Our Expert in India
No results available
Whether stamp duty is payable on a share for share exchange is one of the most commercially consequential, yet frequently misunderstood, questions facing M&A and PE deal teams executing share-swap transactions in India. Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the post-2020 depository-based collection framework, stamp duty treatment hinges on the type of instrument executed (SPA, SSSA or transfer deed), the route of transfer (off-market physical versus demat), and the state in which the instrument is stamped. The Maharashtra Stamp (Amendment) Bill 2026 has added fresh urgency by revising schedule entries that directly affect subscription and allotment instruments used in share-swap structures.
This guide sets out, in practical terms, who pays, at what rate, on which documents, and what deal teams must do at each stage of a transaction to avoid enforceability gaps, penalties and escrow disputes.
Yes, in most cases, stamp duty will be payable, but the incidence and rate depend on how the exchange is structured. Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, any instrument that effects or records a transfer of shares for consideration (including non-cash consideration such as shares) is prima facie a chargeable instrument. Section 8A of the Act modifies the position for securities held in dematerialised form by routing the collection obligation through depositories and stock exchanges, but it does not eliminate the underlying charge. Where a share-for-share exchange involves the execution of a share purchase agreement (SPA), a share subscription and shareholders agreement (SSSA), or a share transfer deed, each document may attract separate stamp duty under the applicable state schedule.
The post-2020 consolidated collection framework, operationalised through NSDL and CDSL procedural circulars, shifted the collection mechanism for securities transactions to stock exchanges, clearing corporations and depository participants (DPs). Industry observers expect the Maharashtra 2026 amendments to further clarify the state’s schedule entries for subscription instruments, making it essential for deal teams to track state-level Gazette notifications alongside central rules.
The stamp duty on transfer of shares in India is governed primarily by the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, read together with the Depositories Act, 1996 and state stamp legislation. The Indian Stamp Act classifies instruments into categories listed in its Schedule, assigning ad valorem or fixed duty rates to each category. Instruments that evidence or effect the transfer or issue of securities fall under several entries, including those for “conveyance,” “transfer” and, in some state schedules, specific securities entries.
Section 8A, inserted by the Finance Act, 2019 and effective from 1 July 2020, provides that the stamp duty on the transfer of securities dealt with by a depository shall be collected by the depository or, in the case of exchange-traded transactions, by the stock exchange or clearing corporation on behalf of the state government. The critical practical effect is twofold:
For share-for-share exchanges, Section 8A applies to the “transfer” leg, the delivery of existing shares from transferor to acquirer via the depository system. However, the “issue” leg, new shares issued by the acquirer as swap consideration, may attract separate duty under state schedule entries for allotment or issue of securities.
The Depositories Act, 1996 defines the legal framework under which NSDL and CDSL operate as central depositories. Section 8A of the Stamp Act cross-references the Depositories Act definition of “depository” and “securities” to delineate which transactions fall under the depository-based collection regime. NSDL Circular NSDL/POLICY/2020/0085 sets out the detailed procedure and guidelines for collection of stamp duty by depository participants, including the obligation on DPs to debit duty from the transferee’s account at the time a transfer instruction is processed. For off-market share swaps between unlisted companies, a common M&A structure, the DP acting for the transferee collects and remits duty based on the consideration value or market value, whichever the state specifies.
A share-for-share exchange typically involves multiple documents, each of which may independently trigger a stamp duty obligation. Understanding the stamp treatment of each instrument is essential when structuring a stamp duty on share swap transaction.
A share purchase agreement records the sale and purchase of existing shares for consideration. Where the consideration is cash, the SPA is a chargeable instrument under the applicable state schedule entry for “agreement” or “conveyance.” Where the consideration is shares (i.e., a share swap), the SPA still evidences a transfer for value and remains prima facie stampable. The quantum of duty depends on the state schedule: some states charge ad valorem duty on the value of the shares transferred; others charge a fixed fee for “agreements” not otherwise specifically provided for.
In practice, the stamp duty on share purchase agreement is calculated by reference to the state where the agreement is first executed. Deal teams should include an explicit stamp allocation clause in the SPA, specifying which party bears the cost and providing for an indemnity if the instrument is subsequently assessed for additional duty.
A share subscription and shareholders agreement governs the issue (allotment) of new shares. In a share-for-share exchange, the acquirer issues new shares to the target’s shareholders as swap consideration. Under Section 8A and the post-2020 collection framework, the issuer is typically responsible for paying stamp duty on the issue of securities through the depository. The Maharashtra Stamp (Amendment) Bill 2026 has proposed changes to the schedule entries applicable to subscription and allotment instruments, the likely practical effect of which will be to broaden the base on which ad valorem duty is computed for certain types of share issues. Deal teams executing swaps with a Maharashtra nexus should monitor the official Gazette for the notification date of these amendments.
For unlisted and closely held companies where shares are held in physical form, a share transfer deed (Form SH-4 under the Companies Act, 2013) must be executed and stamped in accordance with the state schedule. NSDL procedural circulars confirm that where shares are subsequently dematerialised, the original physical transfer instrument must already be duly stamped, dematerialisation does not cure an unstamped transfer.
For demat transfers, the delivery instruction slip processed by the DP replaces the physical transfer deed. Stamp duty is collected by the DP at the point of transfer, as per NSDL’s detailed procedural guidelines. The rate applied is the rate notified by the state in which the transferee’s DP is registered.
The question of who pays stamp duty on shares in a share-for-share exchange is governed by a combination of statutory rules and commercial negotiation. The Indian Stamp Act does not always specify a single “payer”, it identifies the instrument as chargeable and makes the person executing the instrument primarily liable. In practice, the allocation is shaped by the collection mechanism and by contractual allocation clauses in the SPA or SSSA.
| Instrument | Statutory / Collection Mechanism | Typical Market Practice (Who Pays) |
|---|---|---|
| SPA (sale of shares for consideration) | Chargeable instrument under state schedule. For exchange trades, collected by stock exchange / clearing corporation. For off-market transfers, collected by DP from transferee’s account. | Buyer bears duty on exchange trades (collected at source). In off-market transactions, practice varies, contractual allocation clause is essential. Historically, the transferor bore physical stamp costs; under the demat regime, the transferee’s DP debits duty. |
| SSSA / Subscription (issue of new shares) | Issuer liable to pay duty on issue of securities to depository under Section 8A / 9A framework. State schedule may treat allotment as a separately chargeable event. | Issuer pays (practical default). Some transactions contractually shift the burden to the subscribing investor, particularly in PE rounds where the investor negotiates gross-up provisions. |
| Share-for-share exchange (inter-company swap) | Duty may attach to each instrument executed, the transfer instrument (existing shares moving from transferor to acquirer) and the issue instrument (new shares issued as consideration). States may apply different schedule entries to each leg. | Often negotiated: the acquirer (as issuer of swap consideration) typically bears stamp duty on the issuance leg. The transfer leg duty is allocated by contract. SPA vs SSSA stamp duty allocation must be explicit and backed by indemnity language. |
Stamp duty on the transfer or issue of securities is a state subject under the Indian constitutional framework. While the central amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2019 capped the rates for securities transactions collected through depositories and stock exchanges, states retain the power to set rates for instruments not falling within the depository collection mechanism, including SPAs, SSSAs and physical transfer deeds executed as ancillary deal documents.
The table below provides an indicative snapshot of stamp duty rates applicable to share transfers and related instruments in high-volume jurisdictions. Deal teams must verify current rates against the relevant state Gazette or stamp department website before closing.
| State / UT | Indicative Rate / Basis | 2026 Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Maharashtra | 0.015% on transfer of securities (demat, via depository); higher ad valorem rates may apply to SPAs / SSSAs under state schedule entries for “agreements” or “conveyances.” | The Maharashtra Stamp (Amendment) Bill 2026 proposes changes to schedule entries affecting subscription and allotment instruments. Check the Maharashtra Law & Judiciary Department Gazette for the notification date and revised rates. |
| Delhi / NCT | 0.015% on demat transfers collected via depository / DP. SPAs stamped as “agreements” may attract a fixed or ad valorem rate under the Delhi stamp schedule. | Verify with the Delhi Registration Office and applicable UT notifications. |
| Karnataka | 0.015% on demat transfers. State-specific caps and refund procedures apply to instruments stamped as conveyances. | Karnataka state stamp schedule should be cross-checked for SPAs involving immovable-property-holding companies. |
| Tamil Nadu | 0.015% on demat transfers. Subscription agreements may attract different treatment under state entries for “allotment.” | Verify with the Tamil Nadu Registration Department. |
| West Bengal | 0.015% on demat transfers. Historically higher rates for physical share transfer deeds under the Bengal Stamp Act entries. | State stamps department notifications should be reviewed for any 2026 revisions. |
| Gujarat | 0.015% on demat transfers. SPAs may be treated as agreements attracting nominal fixed duty under state schedule. | Check Gujarat state stamp schedule and any 2026 circulars. |
The 0.015% rate referenced above is the uniform rate for transfer of securities (on the sell side) collected through the depository / stock exchange mechanism under the post-2020 central framework. Instruments executed outside the depository mechanism, including SPAs, SSSAs and physical transfer deeds, may attract materially different rates under each state’s stamp schedule. The stamp duty Maharashtra 2026 amendments are particularly significant because Maharashtra is the domicile state of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), NSDL’s registered office, and a large proportion of corporate registered offices, meaning a change to Maharashtra schedule entries has outsized practical impact on Indian M&A transactions.
Deal teams structuring share-for-share exchanges often assume that certain reliefs apply automatically. In practice, the position is more nuanced, and missteps can trigger penalties or unenforceability.
The following checklist provides a practical roadmap for deal teams executing a stamp duty on share swap transaction. Each stage has specific stamping actions that, if missed, can render instruments inadmissible in evidence or trigger penalties under the Indian Stamp Act.
Failure to properly stamp instruments in a share-for-share exchange carries significant legal and commercial consequences under the Indian Stamp Act and state stamp legislation.
The following clauses are provided as drafting templates. They should be adapted to the specific transaction structure and reviewed by Indian stamp counsel before incorporation into definitive agreements.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Shailendra Komatreddy at TLH, Advocates & Solicitors, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 38 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message