Understanding how to make redundancies in Norway 2026 is now more demanding than at any point in the past decade. Amendments to the Working Environment Act (Arbeidsmiljøloven) that took effect on 1 January 2026, combined with the 2025–2029 main agreement (Hovedavtalen) between the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) and the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO), have expanded employer consultation duties, tightened documentation requirements, and strengthened protections for vulnerable employee groups. This guide provides a step-by-step compliance framework, from the first board-level restructuring decision through to final notice delivery and recordkeeping, so that HR directors, in-house counsel and SME owners can execute restructuring in Norway 2026 lawfully and with minimal litigation exposure.
Before diving into the detail, here are the immediate actions every employer planning a workforce reduction must address:
Quick action: If your organisation is contemplating redundancies in the coming weeks, begin with the consultation and documentation steps outlined in Sections 4 and 5 below, these are the areas where employers most frequently face legal challenge.
The legislative landscape for restructuring Norway 2026 differs from prior years in several material ways. The amendments to the Working Environment Act, confirmed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion and published via Lovdata, target three core areas: enhanced consultation and information duties, updated rules on age discrimination and company-specific retirement ages, and expanded psychosocial working environment requirements. In parallel, the 2025–2029 main agreement between NHO and LO introduces stricter procedural expectations for employers bound by collective agreements.
| Date | Legal Change | Employer Obligation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 January 2026 | Working Environment Act amendments, expanded consultation and information duties (Sections 8-1 to 8-3) | Provide written documentation of business rationale, scope and alternatives to employee representatives before any restructuring decision is finalised. |
| 1 January 2026 | Updated age-discrimination and retirement-age provisions (Section 15-13a) | Review and, where necessary, remove or justify any company-specific retirement age below the statutory upper limit. Document objective justification. |
| 1 January 2026 | Strengthened psychosocial working environment obligations (Section 4-3) | Conduct a risk assessment of the psychosocial impact of planned redundancies; implement mitigation measures for both departing and remaining staff. |
| 2025–2029 main agreement cycle | NHO/LO Hovedavtalen, enhanced procedural requirements for restructuring consultations | For unionised workplaces: engage union representatives earlier, provide more detailed written information, and allow adequate time for meaningful consultation before decisions are made. |
A frequently asked question is whether employers can keep company-specific retirement ages after 1 January 2026. The short answer is: only with a clear objective justification. The updated Section 15-13a narrows the scope for setting a mandatory retirement age below the general statutory limit. Employers who previously relied on internal retirement policies at, for example, age 67 must now demonstrate that the age limit is proportionate, non-discriminatory and justified by the nature of the role. Industry observers expect this to trigger a wave of policy reviews, particularly in sectors such as offshore energy, transport and healthcare, as companies reassess whether existing age limits survive scrutiny under the 2026 framework.
Norway has no general statutory right to severance pay for redundant employees. The Working Environment Act entitles dismissed workers only to their notice period and accrued holiday pay. However, negotiated termination agreements (sluttavtaler) are extremely common, particularly where the employer wants to avoid litigation risk or where the affected employee has long tenure.
A typical exit package in Norway may include:
Risk note: Tax treatment of settlement payments can be complex. Salary continuation is taxed as ordinary income, while certain lump-sum payments may qualify for favourable treatment if structured correctly. Employers should always take tax and legal advice before finalising severance terms. The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority (Arbeidstilsynet) publishes guidance on employer duties in connection with termination and lay-off.
Where an employer needs to reduce headcount on an individual (non-collective) basis, the dismissal procedure Norway requires is rigorous. Each step must be documented. Failure at any stage can result in a court declaring the dismissal invalid and ordering reinstatement, a remedy that remains available under Norwegian law.
Formal notice must be delivered in writing and must contain the information prescribed by Section 15-4 of the Working Environment Act, as further detailed by Altinn’s employer guidance on redundancy. The notice must state:
Checklist, redundancy notice contents:
Statutory notice periods depend on tenure and age. The minimum is one month where the employee has been employed for less than five years, increasing with length of service and age. Employer obligations Norway 2026 require strict compliance with these periods, any error in calculation or delivery can invalidate the notice.
When restructuring affects a larger number of employees, additional obligations apply. The collective redundancies Norway framework implements EU Directive 98/59/EC and is codified in Chapter 15 of the Working Environment Act and supplemented by the NAV employer guidance.
A redundancy is classified as collective when an employer contemplates dismissing at least 10 employees within a 30-day period. This threshold includes terminations that are not strictly labelled “redundancy” but result from the same restructuring decision, for example, mutual termination agreements that form part of a wider workforce reduction. Industry observers note that the 2026 consultation requirements Norway must satisfy make early identification of this threshold essential.
The employer must notify NAV at least 30 days before collective redundancies take effect. The notification, sent to the local NAV office, must include:
No individual dismissal in a collective redundancy may take effect before the 30-day notification period has elapsed. The employer must also send a copy of the NAV notification to the employee representatives.
Consultation with employee representatives must begin as soon as collective redundancies are contemplated, and in any event before the NAV notification is sent. Under the 2025–2029 main agreement, the consultation requirements for unionised workplaces are more detailed, requiring the employer to provide written documentation of:
Minutes must be taken at every consultation meeting. Failure to consult meaningfully, or to engage representatives at an early enough stage, is one of the most common grounds for successful legal challenge.
| Action | Responsible Party | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Board/management decision to explore restructuring | Employer (board/CEO) | Week 1 |
| Initial consultation with employee representatives, share written documentation | Employer + HR | Week 1–2 |
| Representatives respond with written comments and alternative proposals | Employee representatives / union | Week 2–3 |
| Further consultation meetings; employer considers alternatives | Employer + representatives | Week 3–4 |
| Notify NAV (minimum 30 days before first dismissal takes effect) | Employer | Week 4 |
| Individual pre-dismissal meetings (drøftingsmøter) | Employer + affected employees | Week 5–6 |
| Issue individual redundancy notices | Employer | Week 6–7 (earliest: 30 days after NAV notification) |
| Psychosocial follow-up and outplacement support commences | Employer / HR | Week 7–8 and ongoing |
One of the highest-risk areas for employers making redundancies is the selection of which employees will be dismissed. Norwegian courts apply close scrutiny to the criteria used and the consistency with which they are applied. The 2026 changes reinforce the prohibition on discrimination based on age, disability, gender, pregnancy, parental leave status and trade-union membership.
The following scoring matrix is widely used in Norwegian practice. Each criterion is weighted according to the employer’s operational needs, and the weighting must be documented and applied consistently:
| Criterion | How to Score | Documentation Required |
|---|---|---|
| Competence and qualifications | Formal qualifications, certifications, performance reviews, relevant experience | HR records, appraisals, training certificates |
| Seniority (length of service) | Total years of continuous service; may be adjusted for sector-specific norms | Employment contracts, payroll records |
| Social circumstances | Age, family dependents, health, re-employability, financial hardship | Self-declaration by employee (offered at consultation meeting), HR notes |
| Operational need for specific skills | Essential competences the business must retain to continue operations | Organisational charts, project plans, role specifications |
Protected employees: Pregnant employees and those on parental leave enjoy heightened protection, redundancy of such individuals carries an extremely high litigation risk. Trade-union representatives and safety delegates also have enhanced protection. Early indications suggest that the 2026 amendments, combined with existing case law, make it practically necessary for employers to demonstrate that no viable alternative to terminating a protected employee exists.
The psychosocial working environment 2026 obligations are among the most significant practical changes for employers. Section 4-3 of the Working Environment Act, as strengthened from 1 January 2026, requires employers to systematically assess and address the psychological and social impact of organisational change, including redundancy programmes, on both departing and remaining employees.
In practice, employers should:
The Arbeidstilsynet provides detailed guidance on psychosocial obligations, and the 2026 updates emphasise that restructuring is a specific trigger event that requires documented assessment and response.
Robust documentation is the single most effective defence against a successful legal challenge. The following templates and records should form the employer’s restructuring file:
📄 Downloadable templates (recommended):
Minimum records to retain:
| Document | What It Contains | Recommended Retention Period |
|---|---|---|
| Board/management minutes | Decision to restructure, rationale, scope | 10 years |
| Consultation meeting minutes | Dates, attendees, points discussed, employee objections, employer responses | 10 years |
| NAV notification (copy) | Content of notification, date sent, proof of delivery | 10 years |
| Individual drøftingsmøte minutes | Date, attendees, rationale presented, employee response, alternatives discussed | 5 years after termination |
| Selection scoring sheets | Criteria, weighting, individual scores, reasons for selection/non-selection | 5 years after termination |
| Redundancy notices (signed copies) | Full notice text, date of delivery, method of delivery | 5 years after termination |
Norwegian courts have a long track record of scrutinising employer conduct during restructuring. The most common litigation triggers are:
Likely remedies if a redundancy is found unlawful: The court may order reinstatement (the default remedy under Norwegian law) and/or compensation. Compensation awards typically cover lost wages and may include a discretionary amount for non-economic loss. The practical effect of a reinstatement order can be highly disruptive, industry observers report that many employers prefer to settle rather than face this outcome, which underscores the value of getting the process right from the outset.
The following condensed timeline summarises the key steps for a lawful collective redundancy in Norway in 2026. It should be read alongside the detailed guidance above.
The 2026 framework for how to make redundancies in Norway demands rigorous process, early consultation, objective selection and comprehensive documentation. Employers who invest time in getting each step right, from the initial board decision through to psychosocial follow-up, will substantially reduce their litigation exposure and protect the integrity of the restructuring. Those who treat the consultation duty as a formality, or who fail to document selection decisions, face the real prospect of reinstatement orders and compensation awards.
Whether you are an HR director managing your first Norwegian restructuring or an experienced in-house counsel navigating the 2026 amendments, the most effective risk-mitigation step is to engage specialist employment law advice at the earliest possible stage. Global Law Experts’ lawyer directory connects employers with experienced labour law specialists across Norway who can guide every phase of the process.
Last reviewed: 30 April 2026
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Kristoffer Dalvang at Verito, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 17 minutes ago
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Legal Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest legal briefings and news within Global Law Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message