Our Expert in Austria
No results available
Last updated: August 2026.
Intra-company transfer Austria procedures give multinational employers a defined legal route to move non-EU managers, specialists and trainees from a related company abroad into an Austrian host entity. This guide is written for HR managers, in-house counsel, secondment coordinators and global mobility teams who need to complete a transfer correctly the first time. It sets out eligibility, a numbered step-by-step procedure, required documents, realistic timelines, costs and the recent regulatory changes that affect employer evidence and record-keeping duties.
Every legal claim is tied to a primary source, the EU ICT Directive (2014/66/EU), the Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI), the Austrian labour market service (AMS) and the federal legal database (RIS), so your team can verify each requirement against the official position.
An intra-company transfer permit allows a qualifying group to second an employee who has an existing employment relationship with a company outside the EU to an affiliated Austrian entity. The Austrian regime implements EU Directive 2014/66/EU (EUR-Lex 2014/66/EU). The route is normally used for managers, specialists and trainees rather than newly recruited staff. In Austria the corresponding residence title is commonly referred to as the “ICT” and “mobile ICT” residence permit.
An intra-company transfer (ICT) is the temporary secondment of a non-EU national from an undertaking established outside the EU to an entity belonging to the same group in Austria. The concept is harmonised across the EU by Directive 2014/66/EU, which obliges member states to provide a specific transfer route and sets out the core categories of transferee, manager, specialist and trainee employee (EUR-Lex 2014/66/EU). Austria implements these rules primarily through the Settlement and Residence Act (Niederlassungs- und Aufenthaltsgesetz, NAG) and related employment legislation, published in the federal legal information system (RIS).
Typical scenarios include a US parent company sending a project manager to its Vienna subsidiary, an Indian technology group deploying a specialist engineer to an Austrian affiliate, or a UK firm placing a graduate trainee at a related Austrian office for structured development. In each case the defining feature is the existing employment relationship abroad and the qualifying corporate connection, an intra-company transfer Austria application will fail without both.
The legal foundation is twofold: the EU ICT Directive (2014/66/EU) at European level, and the Austrian implementing provisions administered by the immigration authorities and published via RIS. Where the Directive leaves discretion to member states, for example on salary requirements or duration limits, Austrian national rules fill the detail (RIS; BMI).
Eligibility turns on three linked tests: the qualifying relationship between the companies, the transferee’s role and seniority, and the salary and qualification conditions. All three must be satisfied for an intra-company transfer Austria application to succeed.
The sending company and the Austrian host entity must belong to the same group of undertakings or be affiliated companies, consistent with the group-link requirement in Directive 2014/66/EU (EUR-Lex 2014/66/EU). Employers should be able to evidence the corporate connection with certificates of incorporation, ownership or shareholding documents and, where relevant, an intra-group assignment agreement. The Austrian host entity must be properly registered and able to demonstrate that it can receive and employ the transferee lawfully (BMI).
Trainees are treated as a distinct category, generally requiring a university degree and a structured training agreement. Managers and specialists face different evidential emphasis, managers on decision-making authority, specialists on specialised knowledge essential to the host entity. Short-term secondments may proceed under posting rules rather than a full residence permit; the appropriate route depends on assignment duration and social security arrangements. Companies can second employees to Austria within intra-group arrangements, most ICTs continue to operate under the current framework, and employers should confirm the current evidence and notification duties before filing (RIS; BMI).
Whether accompanying family members obtain residence rights depends on the specific permit granted. ICT residence permits generally allow family members to apply for a corresponding residence title, subject to the applicable conditions. Confirm the family position at application stage and prepare dependant documentation in parallel (oesterreich.gv.at).
The following numbered procedure maps the full employer workflow, from due diligence to post-arrival compliance. Responsibilities and indicative durations are consolidated in the timeline table below.
In practice, phases overlap. Document preparation (step 4) can run alongside route confirmation (step 3), and AMS liaison (step 6) may begin before final submission depending on the route. Building a shared checklist between the sending HR team, the Austrian host and counsel prevents duplicated effort and missed items.
| Step (number & name) | Who is responsible | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-transfer compliance check | Employer (HR / mobility) + counsel | 1–2 weeks |
| 2. Verify qualifying group relationship | Employer (legal / finance) | 2–7 days |
| 3. Decide permit route (ICT vs RWR vs posting) | Employer + counsel | 1–3 days |
| 4. Prepare application documents | Employer + employee | 1–4 weeks (depends on document collection) |
| 5. Submit application (embassy or authority) | Employer or employee (per route) | Varies (see timeline section) |
| 6. AMS involvement (if applicable) | AMS (via employer / authority) | Varies |
| 7. Authority decision & visa issuance | Austrian authority / embassy | Subject to statutory maximum periods |
| 8. Arrival registrations & set-up | Employer (local HR) | 1–2 weeks post-arrival |
Processing times vary by nationality, country of application and case complexity. The ICT Directive sets a maximum decision period (in principle 90 days from a complete application), but treat any durations as indicative and confirm current handling times against BMI and AMS guidance (BMI; AMS).
Assembling a complete, correctly certified document set is the single biggest lever on processing time. The table below lists the standard requirements by provider and includes notes on translations, apostilles and the presentation of corporate evidence. Requirements differ by transferee category, managers and specialists emphasise role and prior employment, while trainees must evidence the structured training agreement and academic qualification.
| Document | Who provides | When required / notes |
|---|---|---|
| Valid passport | Employee | Copy + original for consular check; valid for the entire intended stay |
| Recent passport photos | Employee | As per embassy specifications |
| Employment contract + secondment / assignment letter | Employer & employee | Specify role, salary, duration and reporting lines |
| Proof of qualifying relationship (group / affiliate) | Employer | Certificate of incorporation, ownership documents, intra-group agreement |
| Evidence of prior employment with sending company | Employee | Payslips, contracts showing minimum prior service |
| Job description and qualifications (CV, diplomas) | Employee | Certified translations if not in German |
| Proof of accommodation in Austria | Employer / employee | Tenancy agreement or host letter |
| Health insurance coverage | Employer / employee | Private or statutory, per legal requirements |
| Proof of salary meeting requirements | Employer | Recent payslips / payroll records |
| Police clearance / certificate of good conduct | Employee | From country of residence; may need apostille |
| Company financials / letter of intent to hire | Employer | For employer credibility checks |
| A1 certificate (if posted under social security rules) | Employer | Where social security remains in the sending country |
| Power of attorney / authorisation letter | Employer | Where counsel files on behalf of the employee |
Two practical points. First, certified German translations are needed for any document not already in German, and foreign public documents frequently require an apostille or legalisation depending on the country of origin. Second, corporate evidence should tell a clear story: a single chart or memorandum linking the sending company, the group parent and the Austrian host reduces follow-up queries (RIS; BMI).
Realistic planning avoids the two most common scheduling failures: promising a business a start date the process cannot meet, and letting documents expire mid-application. Indicative timelines by route are:
The start point matters. Some timelines run from the date the authority or consulate receives a complete file; others effectively begin at the consular appointment date, which itself may be subject to a backlog. To avoid delay: submit a complete document set, arrange certified translations and apostilles in advance, respond to information requests within days rather than weeks, and confirm at the outset whether an entry visa is needed to travel while the residence permit is processed. Where expedited handling is available it is limited and route-dependent, so it should never be assumed. Cross-reference the Step / Who / Duration table for how these durations distribute across the workflow (BMI; AMS).
Budgeting should cover government charges, embassy fees, professional fees and the practical costs of translation, certification and relocation. The figures below are indicative only; always verify current government and consular fees on the official BMI and consulate schedules before committing a budget.
| Fee type | Typical payer | Indicative amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application & issuance fees (ICT / residence permit) | Applicant / employer | As set by the authority | Check current BMI / consulate fee schedule |
| Embassy visa fee (if applicable) | Applicant | As set by the consulate | Short-stay and national visa fees differ |
| AMS involvement / labour market check | Employer | Usually no separate admin fee | Indirect time cost; possible recruitment advertising if required |
| Legal / counsel fee | Employer | Case dependent | Depends on complexity and any fast-track requests |
| Translation & notarisation | Employer / employee | Per document / country | Varies by volume and origin |
| A1 certificate processing | Employer | Minimal | Social security admin fee may apply |
| Relocation costs (housing, travel) | Employer | Variable | Employer policy dependent |
Exact government and consular fees change and should always be confirmed against the official BMI and consulate pages before you finalise a cost estimate (BMI).
Austrian immigration and skilled-worker rules are periodically updated, and changes can affect intra-company transfer Austria planning, including eligibility calibration, employer documentation duties, and notification and record-keeping obligations. Because the detail sits in the relevant statutes and ordinances, HR teams should read the applicable provisions via RIS and follow the accompanying ministry guidance rather than relying on secondary summaries (RIS; BMI).
Employers should be prepared to formally confirm certain facts, for example the qualifying relationship, the transferee’s prior service, or the salary offered, and to retain the supporting evidence. Ensure any confirmations are signed by a person with authority to bind the company, and keep the underlying documents on file (RIS; BMI).
Compliance runs across the whole lifecycle, before, during and after the secondment. Use this concise checklist as the backbone of an internal control:
| Route | Purpose | Typical duration | Labour market test | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICT permit | Intra-group transfer of employees | Short- to medium-term (Directive caps managers/specialists and trainees) | Usually no standard test (AMS may verify conditions) | Family members may apply for a corresponding residence title |
| Red-White-Red (RWR) | Qualified third-country workers (criteria-based) | Long-term settlement possible over time | Points / criteria system | Family reunification possible |
| Posted worker | Short-term posting under sending state’s social security | Short-term | No standard Austrian labour market test for short posts | Family rights unchanged |

A successful intra-company transfer Austria project comes down to sequencing: confirm the corporate link and prior employment, choose the right route, assemble a complete and certified document set, plan for the statutory decision window, and lock down post-arrival compliance. Employer evidence and record-keeping matter, so keep your templates current and audit live files regularly. This article is general guidance only and does not replace case-specific legal advice; employers should obtain tailored counsel for individual transfers. For a managed application or a compliance audit of your transfer process, contact the Global Law Experts corporate immigration network via the Corporate Immigration, Austria overview.
Related reading: Corporate Immigration, Austria (overview). See also the supporting guides on the employer checklist for documents and costs for Austrian work permits, secondments and posting rules, the compliance audit for corporate immigration, post-arrival obligations for seconded employees, and converting an ICT to long-term residence or the RWR card.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Ewald Oberhammer at Oberhammer Rechtsanwälte GmbH, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 10 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Send welcome message