Our Expert in Italy
No results available
Employee sick leave Italy procedures continue to evolve, and employers who handled absence management the same way a few years ago may now face a compliance gap. Recent INPS guidance has tightened how the date of onset and prognosis are recorded in the medical certificate (certificato medico) and how general practitioners transmit that data telematically to INPS. For HR managers, in-house counsel and SME employers, the practical effect is immediate: internal absence policies, payroll instructions and notification templates must be reconciled with current guidance, your applicable national collective agreement (Contratto Collettivo Nazionale di Lavoro, or CCNL) and GDPR-compliant handling of health data.
This guide converts the technical rules into a workable employer playbook, who does what, when, and with what documentation.
Ordinary sickness absence (malattia) in Italy is governed by an interlocking framework: the Civil Code and national labour legislation set the baseline; INPS administers sickness benefit and verification; the applicable CCNL sets contractual sick-pay amounts and duration; and D.Lgs. 81/2008 governs workplace health surveillance and fitness-for-work. An employee who falls ill must notify the employer promptly and obtain a telematic medical certificate from a doctor. The doctor transmits the certificate electronically to INPS, which makes the prognosis and protected period available to the employer through its online channels. The employer records the absence, applies the correct CCNL sick-pay rule, advances payment where required and, depending on category, claims reimbursement from INPS.
Current INPS guidance matters because it clarifies how the date of onset of illness is stated in the certificate and the wording of the prognosis. Those two fields drive the employer’s pay calculation, the protected period against dismissal and any later contest. Getting them wrong, or ignoring them, exposes the employer to payroll errors, reimbursement rejections and litigation.
This guide addresses private-sector employees subject to Italian employment law and the employers who manage them. It covers ordinary illness, not workplace injury or occupational disease, which fall under INAIL. Public-sector rules differ in several respects and are outside this scope. Because sick-pay entitlements are set largely by collective bargaining, the precise figures depend on the CCNL that applies to your workforce, the metalworkers’ (metalmeccanici) and commerce (commercio) agreements are common reference points, and they treat the employer’s carry period and INPS integration differently.
Employee sick leave Italy entitlements apply to subordinate employees who become temporarily incapable of working because of illness. The entitlement is distinct from two neighbouring categories. First, workplace injury (infortunio sul lavoro) and occupational disease (malattia professionale) are insured and administered by INAIL, not INPS, and follow separate reporting routes. Second, long-term incapacity may convert into disability or trigger protected-period expiry under the CCNL, raising redundancy and accommodation questions that go beyond ordinary sick leave.
The dividing line is causation. If the incapacity arises from ordinary illness unconnected to work, INPS governs the benefit and the employee provides a telematic certificato medico. If the incapacity results from an accident at work or a recognised occupational disease, INAIL handles the claim, the certification route differs, and the employer has separate reporting duties. Misclassifying a workplace injury as ordinary illness is a frequent and costly error: it distorts pay, misdirects reimbursement claims and can breach the employer’s INAIL reporting obligations. When in doubt, treat the causation question as the first triage step before any pay decision.
INPS periodically issues circulars clarifying employee sick leave Italy practice. The core clarifications typically concern the medical certificate itself and how it reaches INPS. Current guidance addresses how the date of onset of the illness is to be stated in the prognosis, tightens expectations around prognosis wording, and reiterates the administrative rules for telematic transmission by general practitioners. In short, it reduces ambiguity about when the protected sickness period begins and how the certificate’s content should read.
For employers, three practical consequences follow. The date of onset needs to be read carefully against the first day of absence, because any mismatch between the employee’s self-reported first day and the certificate’s onset date is exactly what INPS and tribunals scrutinise. The prognosis wording governs the end date of the protected period, which in turn fixes when a return-to-work assessment or follow-up certificate is expected. And because transmission is telematic and effectively instantaneous, the employer should confirm receipt through INPS online channels rather than waiting for a paper copy from the employee.
The most sensitive issue is backdating. A certificate that records an onset date earlier than the consultation, or that does not clearly connect to the employee’s notified first day of absence, raises a verification flag. Employers should instruct line managers to log the employee’s first notification precisely (date and time), so that the HR record can be cross-checked against the certificate’s onset date. Where the two diverge without explanation, do not simply pay or refuse to pay: record the discrepancy, retrieve the certificate data from INPS and, if necessary, route the matter through INPS verification rather than acting unilaterally.
Updating your absence policy and notifying staff of the correct reporting procedure is the single most effective step to take in response to current guidance.
The following nine-step workflow converts the legal and administrative rules into a sequence HR can follow. Each step identifies who acts, the timing, the required content and a short template where relevant.
The employee’s duty is to notify absence promptly so the employer can organise cover and begin the record. Fix the acceptable method in your policy, telephone to the direct manager, backed by email or PEC, and the deadline (commonly the same working day). Capture date, time and the channel used. A short template keeps this consistent:
“I am unable to attend work today [date] due to illness. I am seeing my doctor and will ensure the telematic medical certificate is issued to INPS. My certificate protocol number is [to follow].”
The doctor issues the certificate and transmits it telematically to INPS; the process is designed to make the certificate available to INPS instantly. The certificate must clearly record the date of onset and a prognosis. The employee is normally given a protocol number and should pass this to the employer, who can then retrieve the certificate data from INPS directly. Instruct employees never to send scanned certificates by informal channels and never to include diagnosis details, the employer is entitled to the prognosis and protected period, not the underlying clinical diagnosis.
Health data is a special category under the GDPR and its Italian implementation, so the employer must apply data-minimisation. Record only what is operationally necessary: the fact of certified illness, the protocol number, the onset date and the end of the prognosis. Keep this in a restricted HR/payroll file, limit access, and involve the Data Protection Officer where your processing scale or risk requires it. Avoid storing clinical detail; it is neither required nor lawful to hold more than the certification data you need to administer pay and the absence.
Rather than relying on the employee to hand over paper, retrieve the certificate through INPS online services using the protocol number. This confirms the onset date and prognosis against the HR record created in Step 1. Where the certificate’s onset date and the employee’s first notified day of absence match, proceed. Where they diverge, flag the record and do not act punitively, move to Step 7 if verification is warranted. Consistent reconciliation at this stage is the best defence against later reimbursement rejection.
Sick pay in Italy is a two-layer system. The CCNL sets the contractual amount and duration the employer must provide, and the employer typically advances payment. Depending on the employee’s category, part of the sickness allowance is borne by INPS, and for categories covered by the INPS sickness allowance the employer generally advances it and offsets it against social-security contributions (conguaglio) in the monthly declaration. The exact split, the carry period and the integration percentage vary by CCNL, so annotate your process per the agreement that applies, the metalworkers’ and commerce agreements, for example, do not treat the carry period identically. Apply the correct rule before the next payroll run to avoid overpayment or under-recovery.
Return normally occurs automatically at the end of the prognosis. For roles subject to mandatory health surveillance under D.Lgs. 81/2008, or after extended or safety-sensitive absence, the occupational physician (Medico Competente) issues a fitness-for-work judgment. This is distinct from the GP’s sickness certificate: the GP certifies incapacity, while the occupational physician certifies fitness to perform specific duties, with or without restrictions. Build a clear trigger into your policy for when a return-to-work assessment is required, and fund it, employer-mandated occupational health checks are a statutory cost.
An employer may doubt a certificate, but the lawful route runs through institutional verification, not self-help. INPS and the local health authority (ASL) can carry out medical checks and, where appropriate, INPS medical commissions assess the claim. The employer’s role is to supply well-evidenced grounds, documented inconsistencies, verified external facts, not to form its own medical opinion. Disciplinary action should follow only after proper verification establishes misconduct, and the employer must respect medical confidentiality throughout. Corte di Cassazione precedent repeatedly underlines that disciplinary and dismissal measures must rest on clear proof and procedural fairness; unilateral action on suspicion alone is high-risk.
Where the occupational physician finds the employee fit only with limitations, the employer must consider reasonable adjustments to the role, hours or tasks. This is both a safety obligation under D.Lgs. 81/2008 and a protection against discrimination claims. Document the physician’s restrictions, the adjustments considered, and what was implemented. If no safe accommodation exists, take advice before moving toward incapacity-based termination, which engages the protected period and dismissal-protection rules.
Close the loop with disciplined retention. Keep certificates, notifications, payroll evidence, INPS decisions and occupational health reports for the periods set out in the required-documents table below, and run a periodic HR audit to confirm that onset dates, prognoses and pay calculations reconcile. A clean audit trail is what converts a contested absence into a defensible file.
| Issue | Employer action | INPS action |
|---|---|---|
| Validate certificate | Request verification through institutional channels, within legal limits; no self-formed medical opinion | May perform medical checks via ASL or INPS medical commissions |
| Reimbursement | Advance pay per CCNL; offset the INPS allowance via the monthly declaration (conguaglio) where the category applies | Verifies eligibility and recognises or denies the allowance |
| Contest / suspected fraud | Disciplinary action only after clear proof and fair process | May open a verification procedure; fraudulent cases can escalate to criminal referral |
The documents below form the mandatory file for any certified absence. Retention periods should be read alongside the applicable CCNL and any active legal hold; where a tax or litigation reason requires longer retention, that controls. Store all health-related records with restricted access and process only the minimum necessary.
| Document | Issuer | Purpose | Retention recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical certificate (certificato di malattia / prognosi) | General practitioner (telematic to INPS) | Proof of incapacity; records date of onset and prognosis | HR file while employment active + 5 years (check CCNL and legal holds) |
| Employee notification of absence | Employee | Initial notice to employer (phone/PEC/email) | 2 years minimum; per internal policy |
| Employer records for INPS (where applicable) | Employer / payroll | Record for allowance offset and verification | 5 years (payroll records) |
| Payroll records of sick pay | Employer payroll | Evidence of payments and offsets | Per applicable tax/social-security retention rules |
| Fitness-for-work / return-to-work note | Treating or occupational physician | Evidence of clearance or restrictions | Until termination + 5 years |
| INPS verification / decision letters | INPS | Outcome of checks or allowance decisions | With personnel file |
| Occupational health reports (visite mediche) | Occupational physician (Medico Competente) | Risk assessments and fit notes | Per D.Lgs. 81/2008 requirements |
The table below gives an actionable compliance timeline. Note the current emphasis on the onset date: reconcile it against the employee’s first notified day at Step 1 before you pay.
| Step | Who | Typical duration / deadline |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Employee notifies employer of illness | Employee to manager/HR | Same day or within 1 working day (per policy/CCNL) |
| 2. Employee obtains certificato medico; GP transmits telematically to INPS | Employee / GP | Issued on day of consultation; telematic transmission effectively instantaneous |
| 3. Employer records absence in HR/payroll | HR / payroll | Immediately, for payroll accuracy |
| 4. Employer verifies certificate and assesses CCNL pay | HR / payroll | Before the next payroll run |
| 5. Employer/payroll accounts for the INPS allowance (where applicable) | Employer / payroll | Per INPS rules and monthly declaration deadlines |
| 6. INPS/ASL verification (if initiated) | INPS medical commission / ASL | Variable depending on caseload; employer receives the outcome |
| 7. Return-to-work fitness assessment | Occupational / treating physician | On return or at employer request (per D.Lgs. 81/2008 for high-risk roles) |
| 8. Contest / disciplinary process (if applicable) | Employer / labour counsel | Respect procedural fairness and CCNL/statutory time limits for disciplinary proceedings |
Sick-pay cost allocation is set primarily by the CCNL and INPS rules. The employer usually funds the contractual period and advances payment, offsetting the INPS share where the category allows. Administrative and occupational-health costs sit with the employer. Non-compliance, failing to administer the absence correctly or acting unlawfully on suspicion, carries financial and litigation exposure.
| Cost / fee | Who typically pays | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Employer sick pay (contractual period per CCNL) | Employer | Amount and duration set by CCNL; employer advances and may offset the INPS share by category |
| INPS sickness allowance | INPS (where eligible) | Rate and eligibility depend on category and INPS rules; commonly advanced by the employer and offset |
| Administrative / payroll processing | Employer / payroll provider | Internal time plus any external provider fees |
| Penalties for failure to notify or wrongful dismissal | Employer | Administrative sanctions and litigation risk; amounts depend on the violation and tribunal outcomes |
| Occupational health exam costs | Employer (statutory under D.Lgs. 81/2008) | Employer funds mandatory workplace health checks |
In outline: the employer administers the absence, applies the CCNL, advances contractual pay, handles data lawfully and manages return-to-work and any disciplinary process; INPS determines benefit eligibility, carries the statutory sickness share, performs medical verification and recognises the allowance. Keeping these roles distinct, particularly resisting the temptation to form medical judgments that belong to INPS or ASL, is what keeps the employer on the right side of both reimbursement and litigation risk.
To consolidate: INPS guidance clarifies how the date of onset is expressed in the certificato di malattia, sharpens expectations for prognosis wording and restates the telematic transmission rules for general practitioners. The employer actions that follow are concrete: update the absence policy and staff communications; instruct line managers to log first-notification date and time precisely; confirm certificate data through INPS online channels; and brief payroll to reconcile the onset date against the first day of absence before calculating pay. These are low-cost changes that materially reduce reimbursement rejections and contest risk. Always check the latest INPS circulars directly, as guidance is updated periodically.
Use the following short templates as a starting point; they are for guidance only and should be adapted to your CCNL and reviewed before use. First, an employee notification email confirming the first day of absence and undertaking to supply the certificate protocol number. Second, an employer internal acknowledgement logging the notification date, time and channel and opening the HR record. Third, a payroll checklist confirming the onset date reconciled against first notification, the CCNL rule applied, the advance paid and the INPS allowance accounted for. For practitioner guidance on wording and on lawful contest procedures, consult qualified Italian employment counsel and current INPS resources.
Employee sick leave Italy management rewards process discipline over improvisation: a precise first-notification log, a reconciled onset date, lawful data handling and institutional verification of any doubt will keep almost every absence defensible. Align your policy and payroll to current INPS guidance now, and treat the next INPS or Ministero update as the trigger for your next review.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Stefanie Lebek at DM&P Legal&Tax, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 14 minutes ago
posted 27 minutes ago
posted 33 minutes ago
posted 51 minutes ago
posted 56 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message