Our Expert in Turkey
No results available
Understanding how to register medical devices in Turkey is essential for any manufacturer, authorised representative or importer planning to place a device on the Turkish market in 2026. Turkey’s regulatory framework has moved steadily closer to the EU MDR/IVDR model over the 2024–2026 period, yet the operational requirements, ÜTS product-tracking entries, Turkish registrant formalities, dossier translations and import licensing, have become more prescriptive than many foreign companies anticipate. Even CE-marked products can face significant market-access delays when manufacturers overlook local registration obligations or submit incomplete dossiers to the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TİTCK).
This guide walks through every critical step, from device classification and regulatory pathway selection to ÜTS registration, TITCK dossier preparation, import clearance and ongoing post-market obligations.
Before diving into detail, the checklist below provides a high-level decision tree for manufacturers asking how to register medical devices in Turkey. Use it as a starting point; each step is expanded in the sections that follow.
Classification is the gateway to every subsequent registration decision. Turkey applies a risk-based device classification system that mirrors the EU MDR framework, categorising devices into four classes based on intended purpose, duration of contact, invasiveness and active/non-active status. Correct classification determines the conformity-assessment route, the Notified Body involvement required and the depth of clinical evidence TİTCK expects in the dossier.
| Turkey Class | EU MDR Equivalent | Risk Level | Examples | Notified Body Required? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | Class I | Low | Non-sterile bandages, manual wheelchairs, tongue depressors | No (self-declaration); Yes for sterile or measuring function |
| Class IIa | Class IIa | Medium-low | Diagnostic ultrasound devices, hearing aids, surgical clamps | Yes |
| Class IIb | Class IIb | Medium-high | Ventilators, haemodialysis equipment, surgical lasers | Yes |
| Class III | Class III | High | Coronary stents, hip implants, implantable defibrillators | Yes |
Products that sit on the boundary between medical devices, cosmetics or general consumer goods, such as certain skin-care devices or LED therapy masks, require a borderline classification determination. TİTCK may request additional data to confirm the device’s intended purpose. In vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices follow a separate regulatory track under Turkey’s IVD-specific regulation, itself aligned with the EU IVDR. Manufacturers of borderline or IVD products should seek a formal classification opinion from TİTCK before proceeding with dossier preparation.
A manufacturer based outside Turkey cannot directly submit ÜTS registrations or TITCK dossiers. Turkish law requires that a local legal entity, the Turkish registrant (often referred to as the “responsible person” or authorised representative), act as the regulatory point of contact. Understanding who does what is critical to avoiding gaps in compliance responsibility.
The appointment of a Turkish registrant should be formalised in a written agreement. Industry observers expect TİTCK to increase scrutiny of registrant-appointment documentation during inspections. At a minimum, the contract should address the following clauses:
The TITCK registration dossier is the core technical submission that demonstrates a device’s safety, performance and conformity with Turkish regulations. While Turkey accepts EU CE certificates, the dossier must be localised, translated, notarised and supplemented with Turkey-specific information. Incomplete or poorly localised dossiers are the single most common cause of registration delays.
Attention to formatting details prevents avoidable rejections. Sworn translations must be performed by a court-certified translator in Turkey and bear the translator’s official seal. Notarisation of the CE certificate should be done through a Turkish notary public (noter), apostilled copies from the country of origin may also be accepted, but common practice is to have a local notarisation performed for added certainty. All documents should be submitted as originals or certified copies; photocopies without authentication are routinely rejected.
The ÜTS (Ürün Takip Sistemi, or Product Tracking System) is Turkey’s mandatory electronic registry for medical devices. No device may be placed on the Turkish market without an active ÜTS registration. The system serves both a traceability function, tracking individual products from manufacturer to end user, and a regulatory gate-keeping role, as TİTCK uses ÜTS data to monitor market surveillance and recall activity.
The Turkish registrant (or the manufacturer’s Turkish subsidiary, if one exists) is responsible for creating and maintaining ÜTS entries. Importers must verify that ÜTS registration is complete before releasing goods from customs. Distributors interact with the system primarily at the point of supply-chain handoff, confirming receipt and onward distribution of registered products.
| Field | Description | Mandatory? |
|---|---|---|
| Product name | Commercial and generic name of the device | Yes |
| GMDN code | Global Medical Device Nomenclature classification code | Yes |
| Device class | Class I, IIa, IIb or III | Yes |
| Manufacturer | Legal name and country of the manufacturing entity | Yes |
| CE certificate number | Certificate ID and issuing Notified Body | Yes |
| Turkish registrant | Legal name and Tax ID of the local responsible entity | Yes |
| Batch/lot number | Unique identifier for each production run | Yes (at batch level) |
| Expiry date | Shelf-life end date, where applicable | Conditional |
| UDI | Unique Device Identification barcode data | Yes (where UDI-DI is assigned) |
After ÜTS registration and TITCK dossier filing, the physical importation of devices triggers additional customs and licensing requirements. Understanding these steps is critical for manufacturers and importers seeking to avoid port delays and additional costs.
Medical devices entering Turkey require a customs-clearance permit that references the device’s ÜTS registration. For certain higher-risk devices or those subject to additional Ministry of Health controls, a separate import licence (ithalat izni) may be needed. The importer, which may be the Turkish registrant or a distinct customs-clearing entity, must present the following at the point of import:
Customs inspection rates for medical devices vary but early indications suggest increased spot-checks in 2026, particularly for Class IIb and Class III devices. Importers should build a buffer of five to ten business days into their logistics timeline to accommodate potential inspections. Devices held at customs without an active ÜTS entry or with mismatched documentation may be placed in quarantine, a process that can delay market entry by several weeks and incur storage charges. Engaging a customs broker experienced in medical-device imports is strongly recommended.
Registration is not the end of the compliance journey. Turkey’s post-market surveillance framework requires ongoing monitoring, reporting and, where necessary, corrective action for the entire lifecycle of a device on the Turkish market.
Serious incidents involving a medical device, defined as events that led or might have led to the death or serious deterioration in health of a patient, user or other person, must be reported to TİTCK by the Turkish registrant. The reporting timeline depends on severity:
Reports are submitted through TİTCK’s electronic vigilance portal. The manufacturer must provide the Turkish registrant with all supporting investigation data within the agreed contractual timeframe.
Manufacturers are expected to maintain a post-market surveillance (PMS) plan for each device. For Class IIa, IIb and III devices, TİTCK may request Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) summarising complaint data, incident trends, corrective actions and any changes to the risk-benefit profile. Class I device manufacturers are still required to maintain a PMS system but are generally not obligated to submit periodic reports proactively.
Products classified at the device–cosmetic boundary may trigger both medical-device vigilance and cosmetovigilance obligations. Where a product was registered as a medical device but also has cosmetic claims, adverse-event reports should be assessed under the device vigilance framework first. If TİTCK reclassifies the product as a cosmetic, cosmetovigilance rules under Turkey’s Cosmetic Products Regulation apply. Manufacturers of borderline products should maintain dual-reporting capability.
Planning a realistic project timeline is crucial for managing commercial expectations. The table below provides indicative timeframes and cost categories for a typical device registration project in Turkey. Actual durations vary by device class, dossier complexity and TİTCK workload.
| Phase | Best-Case Duration | Typical Duration | Key Cost Categories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification and gap analysis | 1–2 weeks | 2–4 weeks | Regulatory consultancy fees |
| Turkish registrant appointment and contract | 2–3 weeks | 4–6 weeks | Legal review, negotiation costs |
| Dossier preparation and localisation | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks | Sworn translation, notarisation, PIF compilation |
| ÜTS product and batch registration | 1–2 weeks | 2–4 weeks | Administrative (system access, data entry) |
| TITCK dossier review (Class I) | 2–4 weeks | 4–8 weeks | Registration fees (if applicable) |
| TITCK dossier review (Class IIa/IIb) | 4–8 weeks | 8–16 weeks | Registration fees, potential query-response cycles |
| TITCK dossier review (Class III) | 8–12 weeks | 16–24 weeks | Higher registration fees, clinical-data queries |
| Import clearance and first shipment | 1–2 weeks | 2–4 weeks | Customs broker fees, storage, inspection charges |
Delay mitigation tips: begin dossier localisation and ÜTS registration in parallel rather than sequentially. Engage a customs broker before the first shipment arrives. Pre-validate all document translations against TİTCK terminology standards. Maintain a query-response template library so that TİTCK information requests can be answered within days rather than weeks.
The table below summarises how registration duties and post-market obligations are split among the key actors in the Turkish medical device supply chain.
| Entity | Registration / Pre-Market Duties | Post-Market / Reporting Duties |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer (outside Turkey) | Compile PIF, obtain CE/DoC, appoint and contract Turkish registrant, provide QMS evidence (ISO 13485) | Supply vigilance-investigation data, support field safety corrective actions, update PMS plan and PSUR |
| Turkish registrant (local entity / RP) | Submit ÜTS product and batch entries, file TITCK dossier, maintain local copy of technical documentation | Receive and process safety reports, notify TİTCK within mandated timelines, coordinate recalls |
| Importer / Distributor | Verify ÜTS registration before placing on market, present correct customs documentation, ensure Turkish-language labelling | Forward incident information to registrant, maintain distribution and traceability records |
Successfully registering medical devices in Turkey demands careful coordination between the manufacturer, the Turkish registrant and the importer, supported by robust contracts, meticulously localised dossiers and proactive ÜTS management. Regulatory teams should begin the classification and gap-analysis phase well before a target market-entry date, ideally six to nine months ahead for higher-risk devices.
For manufacturers that do not yet have a Turkish subsidiary or a reliable local partner, engaging a qualified regulatory lawyer early in the process can help structure the Turkish registrant appointment, review TITCK dossier completeness and mitigate import-clearance risks. Explore the directory of lawyers in Turkey for specialist support, or consult the wider lawyer directory to find healthcare regulatory expertise across multiple jurisdictions. Staying current with Turkey’s evolving device regulations and ÜTS system updates, which have been issued frequently during the 2024–2026 alignment period, remains the most effective safeguard against costly compliance gaps.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Ata Umur Kalender at Erler Kalender Attorney Partnership, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 23 minutes ago
posted 46 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message