Our Expert in India
No results available
The Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025, introduced in Parliament to amend both the Companies Act, 2013 and the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, is redefining the compliance landscape that international corporate lawyers India-wide must navigate for every cross-border transaction closing in 2026. The amendments raise small-company classification thresholds, widen NFRA oversight of auditors, streamline LLP filing obligations and recalibrate several disclosure requirements that directly feed into FDI approvals, CCI merger-control notifications and post-deal integration timelines. For general counsel, PE sponsors and corporate-development teams structuring inbound acquisitions or joint ventures, the practical effect is a new set of due-diligence checkpoints, tighter filing windows and revised penalty exposure.
This guide maps each major change to a concrete compliance action, provides worked examples and consolidates everything into a downloadable cross-border M&A checklist for India in 2026.
The Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 proposes simultaneous changes to the Companies Act, 2013 and the LLP Act, 2008. Industry observers expect these provisions to be notified in phases during 2026, with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) issuing implementation circulars for each tranche. The headline amendments fall into five categories that matter most for cross-border deal teams.
| Reporting Obligation / Requirement | Companies (Post-2026) | LLPs (Post-2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Small-entity threshold (turnover / capital) | Raised paid-up capital and turnover ceilings under Section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013, more entities qualify for lighter compliance | New “small LLP” classification introduced with simplified Form 11 annual-return filings; larger LLPs face stricter audit requirements |
| Auditor / NFRA oversight trigger | Wider class of companies subject to NFRA registration and disciplinary jurisdiction; auditor-rotation norms tightened | LLPs above the new revenue threshold must appoint auditors registered with NFRA where applicable |
| CCI notification trigger | Asset and turnover tests under Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 apply; company-level financials used for threshold calculation | LLP revenue and assets included in group-level threshold calculations on the same basis as companies |
| Beneficial-ownership disclosure | Expanded Section 90 declarations with stricter penalties for delayed filing | New requirement for LLPs to maintain a register of significant beneficial owners |
| Annual-return filing penalties | Increased per-day penalties under restructured compounding framework | Parallel penalty increases; grace period for small LLPs in the first compliance year |
The Bill was introduced in Parliament as the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025. Once passed and notified in the Official Gazette, MCA is expected to issue section-wise commencement notifications during 2026. Deal teams should monitor the MCA website and eGazette portal for exact notification dates, as individual provisions may take effect on different dates.
Not every cross-border transaction will be equally affected. The practical question is whether the target entity, the acquirer’s Indian vehicle or the combined post-deal group crosses a threshold that triggers new obligations. The matrix below helps deal teams make a rapid first-pass assessment.
| Entity Type / Deal Scenario | Key Threshold to Check | Immediate Obligations |
|---|---|---|
| Indian private limited company (target), now qualifying as “small company” | Revised paid-up capital and turnover ceilings under amended Section 2(85) | Confirm whether target loses exemptions on acquisition (change of control may alter group-level calculations) |
| Indian LLP (target or JV vehicle) | “Small LLP” classification thresholds (contribution and turnover) | Check whether the LLP must now appoint a registered auditor and file enhanced annual returns |
| Foreign acquirer (PE fund or strategic) taking > 10% stake | FDI sectoral cap and automatic-vs-approval route under DPIIT Consolidated FDI Policy | File with RBI within 30 days of allotment; verify Press Note restrictions (e.g., land-bordering countries) |
| Combined entity exceeding CCI thresholds post-deal | Asset and turnover tests under Section 5, Competition Act 2002 (as revised by Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023) | Pre-closing CCI notification mandatory; deal cannot close until CCI approval or deemed approval after 150 days |
| Target company with NFRA-registered auditor | Whether target falls within expanded NFRA class of companies | Verify auditor-registration status; flag any pending NFRA proceedings in due-diligence report |
The critical takeaway for international corporate practitioners is that group-level consolidation rules mean a target that was previously below every threshold may cross one or more limits once combined with the acquirer’s existing Indian operations.
Foreign direct investment into India is governed by the Consolidated FDI Policy issued by DPIIT, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and the RBI’s Master Directions on Foreign Investment. The 2026 corporate-law amendments do not directly alter FDI sectoral caps or the automatic-vs-approval route framework, but they do change several downstream compliance obligations that affect how foreign acquirers structure and close transactions.
Every foreign buyer must first determine which FDI route applies. The two-step decision is unchanged in 2026:
Industry observers expect DPIIT to align its next FDI policy circular with the new corporate-law definitions, meaning that the revised small-company thresholds could affect reporting exemptions for FDI-recipient entities.
The Competition Act, 2002 (as amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023) requires pre-closing notification to the Competition Commission of India for any “combination”, acquisition, merger or amalgamation, that exceeds prescribed asset or turnover thresholds. The 2026 corporate-law amendments do not change CCI thresholds directly, but they affect how target-company financials are classified and reported, which feeds directly into the threshold calculation.
| Trigger Test | How to Calculate | Typical Documents Required |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise-level asset test | Book value of total assets of the acquired enterprise (or combined entity) exceeds the prescribed threshold in India or globally | Audited balance sheet of target; valuation report; group-structure chart |
| Enterprise-level turnover test | Turnover of the acquired enterprise (or combined entity) exceeds the prescribed threshold in India or globally | Audited P&L; revenue-segment breakdown; transfer-pricing documentation if intercompany revenue exists |
| Group-level asset test | Assets of the group to which the target belongs (post-deal) exceed the group-level threshold | Consolidated group accounts; identification of all “group” entities per CCI definition |
| Group-level turnover test | Turnover of the combined group exceeds group-level threshold | Consolidated group accounts; revenue certificates |
| Deal-value threshold (new) | Where the value of the transaction exceeds the deal-value threshold introduced by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, and the target has “substantial business operations in India” | Transaction documents showing deal consideration; target’s India-revenue data |
CCI notification must be filed before closing. The Commission has 30 working days (Phase I) to clear a combination or initiate a Phase II investigation, which extends the review to 150 working days. Parties cannot consummate the deal during the review period. For foreign acquirers, the practical implication is that the CCI timeline must be built into the signing-to-closing bridge alongside any FDI approvals and other regulatory clearances.
The 2026 Companies Act amendments matter here because the revised classification thresholds may change whether a target’s financials are audited to the standard that CCI requires. If a target newly qualifies as a “small company” and has elected lighter audit or reporting obligations, acquirers should ensure that the financial data submitted to CCI meets the Commission’s evidentiary expectations. Early engagement with auditors on this point is strongly recommended.
NFRA auditor registration has become a focal point for M&A due diligence following the 2026 amendments. The National Financial Reporting Authority, established under Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013, oversees compliance with accounting and auditing standards. The expanded scope means more companies and their auditors fall within NFRA’s regulatory perimeter.
| Issue | Due-Diligence Check | Post-Deal Action |
|---|---|---|
| Auditor registration with NFRA | Confirm whether target’s auditor is registered with NFRA; obtain registration certificate | If auditor is not registered and the post-deal entity falls within NFRA scope, appoint a registered auditor within the first board meeting after closing |
| Pending NFRA proceedings | Search NFRA’s public orders database for any disciplinary proceedings against the target’s current or former auditors | Disclose in acquirer’s risk register; assess impact on reliance on historical audited financials |
| Auditor rotation compliance | Verify that the target has complied with the mandatory auditor-rotation requirements (individual: 5 years; firm: 10 years) under Section 139 of the Companies Act | If rotation is due within 12 months of closing, factor auditor-transition costs and timeline into integration plan |
| Related-party audit conflicts | Check whether the target’s auditor also provides non-audit services to the acquirer or its affiliates, the 2026 amendments tighten independence requirements | Terminate conflicting engagements or appoint a new auditor pre-closing to avoid breach |
| Financial-restatement risk | Assess whether the change in small-company thresholds means the target must now prepare financials to a higher standard than it did historically | Budget for restatement or enhanced disclosure in the first post-acquisition financial year |
The likely practical effect of the wider NFRA mandate will be increased auditor-transition activity during 2026, particularly among mid-market targets that previously operated below the oversight threshold. International corporate lawyers India practitioners should treat auditor status as a condition-precedent item rather than a post-closing administrative task.
This step-by-step checklist consolidates every regulatory action point discussed above into a single workflow. Each item identifies who is responsible, the applicable deadline and the governing rule. Deal teams can adapt this framework to their specific transaction.
| Action | Responsible Party | Deadline / Trigger | Governing Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identify FDI route (automatic vs approval) for target’s sector | Buyer counsel | Before term-sheet execution | Consolidated FDI Policy (DPIIT); FEMA Master Directions |
| Run CCI threshold analysis (enterprise + group level, including deal-value test) | Buyer counsel / economist | Before signing SPA | Section 5, Competition Act 2002; CCI Combination Regulations |
| Confirm target’s entity classification (small company / small LLP status post-2026) | Target counsel | During due diligence | Section 2(85), Companies Act 2013 (as amended); LLP Act 2008 (as amended) |
| Verify auditor NFRA registration and check for pending proceedings | Buyer counsel / auditor | During due diligence | Section 132, Companies Act 2013; NFRA Rules |
| Map downstream investments and related-party structures | Buyer counsel + target counsel | During due diligence | FEMA downstream-investment guidelines; Section 188, Companies Act 2013 |
| Action | Responsible Party | Deadline / Trigger | Governing Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| File CCI notification (if thresholds exceeded) | Buyer counsel | Post-signing, before closing; allow 30+ working days for Phase I | Section 6, Competition Act 2002 |
| Apply for government approval (if approval-route FDI or Press Note 3 applies) | Buyer counsel / target counsel | Post-signing; timelines vary by ministry | FEMA; Consolidated FDI Policy |
| Obtain board and shareholder approvals for share transfer / allotment | Target counsel | Per SPA conditions precedent | Companies Act 2013 (Sections 62, 179, 180 as applicable) |
| Update beneficial-ownership register (Section 90) to reflect incoming foreign acquirer | Target counsel / company secretary | At or before closing | Section 90, Companies Act 2013 (as amended 2026) |
| Action | Responsible Party | Deadline / Trigger | Governing Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| File Form FC-GPR with AD bank (share allotment to foreign buyer) | Target counsel / company secretary | Within 30 days of allotment | FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 |
| File updated annual return reflecting new shareholding | Target counsel / company secretary | Within 60 days of AGM | Section 92, Companies Act 2013 |
| Appoint NFRA-registered auditor (if required post-reclassification) | Buyer / target board | First board meeting after closing | Section 132 & 139, Companies Act 2013; NFRA Rules |
| File FLA return with RBI | Target company / finance team | Annually by 15 July | RBI FLA Reporting Framework |
| Update MCA filings to reflect change in directors, KMP and charge creation (if any) | Target counsel / company secretary | Within 30 days of change (Form DIR-12, CHG-1 etc.) | Companies Act 2013 (various sections) |
| Reassess small-company / small-LLP status with combined financials | Finance team / auditor | At first financial-year close post-deal | Section 2(85), Companies Act 2013 (as amended) |
The 2026 LLP Act changes narrow the regulatory gap between companies and LLPs, which alters the calculus for foreign acquirers choosing a vehicle for joint ventures or rollover structures. The table below captures the practical trade-offs.
| Aspect | Company | LLP |
|---|---|---|
| FDI eligibility | FDI permitted under automatic route in most sectors | FDI in LLPs permitted only under automatic route in sectors with 100 % FDI and no FDI-linked performance conditions |
| Audit and NFRA oversight (post-2026) | Broad NFRA oversight; mandatory audit for all companies above small-company threshold | Larger LLPs now subject to mandatory audit and potential NFRA oversight; small LLPs still exempt |
| Exit flexibility | Share transfer mechanism well-established; drag-along / tag-along protections enforceable via SHA | Transfer of LLP interest requires partner consent (unless partnership deed overrides); less liquid |
| Tax treatment of profits | Corporate tax at prevailing rate (currently 25.17 % for companies opting for Section 115BAA); DDT abolished | LLP taxed at 30 % (plus surcharge and cess); no concessional rate equivalent to Section 115BAA |
| Compliance burden (post-2026) | Heavier, board meetings, annual returns, CSR (if applicable), NFRA reporting | Lighter for small LLPs; heavier for larger LLPs approaching company-equivalent obligations |
The likely practical effect of the 2026 changes is that LLPs retain a structuring advantage only for smaller joint ventures in sectors eligible for 100 % automatic-route FDI. For larger transactions or sectors with performance conditions, incorporating a private limited company remains the preferred route for international corporate lawyers India deal teams advising foreign sponsors.
A Singapore-based PE fund proposes to acquire 30 % of an Indian private limited company engaged in IT services. The sector permits 100 % FDI under the automatic route. The target’s standalone turnover is below CCI enterprise-level thresholds, but when combined with the PE fund’s other Indian portfolio companies, the group-level turnover test is exceeded. The acquirer must (a) file CCI notification pre-closing, (b) file Form FC-GPR within 30 days of share allotment, (c) ensure the target updates its beneficial-ownership register to reflect the fund’s ultimate beneficial owners, and (d) confirm whether the target’s post-deal consolidated financials push it above the revised small-company threshold, triggering additional audit and NFRA obligations.
A Japanese manufacturer wishes to transfer a business division’s Indian assets into a newly formed LLP with an Indian partner. Because the sector involves manufacturing (100 % automatic route, no performance conditions), FDI in an LLP is permissible. However, the projected turnover of the LLP exceeds the new “small LLP” ceiling, requiring the LLP to appoint a registered auditor from inception and file enhanced annual returns. The parties must also assess whether the asset transfer constitutes a “combination” for CCI purposes if asset values exceed the prescribed threshold.
The 2026 amendments to the Companies Act, 2013 and the LLP Act, 2008 add a new layer of checkpoints to every cross-border M&A transaction entering or restructuring within India. The changes are manageable, but only when identified early in the deal lifecycle and mapped to specific compliance owners and deadlines. International corporate lawyers India practitioners who build the revised thresholds, NFRA checks and enhanced disclosure obligations into their standard due-diligence protocols will avoid the post-closing surprises, and regulatory penalties, that catch less prepared deal teams off guard. For transactions signing in 2026, the time to update playbooks, diligence checklists and SPA schedules is now.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Lira Goswami at Associated Law Advisers, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 21 minutes ago
posted 43 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message