Commercial Arbitration Lawyers Worldwide.

The three biggest benefits are Privacy, Expertise, and Finality. unlike court trials, which are public record (meaning your dirty laundry is aired to competitors and the press), arbitration is private and confidential. You also get to pick your “judge” (the arbitrator), ensuring they actually understand your specific industry (e.g., shipping or construction) rather than getting a random judge who might not know technical jargon. Finally, the process is usually faster because there are strictly limited avenues for appeal, meaning the dispute doesn’t drag on for years.

Yes, absolutely. An arbitration “award” is just as enforceable as a court judgment. Once the arbitrator signs the decision, you can take that piece of paper to a regular court and ask the judge to “confirm” it, turning it into a court order that allows you to seize assets or garnish bank accounts if the loser refuses to pay. It is not just a “recommendation”; it is the end of the road.

A lawyer treats arbitrator selection like “jury selection” on steroids. They research the candidates’ past decisions (awards) to see if they have a bias toward plaintiffs or defendants. They also interview potential arbitrators to check their availability and conflicts of interest. In a complex construction dispute, for example, your lawyer will fight to appoint an arbitrator who is also an engineer, ensuring the decision-maker understands the technical blueprints without needing a 101 lesson during the hearing.

Generally, no. This is the double-edged sword of arbitration: it is designed to be final. You cannot appeal just because you think the arbitrator made a mistake of fact or law. In the US, under the Federal Arbitration Act, courts will only overturn an award in extremely rare cases of “corruption,” “fraud,” or if the arbitrator completely refused to hear pertinent evidence. The bar is incredibly high; statistics show that courts confirm over 90% of arbitration awards without question.

The New York Convention (1958) is the most successful treaty in private international law, signed by over 170 countries. It requires courts in all signatory nations to recognize and enforce arbitration awards made in other countries. This means if you win an arbitration in London against a company based in Brazil, you can take that award to a Brazilian court, and under the treaty, they must seize the company’s assets to pay you. This makes arbitration far superior to court judgments for international deals, as there is no universal treaty for enforcing court verdicts across borders.

Yes, because a poorly drafted “pathological clause” can cost you thousands of dollars in fighting over how to fight. If your clause is vague (e.g., “disputes shall be settled by arbitration in the USA”), you will spend months arguing about which state, which rules, and how many arbitrators to use. A lawyer ensures the clause specifies the Seat (location), the Institution (like ICC or AAA), the Language, and the Number of Arbitrators to prevent procedural deadlock.

While generally faster than court, it is not instantaneous. A typical domestic commercial arbitration in the US takes about 7 to 15 months from filing to award. International arbitrations are longer, often taking 18 to 24 months due to the complexity and travel involved. However, this is still significantly faster than the 3+ years it often takes to get a civil trial verdict in many overloaded court systems.