Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 2 hours ago
Although Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, was created in 2008, Canada’s approach to regulating cryptocurrencies and trading platforms (also called crypto exchanges) remains relatively new. Until December 2023, these platforms operated within a regulatory sandbox overseen by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), a collective of provincial and territorial securities regulators tasked with improving coordination and developing consistent policies.
Since December 2023, crypto platforms have transitioned out of the sandbox but are still required to register with CSA members, meaning the provincial or territorial securities regulators. Registered platforms must also follow conditions designed to safeguard investors, such as holding customer-deposited crypto assets in trust and keeping them separate from the platform’s own assets.
For tax purposes, on January 17, 2025, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), through its Income Tax Rulings Directorate, released interpretation document no.2024-1031821I7. This document addresses several questions on how crypto assets deposited and staked on registered crypto platforms should be taxed. The issues raised include:
1. For crypto assets held as capital property, does a disposition occur when the assets are:
a) Deposited with a registered platform?
b) Staked on a registered platform?
2. When taxpayers stake crypto assets through a registered platform—either directly by the platform or through a crypto custodian engaged by the platform—the CRA considers the following questions:
a) Are the staking rewards earned by taxpayers taxable as income under section 9 of the Income Tax Act?
b) If so, should the rewards be treated as business income or income from property?
c) At what point must the rewards be included in the taxpayer’s income?
Before addressing the questions, it helps to understand the basics of crypto staking. Staking involves validating transactions for a cryptocurrency and recording them on a proof-of-stake blockchain protocol.
Each validator—selected at random—operates a node that confirms transactions. To take part, validators must “lock up” a required amount of crypto as collateral. If a validator acts against the rules of the blockchain protocol or community, part or all of their staked assets may be forfeited (a process called “slashing”). Staked assets can also be restricted by “lock-up” periods before and after staking—called “bonding” and “unbonding”—during which the assets are unusable and earn no rewards.
Proof-of-work, better known as “mining,” is another method of verifying blockchain transactions. Miners compete to solve complex mathematical problems, with the first to succeed earning rewards. Mining requires continuous use of high-powered computers, which has drawn criticism for its heavy energy use and environmental footprint. While both methods have trade-offs, proof-of-stake has become the preferred approach for many newer cryptocurrencies.
When taxpayers deposit or stake crypto assets with registered platforms, they maintain beneficial ownership of those assets. The platforms themselves do not acquire beneficial ownership. As a result, no disposition occurs when the assets are deposited or staked.
The CRA, with little explanation, takes the position that staking rewards are generally taxable as income under section 9 of the Income Tax Act, reasoning that staking is unlikely to be a purely personal activity without a commercial element.
However, making such a determination in broad terms, without a proper legal analysis, seems premature—particularly given the body of case law addressing whether an activity is personal or commercial. Key decisions such as Stewart v. R., 2002 SCC 46, and Moldowan v. The Queen, [1978] 1 SCR 480, have established frameworks and tests on this issue. Importantly, the presence of a profit motive alone does not necessarily remove an activity from being personal in nature.
The CRA acknowledges that staking rewards cannot be classified in advance as either business income or income from property. The distinction is fact-specific and depends on the taxpayer’s overall conduct, with the primary consideration being the extent of effort and activity invested in generating the income. This position is reasonable, though the issue may ultimately be tested through future litigation.
As established in Canderel v. R., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 147, a taxpayer is entitled to adopt any method of calculating profit that presents a true picture of income for the year, so long as it aligns with applicable law and generally accepted business principles.
According to the CRA, staking rewards are typically included in income at the time they are credited to the taxpayer’s account on a registered platform and cannot be deferred until they are later disposed of. When those rewards are eventually disposed of, the transaction may give rise to either capital gains or income, depending on the circumstances and the taxpayer’s overall course of conduct.
In summary, the CRA’s position is that depositing or staking crypto assets on registered platforms does not constitute a disposition. When crypto assets are staked—whether directly through the platform or through a custodian appointed by the platform—the resulting staking rewards are included in the taxpayer’s income at the time they are credited to the taxpayer’s account. The characterization of that income as business or property income remains a question of fact, based on the taxpayer’s circumstances.
For crypto asset investors, determining the correct tax treatment of holdings and staking income can be complex. It is advisable to seek guidance from experienced Canadian crypto tax lawyers to ensure compliance and proper reporting.
The CRA’s views discussed above apply specifically to platforms registered with CSA members, meaning the provincial or territorial securities regulators. That said, the same tax principles apply regardless of whether income is earned on registered or non-registered platforms, since Canadian taxpayers are taxed on their worldwide income. Because some of these determinations are fact-specific and may vary case by case, they are not fixed. To ensure proper compliance with tax laws, it is strongly recommended that you consult with expert Canadian crypto tax lawyers.
The CRA’s tax interpretations reflect its views on certain issues, but they are not legally binding. If you disagree with the CRA’s position, you may file your taxes based on your own interpretation of the law. If the CRA later issues an assessment that differs from your filing, you have the right to challenge the assessment by submitting a notice of objection. Before filing a return that conflicts with the CRA’s view, or if you intend to object to an assessment, it is highly advisable to seek guidance from experienced Canadian crypto tax lawyers.
DISCLAIMER: This article just provides broad information. It is only up to date as of the posting date. It has not been updated and may be out of date. It does not give legal advice and should not be relied on. Every tax scenario is unique to its circumstances and will differ from the instances described in the articles. If you have specific legal questions, you should seek the advice of a Canadian tax lawyer.
Image by EyeEm via freepik
Author
No results available
posted 26 minutes ago
posted 26 minutes ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 2 days ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
When your international business faces financial distress, quick action is key! 🔑 Negotiating with creditors, restructuring debt, and understanding insolvency laws can help regain stability. Global Law Experts is here to guide you through your options.
🌍Explore the details on our website.
🔗Link in bio
#GlobalLawExperts #CommercialLaw #BusinessLaw #LegalAdvice #BusinessGrowth #LegalTips #BusinessStrategy #LegalCompliance #Law #LegalKnowledge #LegalAwareness #Law101 #LegalEducation #IntellectualProperty
Running a business is hard enough — lawsuits shouldn’t make it harder. 🚫 Protect your business with the right legal strategies and expert tools from Global Law Experts. Let’s secure your future together! 💼
🌍Explore the details on our website.
➡️www.globallawexperts.com
#GlobalLawExperts #CommercialLaw #BusinessLaw #LegalAdvice #BusinessGrowth #LegalTips #BusinessStrategy #LegalCompliance #Law #LegalKnowledge #LegalAwareness #Law101 #LegalEducation #IntellectualProperty #Infringed #Ecommerce #LegalBranding
Using NRIC numbers as passwords or identity proof? That era is done. Strengthen your security with multi-factor authentication and biometrics—because your clients' trust depends on it.
#SingaporeLaw #DataPrivacy #CyberSecurity #PDPA #NRIC #MFA #StrongAuthentication #LegalCompliance #ClientTrust
Swiss law protects secured lenders—with precision. From real estate to IP and bank accounts, every asset counts—just as long as it’s defined, documented, and delivered.
#SwissLaw #SecurityInterest #Collateral #InternationalLending #SwissFinance #LegalCompliance #GlobalBusiness #AssetSecurity
Gold trading in Saudi Arabia isn’t just a business—it’s a lab test, a permit, and a legal tightrope. Want to succeed? Start with compliance, hallmarking, and permits—or risk losing it all.
#GoldTrading #SaudiLaw #PreciousMetals #BusinessSetup #LegalCompliance #GlobalBusiness #SaudiArabia #TradeRigour
Second citizenship isn’t permanent—especially if you break the rules. Know the risks and how to safeguard your status: be transparent, stay lawful, and honour all citizenship requirements.
#SecondCitizenship #CitizenshipRisks #DualNationality #Compliance #GlobalMobility #LegalAdvice #ImmigrationLaw
Send welcome message