Civil Fraud Lawyers Worldwide.

The main difference is the goal and the burden of proof. Criminal fraud is prosecuted by the government to punish the fraudster with jail time, requiring proof “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Civil fraud is a lawsuit filed by the victim to recover their stolen money, requiring a lower standard of proof (“preponderance of the evidence”). Crucially, you can sue someone for civil fraud even if the police refuse to prosecute them, giving you a direct path to justice that doesn’t rely on an overworked District Attorney.

To prove deceit, you have to show that the other person didn’t just make a mistake, but that they knowingly lied to get your money. You must demonstrate that they made a false statement, knew it was false (or didn’t care if it was true), and that you suffered a financial loss because you trusted them. Since fraudsters rarely admit they were lying, lawyers usually prove this by finding “badges of fraud,” like forged documents or secret emails that contradict what they told you face-to-face.

A “freezing order” is a powerful emergency court tool that instantly locks a suspect’s bank accounts and assets so they can’t hide the money while you sue them. It is essentially a legal “pause button” that prevents the defendant from spending a dime—even on their own legal bills—without court permission. This is particularly effective in the UK and US because it is often obtained without warning the defendant, catching them off guard before they can wire funds to an offshore haven.

Yes, but instead of chasing a scammer who has likely vanished, lawyers often target the banks or exchanges that facilitated the transfer. In the UK, new rules now force banks to reimburse victims of “Authorized Push Payment” fraud up to £85,000 in most cases, making it much easier to get your money back directly from your provider. In the US, where Americans lost a record $5.7 billion to investment scams in 2024, lawyers often sue financial institutions for negligence if they ignored obvious red flags while processing the thief’s transactions.

In a fraud lawsuit, you are entitled to be put back in the exact financial position you were in before the lie happened, covering every dollar you lost. Unlike a standard contract dispute where damages are limited, fraud claims allow you to undo the entire deal (“rescission”) and recover all consequential losses. In the US, if the conduct was particularly malicious, you can also ask for “punitive damages”—extra money designed solely to punish the fraudster—though courts generally save these for the most egregious cases.

Fraud is the one thing that can destroy the legal wall protecting a business owner’s personal assets. Normally, a company structure protects directors from personal debt, but if a lawyer can prove the company was a “sham” used primarily to steal money, a judge will “pierce the corporate veil.” This allows you to bypass the company entirely and seize the director’s personal house, car, or savings to satisfy the debt, treating the business and the fraudster as one and the same.

Absolutely, because you cannot find assets hidden in secrecy jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands or British Virgin Islands with a simple internet search. You need a lawyer to obtain specific court orders—like “Norwich Pharmacal Orders” in the UK or “Section 1782” subpoenas in the US—that legally force foreign banks to reveal who really owns an account. Without this legal pressure, offshore banks are bound by strict privacy laws and will simply refuse to tell you where your money went.