Our Expert in Vietnam
No results available
Vietnam’s 2026 intellectual property reforms have fundamentally changed the way businesses can leverage their intangible assets, making IP as collateral in Vietnam a legally explicit and practically viable financing tool for the first time. The Amended IP Law, which entered into force on April 1, 2026, together with its two principal implementing instruments, Decree No. 100/2026/ND‑CP and Circular 10/2026/TT‑BKHCN (promulgated March 31, 2026), now provide a clear statutory framework for pledging registered trademarks, patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights as security for loan obligations. This guide delivers the step‑by‑step playbook that foreign brand owners, commercial lenders and in‑house counsel need to structure, perfect, value and enforce IP‑backed security under the new regime.
For readers already familiar with how to protect intellectual property across borders, what follows is the practical next chapter: converting those protected rights into bankable assets in one of Southeast Asia’s fastest‑growing economies.
Yes. Since April 1, 2026, Vietnam’s Amended IP Law expressly recognises that property rights in registered IP, including trademarks, patents, industrial designs and copyrights, may be used to secure obligations, including bank loans. Decree No. 100/2026/ND‑CP details the procedural rules, and Circular 10/2026/TT‑BKHCN sets out the submission and recordation process at the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Viet Nam). The legal basis is now unambiguous: IP rights constitute property rights under Vietnamese civil law, and property rights can be pledged or assigned as security.
Eight‑step action checklist for brand owners and lenders:
Three interconnected instruments now form the statutory backbone of intellectual property financing in Vietnam. Understanding how they interact is essential for any transaction involving IP‑backed loans in Vietnam.
The Amended IP Law, effective April 1, 2026, explicitly confirms that IP rights are a category of property rights eligible for use as collateral and capital contribution. New provisions allow registered trademarks, patents, copyrights and trade secrets to be pledged as security for obligations, a position that was theoretically available under the Civil Code but lacked IP‑specific procedural clarity.
Decree No. 100/2026/ND‑CP implements these provisions in detail. It clarifies assignment rules, stipulating that only valid titles of protection may be assigned, thereby preventing invalid transactions from the outset and strengthening certainty in industrial property transactions. The Decree also introduces Article 10a, addressing rights to objects of industrial property created using artificial intelligence, a forward‑looking addition relevant to technology‑intensive borrowers.
Circular 10/2026/TT‑BKHCN, promulgated by the Minister of Science and Technology on March 31, 2026, provides the administrative guidance on methods for submitting applications for procedures related to industrial property rights. This includes recordation of pledges and security assignments, standard forms, and procedural timelines.
| Date | Instrument | Key Effect |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | Amended IP Law | Establishes explicit legal basis to use IP as bankable collateral; recognises IP rights as property rights eligible for pledge/assignment. |
| March 31, 2026 | Circular 10/2026/TT‑BKHCN | Guidance on submission and recordation procedures for IP matters, including administrative steps for perfecting security interests. |
| 2026 | Decree No. 100/2026/ND‑CP | Implements procedural and enforcement rules, including assignment validity requirements and new articles on AI‑generated industrial property. |
The practical significance is substantial. The Ministry of Information and Communications has framed the reforms as turning IP into “assets that can be valued, traded, booked on balance sheets and used as loan collateral.” For foreign investors entering Vietnam, this creates a new lever to finance operations using intangible assets that were previously difficult to securitise.
While the legal framework is broad, lender appetite and practical enforceability vary significantly across IP categories. Understanding which rights banks will actually accept, and which require additional structuring, is critical to any intellectual property financing strategy in Vietnam.
For a deeper overview of cross‑border IP protection strategies that complement collateral structuring, see the International Intellectual Property guide.
Vietnamese law offers three principal mechanisms for using IP to secure a loan obligation. The choice affects perfection requirements, the borrower’s ability to continue exploiting the IP, and the lender’s enforcement options. When parties assign a trademark as security, for instance, the mechanics differ materially from a simple pledge.
| Feature | Pledge (Thế chấp) | Conditional Assignment | Security Licence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal mechanism | IP remains owned by borrower; lien recorded against the title. | Ownership transfers to lender on default; conditional transfer agreement executed upfront. | Borrower grants lender exclusive licence exercisable on default; ownership unchanged. |
| Borrower continues exploitation? | Yes, borrower retains possession and use rights. | Yes, until default triggers transfer. | Yes, until default activates lender’s licence. |
| Perfection method | Record pledge at IP Viet Nam + register at NRAST. | Record conditional assignment at IP Viet Nam; file at NRAST. | Record licence at IP Viet Nam; covenant in loan agreement. |
| Enforcement speed | Moderate, requires formal enforcement proceedings or agreement to transfer on default. | Faster, pre‑agreed transfer mechanism; recordation of assignment. | Slower, lender must exercise licence rights and may need separate enforcement for full ownership. |
| Lender preference | Most common for Vietnamese bank lending. | Preferred by sophisticated international lenders. | Used as supplementary protection alongside pledge or assignment. |
| Key risk | Enforcement delay; borrower may encumber further without consent if covenants are weak. | Re‑characterisation risk, courts may treat as outright transfer if not carefully drafted. | Weaker security interest; may not survive insolvency without additional perfection. |
Industry observers expect the conditional assignment model to gain traction among international lenders in syndicated facilities, while the pledge structure will remain the default for domestic IP‑backed loans in Vietnam. In many transactions, licensing IP in Vietnam as a supplementary layer of protection is combined with the primary pledge or assignment to give the lender operational control on default.
This practical playbook walks brand owners and lenders through every stage of the process required to perfect an IP security interest under the 2026 reforms. Each step references the applicable legal instrument.
| Document | Purpose | Source / Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
| Certified copy of IP registration certificate | Proves valid title of protection | IP Viet Nam / Grantor |
| IP search report (encumbrance check) | Confirms no prior security interests | IP Viet Nam / NRAST |
| Independent valuation report | Establishes collateral value | Licensed Vietnamese valuation firm |
| Security agreement (notarised, Vietnamese) | Legal instrument creating the security interest | Lender’s counsel / Grantor |
| Board resolution / shareholder approval | Corporate authority to grant security | Grantor |
| Legalised power of attorney (foreign entities) | Authorises Vietnamese representative | Grantor / Embassy / Consulate |
| Licence schedule (all existing licences) | Discloses encumbrances and revenue streams | Grantor |
| Prosecution file summary | Status of applications, oppositions, renewals | IP counsel / Grantor |
| NRAST registration confirmation | Priority perfection against third parties | NRAST / Lender’s counsel |
IP due diligence in Vietnam follows a pattern familiar to international lenders but with jurisdiction‑specific documentation requirements. Banks structuring IP‑backed loans will typically demand the following categories of evidence before approving the facility.
Three approaches dominate IP valuation in Vietnam:
Vietnamese banks typically require the valuation to be conducted by a firm licensed under Vietnam’s valuation law, using Vietnamese valuation standards. International valuation reports (e.g., from Big Four firms) may be accepted as supplementary evidence but are rarely sufficient alone.
| Due Diligence Category | Documents Required | Why Lenders Need It |
|---|---|---|
| Title and ownership | Registration certificates; assignment chain; IP search at IP Viet Nam | Confirms clean title and that the grantor is the legitimate owner. |
| Validity and prosecution | Renewal receipts; prosecution history; pending applications | Ensures the IP will remain valid for the loan tenor; flags risks. |
| Commercialisation evidence | Revenue data; product catalogues; distribution agreements | Supports valuation and demonstrates economic substance. |
| Licence agreements | All existing and historical licences; royalty records | Identifies third‑party rights that may restrict enforcement. |
| Infringement and dispute history | Litigation records; cease‑and‑desist correspondence; customs detention orders | Assesses risk of impairment; may affect valuation. |
| Valuation report | Independent appraisal by licensed Vietnamese valuer | Establishes collateral value for loan‑to‑value ratio. |
| Corporate governance | Charter; resolutions; signing authority; legalised POA | Confirms the entity has authority to grant the security. |
Effective security documentation for IP‑backed lending in Vietnam must address several matters that are unique to intangible collateral. Below are the key drafting elements and illustrative clause guidance.
“The Grantor hereby pledges and grants to the Lender a first‑priority security interest in the IP Collateral (as described in Schedule A), including all rights, title, interest and associated goodwill in: [Registration No. ___], [Registration No. ___], together with all renewals, extensions, proceeds and products thereof, to secure the full and punctual payment and performance of all Secured Obligations.”
All documentation should be prepared bilingually (English and Vietnamese), with the Vietnamese text designated as the prevailing version for purposes of recordation at IP Viet Nam and enforcement before Vietnamese courts or arbitral tribunals.
The enforceability of IP security is the ultimate test of any collateral arrangement. Under the 2026 reforms, lenders have several enforcement pathways, each with distinct timelines and procedural requirements.
| Method | Typical Timeframe | Pros & Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Consensual transfer on default | 30–90 days (if borrower cooperates) | Pro: Fastest and least costly. Con: Requires borrower cooperation; may not work in contested defaults. |
| Court‑ordered transfer / judicial enforcement | 12–24 months | Pro: Binding and enforceable against uncooperative borrowers. Con: Slow; procedural complexity; court fees and legal costs. |
| Auction / public sale | 6–12 months | Pro: Market price realisation; transparent process. Con: Limited buyer pool for niche IP; logistical complexity. |
| Administrative enforcement (IP Viet Nam recordation of transfer) | 60–120 days | Pro: Direct recordation once legal basis established. Con: Requires prior court or arbitral order, or consensual agreement. |
| Customs detention (supplementary) | Immediate, 10 working days initial detention | Pro: Protects collateral value by stopping counterfeit goods. Con: Does not transfer ownership; must be combined with other enforcement. |
In an insolvency scenario, secured creditors with properly perfected security interests generally enjoy priority over unsecured creditors under Vietnamese insolvency law. However, industry observers expect that the interaction between IP‑specific recordation and the general insolvency regime will continue to evolve as case law develops under the new framework. Lenders should ensure dual perfection (IP Viet Nam recordation plus NRAST registration) and maintain up‑to‑date documentation to preserve their priority position.
Three illustrative scenarios demonstrate how IP as collateral in Vietnam works in practice under the 2026 reforms.
Scenario A, Vietnamese SME pledges a trademark to a domestic bank. A Hanoi‑based consumer goods company pledges its flagship trademark (Registration No. 4‑XXXX‑XXXXX) to a Vietnamese commercial bank to secure a VND 20 billion working capital facility. The company provides the registration certificate, a licensed valuation report and board resolutions. The pledge is recorded at IP Viet Nam and registered at NRAST. The bank monitors renewal dates and requires the borrower to notify it before granting any new licences.
Scenario B, Foreign brand uses patents as security in a syndicated facility. A European technology company with Vietnamese utility solution registrations uses those patents as part of a multi‑jurisdictional security package for a USD 50 million syndicated loan. The Vietnamese security tranche requires a conditional assignment agreement, an independent Vietnamese valuation, consular legalisation of the parent company’s board resolutions and power of attorney, and dual recordation. An intercreditor agreement governs the relationship between the Vietnamese secured assets and the global security pool.
Scenario C, Lender forecloses and enforces after default. Following a payment default, a lender holding a recorded pledge over three trademark registrations issues a default notice. The borrower refuses to cooperate with a consensual transfer. The lender obtains a court order directing IP Viet Nam to record the transfer. Simultaneously, the lender files customs watch requests at key ports to prevent counterfeit products from depleting brand value during the enforcement period. The transfer is completed and recorded within approximately 18 months from default notice.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact D&N International at D&N International, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
Organisations considering using IP as collateral in Vietnam under the 2026 reforms should take the following immediate steps:
For practical templates, including a due diligence request list, sample security agreement clauses and a recordation filing checklist, readers should refer to the supporting resources in this content series: Preparing Trademarks & Patents for Financing in Vietnam, IP Due Diligence & Valuation for Vietnamese Collateral, and Enforcement & Foreclosure: Protecting Lenders’ Interests in IP in Vietnam.
posted 12 minutes ago
posted 37 minutes ago
posted 59 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message