Member
No results available
Austria’s parliament is actively debating the reintroduction of an inheritance and wealth tax in 2026, putting cross‑border estate planning at the top of the agenda for families with assets spanning Austria and Germany. For high‑net‑worth individuals who have enjoyed nearly two decades without Austrian inheritance tax, abolished on 1 August 2008, the prospect of a new levy demands immediate, structured Austria inheritance tax 2026 planning. This guide sets out the legislative landscape as of May 2026, explains how proposed rules would interact with German inheritance tax and the EU Succession Regulation, and provides a step‑by‑step checklist so Austrian–German families can act before any new law takes effect.
Last reviewed: 3 May 2026. The legislative proposals discussed below remain under parliamentary debate and have not been enacted. All readers should obtain personalised legal and tax advice before implementing any restructuring measures.
The risk of a reintroduced Austrian inheritance tax is higher than at any point since the original tax was struck down by the Constitutional Court in 2008. Media reports cite proposed rates of 25 per cent on inheritances up to €5 million and 30 per cent on amounts above that threshold, though no bill has yet been passed into law. For families straddling Austria and Germany, exposure is compounded: German inheritance tax already applies to worldwide assets of German‑resident heirs, and Austrian real estate transfer tax currently catches land transfers on death. A new Austrian inheritance tax would layer additional liability on top of both obligations.
Austria abolished its inheritance and gift tax (Erbschafts‑ und Schenkungssteuer) effective 1 August 2008, following a ruling by the Austrian Constitutional Court. Since that date, no inheritance or gift tax has been levied, although real estate transfer tax and a land‑registry fee continue to apply when property changes hands on death or by gift.
The political environment shifted markedly with the formation of the current coalition government. Several parties have publicly advocated rebalancing the Austrian tax system away from labour income and towards wealth, a position echoed by the OECD in its 2026 Economic Survey of Austria. Throughout late 2025 and into 2026, inheritance and wealth taxation moved from think‑tank discussion papers to concrete parliamentary debate. As of the date of this article, no bill has been enacted, but active committee work is under way.
Proposals reported in European media in February 2026 include a tiered structure: an initial tax‑free allowance, followed by a 25 per cent rate on inherited wealth up to €5 million and a 30 per cent rate on amounts exceeding that threshold. These figures originate from advocacy campaigns and political proposals rather than finalised legislation and should therefore be treated as indicative. The final thresholds, rates, exemptions and effective date remain subject to parliamentary negotiation.
Industry observers expect that any enacted tax would include transitional provisions and a lead‑in period; however, anti‑avoidance provisions, potentially including lookback periods for gifts made shortly before enactment, are widely anticipated.
Understanding the likely scope of any new Austrian inheritance tax is essential for Austria inheritance tax 2026 planning, because the answer to who pays depends on the interplay between residence, asset location and the type of property involved.
Under established international tax principles, and consistent with the approach Austria took before 2008, immovable property (real estate) is taxable where it is situated. This means Austrian real property would be subject to Austrian inheritance tax regardless of whether the deceased or the heir lived in Austria, Germany or elsewhere. Movable assets (bank accounts, shares, personal property), by contrast, are typically taxed based on the residence or domicile of the deceased or the heir.
For Austrian‑resident individuals, a reintroduced tax would likely apply to their worldwide estate, mirroring the approach taken by Germany’s Erbschaft‑ und Schenkungsteuergesetz (ErbStG). Non‑residents would typically be liable only on Austrian‑situs assets, principally real estate and shares in Austrian real‑estate‑holding companies.
| Asset Type | Likely Taxable in Austria? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Austrian real estate (Grundstücke) | Yes, regardless of heir’s residence | Situs principle applies; already subject to real estate transfer tax (GrESt) at 3.5 % |
| Austrian bank accounts / securities deposits | Yes for Austrian residents; possibly for non‑residents depending on final legislation | Movable‑asset treatment expected to follow residence of deceased |
| Shares in Austrian GmbH / AG | Likely yes for residents; uncertain for non‑residents | Shares in property‑rich companies may be treated as immovable for situs purposes |
| German real estate owned by Austrian‑resident decedent | No, situs in Germany | Subject to German inheritance tax; no Austrian claim expected |
| Overseas financial assets (non‑Austrian, non‑German) | Yes for Austrian residents (worldwide estate) | May qualify for credit/exemption under any future DTA or unilateral relief |
| Life insurance policies (Austrian issuer) | Likely taxable for Austrian residents | Treatment depends on final legislation and policy structure |
Currently, Austria maintains an obligation to report inheritances and gifts above certain thresholds to the tax authorities, even though no tax is levied. The Austrian Federal Ministry of Finance’s Tax Book 2026 confirms this reporting requirement. Any new inheritance tax would build on this existing infrastructure.
Cross‑border estate planning between Austria and Germany is complicated by the fact that two separate tax regimes, two civil‑law succession systems and a shared EU regulatory framework all apply simultaneously. Effective planning requires understanding where each system bites.
German inheritance tax applies on a worldwide basis wherever the deceased or the heir has a Wohnsitz (domicile) or gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt (habitual residence) in Germany. Austria would likely adopt a similar residence‑based worldwide approach for its own tax. The critical implication for Austrian–German families: if the deceased was resident in Germany and owned Austrian property, both countries could assert a taxing right, Germany on the worldwide estate and Austria on the situs of the Austrian real estate.
The EU Succession Regulation, Regulation (EU) No 650/2012, commonly called “Brussels IV”, determines which country’s substantive succession law governs an estate. The default rule is the law of the country of the deceased’s habitual residence at the time of death. However, a testator may elect the law of their nationality to govern the entire succession by making a choice‑of‑law declaration in their will.
This is critically important for Austrian–German families. An Austrian national living in Munich can elect Austrian succession law to apply to their entire estate, or allow German law to apply by default. The choice affects forced‑heirship rules, the form of testamentary dispositions and the powers of executors, but it does not determine which country collects tax. Tax jurisdiction follows its own rules (residence and situs), independent of the EU Succession Regulation.
Germany levies inheritance tax at progressive rates from 7 per cent to 50 per cent depending on the heir’s relationship to the deceased and the estate value. Inheritance and gift tax allowances under the German Erbschaft‑ und Schenkungsteuergesetz can be used repeatedly every ten years, a feature that makes staged lifetime giving a central planning tool for German‑resident families. Without a bilateral double‑taxation agreement on inheritance tax between Austria and Germany (none currently exists), any new Austrian tax could create genuine double taxation, with only partial relief available through unilateral credit mechanisms in either country’s domestic law.
The likely practical effect will be that families holding Austrian real estate worth more than modest thresholds face compounded exposure in both jurisdictions, a situation that makes proactive cross‑border estate planning Austria Germany an urgent priority.
The Austrian inheritance tax implications of any new law cannot be understood in isolation from the civil‑law forced‑heirship regime. The Pflichtteil (compulsory share) ensures that close family members receive a minimum portion of the estate, regardless of the testator’s wishes.
Under Austrian law, the Pflichtteil in Austria entitles children and the surviving spouse to one‑half of their intestate share, payable as a monetary claim against the estate. Gifts made by the deceased during their lifetime may be added back to the estate for Pflichtteil calculation purposes, typically with a two‑year lookback window for gifts to third parties and an unlimited lookback for gifts between spouses. German forced‑heirship rules are broadly similar but operate under a ten‑year declining‑value model for lifetime gifts (Pflichtteilsergänzungsanspruch).
Reducing Pflichtteil exposure is lawful but requires careful structuring and timing:
Early indications suggest that any new Austrian inheritance tax law would need to address how Pflichtteil payments are treated, whether the forced share itself is taxable to the recipient and whether the estate receives a corresponding deduction. This interaction will be a critical variable in cross‑border planning.
The following estate planning for Austrians in Germany (and Germans with Austrian assets) checklist provides a structured approach to managing risk while proposals remain in flux. Each step includes the professionals to involve, key documents and realistic timing.
| Instrument | Typical Benefit vs Austrian Inheritance Tax / Pflichtteil | Lead Time and Legal Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Lifetime gifts (direct to heirs) | Reduces taxable estate value; may reduce Pflichtteil base after lookback period expires. Risk of German gift‑tax charge and Austrian reporting obligations. | 1–3 months to document and execute; moderate risk if undertaken without formal advice |
| Inheritance contract (Erbvertrag) | Secures agreed distribution of estate; binds parties and reduces testamentary disputes. Limited Pflichtteil reduction unless combined with waiver. | 2–6 weeks to draft and notarise; low–medium risk when properly executed |
| Pflichtteil waiver agreement | Eliminates or reduces forced‑share claims from consenting heirs; provides certainty for estate planning. Must be voluntary and notarised. | 2–4 weeks; low legal risk but depends on heir’s willingness |
| Austrian Privatstiftung (private foundation) | Shields business assets; creates governance continuity; Pflichtteil claims attach to foundation shares, not underlying assets. Subject to foundation entry tax and ongoing compliance. | 3–6 months; high setup cost; needs specialist structuring to avoid anti‑avoidance challenge |
| German Familienstiftung (family foundation) | Similar protective benefits under German law; allows repeated use of ten‑year gift‑tax allowances for contributions. Subject to substitute inheritance tax every 30 years. | 3–6 months; moderate–high cost; requires German tax and legal counsel |
| Company share reorganisation (GmbH / holding structure) | Consolidates business assets; can facilitate staged transfers and use business‑property exemptions in Germany. Austrian treatment uncertain under proposed new rules. | 2–4 months; moderate legal risk; corporate and tax formalities apply |
| Month | Action |
|---|---|
| 0–1 | Engage cross‑border advisors; begin estate audit and domicile review |
| 1–2 | Obtain asset valuations; review all wills and beneficiary designations |
| 2–3 | Model gift, foundation and restructuring scenarios; assess Pflichtteil exposure |
| 3–4 | Execute priority documents (updated wills, Brussels IV elections, Pflichtteil waivers) |
| 4–5 | Implement selected restructuring (foundation setup, company reorganisation, staged gifts) |
| 5–6 | Complete reporting obligations; establish ongoing monitoring protocol for legislative changes |
Even the most carefully constructed estate plan must be implementable in practice. Cross‑border estates face specific procedural hurdles that affect both cost and timing.
Under Austrian law, the district court (Bezirksgericht) at the deceased’s last habitual residence handles probate through a court‑appointed notary (Gerichtskommissär). Where the deceased held assets in Germany, a separate German probate may be required, or a European Certificate of Succession can streamline recognition across EU Member States under the EU Succession Regulation. Austrian government guidance on oesterreich.gv.at confirms that the European Certificate of Succession is available and recognised for cross‑border inheritance matters.
Practical experience indicates that dual‑jurisdiction probate adds three to six months to estate administration timelines and increases professional costs by 30–50 per cent compared with a single‑jurisdiction estate.
Austria requires the reporting of all acquisitions by way of gift or inheritance to the tax office if they exceed statutory thresholds, currently €50,000 for gifts between family members and €15,000 for gifts between unrelated parties, within any five‑year period. Germany imposes parallel reporting requirements within three months of the inheritance or gift. Failure to report carries penalties in both jurisdictions and can extend limitation periods for tax assessment.
If Austria enacts a new inheritance tax, industry observers expect that anti‑avoidance provisions, including extended lookback periods for gifts, substance‑over‑form doctrines and special rules for closely held companies, will be part of the legislative package. Families who restructure hastily and without substance risk having transactions recharacterised.
| Restructuring Measure | Typical Cost Range (Professional Fees) | Typical Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Cross‑border estate audit and advisory opinion | €5,000–€15,000 | 4–8 weeks |
| Will drafting / update (dual jurisdiction) | €2,000–€6,000 | 2–4 weeks |
| Pflichtteil waiver agreement (notarisation) | €1,500–€4,000 | 2–4 weeks |
| Austrian Privatstiftung setup | €20,000–€50,000+ | 3–6 months |
| Company reorganisation (GmbH restructure) | €10,000–€30,000 | 2–4 months |
| Ongoing compliance and monitoring (annual retainer) | €3,000–€8,000 per year | Ongoing |
The 2026 debate over reintroducing an inheritance tax in Austria represents the most significant potential shift in Austrian wealth‑transfer taxation in nearly two decades. For families with assets, businesses or family members in both Austria and Germany, the Austrian inheritance tax implications extend far beyond a single jurisdiction, they touch on domicile strategy, forced‑heirship exposure, EU choice‑of‑law elections, company structures and long‑term family governance. The most effective Austria inheritance tax 2026 planning strategies are those implemented while proposals are still in flux, because structural changes to estate architecture, foundations, company reorganisations, Pflichtteil waivers, staged lifetime gifts, require months to execute properly and cannot be rushed once legislation is enacted.
Families who begin now will have the broadest range of options available and the strongest defences against both tax and forced‑heirship claims, whatever form the final law takes.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Senad Albani M.A. at Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Albani GmbH, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 19 minutes ago
posted 43 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message