing is governed by the general law of obligations and contracts (the Code of Obligations and Contracts) supplemented by the specific intellectual property statutes administered by the Intellectual Property Protection Office (IPPO) of the Ministry of Economy and Trade: the 1924 Regulations on commercial, industrial, literary and artistic property (Resolution No. 2385 of 17 January 1924, as amended) for trademarks and designs; Law No. 240 of 7 August 2000 on patents; and Law No. 75 of 3 April 1999 on the protection of literary and artistic property for copyright, including software. Lebanon is a party to the Paris and Berne Conventions, but it is not a member of the WTO (and is therefore not bound by TRIPS) nor of the Madrid Protocol, two points that foreign licensors frequently assume otherwise. Because a licence preserves the licensor’s title while monetising the underlying asset, it is frequently preferable to an outright assignment or sale where the owner wishes to retain long-term control, quality standards and residual value.
In the 2026 commercial environment, one factor dominates the drafting agenda: persistent currency volatility makes the choice of payment currency, indexation and payment mechanics a central risk-allocation question rather than a boilerplate afterthought. A well-drafted licence addresses this by fixing the economics in a stable currency and ensuring the instrument is formally compliant, properly stamped and, where applicable, recorded, so that it is enforceable when tested.
Two short examples illustrate the stakes. A European software vendor licensing an enterprise product to a Beirut distributor will care most about royalty reporting, audit rights and currency protection. A regional franchisor licensing a trademark and operating system will instead prioritise quality control, territory, and termination triggers. The drafting emphasis shifts with the asset, but the compliance backbone is common to every licence concluded in Lebanon.
This guide covers pre-contract due diligence, the essential clauses, registration and stamp duty, tax treatment of royalties (withholding tax and VAT), and enforcement options including interim relief and foreign award recognition.
Licensors (local and foreign), licensees, in-house legal teams, finance and tax functions, and commercial managers negotiating or renewing licence arrangements in Lebanon should read it before signing.
The threshold question is structural: should the transaction be a licence, an assignment, or a franchise or agency arrangement? A licence suits situations where the owner wants recurring royalty income and ongoing control. An assignment transfers title outright and is appropriate for a clean sale of rights. Franchise and agency structures layer additional regulatory obligations on top of the underlying IP grant. The trap for foreign licensors is Decree-Law No. 34 of 5 August 1967 on commercial representation: a trademark licence coupled with the exclusive distribution of the licensor’s products may qualify the Lebanese party as a commercial representative, with registration at the Ministry of Economy and Trade, a presumption of exclusivity, a non-waivable right to compensation on termination without just cause, and the jurisdiction of the Lebanese courts of the representative’s place of business whatever the contract provides. Competition Law No. 281 of 17 March 2022, enforced by the National Competition Commission, now also limits the exclusivity and territorial restrictions that may be imposed and enforced against third parties. For foreign licensors, the choice of governing law and dispute forum is equally important, because enforceability in Lebanon depends on how the instrument interacts with local procedural and tax requirements.
Territory, exclusivity and the right to sub-license are the commercial levers that most affect value and risk. An exclusive, nationwide, sub-licensable grant commands a higher royalty but reduces the licensor’s flexibility; a non-exclusive, field-limited grant preserves optionality. Define each precisely; ambiguity here is the single most common source of later dispute, and any exclusivity should be tested against Competition Law No. 281/2022.
The following nine steps form the core drafting workflow. Each is actionable, and the indicative durations assume reasonable cooperation between the parties. Treat the timeline table as a planning tool, not a guarantee; recordal timelines in particular depend on the IPPO’s workload, whereas stamp duty is a fixed and short statutory deadline (Section 7).
|
Step |
Main actor / who to involve | Estimated duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-contract IP & commercial due diligence | IP attorney (local), commercial lead | 1–3 weeks |
| 2. Define licence scope & exclusivity | Commercial lawyer + business | 1–2 weeks |
| 3. Draft payment & royalty mechanics | Finance + tax counsel + lawyer | 1 week |
| 4. Draft currency, devaluation & security clauses | Commercial counsel + local banker | 3–7 days |
| 5. Minimum performance & termination | Commercial counsel | 3–5 days |
| 6. Warranties, indemnities & limitation of liability | Commercial/corporate counsel | 3–5 days |
| 7. Confidentiality & tech transfer clauses | IP counsel + CTO (if software) | 1–2 weeks |
| 8. Recordal & stamp duty | Local counsel / notary / tax advisor | Stamp duty: within 5 days of signature; patent licence recordal: 2–6 weeks (confirm with the IPPO) |
| 9. Dispute resolution & enforcement planning | Litigation/arbitration counsel | 1 week |
The clauses below are the backbone of any enforceable licence. The short samples that follow are illustrative drafting starting points, not finished provisions; each must be tailored and reviewed by Lebanese counsel before use.
Use a dedicated definitions clause so terms such as “Net Sales”, “Licensed Products” and “Territory” are unambiguous. Avoid over-broad warranties; a blanket warranty of non-infringement worldwide is rarely appropriate. Ensure the currency clause and the royalty clause are internally consistent, and expressly carve out the right to injunctive relief from any exclusive arbitration provision. Remember that under article 266 of the Code of Obligations and Contracts an agreed penalty may not be judicially increased or reduced except where the obligation has been partly performed, so calibrate liquidated damages and minimum-royalty shortfall payments with care.
“The Licensee shall pay the Licensor a royalty equal to [X]% of Net Sales of the Licensed Products in the Territory, exclusive of value added tax, payable quarterly within 30 days of each quarter-end, accompanied by a royalty statement in the agreed form. The Licensor may, on reasonable notice, audit the Licensee’s records relating to Net Sales once per calendar year. Royalties shall be paid without deduction other than withholding tax required by Lebanese law, in respect of which the Licensee shall deliver official receipts to the Licensor within 30 days of payment.” (Sample only; adapt to the agreed tax allocation and consider a gross-up where the licensor cannot credit the withholding.)
“All amounts payable under this Agreement are denominated and payable in freely transferable United States Dollars (USD) in cash funds (“fresh dollars”) by wire transfer to the account nominated by the Licensor outside Lebanon. Payment by cheque, by transfer from a Lebanese bank account opened before 17 November 2019, or in Lebanese pounds at any rate of exchange shall not discharge the Licensee. Where any conversion is required, it shall be made at the prevailing commercial rate on the payment date, and the Licensee bears all conversion and transfer costs.” (Sample only; confirm the payment channel with the Licensee’s bank in light of Banque du Liban Basic Decision No. 13729 of 1 July 2025.)
Before signing, stamping or registering a licence, assemble the documents below. Lebanon is not a party to the Hague Apostille Convention: corporate documents and powers of attorney signed abroad must be legalised through the consular chain (notary, foreign ministry, Lebanese consulate, then the Lebanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and accompanied by a sworn Arabic translation for any filing with the IPPO or submission to a court, so build legalisation and translation time into the schedule.
| Document | Purpose / Notes |
|---|---|
| Evidence of IP ownership / registration certificates | Proves the licensor’s right to grant the licence |
| Power of attorney / corporate authorisation | Shows authority to sign (board resolution or POA); consular legalisation and sworn Arabic translation if signed abroad |
| Draft licence agreement (English/Arabic) | Finalised contract for stamping and registration |
| Commercial invoices / payment schedule | For tax reporting and banking |
| Bank guarantee / escrow instructions (if any) | Payment security evidence |
| Financial statements (licensee) | For evaluating credit and performance obligations |
| Proof of identity / company registration | For notarisation and registration |
| Sworn Arabic translation | Required for IPPO filings and for any submission to the Lebanese courts |
From the start of due diligence to a fully stamped and (where required) registered instrument, a straightforward licence typically takes six to twelve weeks. Due diligence and scoping run concurrently in the first two to three weeks; drafting and negotiation of the economic and risk clauses occupy the middle weeks; and recordal of a patent licence at the IPPO, the least predictable stage, can take several weeks. Three deadlines are fixed by law and should be diarised at signing: the proportional stamp duty is payable within five days of signature in Lebanon (a document signed abroad must be stamped within two months of being brought into Lebanon and in any event before it is relied on before any court or administration); withholding tax on royalties paid to a non-resident licensor is declared and paid within fifteen days of the end of each quarter; and a patent licence produces no effect until it is recorded. The Step/Who/Duration table in Section 3 provides a quick scan of the critical path.
The cost of a licence comprises legal and notary fees, IPPO recordal fees, stamp duty and the tax treatment of royalties. The principal rates, as at the date of this guide, are the following:
|
Item |
Typical payer |
Indicative cost / comment |
|
Legal drafting & negotiation |
Usually licensor or split |
Market rates vary widely by firm and matter complexity |
|
Notary authentication |
Either |
Fixed notary fees apply, check the local schedule |
|
Stamp duty on contracts |
Usually licensee or as agreed |
0.4% of the amounts stated in the contract (Legislative Decree No. 67/1967, as amended), payable within five days of signature |
|
IPPO recordal fees |
Licensee or licensor as agreed |
Mandatory for patent licences, optional for trademark licences; per the IPPO fee schedule |
|
Withholding tax on royalties |
Licensee (payer) |
8.5% for non-resident licensors (2024 Budget Law), reduced under certain double-tax treaties; declared and paid quarterly in the currency of the royalty |
|
VAT |
Licensee (reverse charge) if the licensor is abroad; licensor if resident |
11% on royalties and licence fees (Law No. 379/2001) |
|
Court filing / arbitration fees |
Party commencing proceedings |
Depends on forum and claim value |
The interaction between stamp duty, withholding tax, VAT and the chosen payment currency can materially change the net return to a foreign licensor, which is why finance and tax input belongs in the drafting process, not after it.
Enforcement strategy should be decided at the drafting stage, not after a breach. The two principal routes, the Lebanese courts and arbitration, differ in speed, confidentiality, cost and the practicalities of enforcement. The comparison below summarises the trade-offs. Arbitration is governed by articles 762 to 821 of the Code of Civil Procedure (domestic arbitration, arts. 762–808; international arbitration, arts. 809–821), and judicial mediation by Law No. 82 of 10 October 2018 offers a third route.
| Factor | Lebanese Courts | Arbitration |
|---|---|---|
| Speed (typical) | Slower, less predictable | Typically faster, depending on the seat |
| Interim measures | Available but can be slower to obtain | Arbitral tribunals (and emergency arbitrators under some rules) available |
| Enforceability of award | Domestic judgments enforceable; foreign awards enforceable under the New York Convention | Enforceable under the New York Convention where seat and parties are compliant |
| Confidentiality | Public proceedings | Private and confidential |
| Costs | Lower filing fees but potentially protracted | Higher up-front fees but more predictable |
| Practicalities in Lebanon (2026) | Courts may be congested; enforcement affected by economic conditions | Often preferred by foreign licensors for neutrality |
Interim relief, including injunctions and attachment of assets, is central to protecting a licence, particularly where a licensee continues unauthorised use or withholds royalties. A well-drafted dispute clause expressly preserves the right to apply for interim measures from a court even where the merits are reserved to arbitration. Urgent relief is sought from the juge des référés (Code of Civil Procedure, arts. 579 et seq.), and a precautionary attachment is granted ex parte by the execution judge on an apparent debt (arts. 866 et seq.), usually against security; it lapses unless the merits claim is filed within the short statutory period that follows. Under Law No. 240/2000 (art. 41) an exclusive patent licensee may itself seek precautionary measures and sue for infringement; for trademark and copyright licences, the licensee’s standing should be secured in the contract and, for trademarks, by recordal.
Foreign arbitral awards are recognised and enforced under the New York Convention, in force for Lebanon since 1998, through the exequatur procedure of the Code of Civil Procedure (arts. 814–815 and 1009–1024), the principal ground for refusal being conflict with Lebanese public order (art. 1014). Ensure the arbitration clause names a seat and rules that support enforceability. Note also that Law No. 46/2026 suspended legal, judicial and contractual deadlines from 1 March to 31 July 2026, with time resuming on 1 August 2026 and no revival of periods that had already expired; any cure, termination or limitation period running in 2026 should be recomputed accordingly.
Local courts may be appropriate where the dispute is purely domestic, where urgent attachment over assets located in Lebanon is needed, or where the cost of arbitration is disproportionate to the claim. The right choice is matter-specific, and the clause should be drafted with the likely dispute profile in mind.
Given currency volatility, payment security is the defining risk-management challenge for licensors into Lebanon. Practical protections include denominating royalties in a hard currency such as USD or EUR, requiring payment through a defined banking channel, and securing obligations with a bank guarantee, letter of credit or escrow. Pair these with an early-termination right on non-payment and a clear conversion mechanism. A sample protective clause: “If any royalty remains unpaid for more than 30 days after the due date, the Licensor may draw on the bank guarantee and, on continued default, terminate this Agreement on 15 days’ written notice.” (Sample only; adapt to the agreed security instrument.)
Where payment is routed through Lebanese banks, distinguish between “fresh” funds and deposits held in accounts opened before 17 November 2019: Banque du Liban Basic Decision No. 13729 of 1 July 2025 bars banks from paying out of the latter except within the limits set by the central bank or with its prior written approval, so a royalty paid from such an account may never reach the licensor in usable currency. Payment in foreign currency between private parties remains lawful (Code of Money and Credit, art. 192; Code of Obligations and Contracts, art. 301), but the case law on discharge in Lebanese pounds at the official rate is precisely why licences now specify fresh-dollar payment to accounts outside Lebanon.
Drafting and enforcing a licence that the parties can rely on in Lebanon in 2026 requires a disciplined combination of due diligence, precise clauses, timely recordal and stamping, and a dispute strategy chosen before any breach occurs. The most effective approach is to align legal, finance and tax input from the outset, to fix the economics in a stable currency, and to verify every statutory and tax point against the primary official sources. Readers assessing a new or renewing licence should seek a jurisdictional review to confirm registration obligations, stamp duty and the optimal enforcement route for their specific arrangement.
This article provides general information only and is not legal advice. Licensing, tax and enforcement rules in Lebanon are subject to change and to court interpretation; always consult qualified counsel in Lebanon and verify current rates and obligations with the relevant ministries before acting.
Cyrille Naffah is Managing Partner of The Edge Law Firm, a corporate and commercial practice operating across Riyadh, Beirut and the wider MENA region, and co-founder of CyberLex MENA Group. He advises foreign licensors, franchisors and technology companies on their Lebanese and Saudi arrangements.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Cyrille Naffah at The Edge Law Firm, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 15 minutes ago
posted 35 minutes ago
posted 55 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message