Since 2010, the Global Law Experts annual awards have been celebrating excellence, innovation and performance across the legal communities from around the world.
posted 3 months ago
By Judgement of 5 December 2019 on joined cases C‑708/17 and C‑725/17 the Court of Justice of the European Union /CJEU/ ruled that Article 27 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council read in conjunction with Article 5(1) and (5) of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’), must be interpreted as not precluding a national law that provides that the owners of an apartment in a building in co-ownership connected to a district heating network are required to contribute to the costs of the consumption of thermal energy by the common parts and the internal installation of the building, even though they did not individually request the supply of that thermal energy and they do not use it in their apartment.
In the same judgement, however, the CJEU also emphasizes that Article 13(2) of Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC and Article 10(1) of Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC must be interpreted as not precluding a national law that provides that in a building held in co-ownership the bills for thermal energy consumption by the internal installation are calculated for each property owner in the building in proportion to the heated volume of his or her apartment. Only if this condition is met the owner’s consumer rights would be protected to the maximum extent.
In the reasons for the aforementioned judgement, the CJEU notes that, as regards more specifically the internal installation, it follows from that information that it may prove difficult, or even impossible, to determine precisely the quantity of heat emitted by that installation in each apartment. That quantity comprises not only the heat emitted inside the apartment concerned by the material elements of the internal installation, such as the ducts and the pipes which pass through that apartment, but also the thermal exchanges between the heated parts and non-heated parts of the building. In this sense the separated apartments in a building in co-ownership are not thermally independent of each other since heat circulates between the units that are heated and those that are less or are not heated.
Author
No results available
posted 17 hours ago
posted 1 day ago
posted 3 days ago
posted 3 days ago
posted 3 days ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
When your international business faces financial distress, quick action is key! 🔑 Negotiating with creditors, restructuring debt, and understanding insolvency laws can help regain stability. Global Law Experts is here to guide you through your options.
🌍Explore the details on our website.
🔗Link in bio
#GlobalLawExperts #CommercialLaw #BusinessLaw #LegalAdvice #BusinessGrowth #LegalTips #BusinessStrategy #LegalCompliance #Law #LegalKnowledge #LegalAwareness #Law101 #LegalEducation #IntellectualProperty
Running a business is hard enough — lawsuits shouldn’t make it harder. 🚫 Protect your business with the right legal strategies and expert tools from Global Law Experts. Let’s secure your future together! 💼
🌍Explore the details on our website.
➡️www.globallawexperts.com
#GlobalLawExperts #CommercialLaw #BusinessLaw #LegalAdvice #BusinessGrowth #LegalTips #BusinessStrategy #LegalCompliance #Law #LegalKnowledge #LegalAwareness #Law101 #LegalEducation #IntellectualProperty #Infringed #Ecommerce #LegalBranding
Using NRIC numbers as passwords or identity proof? That era is done. Strengthen your security with multi-factor authentication and biometrics—because your clients' trust depends on it.
#SingaporeLaw #DataPrivacy #CyberSecurity #PDPA #NRIC #MFA #StrongAuthentication #LegalCompliance #ClientTrust
Swiss law protects secured lenders—with precision. From real estate to IP and bank accounts, every asset counts—just as long as it’s defined, documented, and delivered.
#SwissLaw #SecurityInterest #Collateral #InternationalLending #SwissFinance #LegalCompliance #GlobalBusiness #AssetSecurity
Gold trading in Saudi Arabia isn’t just a business—it’s a lab test, a permit, and a legal tightrope. Want to succeed? Start with compliance, hallmarking, and permits—or risk losing it all.
#GoldTrading #SaudiLaw #PreciousMetals #BusinessSetup #LegalCompliance #GlobalBusiness #SaudiArabia #TradeRigour
Second citizenship isn’t permanent—especially if you break the rules. Know the risks and how to safeguard your status: be transparent, stay lawful, and honour all citizenship requirements.
#SecondCitizenship #CitizenshipRisks #DualNationality #Compliance #GlobalMobility #LegalAdvice #ImmigrationLaw
Send welcome message