Our Expert in Australia
No results available
Last updated: 13 May 2026
Family mediation in Australia entered a new regulatory era on 1 April 2025, when the Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2025 replaced the previous framework governing how accredited mediators screen parties, issue certificates and manage their professional obligations. For separating couples, the changes reshape what to expect at intake, how safety is assessed and what happens to a mediated agreement once the sessions end. For family dispute resolution (FDR) practitioners, the Regulations impose updated duties around recordkeeping, family violence screening and the content of Section 60I certificates, the documents that open the door to parenting proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
This guide provides a single, practitioner-informed resource covering every stage of the process: understanding the regulatory changes, preparing for mediation, meeting compliance obligations, and converting mediated outcomes into enforceable consent orders or binding financial agreements.
Key takeaways, what you need to do now:
The Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2025 are the primary legislative instrument governing who can practise as an accredited family mediator in Australia and what duties they owe to the parties and the court system. The Regulations commenced on 1 April 2025, replacing the Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2008 that had been in force for over sixteen years. According to the Attorney-General’s Department, the new instrument modernises practitioner standards, tightens family violence screening requirements and updates the rules around the Section 60I certificates that separating parents need before they can file most parenting applications.
The FDR Regulations Australia framework affects every registered FDR practitioner, whether working through a Family Relationship Centre, a community legal service, Relationships Australia or in private practice. Industry observers expect the practical effect to be felt most sharply in three areas: intake and screening, certificate issuance and ongoing professional development.
| Date | Instrument / Change | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|
| 1 April 2025 | Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2025, commencement | New practitioner duties commence, revised certificate requirements take effect, updated screening and recordkeeping obligations apply to all registered FDR practitioners. |
| 10 June 2025 | Family Law Act property reforms commenced | Courts now consider the economic effect of family violence in property settlements, directly relevant to mediator-led property discussions, financial disclosures and the framing of consent orders. |
| 29 April 2026 | GLE: Family Mediation Changes Australia 2026 (practitioner summary published) | Consolidated practitioner summary of the combined effect of the FDR Regulations 2025 and the Family Law Act property reforms on mediation practice. |
If you are separating and considering mediation, the FDR Regulations 2025 affect you in two primary ways: the screening you will experience at intake is now more structured, and the certificates your mediator issues carry updated procedural weight in court. Understanding what to expect, and how to prepare, helps you get the most out of the process.
Preparation is the single most significant factor separating productive mediation from wasted sessions. Before your first appointment, gather the following:
Family Relationships Online, a service of the Australian Government, provides practical resources for parents preparing for family dispute resolution, including information about confidentiality and what mediation can and cannot achieve.
Under the FDR Regulations 2025, every accredited practitioner must conduct a structured safety assessment before mediation begins. This screening is confidential and typically involves a separate telephone or in-person interview with each party. The practitioner will ask about the history of the relationship, any experience of family violence, including physical, emotional, psychological, financial and technology-facilitated abuse, and whether there are current safety concerns for either party or the children.
Mediation and family violence in Australia intersect in important ways. If the practitioner determines that FDR is not appropriate, because there is a serious risk to safety, because the power imbalance between the parties is too great to allow fair negotiation, or because one party is unable to participate freely, the practitioner can issue a certificate stating that FDR is not appropriate. That certificate allows the affected party to proceed directly to court without completing mediation.
If you have experienced family violence: You are not required to mediate with a person who has been violent towards you. Tell the FDR practitioner during intake screening, this information is confidential and will not be shared with the other party. If you are in immediate danger, contact 000. For specialist family violence support, contact 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732) or, for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander support, contact 1800 019 123.
The FDR Regulations 2025 do not merely relabel existing obligations. They introduce a more prescriptive compliance framework that every accredited family mediator in Australia must follow. The Attorney-General’s Department has published detailed implementation guidance, and the WA Family Law Pathways Network hosted a national information session shortly after commencement. Practitioners who have not yet reviewed these materials should do so as a matter of priority.
The Regulations mandate that screening for family violence and child safety concerns occurs before any joint session and must be revisited if circumstances change during the FDR process. In practical terms, this means:
Section 60I of the Family Law Act requires that, for most parenting applications filed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court, the applicant must first obtain a certificate from a registered FDR practitioner. The FDR Regulations 2025 update both the form and the circumstances under which each category of certificate is issued. Practitioners must now document:
Records must be retained for the period prescribed in the Regulations and must be producible if requested by the regulatory authority in connection with a complaint or audit. The Mediation Institute has published a practitioner-focused summary of the recordkeeping changes that is a useful cross-reference alongside the AGD guidance.
The Regulations acknowledge that FDR is increasingly conducted by video conference and telephone, a shift accelerated by COVID-era practice and now embedded in standard service delivery. Industry observers expect the following areas to receive close regulatory attention in the months ahead:
A mediated agreement, whether it covers parenting arrangements, property division or both, is not, by itself, legally enforceable in Australia. To give a mediated outcome the force of law, the parties must take one of two pathways: applying for consent orders through the Federal Circuit and Family Court, or entering into a binding financial agreement (BFA) under the Family Law Act. The pathway you choose depends on whether the agreement involves parenting matters, financial matters, or both.
For parenting arrangements, consent orders are the standard mechanism for turning a mediation agreement into an order. For property and spousal maintenance, consent orders are the most common route where both parties agree on the division. The Federal Circuit and Family Court provides guidance on the application process.
The key steps to preparing a mediation consent order application are:
For financial matters only, parties may choose to enter into a binding financial agreement mediation outcome rather than applying for consent orders. A BFA is a private contract that, if properly executed, excludes the court’s jurisdiction to make property or spousal maintenance orders.
A BFA reached through mediation must satisfy strict validity requirements:
Industry observers note that BFAs negotiated through mediation can be vulnerable to challenge if the screening and disclosure process was inadequate, or if one party can later show that the agreement was entered into under duress or without full financial disclosure. The likely practical effect of the FDR Regulations 2025 is to make properly documented mediation processes a stronger foundation for BFA validity, because the enhanced screening and recordkeeping requirements create a clearer evidentiary record of the conditions under which the agreement was reached.
Not every family dispute can or should proceed through mediation. The family dispute resolution regulations explicitly recognise circumstances where FDR is inappropriate, and the law provides alternative pathways for urgent and high-risk matters.
Exemptions from the requirement to attempt FDR before filing a parenting application include situations where there are reasonable grounds to believe that there has been family violence or child abuse, where the matter is urgent (for example, a child is at risk of being removed from Australia), or where one party is unable to participate effectively due to incapacity or geographical remoteness. In such cases, the court may grant leave to file without a Section 60I certificate.
The Family Law Act property reforms that commenced on 10 June 2025 introduced an explicit requirement for courts to consider the economic effect of family violence when determining property settlements. This change has direct implications for family mediation in Australia, mediators discussing property division must now ensure that both parties understand how economic abuse (controlling finances, preventing a partner from working, accumulating debt in the other party’s name) may be treated by a court if the matter proceeds to litigation.
For FDR practitioners, this means that property-related mediation sessions should include a discussion of how economic abuse, if present, affects the fairness of any proposed financial settlement. Early indications suggest that courts are scrutinising consent orders more closely where family violence has been alleged, to ensure that proposed settlements reflect the legislative intent.
If a mediated financial agreement appears unconscionable, grossly unfair to one party, or was signed under duress, it may be set aside by the court. Warning signs include:
If you believe that a mediated agreement you have signed is unconscionable or was entered into under duress, seek independent legal advice immediately. A family lawyer can assess whether there are grounds to have the agreement set aside and what alternative remedies are available.
The following checklists and sample wording are provided as starting points. All sample language should be reviewed by a qualified family lawyer before use, mediated agreements and consent orders must reflect the specific circumstances of each matter.
Note: This sample is illustrative only and must be reviewed by a qualified family lawyer before filing. Legal review required.
“BY CONSENT, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The child [Name], born [Date], shall live with [Party A].
2. The child shall spend time with [Party B] each alternate weekend from Friday at 4:00 pm to Sunday at 6:00 pm, with [Party B] responsible for collection and return.
3. The child shall spend half of each school holiday period with each parent, alternating the first half each year.
4. Each party shall have the child on that party’s birthday and on [specified public holidays] in alternating years.”
Note: Legal review required before inclusion in any binding financial agreement.
“The parties acknowledge that the terms of this Agreement were negotiated with the assistance of an accredited Family Dispute Resolution practitioner, registered under the Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2025. Each party has received independent legal advice from a separate legal practitioner prior to executing this Agreement, as certified by the annexed certificates.”
The Family Dispute Resolution Regulations 2025 represent the most significant update to the family mediation in Australia framework in nearly two decades. For separating couples, the changes mean a safer, more structured intake process and clearer pathways from mediated agreement to enforceable court order. For FDR practitioners, they demand a careful review of screening tools, certificate templates and recordkeeping systems. For family lawyers advising clients before, during or after mediation, familiarity with both the FDR Regulations and the Family Law Act property reforms is now essential to providing competent, current advice.
Whether you are preparing for your first mediation session or updating your practice to comply with the new requirements, the key is to act now, review the regulatory guidance, gather the right documents and seek specialist legal advice where needed. To find an accredited mediation lawyer in Australia, visit the Global Law Experts directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Jodylee Bartal at Schetzer Papaleo Family Lawyers, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 9 minutes ago
posted 28 minutes ago
posted 53 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message