Antitrust Lawyers Worldwide.

An Antitrust lawyer (often called a “Competition lawyer” outside the U.S.) ensures that businesses compete fairly and do not manipulate the market to crush their rivals. They play two main roles: counseling, where they advise companies on how to price products and structure deals to avoid breaking the law, and litigation, where they defend companies accused of illegal practices like price-fixing or monopolies. They are also critical during mergers, acting as the bridge to government regulators to prove that combining two massive companies won’t hurt consumers.

You look for “collusion”—secret agreements between competitors to stop fighting each other and start working together against the consumer. Common red flags include “price fixing” (where rivals agree to charge the same amount), “bid rigging” (where companies take turns winning contracts), and “market allocation” (where they agree not to sell in each other’s territories). If you notice that all competitors raise prices simultaneously without a clear economic reason, or if a vendor tells you they “can’t” sell to you because you belong to another company’s territory, you may be witnessing an antitrust violation.

Yes, and doing so quickly is often a race against time due to “leniency programs.” In jurisdictions like the U.S. and UK, the first company to confess their involvement in a price-fixing cartel to the government is often granted total immunity from criminal prosecution. A lawyer negotiates this “marker” with the Department of Justice or the Competition and Markets Authority, securing your safety before your co-conspirators have a chance to turn you in.

The difference is how the company got to the top. It is perfectly legal to become a monopoly by having a superior product, better management, or just being luckier than everyone else (this is a “legal market leader”). It only becomes an illegal monopoly if the company maintains that power through “exclusionary conduct,” such as forcing suppliers not to work with rivals or selling below cost to bankrupt competitors.

Yes, especially if the deal is large enough to trigger mandatory government reporting. In the U.S., under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act, deals over a certain value (approx. $119.5 million in 2024) must be reported to the FTC and DOJ before they can close. A lawyer prepares this complex filing and performs a “competitive impact analysis” to convince regulators that your merger won’t create a monopoly that raises prices for consumers.

Yes, but these are historically difficult cases to win. Predatory pricing is not just having “low prices”; your competitor must prove that you are pricing your goods below your own cost specifically to drive them out of business, and that you plan to recoup those losses by raising prices later (recoupment). A lawyer defends you by proving your low prices are simply “aggressive competition” resulting from efficiency or lower supply costs, which is exactly what the free market is supposed to encourage.

The penalties are among the most severe in the corporate world. In the U.S., criminal violations like price-fixing can lead to 10 years in prison for individuals and fines of up to $100 million for corporations. Additionally, private companies can sue you for “treble damages,” meaning they can collect three times the actual money they lost. In the UK/EU, fines can reach up to 10% of your global annual turnover, which can easily amount to billions of dollars for large tech firms.

An exclusive dealing agreement (where a buyer agrees to buy only from one supplier) is not automatically illegal; it is judged by the “Rule of Reason.” A lawyer analyzes whether the contract locks up so much of the market that new rivals can’t survive. If the agreement is short-term (e.g., one year) and helps lower costs, a lawyer can usually defend it; if it lasts for years and blocks a competitor from accessing necessary supplies, they will advise you to restructure it to avoid a lawsuit.