Member
No results available
Last updated 1 May 2026
The A1 certificate Liechtenstein telework 2026 landscape has shifted decisively, and employers that have not yet adapted face material compliance exposure. Post‑pandemic remote work is now embedded in employment practice across the Rhine Valley and wider EEA, yet many Liechtenstein‑based companies still treat social‑security coordination as an afterthought. The EU Commission’s ongoing work to modernise social‑security coordination, coupled with tighter enforcement of A1 certificate rules, means that cross‑border employment in Liechtenstein demands board‑level attention in 2026. This guide translates the relevant EU framework and Liechtensteinische Landesverwaltung (LLV) guidance into practical checklists, step‑by‑step application workflows and risk‑mitigation strategies that general counsel, HR directors and payroll teams can act on immediately.
Before reading the detailed analysis below, consider the six immediate compliance actions every Liechtenstein employer permitting cross‑border telework should prioritise right now:
Liechtenstein, as an EEA member, participates in the EU social‑security coordination framework established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and its Implementing Regulation 987/2009. These instruments determine which country’s social‑security legislation applies when a worker is active in more than one state, and the A1 certificate is the document that proves which regime covers a given employee. Before the pandemic, A1 questions were largely confined to classic posting scenarios. Today, they are inseparable from everyday telework arrangements.
The Framework Agreement on the application of Article 16(1) of Regulation 883/2004 in cases of habitual cross‑border telework, commonly called the Framework Agreement on cross‑border telework, formalised a multilateral mechanism under which workers who telework between 25 % and less than 50 % of their total working time in their state of residence can, by agreement, remain subject to the social‑security system of their employer’s state. This Framework Agreement has become the cornerstone of A1 certificate requirements for telework in Liechtenstein and neighbouring signatory states.
Industry observers note that enforcement is intensifying. Retrospective social‑security assessments, double contribution claims and administrative penalties are being reported with growing frequency across the EEA. The practical effect for employers is clear: failure to obtain an A1 where one is required can trigger back‑payments of contributions, penalties and, in extreme cases, personal liability for directors.
Under Regulation 883/2004, a person who normally pursues an activity as an employed person in two or more member states is subject to the legislation of the member state of residence if they pursue a substantial part of their activity there. “Substantial” has been interpreted as 25 % or more of working time or remuneration. If the worker performs less than 25 % in the state of residence, the legislation of the state where the employer’s registered office is located generally applies.
The Framework Agreement on cross‑border telework introduced a targeted exception: where a worker’s telework in the state of residence amounts to at least 25 % but less than 50 % of total working time, the employer and worker may jointly request that the worker remain covered under the legislation of the employer’s state, provided both states have signed the Framework Agreement. This is the “exemption agreement” mechanism referenced in LLV guidance.
| Telework in state of residence (% of total working time) | Default applicable legislation | Employer action required |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 25 % | Employer’s state (Liechtenstein) | No exemption application needed, standard A1 may still be advisable as proof |
| 25 % to less than 50 % | State of residence (default), but exemption agreement allows Liechtenstein coverage to continue | File exemption agreement application with LLV to keep worker under Liechtenstein social security |
| 50 % or more | State of residence | Worker transfers to home‑state social security, adjust payroll; no Liechtenstein A1 exemption available under Framework Agreement |
| 100 % remote from abroad | State of residence | Worker is subject to home‑state system, employer must register in that state or use compliant payroll arrangements |
Scenario 1, Occasional home office. An employee resides in Austria and commutes daily to Vaduz, teleworking from home one day per week (20 % of working time). Because the telework share is below 25 %, Liechtenstein social security applies by default. A formal exemption application is not required, but obtaining an A1 certificate as proof is considered best practice.
Scenario 2, Hybrid arrangement. An employee resides in Switzerland and works two days per week from home in St. Gallen (40 % of working time). The 25‑to‑less‑than‑50 % threshold is met. Without an exemption agreement, Swiss social security would apply by default. The employer must file an exemption application with the competent Liechtenstein authority (and mirror application in Switzerland) to retain Liechtenstein coverage.
Scenario 3, Full remote. A software developer resides in Germany and works entirely from Munich for a Liechtenstein employer. At 100 % telework in the state of residence, German social security applies. The employer must register for social‑insurance contributions in Germany or engage a compliant payroll structure. No Liechtenstein A1 exemption is available under the Framework Agreement.
The LLV publishes specific guidance on the exception agreement for cross‑border telework (home office). Under this guidance, the exemption application is triggered when a worker habitually performs cross‑border telework amounting to at least 25 % but less than 50 % of total working time in the state of residence. The application is submitted jointly by employer and employee to the competent Liechtenstein social‑security authority, the AHV‑IV‑FAK‑Anstalt, which then coordinates with the corresponding authority in the worker’s state of residence.
Key practical points from LLV guidance include:
The AHV‑IV‑FAK‑Anstalt is the designated competent institution for social‑security coordination matters, including A1 certificate issuance and exemption agreement processing. Applications and supporting documentation are submitted directly to this body. The LLV acts as the overarching government authority publishing guidance and policy.
Employers should maintain a contemporaneous evidence pack for each cross‑border teleworker. The likely documentation requirements, drawn from LLV guidance and established EEA practice, include the employment contract (specifying place of work and telework terms), timesheets or digital logs showing where work was performed, the employee’s signed self‑declaration of residence and telework pattern, a copy of the A1 certificate or exemption agreement once issued, and payroll records showing contributions withheld and remitted.
The following workflow applies where an employer determines that an exemption agreement application is necessary, typically in the 25‑to‑less‑than‑50 % telework band. This step‑by‑step process also applies, with adaptations, to classic posting A1 applications.
Calculate the employee’s telework percentage in the state of residence as a proportion of total working time. Use the table in the previous section to identify the default legislation and whether an exemption application is needed. If telework is below 25 %, consider whether a standard A1 is desirable as proof. If telework is at or above 50 %, the exemption route is unavailable.
Prepare the following documentation:
File the application with the AHV‑IV‑FAK‑Anstalt. The submission should include the evidence pack listed above and reference the Framework Agreement on cross‑border telework. Where the worker’s state of residence requires a parallel filing, coordinate with the corresponding foreign institution simultaneously.
Processing times vary but early indications suggest that straightforward applications, supported by complete documentation, are typically resolved within several weeks. Once issued, the A1 certificate or exemption confirmation will state the applicable legislation and the validity period. Certificates can cover up to three years under the Framework Agreement. Calendar the renewal date and begin re‑application at least two months before expiry to avoid gaps in coverage.
Once the A1 confirms that Liechtenstein legislation continues to apply, ensure payroll settings reflect continued Liechtenstein AHV/IV/ALV contributions. Provide the employee with a copy of the certificate for their records and for presentation to any foreign authority that may request it.
Employer checklist callout: A condensed, one‑page A1 application checklist covering all five steps, including a sample employee self‑declaration and a model employer cover letter, is set out in the quick‑reference section below.
Liechtenstein employers must withhold and remit first‑pillar social‑insurance contributions (AHV, old‑age and survivors’ insurance, IV, disability insurance, and ALV, unemployment insurance) for all employees subject to Liechtenstein legislation. Where an A1 confirms Liechtenstein coverage, payroll continues as normal. Where the A1 or the absence of an exemption agreement results in foreign coverage, the employer must either register with the foreign social‑security institution and remit contributions there, or engage a compliant intermediary (payroll provider or employer of record) in the relevant state.
For posted employees sent from Liechtenstein to another EEA state, the employer must obtain an A1 (posting) confirming continued Liechtenstein coverage before the posting begins. The posting A1 is subject to the general time limits in Regulation 883/2004. Employer reporting to the AHV continues for the posting period, and the posted‑workers directive may impose additional notification obligations in the host state (such as advance notification to the host labour inspectorate).
| Scenario | Typical social‑security jurisdiction | Employer reporting and payroll obligations (Liechtenstein) |
|---|---|---|
| Resident employee, commuter, less than 25 % telework in state of residence | Liechtenstein (employer’s state) | Maintain timesheets; standard AHV/IV/ALV reporting; A1 optional but recommended as proof |
| Hybrid teleworker, 25 % to less than 50 % telework in state of residence | State of residence by default; Liechtenstein retained if exemption granted | File exemption agreement application; continue AHV reporting once exemption confirmed; maintain location records |
| Posted employee, temporary assignment abroad | Liechtenstein (posting state) for duration of A1 | Obtain A1 (posting) before departure; continue Liechtenstein contributions; file host‑state notifications if required |
| 100 % remote worker, located abroad | State of residence | Register in worker’s state or use compliant payroll intermediary; adjust contributions; no Liechtenstein A1 exemption available |
Social‑security jurisdiction and tax residence do not always align. Employers should separately assess withholding‑tax obligations, particularly where double‑taxation agreements between Liechtenstein and the worker’s state of residence contain specific provisions for frontier workers or teleworkers. This analysis is outside the scope of the A1 framework but must be conducted in parallel to avoid under‑withholding risks.
Obtaining an A1 certificate is necessary but not sufficient. Employers in Liechtenstein should embed ongoing compliance into HR operations through the following practical measures:
Liechtenstein’s social‑security authorities, and, importantly, the authorities in the worker’s state of residence, have the power to conduct retrospective assessments where an A1 is missing or was obtained on incorrect information. The likely practical consequences of non‑compliance include:
If a social‑security authority in another state contacts a Liechtenstein employer questioning the applicable legislation or requesting contributions, the employer should immediately engage specialist legal counsel, gather all A1 certificates and supporting documentation, and respond within the stated deadline. Where a dispute arises between two competent institutions over applicable legislation, Regulation 883/2004 provides for a dialogue and determination procedure between the institutions involved. Employers should not attempt to resolve inter‑institutional disputes unilaterally.
The following condensed checklist summarises the core employer actions for A1 certificate Liechtenstein telework 2026 compliance. It can be adapted as an internal one‑page reference document.
“I, [Employee Name], confirm that my state of residence for social‑security purposes is [Country]. I telework from my residence at [Address] for approximately [X] % of my total working time. I undertake to notify my employer in writing of any change to my residence, telework location or telework percentage within five working days of the change.”
“We, [Company Name], registered in Liechtenstein (Handelsregister No. [X]), hereby apply for an exemption agreement under the Framework Agreement on cross‑border telework in respect of our employee [Employee Name], who resides in [Country] and teleworks from their residence for approximately [X] % of total working time. We enclose the supporting documentation as listed and request that the employee remain subject to Liechtenstein social‑security legislation. We are available to provide any further information required.”
Cross‑border telework is no longer an exceptional arrangement, it is standard operating practice in Liechtenstein’s internationally integrated labour market. The legal framework governing A1 certificates and social‑security coordination in 2026 demands proactive, documented compliance. Employers that audit their cross‑border workforce, file exemption applications where telework falls in the 25‑to‑less‑than‑50 % band, and embed ongoing monitoring into HR workflows will be well positioned to avoid retrospective assessments, double‑contribution claims and administrative penalties. Those that do not risk financial exposure that can reach back several years.
The practical tools in this guide, the threshold table, step‑by‑step application workflow, comparison of obligations by scenario, condensed checklist and template declarations, are designed to be implemented immediately. For complex arrangements involving multiple jurisdictions or disputed applicable legislation, specialist legal advice tailored to the employer’s specific circumstances remains essential. Employers seeking guidance on A1 certificate Liechtenstein telework 2026 obligations can consult qualified employment law practitioners through the Liechtenstein lawyer directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Thomas Wiedl at Ospelt & Partner, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 34 seconds ago
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message