Our Expert in South Africa
No results available
South Africa’s Budget 2026, effective 1 March 2026, introduced changes that directly reshape how high-net-worth individuals, trustees and family offices approach lifetime transfers and deceased-estate structuring. The annual donations tax exemption has been raised to R150,000 per donor, capital gains tax rules on deemed disposals at death have been adjusted, and the primary residence CGT exclusion has been updated, all of which create new planning opportunities and compliance obligations. For estate planning lawyers South Africa practitioners rely on, the window to act is now: clients who restructure before the current tax year ends stand to reduce estate duty exposure materially.
This guide sets out the legal mechanics, practical drafting steps, worked numerical examples and executor checklists that HNW clients and their advisors need following these 2026 changes.
TL;DR: From 1 March 2026, each natural-person donor in South Africa may donate up to R150,000 per tax year free of donations tax (previously R100,000). CGT at death rules and the primary residence exclusion have been adjusted. Together, these changes allow more aggressive, but carefully documented, lifetime-transfer strategies to reduce estate duty.
Short answer: The donations tax exemption 2026 increase to R150,000 per donor per year is the headline change. Alongside this, the Budget confirmed adjustments to the CGT treatment of deemed disposals at death, including an updated primary residence exclusion amount, creating a more nuanced interaction between lifetime giving and death-event taxation.
The National Treasury’s Budget Speech 2026 and the accompanying Budget Review document confirmed three sets of changes relevant to estate planning in South Africa:
| Change | Pre-Budget 2026 Position | Post-1 March 2026 Position |
|---|---|---|
| Annual donations tax exemption (natural persons) | R100,000 per donor per year | R150,000 per donor per year |
| CGT annual exclusion at death | R300,000 | Adjusted upward (per Budget Review inflationary recalculation) |
| Primary residence CGT exclusion at death | R2 million | Updated per Budget Review (primary residence CGT exclusion now reflects revised thresholds) |
| Estate duty rates | 20% (≤ R30m) / 25% (> R30m) | Unchanged |
| Section 4A abatement | R3.5 million | Unchanged |
Industry observers expect the R150,000 donations exemption to become a central building block in multi-year estate-reduction strategies for South African HNW families. The practical effect will be that a married couple can now transfer up to R300,000 per year out of their combined estates without triggering any donations tax.
Short answer: The R150,000 donations exemption is measured per donor, not per recipient. Each natural person may donate up to R150,000 across all recipients in a tax year without incurring donations tax. Proper documentation and valuation are essential.
A frequent misconception is that the R150,000 threshold applies per recipient. It does not. Section 56(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act limits the exemption to R150,000 per donor in aggregate across all donations made during the tax year. A donor who gives R100,000 to one child and R60,000 to another has used R160,000 in aggregate, exceeding the exemption by R10,000, and donations tax at 20% would apply to that R10,000 excess.
This means record-keeping across multiple recipients is critical. Practitioners should maintain a running register of all donations made by each client during the tax year, including non-cash transfers valued at market value on the date of donation.
Spouses may each utilise their own R150,000 exemption independently. Donations between spouses are exempt from donations tax under section 56(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act (there is no cap on interspousal donations), but this exemption must not be confused with the annual R150,000 threshold for donations to third parties. The practical implication: a husband and wife can together donate up to R300,000 per year to children or trusts without incurring donations tax, provided each spouse makes a genuine, separate donation from assets they own or control.
Indirect gifts, such as a husband funding a donation that the wife purports to make, will be scrutinised. SARS may look through the arrangement and attribute the donation to the true donor under the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in sections 80A–80L of the Income Tax Act, or under the specific attribution rules in sections 7(2)–7(8).
The valuation date for a donation is the date on which the donation takes effect, typically the date of transfer for cash, or the date of cession/registration for other assets. Non-cash donations must be valued at open-market value on that date. Best practice for estate planning lawyers South Africa-wide is to advise clients to:
Short answer: Any lifetime donation of a capital asset is a disposal for CGT purposes. CGT at death South Africa rules treat a deceased person’s assets as disposed of at market value on the date of death, subject to exclusions. The interaction between these two regimes determines whether it is more tax-efficient to give during life or on death.
When a donor transfers a capital asset (shares, immovable property, collectibles) as a donation, paragraph 38 of the Eighth Schedule deems the disposal to take place at market value on the date of the donation, regardless of the actual consideration (which in a donation is nil). This means the donor may realise a capital gain, the difference between the market value on the date of donation and the original base cost, and that gain is subject to CGT in the donor’s hands.
The effective CGT rate for individuals (at the maximum marginal tax rate of 45%) is currently 18% (i.e., 40% inclusion rate × 45% marginal rate). Importantly, the donor’s annual CGT exclusion of R40,000 (during life) can offset a portion of the gain, but this exclusion is modest relative to HNW asset values.
The Eighth Schedule treats death as a deemed disposal at market value. However, the annual CGT exclusion at death is significantly higher than the lifetime exclusion, the Budget 2026 Review adjusted this amount upward from R300,000. This larger exclusion can shelter a meaningful portion of gains that have accrued over a lifetime.
Executors must calculate the capital gain on every asset in the deceased estate, apply the death exclusion, and include the net gain in the deceased’s final tax return. The resulting CGT is a charge against the estate and must be settled before the estate can be wound up.
The primary residence CGT exclusion shelters gains on a qualifying primary residence from CGT. The Budget 2026 Review confirmed an updated exclusion amount for disposals at death. This exclusion applies only if the property was the deceased’s primary residence as defined in paragraph 44 of the Eighth Schedule. If a donor transfers a primary residence during life (as a donation), the lifetime primary residence exclusion, which has a lower threshold, applies instead, and the donor also triggers donations tax on any value above R150,000.
The practical lesson for lifetime transfers estate planning is significant: in most cases, holding a primary residence until death will yield a better CGT outcome than donating it during life, because the death exclusion is higher and estate duty can be managed through other mechanisms (such as the section 4(q) spousal deduction).
Short answer: Lifetime donations reduce estate duty South Africa exposure by removing assets from the dutiable estate before death. However, the donation must be genuine and unconditional, with no reservation of benefit. Anti-avoidance provisions can claw assets back into the estate if the transfer is not properly structured.
An unconditional cash donation of R150,000 or less per year is the simplest estate-reduction tool. The amount leaves the donor’s estate immediately, no donations tax is payable, and the cash is not a capital asset (so no CGT arises). Over time, a systematic annual donation programme can transfer substantial wealth out of an estate.
Conditional donations, where the donor attaches conditions that effectively retain control or benefit, are problematic. Section 3(3)(d) of the Estate Duty Act may deem property to be included in the estate of the deceased if the donation was made subject to a condition that has not been fulfilled at the date of death, or if the donor retained a right of enjoyment.
The most common drafting error in lifetime-transfer programmes is the reservation of benefit: the donor transfers an asset but continues to use or enjoy it. Classic examples include donating a property but continuing to live in it rent-free, or donating shares but retaining dividend rights. Section 3(3)(d) of the Estate Duty Act will include the property in the deceased’s estate for duty purposes if any such benefit is retained.
To avoid this risk, practitioners should ensure that the donor genuinely relinquishes all rights and that any continued use is at arm’s length (e.g., a formal lease at market rental).
SARS has broad powers under the GAAR (sections 80A–80L of the Income Tax Act) and the specific anti-avoidance rules in the Estate Duty Act to look through arrangements that lack commercial substance. Early indications suggest that SARS is increasingly scrutinising estate-reduction schemes involving trusts and related-party loans. Practitioners should document the commercial rationale for every transfer and retain evidence of genuine intention to donate.
| Transfer Type | Tax Trigger (Donations Tax / CGT / Estate Duty) | Practical Estate-Duty Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Unconditional cash donation (≤ R150,000 p.a.) | No donations tax; no CGT on cash | Reduces dutiable estate if genuinely out-of-estate and documented, record and intent are critical |
| Transfer of shares to trust | Donations tax on value above R150,000 exemption; CGT on disposal at market value | Removes asset from estate if full beneficial interest passes; trustee reporting and anti-avoidance considerations apply |
| Asset retained until death (bequest in will) | CGT deemed disposal at death (with higher death exclusion); no donations tax | Estate duty applies to full dutiable value; CGT death exclusion may reduce gain but asset remains in estate for duty |
Short answer: Trust donations South Africa arrangements remain a viable estate planning tool after Budget 2026, but only when the trust serves a genuine purpose, asset protection, succession planning or family governance. Donations into trusts trigger donations tax on amounts above R150,000 per donor, and trustees face heightened reporting obligations.
A donation to a trust is treated identically to a donation to any other person for donations tax purposes. The R150,000 annual exemption applies per donor. If a donor transfers shares worth R500,000 to a family trust, donations tax at 20% applies on R350,000 (i.e., R500,000 less the R150,000 exemption), resulting in a R70,000 donations tax liability. In addition, the transfer triggers CGT on the deemed disposal of the shares at market value.
An alternative, commonly used by estate planning practitioners, is to sell the assets to the trust on loan account rather than donating them. This avoids donations tax entirely but creates a loan claim that remains in the donor’s estate for estate duty purposes unless the loan is gradually forgiven (using the annual R150,000 exemption) or repaid by the trust.
Trustees must maintain accurate records of all donations received, distributions made, and the trust’s financial position. The Trust Property Control Act, 57 of 1988, imposes fiduciary duties on trustees, and SARS requires trusts to submit annual income tax returns (IT12TR) as well as beneficial ownership declarations. Failure to comply can result in penalties, loss of tax benefits and potential personal liability for trustees.
When establishing or amending a trust deed in light of the 2026 changes, practitioners should consider including the following provisions at a minimum:
Short answer: Executors and practitioners should follow a structured process to implement the Budget 2026 changes. The checklist below covers the key compliance and drafting steps for both lifetime-transfer planning and post-death administration.
“The Donor hereby irrevocably donates, cedes, transfers and makes over to the Donee, free of any condition or reservation of benefit, the following property: [description and value]. The Donor confirms that this donation is made voluntarily and without consideration, and that the Donor relinquishes all rights, title and interest in and to the donated property with effect from the date of signature hereof.”
“No Donor or Founder of the Trust shall retain, directly or indirectly, any right of use, enjoyment, occupation or other benefit in respect of any property donated or transferred to the Trust, unless such use or enjoyment is pursuant to a written agreement at arm’s-length terms, approved by a majority of independent trustees.”
The following three examples illustrate the practical effect of the 2026 changes. All examples assume the donor is a natural person at the maximum marginal tax rate (45%) with a 40% CGT inclusion rate, producing an effective CGT rate of 18%.
| Item | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cash donated | R150,000 | Within annual exemption |
| Donations tax | R0 | Exempt under s 56(2)(b) |
| CGT | R0 | Cash is not a capital asset |
| Estate duty saved (at 20%) | R30,000 | R150,000 removed from dutiable estate |
| Over 10 years (couple donating R300,000 p.a.) | R3,000,000 removed | Estate duty saving: R600,000 at 20% |
| Item | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market value of shares donated | R500,000 | Original base cost: R200,000 |
| Donations tax: 20% × (R500,000 − R150,000) | R70,000 | Payable by donor |
| Capital gain: R500,000 − R200,000 | R300,000 | Less R40,000 annual exclusion = R260,000 taxable |
| CGT: 18% × R260,000 | R46,800 | Payable by donor in year of donation |
| Total cost of transfer | R116,800 | Donations tax + CGT |
| Estate duty saved: 20% × R500,000 | R100,000 | Shares fully removed from estate |
| Net cost vs estate-duty saving | R16,800 net cost | Break-even if shares appreciate further in the trust |
The likely practical effect will be that this structure becomes more attractive as asset values increase: the sooner shares are transferred, the lower the CGT base from which future gains accrue within the trust, and the greater the long-term estate duty saving.
| Item | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Market value at death | R5,000,000 | Original base cost: R1,500,000 |
| Capital gain | R3,500,000 | Before exclusions |
| Primary residence exclusion at death | R2,000,000 | Per Eighth Schedule (updated threshold) |
| Death annual exclusion | R300,000+ | Per Budget Review adjustment |
| Taxable gain (estimated) | R1,200,000 | R3,500,000 − R2,000,000 − R300,000 |
| CGT at 18% | R216,000 | Charge against estate |
| Estate duty at 20% on R5,000,000 (less abatement) | R300,000 | After R3.5m abatement on total estate (simplified) |
| Total tax at death | R516,000 | CGT + estate duty |
Had the donor gifted the property during life, the primary residence exclusion would have been lower (the lifetime exclusion amount is R2 million on disposal, but the proceeds threshold and circumstances differ), and donations tax would have applied on the value above R150,000, making the total cost of a lifetime transfer substantially higher. This confirms that for most primary residences, retention until death remains the more tax-efficient strategy.
The 2026 changes create genuine opportunities, but they also create compliance risks. A single undocumented donation, an improperly worded trust clause or a missed IT144 filing can trigger penalties, GAAR challenge or the inclusion of assets back into the dutiable estate. Estate planning lawyers South Africa clients engage should be consulted before executing any lifetime-transfer strategy, not after.
Practitioners and HNW individuals should take the following immediate steps:
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information based on South African law as at 6 May 2026. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for personalised professional guidance. Readers should consult a qualified estate planning lawyer before making any decisions based on the information in this article.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Kevin Barnard at Kevin Barnard Attorneys, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 20 minutes ago
posted 43 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message