Our Expert in Indonesia
No results available
Understanding how to register a trademark in Indonesia has become materially easier, and faster, since Minister of Law Regulation No. 5 of 2026 (“Regulation 5/2026”) took effect on 23 February 2026. The new regulation replaces the decade-old Ministerial Regulation No. 67 of 2016, accelerates administrative timelines at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP/DJKI), mandates fully digital filing, and introduces alternative document requirements for micro and small enterprises. This guide walks in-house counsel, brand owners and IP managers through every stage of the DGIP trademark Indonesia workflow, from clearance search to certificate issuance, together with the updated costs, opposition windows and practical risk-mitigation strategies that apply under the 2026 regime.
Yes, in principle. Regulation 5/2026 establishes what practitioners now call the “six‑month standard” by compressing the administrative time limits for formality checks, substantive examination and the publication period. The DGIP’s stated objective is to move a straightforward, unopposed application from filing to registration within approximately six months.
Important caveats apply. The six‑month target assumes no substantive refusal is issued, no third-party opposition is filed during the publication period, and no priority claim requires additional verification. Where an office action is raised, the applicant’s response time is added to the clock. If a trademark opposition Indonesia proceeding is initiated, the total timeline can extend to twelve months or more, depending on the complexity of the dispute and any appeal.
The practical effect, according to industry observers, is that brand owners filing clean, well-prepared applications in straightforward trademark classes Indonesia 2026 can expect a significantly shorter wait than the twelve-to-eighteen-month average that prevailed under the prior regime. Early indications suggest that the DGIP’s digital-first infrastructure is already reducing formality-check bottlenecks.
The following five-step process reflects DGIP practice as updated by Regulation 5/2026. Each step includes the estimated timeframe under the new regime and the key documents or actions required.
Before filing, conduct a comprehensive Indonesia trademark search to identify potential conflicts. The DGIP maintains a publicly accessible online database (the DJKI trademark search portal) where applicants can check word marks, figurative elements and device marks across all Nice Classification classes.
A thorough clearance search should cover:
Engaging a local IP agent to conduct a professional clearance search with written opinion is strongly recommended. The small upfront cost can prevent a costly refusal or opposition later in the process.
Regulation 5/2026 clarifies and, in some cases, simplifies the documentary requirements. The table below summarises the documents needed by applicant type.
| Applicant type | Required documents |
|---|---|
| Indonesian company (PT) | Company deed and amendments; tax identification number (NPWP); identity card (KTP) of authorised signatory; power of attorney (if using an agent); trademark specimen (JPEG/PNG, min. 2×2 cm at 300 dpi); class and goods/services listing |
| Foreign company | Certificate of incorporation (legalised/apostilled); power of attorney to Indonesian-registered IP agent (mandatory); trademark specimen; class and goods/services listing; priority document (if claiming convention priority) |
| Micro/small enterprise (UMK) | KTP; OSS (Online Single Submission) business number or UMK recommendation letter from local government; trademark specimen; class and goods/services listing |
The DGIP now accepts alternative business-identification documents for micro and small enterprises, including OSS registration numbers and UMK recommendation letters, making the Regulation 5/2026 trademark filing process more accessible to smaller Indonesian businesses.
Under Regulation 5/2026, the DGIP has moved to a fully digital filing model. The non-electronic (paper-based) channel has been formally discontinued for new applications. All filings must be submitted through the DGIP’s online trademark application portal (merek.dgip.go.id).
Key practical tips for the filing stage:
Once the application is submitted and the fee confirmed, the DGIP issues a filing receipt with a filing date and application number. This filing date is critical, it establishes priority against later-filed identical or similar marks.
The DGIP conducts a two-phase review. The formality examination verifies that the application is complete: correct documents, fee payment, specimen quality and class listing. Regulation 5/2026 shortens the window for this check, and industry observers expect formality clearance within days rather than weeks for well-prepared filings.
The substantive examination assesses whether the mark is registrable. The examiner reviews absolute grounds (distinctiveness, descriptiveness, public order, deceptive elements) and relative grounds (similarity to prior marks). Regulation 5/2026 introduces an additional category of non-registrable trademarks under the absolute grounds for refusal, marks that are contrary to prevailing moral values or public interest standards are now explicitly cited.
If the examiner raises an objection, the applicant receives an office action and must respond within the stipulated deadline. Failure to respond results in the application being deemed withdrawn. Under the accelerated timeline of Regulation 5/2026, response windows are tighter, so prompt engagement with a local IP agent is essential.
Marks that pass substantive examination enter the publication period Indonesia trademark owners should monitor carefully. The approved mark is published in the official DGIP gazette for a two-month period during which any third party may file an opposition.
If no opposition is filed, the DGIP issues the certificate of registration. If an opposition is filed, the matter proceeds to an opposition examination (discussed in detail below). Once registered, the trademark is valid for ten years from the filing date and is renewable indefinitely in ten-year increments.
The most significant practical impact of Regulation 5/2026 is the compression of processing times. The table below compares the typical experience under the prior regime with the targets established by the new regulation.
| Stage | Pre‑2026 (typical under Reg 67/2016) | Post‑2026 (Regulation 5/2026 target) |
|---|---|---|
| Formality examination | 15–30 days | Significantly reduced (days, not weeks) |
| Substantive examination | 6–12 months | Target completion within approximately 3–4 months |
| Publication period | 2 months | 2 months (unchanged) |
| Opposition window | 2 months from publication | 2 months from publication (unchanged) |
| Certificate issuance (if unopposed) | 12–18 months total | Approximately 6 months total |
The two-month publication and opposition period remains unchanged because it is set by the parent statute, Law No. 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications. What Regulation 5/2026 compresses is the administrative processing on either side of that window, formality review, substantive examination and post-publication certificate issuance.
| Date | Event | Practical effect |
|---|---|---|
| 13 January 2026 | Permenkum No. 5/2026 adopted by the Minister of Law | Regulatory text finalised; DGIP begins system preparation |
| 23 February 2026 | Regulation 5/2026 enters into force | All new applications subject to new timelines, digital-only filing and updated documentary requirements |
| 23 February 2026 | Ministerial Regulation No. 67 of 2016 (as amended 2021) formally revoked | Prior procedural rules no longer apply; transitional provisions govern pending applications |
Applicants who filed before 23 February 2026 may benefit from transitional provisions under Regulation 5/2026 that allow the DGIP to apply the new accelerated examination procedures to pending applications. The likely practical effect will be a gradual reduction in the existing backlog throughout 2026.
Understanding trademark cost Indonesia figures is essential for budgeting, whether you are filing a single national mark or building a multi-class portfolio. The table below provides a representative fee structure.
| Item | Official fee (IDR) | Typical agent fee (range) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application filing, one class (standard/online) | IDR 1,800,000 | IDR 3,000,000 – 7,000,000 | UMK applicants may qualify for a reduced official fee |
| Each additional class | IDR 1,800,000 per class | IDR 1,500,000 – 3,000,000 per class | Multi-class filings save time but multiply fees |
| Opposition filing (by opponent) | IDR 500,000 | IDR 5,000,000 – 15,000,000+ | Agent fees vary significantly based on complexity |
| Renewal (per class, every 10 years) | IDR 2,000,000 | IDR 2,000,000 – 5,000,000 | Late renewal surcharges apply if filed after expiry |
| Madrid Protocol designation (Indonesia) | CHF 100 (individual fee) | Varies by home-country agent | WIPO fee schedule; national processing by DGIP follows same substantive exam |
Agent fees vary widely depending on the complexity of the mark, the number of classes, whether a clearance search is included and the agent’s level of involvement in prosecution. For a single-class, straightforward word-mark application, brand owners should budget approximately IDR 5,000,000 to IDR 9,000,000 in total (official fee plus agent fee). Multi-class or complex filings involving figurative elements, colour claims or priority documents will be at the higher end of the range.
Trademark opposition Indonesia proceedings remain a significant risk factor for any filing, even under the streamlined Regulation 5/2026 regime. The opposition window opens on the first day of the two-month publication period and closes at its end.
Third parties may oppose on both absolute grounds (the mark is generic, descriptive, deceptive or contrary to public order) and relative grounds (the mark is confusingly similar to an earlier registered or well-known mark). Regulation 5/2026 broadens the absolute grounds by adding explicit reference to marks that conflict with prevailing moral values.
Once an opposition is filed, the DGIP notifies the applicant, who is given an opportunity to file a counter-statement and supporting evidence. The examiner then issues a decision. If the opposition succeeds, the application is refused. If it fails, the mark proceeds to registration. Either party may appeal to the Trademark Appeal Commission and, subsequently, to the Commercial Court.
Brand owners who proactively monitor the DGIP gazette during publication can also use the opposition mechanism offensively, filing oppositions against later marks that conflict with their own rights. A watching service is strongly recommended for portfolio protection.
Indonesia has been a member of the Madrid Protocol since 2018, giving international brand owners a streamlined route to designate Indonesia through a single application filed at WIPO via the applicant’s home trademark office. The Madrid Protocol Indonesia trademark route can be cost-effective when filing across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously.
However, the Madrid route has practical considerations. The designated mark remains subject to DGIP substantive examination, including the new standards under Regulation 5/2026, and any refusal must be handled by a locally registered IP agent. The five-year dependency period means that if the home registration is cancelled or restricted within five years, the Indonesian designation may fall with it. For applicants focused solely on Indonesia, a direct national filing often provides more control and, under the new six‑month standard, comparable speed.
Early indications suggest that Regulation 5/2026’s accelerated administrative procedures also apply to the national phase of Madrid designations, potentially reducing DGIP processing times for international registrations entering Indonesia.
Before filing, work through this ten-point checklist to minimise risk and accelerate your path to registration under Regulation 5/2026:
Regulation 5/2026 represents the most significant update to Indonesian trademark procedure in a decade. Whether you are filing a single mark for a new product launch or managing a multi-class portfolio across Southeast Asia, the accelerated timelines and digital-first process at the DGIP offer real advantages, but only for applicants who prepare thoroughly and engage experienced local counsel. To register a trademark in Indonesia efficiently under the new regime, secure professional guidance at the earliest stage of clearance and filing to avoid costly delays, oppositions or refusals.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Ardhiyasa Suratman at A&CO Law Office, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 2 minutes ago
posted 20 minutes ago
posted 46 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message