Member
No results available
The Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2026, tabled in the Kenyan Parliament in April 2026, proposes a significant shift in how capital gains tax applies to property transfers between companies and their shareholders. For corporate counsels, conveyancers, real estate developers and lenders grappling with capital gains tax property transfer Kenya 2026 implications, the Bill opens a potential restructuring window, but it also introduces immediate compliance, documentation and security risks that demand careful navigation. Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) enforcement upgrades, including enhanced digital validation of income and expenses, add an additional layer of scrutiny to every transaction that seeks to rely on the proposed exemption.
This guide provides the practical, step-by-step analysis that transactional teams need to act on now, well before final enactment.
The Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2026 introduces a proposed CGT exemption for qualifying transfers of property between a company and its shareholders. If enacted, this provision will eliminate a material tax cost, currently levied at 15 per cent of the net gain, on internal reorganisations, distributions in specie and reconveyances that meet the Bill’s conditions. This represents a direct benefit to corporate groups restructuring property holdings, developers unwinding special-purpose vehicles, and shareholders receiving property as part of a winding-up or dividend distribution.
However, the exemption is not automatic. Practitioners must satisfy strict documentary and procedural requirements, and lenders with existing charges over the property face immediate title, priority and enforcement risks. The Bill is still before Parliament and has not yet received Presidential assent, so all reliance must be treated as provisional. Industry observers expect that the Finance Committee review process may introduce further conditions or anti-avoidance provisions before the Bill reaches its final form.
The three actions every affected party should take immediately are:
The Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2026 was published by the Parliament of Kenya in April 2026. The Bill proposes amendments to the Eighth Schedule of the Income Tax Act (Cap. 470) to insert a new exemption covering the transfer of property between a company and its shareholders in specified circumstances. The critical provision introduces language stipulating that a transfer of property from a company to a shareholder, or from a shareholder to a company, shall not be treated as a disposal giving rise to a chargeable gain where the transfer forms part of an internal reorganisation and specified conditions are met.
The conditions outlined in the Bill include that the transfer must be between a company and a person who holds shares in that company (or vice versa), that the transfer must be for bona fide commercial purposes, and that anti-avoidance provisions must not apply. The Bill also requires that the Commissioner be notified of the transfer and that appropriate documentation be submitted alongside the notification. Practitioners should consult the full text of the Bill on the Parliament of Kenya website for the exact statutory wording, clause numbering and any schedular references.
The Bill, as tabled, contemplates that the amendments take effect upon Royal Assent (Presidential assent). As of 1 May 2026, the Bill has received parliamentary backing, reported by The Star on 29 April 2026, but has not yet been signed into law. There are no express transitional provisions for transfers that were completed before commencement but where CGT has not yet been assessed or paid. Early indications suggest that KRA may adopt the position that the exemption applies only to transfers completed on or after the date of assent, but this remains to be confirmed by the final enacted text or by KRA practice notes issued after enactment.
Practitioners should therefore treat any transfer executed before assent as falling under the existing CGT regime and should not rely on the proposed exemption until the Bill has been signed into law and published in the Kenya Gazette.
Under the current Kenyan tax framework, capital gains tax is payable by the transferor, that is, the person disposing of the property. According to the Kenya Revenue Authority, CGT is charged on the gain accruing to a person on the transfer of property situated in Kenya, whether or not the transferor is resident. In the context of a company-to-shareholder transfer, the company is the transferor and bears the primary CGT liability. Where a shareholder transfers property back to a company (reconveyance), the shareholder is liable.
The CGT rate in Kenya is 15 per cent, applied to the net gain. The net gain is calculated as the transfer value (market value or consideration received, whichever is higher) minus the adjusted cost of the property (original cost plus allowable incidental expenses such as legal fees, stamp duty paid on acquisition, and documented improvement costs). The tax is payable to KRA before or at the time of registration of the transfer at the Lands Registry. The Lands Registrar will not register a transfer without evidence that CGT has been paid or that an exemption applies.
Consider a Kenyan company that acquired commercial land in 2018 for KES 20,000,000, incurred KES 2,000,000 in allowable improvement and legal costs, and now transfers the property to its sole shareholder at a current market value of KES 40,000,000.
| Item | Before the Bill (current law) | After the Bill (if exemption applies) |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer value (market value) | KES 40,000,000 | KES 40,000,000 |
| Adjusted cost (acquisition + allowable expenses) | KES 22,000,000 | KES 22,000,000 |
| Net gain | KES 18,000,000 | KES 18,000,000 |
| CGT at 15% | KES 2,700,000 | KES 0 (exempt) |
| Tax saving | , | KES 2,700,000 |
This worked example demonstrates the material cost saving that the proposed CGT exemption for property transfers in Kenya would deliver. However, the exemption applies only where all statutory conditions are satisfied and KRA is properly notified. If any condition is not met, the full KES 2,700,000 liability crystallises, together with potential penalties and interest for late payment.
The Bill targets transfers that occur as part of an internal reorganisation or distribution. A company distributing property to a shareholder, whether as a dividend in specie, a return of capital, or as part of a voluntary winding-up, may fall within the exemption provided the shareholder holds shares in the transferring company at the time of the transfer. The transfer must be for bona fide commercial purposes, and the Bill’s anti-avoidance provisions must not be triggered. In practice, this means the transfer cannot be a device to avoid tax that would otherwise be payable on a sale to a third party.
Developers unwinding special-purpose vehicles (SPVs) after project completion are likely to be among the primary beneficiaries. Where a developer holds land through an SPV and wishes to distribute the completed property to the parent company or individual shareholders, the exemption, once enacted, would eliminate the CGT layer that currently makes such restructurings prohibitively expensive.
The proposed exemption also covers the reverse scenario: a shareholder transferring property into a company. This is common where an individual initially acquires land in their own name and subsequently wishes to inject it into a corporate vehicle for development, financing or estate-planning purposes. The same conditions apply, the transfer must be between a shareholder and the company in which they hold shares, and the transfer must be for genuine commercial reasons.
The likely practical effect for real estate development tax planning in Kenya will be to facilitate capitalisation of family-held land into development companies without triggering an immediate CGT event, provided the exemption conditions are met and adequate documentation is filed with KRA.
The exemption does not extend to transfers between unrelated parties. A sale of property from a company to an external purchaser, or from a shareholder to a third party, remains fully subject to CGT at 15 per cent. Similarly, transfers that are structured to appear as internal reorganisations but are in substance sales to third parties will be caught by anti-avoidance provisions. Practitioners should be alert to arrangements where, for example, shares in the transferee company are sold to a third party shortly after the property transfer, such a sequence is likely to attract KRA scrutiny and potential disallowance of the exemption.
Relying on the proposed CGT exemption property Kenya provision demands rigorous conveyancing documentation. The conveyancing tax implications in Kenya are significant because the Lands Registrar acts as a gatekeeper, no transfer is registered without proof that CGT has been paid or that a valid exemption applies. The following documents should be prepared and executed before lodging the transfer:
Stamp duty is assessed separately from CGT. A transfer of property in Kenya attracts stamp duty at prescribed rates, generally 2 per cent for properties outside municipalities and 4 per cent within municipalities, and this obligation is not affected by the proposed CGT exemption. The stamp duty must be assessed and paid before the transfer can be registered. Conveyancers should note that KRA issues a CGT clearance certificate (or confirmation that an exemption applies) which the Lands Registrar requires before processing the transfer. Without this certificate, the transfer will be rejected at the registry.
Given KRA’s increasing emphasis on income and expenses validation through digital systems, presenting a comprehensive evidence pack is essential. The recommended KRA evidence pack for a transfer relying on the proposed exemption should include:
The KRA has significantly enhanced its digital enforcement capabilities in 2026, including automated cross-referencing of income declarations, property transactions and company filings. For transfers claiming the proposed CGT exemption, KRA income and expenses validation 2026 systems are expected to flag transactions where:
Practitioners should conduct a pre-filing internal audit to ensure every element of the evidence pack is consistent, accurate and contemporaneous. Any discrepancy, even an administrative error in the share register, could delay or derail the CGT clearance process.
If KRA disallows the claimed exemption, the transferor becomes liable for CGT at 15 per cent of the net gain, plus penalties for late payment (currently 20 per cent of the tax due) and interest at the prevailing rate prescribed by KRA. The transferor may lodge an objection within 30 days of the assessment notice under the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, and may escalate to the Tax Appeals Tribunal if the objection is disallowed. Given the sums involved in property transactions, the cost of an unsuccessful exemption claim can be substantial, and companies should factor this risk into their transaction planning.
The proposed changes to capital gains tax on property transfers in Kenya carry significant consequences for banks and lenders holding security over real property. A transfer from a company borrower to a shareholder, even if CGT-exempt, may fundamentally alter the lender’s security position.
Lenders should incorporate the following checks into their due diligence and monitoring procedures for any borrower that may rely on the proposed exemption:
In light of the proposed amendments, lender security implications in Kenya require updated contractual protections. Lenders should consider incorporating or strengthening the following provisions in facility agreements and security documents:
If a borrower transfers property to a shareholder without the lender’s consent, the lender’s remedies will depend on the terms of the security documents and the applicable statutory framework. Under the Land Act, 2012, a chargee (lender) may apply to court for an order restraining the transfer or, if the transfer has already been registered, may exercise its power of sale over the property in the hands of the new proprietor, provided the charge was registered before the transfer. Lenders should note that enforcement against a natural person (the shareholder) may raise different practical considerations compared to enforcement against a corporate borrower, including homestead protections under the Land Act where the property is a matrimonial home.
| Entity Type | Filings / Evidence Required | Deadline / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Company transferring property to shareholder | Board resolution, minutes, transfer instrument, independent valuation report, KRA evidence pack (original cost, consideration, allowable expenses), stamp duty payment evidence, share register extract | KRA CGT filing at or before registration at the Lands Registry; stamp duty payable before lodgement; follow Bill-specific conditions once enacted |
| Shareholder receiving property as distribution | Declaration of distribution or reorganisation, receipt of property, independent valuation, KRA filing (if applicable), evidence of tax position on any dividend or distribution income | Ensure KRA validation documents are on file; consider income tax treatment where distribution is in lieu of dividends; file individual return in the year of receipt |
| Non-resident or third-party purchaser | Full conveyancing documents, KRA CGT assessment and payment by seller (transferor), proof of CGT payment, withholding tax deduction (if applicable for non-resident vendor) | Standard CGT at 15% payable by transferor; Lands Registry will not register transfer without KRA CGT clearance certificate; no proposed exemption applies to third-party sales |
The following is indicative drafting only and must be adapted to the specific transaction and reviewed by qualified legal counsel before use.
“RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to [section X] of the Companies Act, 2015 and in reliance on the exemption proposed by the Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2026 (once enacted), the Company hereby authorises the transfer of [Property Description, Title Number] to [Shareholder Name, ID/Passport Number], being a registered shareholder holding [X]% of the issued share capital of the Company, as a distribution in specie of company assets, for bona fide commercial purposes and in accordance with the Company’s articles of association.
The Company Secretary is hereby directed to prepare all necessary transfer instruments, obtain an independent valuation report, lodge the requisite filings with the Kenya Revenue Authority, and arrange for the payment of stamp duty and registration of the transfer at the relevant Lands Registry.
The following is indicative drafting only and must be adapted to the specific facility and security arrangements.
“We, [Lender Name], hereby consent to the transfer of [Property Description, Title Number] from [Company Name] to [Shareholder Name], subject to the following conditions: (a) the transferee executes a Deed of Assumption in the form annexed hereto, assuming all obligations of the Borrower under the Facility Agreement dated [Date] and the Charge dated [Date]; (b) the Charge is noted against the title in the name of the transferee at the relevant Lands Registry; (c) the transferee provides evidence that the Kenya Revenue Authority has accepted the claimed CGT exemption under the Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2026 (once enacted); and (d) property insurance is updated to reflect the transferee as proprietor with [Lender Name] noted as the interested party.
This consent shall be deemed withdrawn if any of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied within [60] days of the date hereof.
Practitioners engaged in capital gains tax property transfer Kenya 2026 transactions should treat the above precedents as starting points and tailor them to the specifics of each deal. Given that the Bill has not yet been enacted, all documentation should include appropriate conditionality and fall-back provisions. The interaction between corporate restructuring mechanics and tax exemption requirements makes specialist advice essential. Teams should monitor the parliamentary process closely and be prepared to adjust their approach once the final enacted text is published in the Kenya Gazette.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Guy Elms at Raffman Dhanji Elms & Virdee, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 21 minutes ago
posted 44 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message