Member
No results available
Since 1 March 2026, every M&A deal team active in the Philippines must screen transactions against higher mandatory filing thresholds following the Philippine Competition Commission’s adoption of Commission Resolution No. 02‑2026. The new rules governing PCC merger notification Philippines 2026 set the Size of Party (SOP) threshold at PHP 9.1 billion and the Size of Transaction (SOT) threshold at PHP 3.8 billion, both of which must be met before a compulsory filing is triggered. This guide walks in‑house counsel, private equity teams and transaction lawyers through the computation methodology, exemptions, timing rules and a step‑by‑step PCC filing checklist designed to keep deals on track and fully compliant with Philippine merger control requirements.
If your transaction meets both of the following tests, a mandatory PCC merger notification is required:
Both conditions are cumulative. If only one threshold is met, mandatory notification is not triggered, although the PCC retains jurisdiction to review a transaction on its own initiative, and parties may choose to file voluntarily. Parties to a notifiable transaction are required to notify the PCC within 30 days of the execution of the definitive agreement and prior to consummation of the deal. Filing before the definitive agreement is signed is not permitted, and closing before PCC clearance (or expiry of the applicable waiting period) is prohibited.
The Philippine Competition Commission periodically adjusts its notification thresholds to reflect changes in the consumer price index and gross national income, as mandated by the Philippine Competition Act (Republic Act No. 10667). Commission Resolution No. 02‑2026, published in early 2026, raised both thresholds effective 1 March 2026. The adjustment means that a number of transactions that would previously have required mandatory notification will now fall below the new floors, reducing the filing burden on smaller and mid‑market deals while allowing the PCC to concentrate enforcement resources on transactions with a greater competitive impact in the Philippine market.
| Date | Instrument | Effect on Thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Republic Act No. 10667 (Philippine Competition Act) | Established the statutory framework for merger control and empowered the PCC to set and revise notification thresholds |
| Prior to 1 Mar 2026 | Previous PCC Commission Resolutions | Lower SOP and SOT thresholds applied (revised periodically) |
| 1 March 2026 | Commission Resolution No. 02‑2026 | SOP raised to PHP 9.1 billion; SOT raised to PHP 3.8 billion |
The PCC announced the revised thresholds via its official resource page and the revised notification form (dated 9 March 2026) was uploaded to the PCC website shortly after. Industry observers expect the increase to remove a meaningful volume of mid‑cap deals from the mandatory pipeline, though any transaction that raises competition concerns may still be caught through the PCC’s power to initiate a motu proprio review.
Understanding the mechanics of the two tests is essential for accurate deal screening under the 2026 merger control regime in the Philippines. The PCC’s official Computing Merger Thresholds guidance sets out the methodology for both calculations.
The Size of Party test looks at the overall economic footprint of the parties. For each party to the transaction, SOP is measured as the higher of:
Critically, the SOP calculation must be performed on a group basis. This means aggregating the assets or revenues of the relevant entity together with its ultimate parent entity and all entities it controls. Control is typically assessed as holding more than 50 % of equity or voting rights, or the ability to direct business decisions. At least one party to the transaction must meet or exceed the PHP 9.1 billion SOP threshold for the first leg of the test to be satisfied.
The Size of Transaction test focuses on the value of what is actually being acquired. Depending on the transaction structure, the SOT is measured as:
The SOT calculation also uses a group lens, where only part of an entity is being acquired, the relevant assets or revenues must still be attributed based on the PCC’s aggregation methodology.
| Variable | What It Measures | Source of Data |
|---|---|---|
| SOP, Total assets | Book value of all Philippine assets of the party’s group | Most recent audited financial statements |
| SOP, Gross revenues | Revenues in, into, or from the Philippines | Most recent audited financial statements |
| SOT, Asset deal | Book value of acquired Philippine assets | Most recent audited financial statements |
| SOT, Share deal | Higher of: target’s Philippine assets/revenues or deal consideration | Audited financials + transaction documentation |
A key practical point: the measurement date for financial data is the most recently completed and audited fiscal year. Parties should not use interim or unaudited figures unless PCC guidance expressly permits it in a specific context. Using the wrong base period is one of the most common errors practitioners encounter during the merger notification process.
Not every transaction that crosses the threshold values necessarily requires a filing. The PCC recognises certain categories of exempt transactions, including:
Even where a transaction falls below the mandatory thresholds, parties may choose to make a voluntary notification. This can be strategically valuable when the deal might attract PCC scrutiny post‑closing or where certainty of clearance supports deal financing or contractual conditions precedent.
Common pitfalls that deal teams should guard against include:
The following step‑by‑step PCC filing checklist is designed to guide deal teams from initial screening through to clearance. Each step should be documented and assigned to a responsible party within the transaction workstream.
The 30‑day filing window begins on the date the definitive agreement is executed, not the date of a non‑binding term sheet or memorandum of understanding. “Consummation” refers to the closing or completion of the transaction (transfer of shares, payment of consideration, or assumption of control). Closing before PCC clearance is a violation of the standstill obligation. Where a transaction involves conditions precedent (such as sectoral approvals), deal teams typically structure the PCC notification to run in parallel with other regulatory workstreams to minimise overall timeline risk.
The PCC’s revised Notification Form (version dated 9 March 2026) and the official computation guidelines are available for download on the PCC’s Mergers and Acquisitions page. The PCC also publishes guidance notes on its “Computing Merger Thresholds” page, which sets out the methodology and worked examples for SOP and SOT calculations.
| Document | Who Prepares | Typical Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| PCC Notification Form (rev. 9 Mar 2026) | Transaction counsel (acquirer side, coordinated with target counsel) | Deal documents, audited financials, corporate charts |
| SOP/SOT Computation Worksheet | Financial advisers / in‑house finance, reviewed by counsel | Audited financial statements (acquirer group + target group) |
| Affidavit of Accurate Computation | Authorised officer of each notifying party | Notarised sworn statement referencing computation worksheet |
| Competition Assessment Narrative | Transaction counsel, with economist input as needed | Market share data, industry reports, overlap analysis |
| Confidentiality Request (if applicable) | Transaction counsel | Identification of sensitive documents, legal basis |
PCC clearance is rarely the only regulatory hurdle in a Philippine M&A transaction. Depending on the industry, parallel sectoral approvals may be required, and coordination of timelines is critical to avoid delays at closing. The practical effect of the PCC merger notification Philippines 2026 regime change is that deal teams must plan these workstreams together from the outset.
A practical tip: build a consolidated regulatory approval timeline at the term sheet stage. Identify the longest‑lead‑time approval (often BSP or NTC) and structure the PCC filing and any other approvals to run concurrently where possible. Foreign ownership limits in the Philippines remain a live issue across multiple sectors and should be factored into deal structuring from the earliest stage.
Failure to file a mandatory PCC merger notification, or consummating a transaction before receiving clearance, exposes parties to significant enforcement risk. The Philippine Competition Act empowers the PCC to:
The PCC has publicly signalled its intent to enforce the notification regime rigorously. Industry observers expect the Commission to continue pursuing gun‑jumping and non‑notification cases as part of its broader effort to build a credible enforcement track record. The practical mitigation strategy is straightforward: when in doubt, file voluntarily. The cost and time of a voluntary notification are modest compared to the potential penalties and deal disruption of a retrospective enforcement action.
The following worked examples illustrate how to apply the SOP and SOT tests in common deal scenarios under the PCC merger notification Philippines 2026 regime.
| Variable | Acquirer Group | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Philippine assets (audited) | PHP 12.5 billion | PHP 4.2 billion |
| Philippine revenues (audited) | PHP 8.0 billion | PHP 3.1 billion |
| SOP (higher of assets/revenues) | PHP 12.5 billion ✓ | PHP 4.2 billion |
| SOT (target’s assets) | PHP 4.2 billion ✓ | |
Result: SOP ≥ PHP 9.1 bn (acquirer) AND SOT ≥ PHP 3.8 bn → mandatory PCC notification required.
| Variable | Foreign Acquirer Group | Philippine Target |
|---|---|---|
| Philippine assets | PHP 1.2 billion | PHP 5.0 billion |
| Revenues into the Philippines | PHP 10.3 billion | PHP 2.8 billion |
| SOP (higher of assets/revenues) | PHP 10.3 billion ✓ | PHP 5.0 billion |
| SOT (target’s assets) | PHP 5.0 billion ✓ | |
Result: SOP ≥ PHP 9.1 bn (foreign acquirer’s revenues into the Philippines count) AND SOT ≥ PHP 3.8 bn → mandatory notification required.
| Variable | Acquirer Group | Target (15 % stake acquired) |
|---|---|---|
| Philippine assets | PHP 15.0 billion | PHP 22.0 billion (total entity) |
| Deal consideration for 15 % stake | PHP 3.0 billion | |
| SOP (higher of assets/revenues) | PHP 15.0 billion ✓ | , |
| SOT (consideration for stake) | PHP 3.0 billion ✗ | |
Result: SOP is met, but SOT falls below PHP 3.8 bn → mandatory notification not required. Consider voluntary filing if the stake confers material influence.
| Reporting Obligation / Entity Type | PCC Mandatory Notification? | Typical Complementary Filings (Sector / Regulator) |
|---|---|---|
| Private domestic company sale (control transfer) | If SOP ≥ PHP 9.1 bn AND SOT ≥ PHP 3.8 bn → Mandatory | None specific unless in a regulated sector (see sectoral table above) |
| Foreign acquirer buying Philippine target | Same tests apply, aggregate party presence may include Philippine revenues and assets | BSP (if banking/FX); sector regulators as applicable; foreign ownership limit review |
| Minority share purchase (<30 %) | May or may not meet SOT, depends on value; control/influence factors matter for PCC review | Typically no sectoral approval unless specific industry rules apply |
The 2026 increase in PCC merger notification thresholds reflects the Philippine Competition Commission’s ongoing calibration of its merger control regime to focus enforcement resources on economically significant transactions. For deal teams, the practical takeaway is clear: accurate and timely threshold screening is the first step in every Philippine M&A transaction. Mastering the SOP and SOT computation methodology, assembling the required documentation early and coordinating PCC notification with sectoral clearances will protect against enforcement risk and keep deal timelines on track. Any practitioner navigating PCC merger notification Philippines 2026 requirements should engage experienced local competition counsel at the earliest opportunity to ensure full compliance and a smooth path to closing.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Juanito L. Sañosa, Jr. at Villaraza & Angangco, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 10 minutes ago
posted 15 minutes ago
posted 34 minutes ago
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 56 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message