Our Expert in Greece
No results available
The criminalisation of illegal stay in Greece under Law 5275/2026 represents one of the most consequential shifts in the country’s migration framework in over a decade. Published in the Government Gazette in February 2026, the law upgrades what were previously administrative migration infractions, overstaying a visa, remaining without a valid residence permit, into criminal offences carrying imprisonment and substantial fines. For employers, landlords and NGOs operating in Greece, the practical effect is immediate: a broader range of everyday business decisions now carries potential criminal liability, and the facilitation offences in the law extend exposure well beyond the individual migrant.
Before reading the full analysis, note these critical points:
Greece’s migration legal framework has undergone rapid evolution. The trajectory that culminated in Law 5275/2026 began with legislative amendments in September 2025, when the Greek Parliament approved initial changes to the Criminal Code and migration statutes that signalled an intention to treat irregular stay as a criminal rather than purely administrative matter. Those amendments drew significant international attention, with outlets such as The Guardian and InfoMigrants reporting on the policy direction in early September 2025.
Law 5275/2026 consolidated and extended those changes. Published in the Government Gazette in February 2026, it established a comprehensive new immigration code that replaced and repealed large sections of the prior legislative framework. The law introduces criminal sanctions for illegal stay, defined as remaining on Greek territory without a valid visa, residence permit or other lawful authorisation, and significantly broadens the scope of facilitation offences to capture a wider range of conduct by third parties.
Industry observers expect that the combined effect of these provisions will be to shift enforcement focus from deportation-centric administrative procedures towards criminal prosecution, creating a fundamentally different risk environment for anyone who interacts with third-country nationals in a professional or organisational capacity.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| September 2025 | Greek Parliament approves initial Criminal Code amendments targeting irregular migration; international press coverage signals policy direction |
| February 2026 | Law 5275/2026 published in the Government Gazette, establishing the new comprehensive immigration code with criminal sanctions for illegal stay |
| February–March 2026 | Major Greek and international law firms (Bernitsas Law, Kyriakides Georgopoulos, PwC, EY) publish practitioner briefings on employer obligations and compliance implications |
| March–May 2026 | Early enforcement actions reported; RSAegean documents close to 300 individuals imprisoned under the new criminalisation provisions |
Under Law 5275/2026, illegal stay in Greece is defined as the presence of a third-country national on Greek territory without holding a valid visa, residence permit or other form of lawful authorisation as specified by the law or by EU regulations. This definition is broader than many practitioners initially anticipated. It captures not only individuals who entered Greece unlawfully but also those who entered legally, on a tourist visa, student visa or work permit, and subsequently remained after their authorisation expired or was revoked.
The criminal provisions require the prosecution to establish that the individual was present on Greek territory and that they lacked valid authorisation at the time. The law treats this as a standalone offence, meaning that it is not necessary to prove any additional criminal intent beyond the fact of remaining without documentation. However, aggravating circumstances can increase the severity of charges and penalties. These include repeat offences, the use of fraudulent documents, evading a prior deportation order, and conducting illegal employment while in irregular status.
The facilitation offences operate on a separate but related track. Under Law 5275/2026, any person who knowingly assists, facilitates, transports, harbours or conceals a third-country national in illegal stay may face prosecution. The critical legal question, and one that remains partially ambiguous, is the precise scope of the mens rea (mental element) required. The law references knowledge as the threshold, but how courts will interpret “knowledge” in the context of landlord-tenant relationships, employer-employee verification failures, or NGO humanitarian operations has not yet been tested in appellate case law.
| Offence | Typical Penalty Range |
|---|---|
| Illegal stay (basic offence) | Imprisonment; re-entry ban; administrative fine |
| Illegal stay with aggravating factors (repeat offence, fraudulent documents, evasion of deportation) | Enhanced imprisonment; extended re-entry ban |
| Facilitation of illegal entry or stay (basic) | Imprisonment and fine |
| Facilitation with profit motive or organised activity | Significantly enhanced imprisonment and fines |
| Employment of third-country nationals without valid permits | Imprisonment, administrative fines, potential business sanctions |
The criminalisation of illegal stay under Law 5275/2026 creates exposure not only for the individuals who lack valid documentation but also, and this is the critical compliance concern, for a range of third parties whose interactions with those individuals may be characterised as facilitation. Three categories of organisation face the most acute risk: employers, landlords and NGOs.
An employer who hires a third-country national without verifying that the individual holds a valid work permit faces criminal prosecution under the facilitation and employment provisions of Law 5275/2026. This extends beyond direct hiring. As Bernitsas Law and Siopi Law have noted in their practitioner briefings, the law imposes obligations throughout the employment chain, including on temporary employment agencies (TEAs) and companies that engage subcontractors. If a subcontractor’s workforce includes individuals in illegal stay, the principal employer may face exposure depending on the level of knowledge or wilful blindness that can be demonstrated.
The likely practical effect will be that prosecutors focus on cases where there is documented evidence of awareness, payroll records showing expired permit numbers, internal emails flagging documentation gaps, or repeated engagement of labour intermediaries known to use irregular workers.
Landlords who rent residential or commercial property to individuals in illegal stay may be prosecuted for harbouring or facilitating illegal stay. The risk is particularly acute for landlords in areas with high concentrations of migrant populations, where short-term rentals may be concluded without thorough identity and documentation checks. The knowledge threshold is the key legal battleground: a landlord who copies a passport and residence permit at the start of a lease and retains those records occupies a very different legal position from one who accepts cash payments with no documentation.
Early indications suggest that enforcement agencies are examining rental records and cross-referencing them against residence permit databases, creating a tangible and growing risk for landlords who have not updated their tenant verification procedures.
The broadened facilitation offences in Law 5275/2026 have generated the most controversy in the NGO sector. Organisations providing humanitarian assistance, food distribution, legal aid, search and rescue coordination, temporary shelter, face the risk that their activities could be characterised as facilitating illegal entry or stay. The law does not contain an explicit, broadly drafted humanitarian exception that would unambiguously shield all forms of assistance. While certain narrow exceptions may apply (for example, emergency medical care), the boundaries remain unclear and untested in court.
RSAegean and other civil society organisations have reported that the enforcement environment has already affected NGO operations, with some organisations scaling back activities or relocating operational decision-making outside Greece to reduce the personal criminal exposure of local staff and volunteers. For any NGO operating in Greece, a formal legal risk assessment, conducted by criminal defence counsel with specific experience in facilitation offences, is now essential.
The penalty structure under Law 5275/2026 represents a significant escalation from the prior administrative framework. Where previously an individual found in illegal stay might face a deportation order and an administrative re-entry ban, the criminal provisions now authorise custodial sentences. For facilitation offences committed with a profit motive or as part of an organised network, the sentences are substantially heavier.
Enforcement practice in the months since the law’s publication has been aggressive. RSAegean has documented that close to 300 people have been imprisoned under the new provisions, indicating that prosecutors are actively pursuing criminal charges rather than defaulting to administrative deportation. For third parties, employers, landlords, NGOs, the enforcement risk manifests differently. Investigations may begin with labour inspections, police visits to rental properties, or surveillance of NGO operations, and can escalate rapidly to criminal prosecution if evidence of knowledge or facilitation is identified.
Procedural rights remain governed by the Greek Code of Criminal Procedure. Any person under investigation or arrested has the right to legal counsel from the moment of arrest, the right to remain silent, the right to be informed of the charges, and the right to contest pre-trial detention. For organisations, the critical procedural concern is that employees, managers or volunteers may be questioned by police before the organisation’s legal team is aware of the investigation. This makes pre-incident planning, clear internal protocols on who to contact and what to say, essential.
The following entity-specific checklists translate the legal requirements of Law 5275/2026 into concrete operational steps. Each checklist should be reviewed by specialist counsel and adapted to the specific circumstances of the organisation.
| Entity | Potential Criminal Exposure | Key Immediate Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Employer | Hiring or retaining workers without valid permits; facilitation through wilful blindness to subcontractor non-compliance | Verify right to work; implement permit tracking system; contractual subcontractor warranties; engage criminal counsel |
| Landlord | Renting to individuals in illegal stay; harbouring or facilitating through continued tenancy without verification | ID and permit checks at lease signing; periodic re-verification; retain all records; consult counsel before action |
| NGO / Volunteer | Facilitating entry, transport or housing; broad facilitation exposure for solidarity activities | Formal legal risk assessment; written SOPs; legal sign-off for transport and shelter activities; volunteer training |
When an investigation begins, whether through a police visit, a labour inspection, or a formal summons, the actions taken in the first hours are critical. The following defence playbook outlines the immediate triage steps that employers, landlords and NGOs should follow.
Immediate actions (first 24 hours):
Available defence strategies include:
For HR managers, landlords or NGO staff approached by police or investigators:
Do not volunteer information, speculate about colleagues’ activities, or consent to a search beyond what is legally required without legal advice. Consult the lawyer directory if you do not already have criminal defence counsel in place.
Organisations seeking to minimise criminal exposure under Law 5275/2026 should embed compliance into their standard documentation. The following clause headings and templates should be reviewed and adapted by legal counsel to suit specific operational circumstances.
Recommended clause headings for employment contracts:
Recommended clause headings for subcontractor agreements:
Recommended clause headings for lease agreements:
For NGO memoranda of understanding and volunteer agreements:
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Konstantinos Darivas at Darivas Law Firm & Partners, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
The legal landscape surrounding illegal stay in Greece is evolving rapidly. Organisations should monitor the Hellenic Ministry of Migration and Asylum for updated guidance and implementing regulations. The official Government Gazette text of Law 5275/2026 remains the authoritative reference for all statutory provisions. Those with interests in related areas should review the Greece Golden Visa 2026 changes for broader immigration policy context.
For urgent matters, including active investigations, arrests or requests for policy review, specialist criminal defence counsel should be engaged without delay.
posted 17 minutes ago
posted 39 minutes ago
posted 54 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message