Member
No results available
Last updated: 2 May 2026
Since 1 March 2026, mandatory mediation in construction disputes in Poland has been a procedural reality, courts are now required to refer qualifying construction cases to mediation before litigation can proceed, following the amendment to the Polish Code of Civil Procedure published as legislative project 12406607 on the Rządowe Centrum Legislacji (RCL) portal. The change affects contractors, developers, subcontractors and construction counsel across every project type, from residential builds to large-scale infrastructure. This compliance guide provides the actionable checklists, contract-redrafting templates and workflow timelines that construction dispute resolution in Poland now demands. For broader context on how mandatory models are reshaping ADR across Europe, see our analysis of mediation under pressure, ethics, duress and mandatory models across Europe.
The 2026 changes can be distilled into five key points and five immediate actions. Before diving into the detail, here is the short version:
Top 5 immediate actions:
Courts must now refer qualifying construction disputes to mediation. The amendment, tracked as RCL legislative project 12406607, inserted new provisions into the Code of Civil Procedure that make court-ordered referral to mediation obligatory, rather than discretionary, for a defined category of construction-related claims. The Polish Ministry of Justice confirmed the reform’s objectives in public communications, emphasising the need to reduce the backlog of complex construction cases and promote faster, more cost-effective resolution.
| Date | Event | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|
| 7 January 2026 | Certain construction law changes entered into force (related regulations) | Updated statutory definitions and exemptions, review contract references to statutory terms for consistency. |
| 1 March 2026 | Code of Civil Procedure amendment: mandatory court referral to mediation for construction disputes | Courts now obligatorily refer covered construction cases to mediation before litigation proceeds. All parties must prepare a mediation response workflow. |
| 1 March 2026 | Related procedural rules on e-filing and mediation reporting take effect | Counsel must submit mediation reports and certain documents electronically. Update filing procedures and IT systems. |
Mediation in construction Poland 2026 applies broadly but not universally. The amendment targets civil disputes arising from construction contracts, including payment disputes, delay claims, defect liability actions and performance-related disagreements. However, certain categories of dispute remain outside the mandatory mediation framework.
| Dispute Type | Covered? | Notes & Practical Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Payment disputes (contractor vs. investor/developer) | Yes | Includes interim payment claims, final account disputes and retention release disagreements. |
| Delay and liquidated damages claims | Yes | Both contractor delay claims and employer-caused delay claims fall within scope. |
| Defect liability and warranty claims | Yes | Post-completion defect disputes, including between main contractor and subcontractors. |
| Design professional liability (architects, engineers) | Yes | Claims against design professionals arising from construction contract performance. |
| Administrative/regulatory enforcement (building permits, inspections) | No | Public-law disputes handled under administrative procedure remain excluded. |
| Criminal liability (construction safety violations) | No | Criminal proceedings are outside the scope of civil mediation referral. |
| Enforcement/execution proceedings | No | Claims already in the enforcement stage are not referred back to mediation. |
| Interim relief / injunction applications | No | Urgent applications for interim measures proceed without mediation referral. |
Industry observers expect courts to apply a straightforward filter: (1) Is the claim a civil dispute? (2) Does it arise from or relate to a construction contract? (3) Is it filed on or after 1 March 2026? If all three conditions are met, referral is mandatory. The court does not assess the merits or the likelihood of settlement before referring, the referral is procedural and automatic for qualifying cases. Early indications suggest judges are applying this mechanically rather than exercising residual discretion, which aligns with the legislative intent to make referral systematic rather than selective.
Compliance is not a single action, it spans the full project lifecycle. The following numbered checklist is organised by phase to help contractors, developers and their counsel prepare systematically.
This is the most critical compliance step. Every new construction contract signed after 1 March 2026, and ideally every live contract where amendment is possible, should include or be updated with the following elements:
Ready actions, next 30 days:
A well-drafted mediation clause template for Polish construction contracts is now essential. Below are two model clauses. These are provided as legal drafting assistance, parties should seek qualified counsel before incorporating them into binding agreements.
“Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall first be referred to mediation in accordance with the provisions of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure. The parties shall jointly appoint a mediator from [named institution/list] within 14 days of a written mediation request. The mediation shall be conducted in [Polish/English] at [city/seat]. If the dispute is not settled within 60 days of the mediator’s appointment, either party may commence court proceedings or refer the dispute to arbitration as provided in Clause [X].”
Drafting notes:
“Prior to commencing arbitration under Clause [Y], the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation. The mediation shall be initiated by written notice from the claiming party and shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of [named mediation institution]. The mediator’s fees shall be borne equally by the parties unless otherwise agreed. If no settlement is reached within 45 days of the mediator’s appointment, or if either party fails to participate in good faith, the dispute shall be referred to arbitration under the rules of [named arbitral institution] with its seat in [city].”
Drafting notes:
Pitfalls to avoid: Do not use vague language like “the parties may consider mediation”, this will not satisfy the statutory framework. Avoid setting mediation timelines shorter than 30 days, as courts may view this as a sham compliance step.
The procedural flow from filing to mediation to resolution follows a defined sequence. Understanding timelines and costs is essential for budgeting and project planning under the obligatory mediation Poland framework.
| Event | Typical Duration | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Court issues mediation referral | Within days of claim filing | Litigation is stayed; parties must engage with mediation process. |
| Mediator appointment | 14–28 days | Parties agree on a mediator or the court appoints one from the institutional list. |
| Mediation sessions | 1–3 sessions over 30–60 days | Sessions are typically half-day or full-day; complex multi-party disputes may require more. |
| Mediator files report with court | Within 7 days of conclusion | Report details participation, outcome and whether settlement was reached. Filed electronically. |
| Litigation resumes (if no settlement) | Promptly after report filed | Case proceeds through normal court timetable; mediation report becomes part of the file. |
Mediator fees in Poland for construction disputes vary based on the value in dispute and the mediator’s experience. Industry observers note that court-appointed mediators follow statutory fee schedules, while private mediators engaged through institutions may charge higher rates reflective of their construction expertise. The likely practical effect for most mid-size construction disputes is that mediation costs will represent a fraction of full litigation expenses, but they must be budgeted for nonetheless.
Ignoring or boycotting the mediation referral carries real risks. While a party cannot be physically compelled to attend, the court may:
Existing arbitration clauses remain enforceable. The 2026 amendment does not override contractual arbitration agreements. However, the recommended approach is to layer a mediation-first step before the arbitration trigger. This ensures compliance with the statutory framework while preserving the efficiency benefits of arbitration. For a deeper comparison of these mechanisms, see our guide to the 11 key differences between arbitration and litigation.
| Option | When It Works | Drafting Tip |
|---|---|---|
| Mediation → Arbitration (med-arb) | Complex, high-value disputes where confidentiality and enforceability matter | Use Template B above; specify the arbitral institution and rules explicitly. |
| Mediation → Litigation | Lower-value disputes or where one party lacks resources for arbitration | Use Template A; reference the court of jurisdiction. |
| Arbitration only (no mediation step) | Generally not recommended post-amendment, risk of procedural challenge | At minimum, add a mediation window (even 30 days) to demonstrate compliance with the legislative intent. |
The likely practical effect is that parties with pure arbitration clauses will still be able to proceed, but industry observers expect courts to view a mediation-first step favourably, and its absence unfavourably, when exercising their residual discretion on costs and procedural matters. For practical guidance on preparing for hearings that may follow mediation, consult our notes on arbitration hearings, preparation and conduct.
Mediation is only as effective as the preparation behind it. These strategic tips help contractors and developers extract maximum value from the mandatory mediation step:
For organisations managing multiple construction projects across Poland, systematic implementation of the 2026 changes is essential. Use this operational checklist:
The following resources support compliance with the mandatory mediation construction Poland 2026 framework. Templates are provided as legal drafting assistance and should be reviewed by qualified counsel before use in binding agreements.
For bespoke mediation clause drafting, dispute preparation support or questions about ADR in Polish construction contracts, consult a qualified Polish dispute resolution lawyer through the Global Law Experts directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Wojciech Deja at Today Legal, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 3 minutes ago
posted 24 minutes ago
posted 48 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message