Our Expert in Kenya
No results available
Kenya’s family law landscape is shifting. A series of landmark High Court and Court of Appeal judgments handed down in 2025 and early 2026 has reshaped custody rights for children born outside marriage, clarified cohabitation property claims, and reinforced the primacy of the “best interests of the child” standard under the Children Act. On 17 April 2026 the Judiciary of Kenya issued a press release directing courts across the country to strengthen the referral of family disputes to mediation before contested hearings proceed, a policy change that alters the practical timeline and strategy for virtually every custody, divorce and succession case filed in Kenya today.
For parents navigating separation, spouses planning divorce, guardians protecting children’s welfare, and estate advisers handling contested successions, the combined effect of these family law reforms in Kenya is significant. Mediation is no longer an optional afterthought; it is becoming the expected first step. Custody applications by unmarried fathers now carry greater judicial support than at any point in the past two decades. And succession disputes that intersect with family breakdown are increasingly being channelled through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before probate courts will hear them. This guide explains what has changed, what it means in practice, and the steps readers should take now.
The family law reforms Kenya has experienced since mid-2025 are not the product of a single new statute. Instead, they flow from judicial interpretation, policy directives and the maturing of statutes already on the books. The key developments fall into three categories: custody and parental rights, mediation policy, and property and succession.
| Date | Event | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Children Act (Cap. 586) enacted, domestication of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child | Established the “best interests of the child” as the paramount consideration in all custody and guardianship decisions |
| 2013–2014 | Marriage Act 2014 and Matrimonial Property Act 2013 come into force | Created the statutory framework for divorce, matrimonial property division and recognition of different types of marriage |
| 2025–2026 | Series of landmark family law judgments (High Court and Court of Appeal) | Clarified custody rights of children born outside marriage; affirmed cohabitation property claims based on contribution and common intention |
| 17 April 2026 | Judiciary of Kenya press release: strengthened mediation referral for family disputes | Courts now actively refer custody, maintenance, property and succession cases to mediation before contested hearings |
The Judiciary’s 17 April 2026 directive marks a decisive shift in how mediation in family disputes in Kenya operates. While court-annexed mediation has existed under the Civil Procedure Rules and the Judiciary’s Court Annexed Mediation (CAM) programme since 2016, the new guidance elevates mediation from a discretionary suggestion to a standard pre-trial step. Industry observers expect that courts will increasingly decline to list contested custody or property matters for hearing until the parties have attempted mediation or provided cogent reasons why it is unsuitable.
There are two primary pathways. The first is court-annexed mediation, where a judge or magistrate refers a filed case to the Mediation Accreditation Committee’s roster of certified mediators. The court issues a mediation order, assigns a mediator, and sets a date, typically within 30 to 60 days of the referral. No additional filing fees are required for the mediation itself, although parties bear the mediator’s session fees. The second pathway is private mediation, where parties agree, either before or after filing a case, to engage a certified mediator independently. Private mediation may begin before any court case is filed, which can avoid the cost and emotional strain of formal proceedings entirely.
In both cases, the parties and their advocates attend mediation sessions. If agreement is reached, the mediator prepares a written settlement, which is signed by all parties. That agreement is then filed in court and converted into a consent order, a formal court order enforceable in the same way as a judgment. This enforcement mechanism is critical: a mediation agreement that is not recorded as a consent order lacks the immediate enforceability of a court decree.
Mediation sessions under the CAM programme typically involve session fees set by the Judiciary’s published schedule, which are substantially lower than the cost of a full hearing. Private mediators charge varying rates, but even at the higher end the total cost is generally a fraction of contested litigation. The early practical effect of the 2026 reforms is that cases referred to mediation tend to conclude the dispute, or at least narrow the contested issues, within one to three months, compared with six months to several years for fully litigated family matters.
| Aspect | Mediation | Litigation |
|---|---|---|
| Typical timeline | 1–3 months (varies by complexity) | 6 months to several years |
| Cost | Lower, fixed session fees plus advocate time | Higher, court filing fees, multiple hearings, prolonged advocate fees |
| Outcome enforceability | Enforceable once recorded as a court consent order | Court judgment, immediately enforceable |
| Confidentiality | Private, discussions are without prejudice | Public court record (though children matters may have restricted access) |
| Control over outcome | Parties decide together with mediator’s facilitation | Judge or magistrate decides; parties have limited control |
| Relationship preservation | Designed to reduce hostility, valuable where co-parenting continues | Adversarial by nature, can deepen conflict |
Mediation is not appropriate in every case. Where there is a history of domestic violence, where one party has absconded with a child, or where urgent interim orders are needed (such as a temporary injunction preventing asset disposal), direct court intervention remains necessary. In such situations, a party should file an urgent application under Certificate of Urgency and seek protective orders before any mediation is attempted.
Child custody in Kenya is governed by the Children Act (Cap. 586), the Constitution of Kenya (particularly Articles 45 and 53) and a growing body of case law. The overarching principle is simple but far-reaching: the best interests of the child are the paramount consideration in every custody decision. What has changed through the recent family law reforms in Kenya is the way courts apply that principle, particularly for unmarried parents and fathers seeking greater involvement in their children’s lives.
Section 4(2) of the Children Act requires courts to treat the child’s welfare as the first and paramount consideration. In determining what serves those interests, courts evaluate a range of factors: the child’s physical, emotional and educational needs; the likely effect of any change of circumstances on the child; the child’s age, sex and background; any harm the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering; the capability of each parent to meet the child’s needs; and, where the child is of sufficient age and understanding, the child’s own wishes. For a detailed analysis of how Kenyan courts interpret this standard, see the best interests of the child, Kenya’s paramount principle.
One of the most consequential effects of the 2025–2026 judgments is the clarification of custody rights when parents are not married. Under the Children Act, every child has the right to parental care from both parents regardless of the parents’ marital status. The practical position, however, had long favoured mothers, particularly for very young children, through a combination of statutory language and judicial convention.
Recent High Court decisions have emphasised that this maternal preference is not a legal presumption but a practical starting point that can be displaced by evidence. Fathers of children born outside marriage may apply for custody, access and guardianship provided they can demonstrate that they have acknowledged the child (through birth registration or other evidence), that they have been involved in or wish to be involved in the child’s upbringing, and that the proposed custody arrangement serves the child’s best interests.
The step-by-step process for an unmarried father seeking custody or access typically involves:
There is no specific age in Kenyan law at which a father (or mother) automatically gains or loses custody. However, courts have historically been more willing to place younger children, particularly those still breastfeeding or under the age of approximately five, in the primary care of their mother. The 2025–2026 judgments have not eliminated this tendency, but they have confirmed that age is only one factor. As children grow older, courts give increasing weight to the child’s own expressed wishes, especially once a child reaches the age where they can articulate a reasoned preference, typically around 12 to 14 years, though there is no statutory threshold.
Whether pursuing custody through mediation or court proceedings, parents should prepare the following:
Divorce in Kenya is governed by the Marriage Act 2014, which recognises civil, Christian, customary, Hindu and Islamic marriages and provides grounds for dissolution including cruelty, desertion, adultery and irretrievable breakdown. The practical question for most parties, however, is not whether divorce can be obtained but how property will be divided, how maintenance will be determined, and, under the family law reforms Kenya enacted and the Judiciary is now enforcing, whether mediation must come first.
Following the 17 April 2026 Judiciary directive, courts handling divorce petitions are expected to refer parties to mediation on ancillary matters, particularly property division, spousal maintenance and child arrangements, before scheduling contested hearings. The petition itself proceeds through the court, but the ancillary issues that typically consume the most time and cost are channelled through mediation. Where mediation produces an agreement, it is recorded as a consent order alongside the divorce decree. Where mediation fails, the court proceeds to hear the contested issues in the normal way.
Courts have wide discretion to award maintenance. Spousal maintenance may be ordered during the pendency of divorce proceedings (interim maintenance) or as part of the final decree. Factors include each spouse’s financial resources, earning capacity, standard of living during the marriage, the duration of the marriage, and contributions (including non-financial contributions such as childcare and homemaking). Child maintenance is assessed against the child’s reasonable needs and each parent’s means. The 2025–2026 judgments have reinforced that non-financial contributions to the family must be given meaningful weight in both maintenance and property decisions, a principle that early indications suggest will significantly affect cases where one spouse was the primary homemaker.
One of the most significant developments within the recent family law reforms in Kenya concerns cohabiting partners who separate. Kenya’s Marriage Act 2014 does not formally recognise cohabitation as a form of marriage. However, recent Court of Appeal decisions have held that where partners can demonstrate joint contribution, financial or non-financial, to the acquisition of property during cohabitation, and where there was a common intention that both would benefit, the contributing partner has a legitimate equitable claim. The constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 27, read together with the family protections of Article 45, has been instrumental in these decisions.
Practical steps for cohabiting partners who wish to protect their property rights include:
For separated couples managing rental property, the tax implications of property held in one or both names may also be relevant, see Kenya residential rental income rules 2026 for practical guidance on reporting obligations.
Family disputes frequently intersect with succession. When a marriage or cohabitation breaks down and one party dies, whether before or after formal separation, the surviving partner and children may face contested succession claims. The Law of Succession Act (Cap. 160) governs how estates are administered, but the family law reforms Kenya has seen in 2025–2026 have practical consequences for how succession disputes are handled.
Under the Judiciary’s strengthened mediation policy, courts handling succession disputes, particularly those involving competing claims from a surviving spouse, children from different relationships, or cohabiting partners, are now expected to refer parties to mediation before scheduling contested hearings. Mediation is particularly well suited to succession disputes where the parties will have an ongoing relationship (such as siblings or co-parents of the deceased’s children) and where dividing assets by agreement may produce a better outcome than a rigid court-imposed distribution.
However, mediation is not appropriate where there are allegations of fraud, forgery of a will, or undue influence, or where an urgent grant of letters of administration is needed to preserve estate assets. In such cases, parties should apply directly to the High Court’s Probate and Administration Division.
Estate planners and advisers handling succession matters that intersect with family disputes should consider the following:
The family law reforms Kenya has seen in 2025–2026 demand proactive steps. Whether a reader is facing a custody dispute, contemplating divorce, managing a cohabitation separation, or advising on a contested estate, the following checklist provides a clear starting point.
The family law reforms Kenya has undergone through the 2025–2026 judgments and the Judiciary’s strengthened mediation policy represent a meaningful shift in how custody, divorce, property and succession disputes are resolved. Mediation is now the expected first step, custody rights for unmarried parents are more clearly defined, and cohabitation property claims have stronger judicial backing than ever before. For parents, spouses and advisers, the practical imperative is clear: act early, document thoroughly, and engage experienced family law professionals who understand both the courtroom and the mediation table.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Veronica Kimiti at Kimiti & Associates Advocates LLP, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 9 minutes ago
posted 33 minutes ago
posted 55 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message