Our Expert in United Arab Emirates
Construction law in the United Arab Emirates entered a new era on 1 June 2026, when Federal Decree‑Law No. 25 of 2025, the UAE Civil Transactions Law (CTL), came into force and replaced the longstanding Civil Code. For construction stakeholders, two provisions demand immediate attention: Article 224, which codifies an express good‑faith duty across negotiation and performance, and Article 829, which introduces a statutory hardship regime that gives courts and tribunals power to adjust or terminate contracts struck by extraordinary, unforeseen events. At the same time, Dubai Law No. 7 of 2025 has imposed a new contractor classification and registration framework with a one‑year regularisation window, creating a parallel compliance burden for every contractor and developer operating in the emirate.
This article provides a practitioner‑led contract drafting checklist, sample clauses and a dispute‑avoidance playbook to help in‑house counsel, project directors, contractors and procurement teams navigate these changes.
The following action items summarise the most urgent steps for parties to construction contracts governed by UAE law. Each item is explored in detail in the sections that follow.
Federal Decree‑Law No. 25 of 2025 represents the most significant overhaul of civil obligations law in the UAE since the original Civil Transactions Law of 1985. Published in the Official Gazette in December 2025 and enforceable from 1 June 2026, the CTL repeals and replaces the previous Civil Code while preserving certain transitional protections for contracts already in force on the effective date.
| Date | Event | Practical Effect for Contracts |
|---|---|---|
| December 2025 | Federal Decree‑Law No. 25/2025 promulgated | New CTL text published in the Official Gazette, transitional rules flagged for review |
| 1 June 2026 | CTL enforcement date | Articles 224 & 829 and all other CTL provisions apply to newly formed contracts and, per transitional provisions, to the ongoing performance of existing contracts, review long‑term agreements immediately |
| 8 January 2026 → 8 January 2027 | Dubai Law No. 7/2025 effective and one‑year regularisation window | Contractors must obtain or regularise classification, update registrations and confirm subcontractor approvals, insert compliance covenants in contracts |
For construction law in the United Arab Emirates, the CTL’s transitional provisions are critical: long‑term agreements, including EPC, design‑build and concession contracts, should be reviewed to determine which obligations are governed by the old Civil Code and which fall under the new CTL regime. Industry observers expect that courts will apply the new good‑faith and hardship provisions to future performance obligations under existing contracts, making retroactive contract audits essential.
Two provisions of the UAE Civil Transactions Law 2026 carry the most transformative weight for the construction sector. Article 224 establishes a good‑faith duty applicable to all stages of the contractual lifecycle, while Article 829 introduces a formal hardship mechanism that permits judicial or arbitral intervention when extraordinary events fundamentally alter the economics of a contract.
Article 224 requires that parties exercise their contractual rights and perform their obligations in good faith. In practical terms, this imposes duties of honesty, cooperation and fair dealing during both negotiation and execution. For construction projects, the implications are significant: an employer who withholds site‑access information or a contractor who conceals known design deficiencies may now face statutory liability beyond any express contractual remedy. Parties should draft explicit cooperation covenants and disclosure obligations into their contracts to give shape to this otherwise open‑ended duty.
Article 829 provides that where extraordinary events of a general nature, unforeseen at the time of contracting, render performance excessively onerous (though not impossible), the court or tribunal may reduce the onerous obligation to a reasonable level or adjust the contract terms. The distinction from force majeure is crucial: hardship does not excuse performance entirely but permits rebalancing. For a contractor facing extreme material‑price escalation or supply‑chain disruption that falls short of impossibility, Article 829 of the CTL opens a formal route to price adjustment or renegotiation that the old Civil Code left largely to judicial discretion.
A sample hardship trigger clause for immediate use:
“If, after the date of this Contract, an event occurs that was not reasonably foreseeable at the date of execution and that renders the Contractor’s performance excessively onerous within the meaning of Article 829 of Federal Decree‑Law No. 25 of 2025, the affected Party shall give notice in accordance with Clause [X] and the Parties shall enter into good‑faith negotiations for a period of [30] days before either Party may refer the matter to [the DAAB / arbitration].”
A well‑drafted hardship clause UAE construction contracts should contain the following elements. Each sub‑section below includes guidance for employers, contractors and counsel on how to calibrate the provision to the risk profile of the project.
The hardship trigger must be specific enough to prevent opportunistic claims but broad enough to capture genuine economic disruption. Define the triggering threshold, for example, a percentage increase in the cost of specified materials or labour exceeding a stated benchmark, and exclude events that fall within normal commercial risk or that the affected party could have mitigated through insurance or hedging.
Require the affected party to issue a formal hardship notice within a defined period (typically 14 to 28 days) after the triggering event becomes apparent. The notice should specify the nature of the event, the estimated financial impact and the evidence relied upon. Late notice should result in forfeiture of the right to claim relief unless the claiming party can demonstrate reasonable cause for delay.
Sample notice wording: “The Contractor hereby gives notice pursuant to Clause [X] that the [describe event] constitutes a Hardship Event. The estimated additional cost is AED [amount]. Supporting evidence is attached at Appendix [Y]. The Contractor requests commencement of the negotiation period under Clause [X.2].”
Require the claiming party to provide contemporaneous documentary evidence, invoices, market indices, supply correspondence, and to demonstrate active mitigation steps. An employer‑favourable version might require independent verification; a contractor‑friendly version might permit self‑certification subject to audit rights.
The clause should set out a clear escalation ladder:
Three contract drafting checklist variants are provided in the Annex: employer‑favourable (narrow trigger, short notice, audit rights), neutral (balanced thresholds and shared risk), and contractor‑friendly (broader trigger, longer negotiation period, self‑certification).
The good‑faith duty under Article 224 is not merely aspirational, it creates enforceable obligations and, where breached, may give rise to damages or other remedies at law. For construction contracts, the challenge lies in translating this duty into measurable, actionable provisions.
Contracts should include express covenants requiring each party to cooperate in the timely exchange of design information, site‑access permits, approvals and payment certifications. Consider including positive obligations to disclose known risks, share safety data and coordinate with co‑contractors. These behavioural covenants give substance to the statutory good‑faith duty in the UAE and reduce the risk of subjective judicial interpretation.
Rather than attempting to exclude the good‑faith obligation entirely, an approach that early indications suggest UAE courts may resist, parties should define what constitutes good‑faith compliance in their specific context. For instance, a clause might provide that compliance with specified reporting schedules, response times and approval protocols constitutes satisfaction of the good‑faith duty for the purposes of the contract.
Include a remedial clause that specifies the consequences of a good‑faith breach: for example, the right to withhold a specified percentage of the next interim payment, to call on a performance bond, or to refer the matter to the DAAB for expedited determination. A sample conduct clause is provided in the Annex below (Clause C).
Construction law in the United Arab Emirates has long imposed a form of decennial (ten‑year) liability on contractors and consultants for structural defects in buildings. The CTL preserves and clarifies this regime, and Dubai Law No. 3 of 2026, the Quality and Safety of Buildings law, adds emirate‑level obligations concerning completion certificates and post‑handover defect management.
Under the CTL, contractors and architects remain jointly liable for a period of ten years from handover for total or partial collapse of a building, or for defects that threaten its stability or fitness for purpose. The decennial liability period cannot be shortened by contract. This means that limitation‑of‑liability clauses commonly found in FIDIC‑adapted contracts must be reviewed against the mandatory statutory minimum.
Contracts should distinguish between patent defects (discoverable on reasonable inspection at handover) and latent defects (hidden and only emerging later). For latent defects falling outside the decennial regime, include specific notification windows, evidence protocols and allocation of remediation costs. Consider requiring contractors to maintain professional indemnity insurance for the full decennial period and to provide step‑in rights for the employer if the insurer rescinds cover.
Dubai Law No. 7 of 2025 establishes a mandatory contractor classification system administered by a dedicated classification committee. The law, which took effect in early 2026, requires all contractors undertaking works in Dubai to be registered and classified according to their technical capability, financial standing and track record. Existing contractors have a one‑year regularisation window to bring their registrations into compliance.
Insert the following provisions into every construction contract involving works in Dubai:
The CTL’s good‑faith and hardship provisions alter the claims landscape for construction disputes in the United Arab Emirates. Parties must align their internal claims‑management protocols with the new statutory framework.
Every contractual notice, whether for variations, delays, hardship events or defects, should specify the CTL article relied upon, describe the factual basis with reasonable particularity and attach contemporaneous evidence. The good‑faith duty under Article 224 implies that notices must be issued promptly and honestly; strategically delayed or exaggerated claims may themselves constitute a breach.
The CTL framework supports applications for interim relief, including injunctions to prevent irreversible harm and interim payment orders. In arbitration, parties should ensure their dispute‑resolution clause expressly preserves the right to seek interim measures from UAE courts, particularly given the enhanced judicial discretion under the hardship regime.
| Stage | Action | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Event occurs, contemporaneous record‑keeping begins | Day 0 |
| 2 | Preliminary notice issued to counterparty | Within 14 days |
| 3 | Detailed claim submission with evidence | Within 42 days |
| 4 | Good‑faith negotiation period (hardship claims) | 30 days from submission |
| 5 | Referral to DAAB or expert determination | If negotiation fails |
| 6 | Arbitration or court proceedings | Per dispute‑resolution clause |
Industry observers expect DAABs to become more common in UAE construction contracts as a natural extension of the good‑faith and hardship regimes. A standing DAAB, appointed at project commencement, can issue binding‑with‑immediate‑effect decisions that help avoid the cost and delay of formal arbitration. Arbitration clauses should reference a recognised UAE‑seated institution and expressly preserve the DAAB process as a condition precedent.
The following contract drafting checklist is designed for in‑house counsel and procurement teams preparing or reviewing construction contracts after 1 June 2026.
The following sample clauses are provided for reference and adaptation. Each should be reviewed by qualified construction law counsel before incorporation into a binding contract.
Construction law in the United Arab Emirates has fundamentally shifted with the CTL’s entry into force and Dubai’s new contractor classification regime. The practical effect will be felt in every construction contract negotiation, variation assessment and claims process from this point forward. Stakeholders who act now, auditing existing contracts, inserting the clauses and protocols outlined in this article and verifying compliance status, will be best positioned to manage risk, maintain project momentum and avoid costly disputes.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Dr. Bini Saroj at Khalifa Bin Huwaidan Alketbi Advocates & Legal Consultants, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 3 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 8 hours ago
posted 8 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
posted 10 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message