Our Expert in Kenya
No results available
Last updated: 14 May 2026
Employee transfer in M&A in Kenya is one of the most misunderstood, and most consequential, issues that buyers, sellers and HR teams face during a transaction. Unlike the United Kingdom’s TUPE regulations or South Africa’s Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act, Kenya has no single statute that mandates the automatic transfer of employment contracts when a business changes hands. The 2026 overhaul of merger-control rules by the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK), which introduced higher filing fees, revised suspensory thresholds and stricter gating requirements, has made pre-deal employment-risk management more time-sensitive than ever.
This guide provides a transaction-focused playbook, grounded in the Employment Act (Cap 226), current CAK guidance and prevailing market practice, for general counsel, in-house M&A teams, HR leaders and deal advisers navigating employee rights in mergers in Kenya.
Who should read this guide: Buyers evaluating workforce liabilities, sellers preparing disclosure schedules and employee warranties, and HR professionals tasked with executing workforce transitions before, during and after a Kenyan M&A deal.
Before diving into the legal detail, here are the core actions each stakeholder must take, mapped to deal phase. These checklists serve as a quick-reference framework; each item is explored in depth in the sections that follow.
The Employment Act, 2007 (Cap 226 of the Laws of Kenya) is the primary legislation governing employment relationships. Several provisions are particularly relevant to the transfer of employees in an acquisition in Kenya:
A common question in Kenyan M&A practice is whether employment contracts can be assigned from one party to another without the employee’s consent. The answer, grounded in both statute and common-law principle, is that employment contracts are personal in nature and cannot be unilaterally assigned. The employer cannot simply transfer an employee’s contract to a third party as though it were a commercial receivable.
Section 10(5) of the Employment Act preserves continuity of service where a business is transferred, but industry observers note that this provision does not create an automatic TUPE-style transfer mechanism. The likely practical effect is that employees retain their accrued rights (length of service, leave entitlements, redundancy qualification) but the contractual relationship itself requires either novation (a tripartite agreement among old employer, new employer and employee) or a fresh offer and acceptance from the acquiring entity. Leading commentators have highlighted this gap and called for specific legislation, comparable to the UK’s TUPE regime or South Africa’s Section 197, to provide legal certainty in Kenyan transactions.
In practice, well-advised deal teams treat this ambiguity as a risk to be managed through robust warranties, indemnities and operational planning rather than relying on any implied statutory transfer.
Effective HR due diligence in a Kenyan M&A requires early coordination among several stakeholders. The general counsel or external M&A adviser should engage the HR team, the compensation and benefits function, payroll, and, critically, CAK merger-control counsel from the outset. This is because the 2026 CAK reforms have made it necessary to sequence employment decisions around merger notification timelines. Restructuring the workforce before obtaining CAK clearance can constitute gun-jumping, with potentially severe consequences including the unwinding of the transaction.
| Due diligence item | Why it matters | Red flag |
|---|---|---|
| Employment contracts (all categories) | Identifies employer obligations, change-of-control clauses and restrictive covenants | Missing written contracts; oral-only arrangements in senior roles |
| Collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) | CBAs may contain transfer, consultation or consent provisions that override individual contracts | Active CBA disputes; upcoming renegotiation deadlines |
| Pension and NSSF records | Unfunded pension obligations or arrears on NSSF contributions create direct buyer liability | Employer contribution arrears; trust-based scheme with deficit |
| Payroll data and PAYE records | Confirms wage costs, statutory deductions and potential tax exposure | Unremitted PAYE; unexplained payroll adjustments |
| Pending or threatened employment claims | Outstanding claims at the Employment and Labour Relations Court can transfer with the business | Multiple claims; pattern of unfair termination disputes |
| Secondment and consultancy agreements | Individuals classified as consultants may be deemed employees, creating hidden liabilities | Long-term consultants performing core functions without written contracts |
The 2026 CAK merger-control reforms introduced stricter suspensory filing requirements. Transactions that meet the revised notification thresholds cannot be completed, and the parties must not take steps to integrate operations, until the CAK has issued its determination. For employment purposes, this means buyers must not issue new employment contracts, commence redundancy consultations or make binding retention offers until after clearance, unless these actions can be clearly separated from the notifiable transaction. Failure to observe this sequencing can expose both parties to CAK penalties and may undermine the validity of employee consents obtained prematurely.
Early engagement with CAK merger-control counsel is essential for any deal that involves Kenya, particularly given the evolving regulatory landscape for business registration and compliance in Kenya.
The deal structure fundamentally determines the buyer’s obligations regarding employees. In a share purchase, the buyer acquires the shares of the target company. The target company, as the employing entity, continues to exist, and its employment contracts remain in place. The employees’ legal employer does not change, although beneficial ownership of their employer has shifted. Buyer obligations in a share deal focus on updating governance, aligning benefits and addressing any operational restructuring that may follow.
In an asset purchase (including the acquisition of a business as a going concern), the buyer acquires specific assets, premises, equipment, customer contracts and, potentially, the workforce, but the selling entity remains a separate legal person. Employment contracts do not automatically transfer with the assets. The buyer must either negotiate the novation of existing contracts (requiring the employee’s consent) or offer fresh employment contracts to the individuals it wishes to retain. Section 10(5) of the Employment Act preserves continuity of service for employees who continue working after the transfer, but it does not compel the buyer to offer employment or the employee to accept.
Where the buyer offers fresh contracts, several practical risks arise. If the new terms are materially less favourable than the existing ones, employees may refuse and claim constructive dismissal against the seller. If the buyer fails to offer employment to some employees while taking on others, the seller may face redundancy obligations for those left behind. In practice, the most effective approach is a coordinated process in which:
Sophisticated buyers negotiate specific indemnities from the seller for pre-closing employment liabilities, including pending claims, unpaid wages, unremitted statutory contributions and unfunded pension obligations. Common mechanisms include a purchase-price holdback (where a portion of the consideration is retained in escrow for an agreed period, typically 12–24 months) or a pound-for-pound indemnity with a de minimis threshold and an overall cap. Industry observers expect escrow holdbacks to be particularly important in Kenyan deals involving businesses with large workforces, given the absence of automatic transfer protections and the potential for latent claims. Buyers should also consider whether to require the seller to fund any redundancy costs arising from employees who do not transfer.
The seller’s disclosure schedule should cover, at a minimum:
Seller warranties employee liabilities clauses in Kenyan M&A transactions typically address the following themes. Sample wording follows each:
Typical Kenyan deal practice sets seller indemnity caps for employment warranties at between 10 % and 25 % of the purchase price, with a de minimis threshold per claim and a basket (aggregate threshold) before the buyer can claim. Survival periods for employment warranties commonly run for 18–24 months post-closing, though claims relating to fraud or tax are usually carved out and given longer survival periods. These parameters are, of course, negotiable and should reflect the specific risk profile identified during due diligence into the target’s regulatory compliance posture.
Post-acquisition restructuring frequently results in role duplications, and buyers may need to reduce headcount. Redundancy in Kenyan law is governed by Section 47 of the Employment Act, which defines redundancy as the loss of employment through no fault of the employee, arising from factors such as the employer’s need to reduce the workforce. The statutory process is strict, and failure to follow it exposes the employer to claims for unfair termination.
Section 47 requires the employer to:
The Employment Act provides for a minimum redundancy payment of not less than fifteen days’ pay for each completed year of service. The employment contract or CBA may stipulate a more generous formula, and buyers should verify the applicable terms during due diligence. Disputes over redundancy, including challenges to the fairness of the selection criteria or the adequacy of consultation, are adjudicated by the Employment and Labour Relations Court. For context on how East African neighbours are reforming employment law in 2026, see our companion analysis on Uganda’s recent amendments.
Many Kenyan employers operate occupational pension schemes, often structured as irrevocable trusts registered with the Retirement Benefits Authority (RBA). Where the seller’s scheme is a standalone trust, the buyer must decide whether to admit transferring employees to its own scheme, maintain the seller’s scheme as a closed fund, or arrange for a bulk transfer of accrued benefits. The RBA must approve any transfer of scheme assets, and the process can take several months, a factor that should be built into the transaction timeline.
In addition, both the seller and the buyer must ensure that all employer and employee contributions to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) are current. NSSF arrears constitute a statutory debt that can attach to the business, and buyers should insist on a clean compliance certificate before closing.
Termination payments, including redundancy pay, notice pay and accrued leave, are subject to PAYE withholding in accordance with the Income Tax Act and Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) guidelines. Statutory redundancy pay (the minimum fifteen days per year of service under Section 47) benefits from a tax exemption up to a prescribed threshold, but any amount paid above the statutory minimum is taxable. Buyers inheriting a payroll mid-month must coordinate a clean cut-off with the seller to avoid double-reporting. A practical payroll close-out checklist should confirm that all PAYE, NSSF and pension remittances are settled up to the effective transfer date, and that employees receive accurate P9 tax deduction certificates reflecting the correct employer for each period.
For further insight into Kenya’s tax landscape, see our guide to Kenya’s residential rental income rules (2026).
The Competition Authority of Kenya introduced significant changes to its merger-control framework in 2026. The reforms include revised notification thresholds, increased filing fees and, most critically for workforce planning, a strengthened suspensory regime. Transactions that meet the relevant thresholds must not be completed, and the merging parties must not begin to integrate operations, until the CAK has issued its determination. The practical effect is a gating period between signing and closing during which the buyer has no legal authority to direct the target’s workforce, issue new contracts or commence restructuring. Any CAK merger compliance obligation relating to employees must therefore be coordinated carefully with the employment-law steps outlined above.
The interplay between CAK gating and employment-law obligations creates a sequencing challenge that deal teams must plan for:
Failure to respect this sequencing can result in CAK sanctions, the potential unwinding of the transaction, and exposure to employment claims from employees who received, and acted upon, premature commitments. For practitioners seeking to locate experienced M&A counsel in Kenya, the Global Law Experts lawyer directory is a useful starting point.
The following resources summarise the operational steps covered throughout this guide. Deal teams are encouraged to adapt them to the specific circumstances of each transaction.
| Transaction type | Employee contract effect | Key HR steps |
|---|---|---|
| Share purchase | Employer unchanged; contracts remain with the same legal entity, but operational changes may trigger redundancies | Identify affected roles; update payroll and benefits; consult employees as necessary |
| Asset purchase (business as going concern) | No automatic assignment, in practice, buyer offers new contracts or novates with employee consent; continuity of service may be preserved under Section 10(5) if the business transfers | Plan retention offers; prepare novation or offer letters; carve out liabilities; escrow for withheld liabilities |
| Merger (statutory or company merger) | Depends on vehicle: where the legal employer continues, contracts are generally unaffected; where the employer company ceases to exist, obligations depend on the merger structure and prevailing practice | Determine legal employer post-merger; map employee population to the new employer; consult and align benefits |
Managing employee transfer in M&A in Kenya demands careful legal analysis, rigorous due diligence and precise sequencing around the 2026 CAK merger-control gating requirements. Without a TUPE-equivalent statute, the burden falls squarely on deal teams to craft contractual protections, warranties, indemnities, novation frameworks and escrow mechanisms, that allocate employment risk fairly between buyer and seller. The practical checklists and sample clauses in this guide provide a starting framework, but every transaction carries unique risks that require tailored advice from experienced Kenyan M&A counsel.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Morintat Peter Oiboo, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 2 minutes ago
posted 2 minutes ago
posted 2 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 5 minutes ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message